Abstract
Purpose of Review
Respiratory allergies are non-communicable diseases caused by the hypersensitivity of the immune system to environmental aeroallergens. The culprits are aero-transported proteins eliciting respiratory symptoms in sensitized/allergic individuals. This review intends to provide a holistic overview on the categorization of aeroallergens into protein families (Part 1) and to exploit the impact of physicochemical properties on inhalant protein allergenicity (Part 2). This first part will focus particularly on aeroallergen organization into families and how this classification fits their physicochemical properties.
Recent Findings
Aeroallergen classification into protein families facilitates the identification of common physicochemical properties, thus aiding a better comprehension of known allergens, while predicting the behavior of novel ones. The available online databases gathering important features of aeroallergens are currently scarce.
Summary
Information on distinct aeroallergen classification is still lacking, as data is dispersed and often outdated, hampering an efficient evaluation of new aeroallergens.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Respiratory allergies (RA) are conditions caused by the hypersensitivity of the immune system to certain allergens in the environment. They are known to be caused by shared sources of allergens and to induce similar clinical expression. However, they present some dissimilarities in their pathophysiologic mechanisms, being considered clinically distinct diseases. The most common types of RA include allergic rhinitis (hay fever), allergic asthma, allergic sinusitis, and occupational allergies. The prevalence of RA is influenced by factors such as geographical area, environmental exposure, and genetic predisposition, as well as by the condition typology. Allergic rhinitis is probably the most prevalent RA affecting globally approximately 10–30% of adults and 40% of children [1]. Allergic asthma is also estimated to have a major impact on 5–10% of the population, with higher prevalence in urban areas and industrialized countries [2, 3].
Allergic asthma is described as a chronic lung disease with multifactorial components that are associated with airway obstruction, mucus production, and bronchospasm [4]. Its clinical expression includes wheezing, coughing, shortness of breath, and chest tightness, being triggered by aeroallergens [5]. Allergic asthma is typically life-persistent, being a major non-communicable disease with a significant impact on the life quality of individuals of all ages, thus representing a key public health issue and a global economic burden [6].
Allergic rhinitis is characterized by an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated type 1 hypersensitivity reaction to a wide variety of aeroallergens, leading to a cascade of immunological/biochemical events responsible for the clinical expression of the disease, namely sneezing, nasal congestion, itching, and rhinorrhea for more than one hour during two or more consecutive days [7]. Allergic rhinitis can be categorized based on symptoms’ duration and severity, ranging from intermittent to persistent and mild to life-threatening, respectively. It can co-occur with other diseases from the spectrum of allergies, namely allergic asthma, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy (FA), meaning that these health conditions might share some common mechanisms [8]. Additionally, allergic rhinitis is widely correlated with sinusitis, but the link between them is still unknown [9]. The term allergic sinusitis has been used to define a systemic inflammation process of the local nasal airway, nasal-associated lymphatic tissue, the bone marrow, and the sinuses [10]. This condition is caused by aeroallergens leading to facial pain, pressure, nasal congestion, postnasal drip, and a reduced sense of smell. Its diagnosis involves a combination of clinical evaluation, imaging studies (such as computed tomography scan), and allergy testing [11, 12].
Along with the previous three health conditions, occupational allergies are among the most reported work-related diseases, with the respiratory tract (occupational asthma/rhinitis) and skin (allergic contact dermatitis) being the classical target organs. So far, more than 400 occupational agents are classified as potential “respiratory sensitizers”, inducing immunological responses that can be IgE or non-IgE-mediated [13]. Their diagnosis is performed by evaluating the medical history, followed by other exams, such as positive methacholine challenge result or bronchodilator responsiveness, determination of IgE-mediated sensitization, and specific inhalation challenge tests [14]. Besides being important RA, occupational allergies can also be related to FA, leading to very complex clinical manifestations, and greatly affecting the quality of life of allergic patients.
So far, the best strategy to avoid RA relies on the efficient primary prevention, meaning that susceptible individuals should ideally avoid contact with any of the potential sensitizers. However, it is estimated that 10% of the general population and between 50–80% of RA patients are polysensitized to multiple aeroallergens, either by displaying (i) cross-reactivity (one IgE repertoire binds different allergens sharing common structural features) or (ii) co-sensitization (several IgE repertoires binding unrelated/not structurally similar allergens) [15, 16]. This evidence greatly hampers any attempt at efficient RA management.
The causative agents are normally proteins from plant/animal/fungal origins, namely pollens, dust mites, animal dander, insect feces, fungi, or certain foods (flour and grains, fish, and seafood), being common triggers to all types of RA (allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma, allergic sinusitis, and occupational allergies). Aeroallergens (or inhalant allergens) are proteins belonging to well-defined protein families, often sharing collective features among them. Nonetheless, it is unknown how the physicochemical properties affect inhalant protein allergenicity. Due to the clinical relevance and prevalence of RA, it is important to fill knowledge gaps on the importance of aeroallergen physicochemical properties. In this two-part review, it is intended to highlight the paramountcy of the organization of the aeroallergens into families (Part 1) and to evaluate how different physicochemical properties affect inhalant protein allergenicity (Part 2). This Part 1 review will be particularly focused on the categorization of the aeroallergens into families and in what manner this classification fits their physicochemical properties.
Aeroallergen Families
Allergens are compiled in few databases, being the World Health Organization/International Union of Immunologic Societies (WHO/IUIS) allergen nomenclature, the Allergome, the AllergenOnline, and the COMPARE among the most popular [17,18,19,20]. The WHO/IUIS allergen nomenclature database is probably the most widely used and frequently updated [21]. It provides information on allergen nomenclature, isoforms, variants and epitopes, protein biochemical name, species, protein molecular weight (MW), and routes of exposure, being organized according to major taxonomical groups and respective orders [17]. It also includes the links to databases on protein sequences (UniProt) and respective encoding genes (GenBank) [22, 23]. The other databases (COMPARE and AllergenOnline) also contain most of the referred information [24, 25]. The classification/inclusion of allergens into protein families can only be found in a different database, the AllFam [26]. This database catalogues the allergens into protein families, linking them to the WHO/IUIS Allergen Nomenclature and AllergenOnline databases, as well as correlating with data from the Pfam database [27]. However, its major gaps regard the absence of updated information since 2017 [26].
Currently, the WHO/IUIS allergen nomenclature lists 495 aeroallergens [17, 18], being divided in 103 families [26]. From those, 37% are distributed into 9 superfamilies of proteins, namely EF-hand superfamily (28 aeroallergens), profilin superfamily (28 aeroallergens), calycin superfamily (27 aeroallergens), prolamin superfamily (24 aeroallergens), subtilisin-like serine protease (21 aeroallergens), expansin superfamily (16 aeroallergens), Ole e 1-like proteins (16 aeroallergens), pathogenesis-related (PR-10) proteins, also known as Bet v 1 family (12 aeroallergens), and tropomyosins (11 aeroallergens), which are often subdivided in relevant groups containing important aeroallergens.
In this review, besides considering the number and importance of the allergens, the criteria of inclusion as inhalant protein families also considered their relevance as primary sensitizers of RA and their relationship with FA. PR-10 proteins and the nonspecific lipid-transfer proteins (nsLTP) (prolamin superfamily) are cases of important primary sensitizers of respiratory and food allergies in Europe.
EF-hand Family
The EF-hand family encompasses a variety of calcium-binding proteins disclosing a conserved motif with a helix-loop-helix secondary structure composed of a 12-residue calcium-binding loop flanked by 2 α-helices of 12 residues in length. EF-hand protein members tend to occur in pairs, meaning that most family members have two, four, or six calcium-binding motifs. This motif is crucial for eukaryotic cellular signaling, and the pairing enables communication, and positive cooperativity, reducing the Ca2+ signal needed to attain protein saturation [28]. The conformational effects of Ca2+-binding are diverse and depend on the function of the protein. EF-hand proteins display varying sensitivities to Ca2+, influenced by the intrinsic binding ability of the EF-hand and the degree of cooperativity in Ca2+-binding to paired EF-hands. Additionally, two factors can affect their ability to bind Ca2+, namely its selectivity towards Mg2+ (a divalent cation that is in a much higher cytoplasmic concentration) and its interaction with a protein target [28]. The biological functions of EF-hand family members encompass signaling and calcium buffering or transport processes.
This family is composed of different groups of proteins, some of them with allergenicity. The EF-hand superfamily ranks first position in terms of identified and listed aeroallergens, sharing this position with profilins [17]. Presently, 28 aeroallergens belonging to EF-hand family are divided into different subfamilies of proteins, namely polcalcins (17 allergens), troponin C (5 allergens), myosin light chain (MLC) (5 allergens), and sarcoplasmic calcium-binding proteins (SCBP) (1 allergen) [17]. Polcalcins are composed of aeroallergens from plant sources (e.g., Bet v 4 – European white birch), while troponin C, MLC, and SCBP groups contain mostly aeroallergens from animal sources (e.g., Der f 39 – American house dust mite, Bla g 8 – German cockroach, Bos d 3 – cow, respectively) (Table 1).
Polcalcins
Based on the number of calcium-binding EF-hand motifs, polcalcins are categorized into three types, possessing different number of EF-hand motifs: two (e.g., Che a 3, white goosefoot), three (e.g., Bet v 3, European white birch), or four (e.g., Ole e 8, olive tree). The three-dimensional (3D) structure of polcalcins is characterized by α-helices forming a typical all-α protein fold (Fig. 1a, Table 1). The monomer, with a MW of 8–9 kDa, exhibits the characteristic polcalcin structural domain [29], but whose biological function remains unclear. However, given their specific localization in pollen and their calcium-binding ability, it is suggested that polcalcins may regulate intracellular calcium levels during pollen germination. Notably, the calcium-binding property of polcalcins influences their IgE-reactivity and thermostability [29]. Due to their high sequence identity and structural homology, these proteins are classified as panallergens [30]. Polcalcins are highly cross-reactive calcium-binding allergens specifically expressed in pollen tissues, meaning that sensitization to polcalcins is not associated with FA [29]. Less than 10% of allergic individuals are sensitized to polcalcins, so these proteins are classified as minor allergens [31]. The clinical expression of sensitization to polcalcins is still not clear, although symptoms are mostly described as mild. Patients sensitized to polcalcins often exhibit high cross-reactivity, as well as distinct IgE repertoires to different allergens, which highlights the need for monitoring these patients as they are susceptible of developing multiple pollen sensitizations [29]. So far, 17 polcalcins have been identified as aeroallergens in pollen (e.g. Ole e 3, olive) [17].
Troponin C
Troponin C is a calcium-binding protein that makes part of the troponin complex encompassing another 2 proteins, namely inhibitory (troponin I), and tropomyosin binding (troponin T). Troponin C is a muscle protein that connects the thin filaments and signals muscle contraction after binding Ca2+, presenting 2 structurally homologous lobes, mainly composed of α-helices and loops connected by a long uncovered 9-turn helical linker [32]. This protein plays a regulatory function, being common to animal sources. Sensitization to troponin C is often accompanied by cross-reactivity to its counterparts in foods, leading to an increased risk for individuals sensitized to this set of proteins [32]. So far, 5 troponin C have been classified as aeroallergens of insects/mites (e.g., Bla g 6, German cockroach) (Fig. 1b, Table 1), being classified as minor allergens [33].
Myosin Light Chain
MLC comprises a multi-subunit complex of two heavy chains and four calcium-binding light chains. It serves as a fundamental contractile protein present in animal cells. MLC from invertebrates, including cockroaches and crustaceans, can bind IgE, being classified as aeroallergens and food allergens, respectively. So far, 5 MLC have been identified as aeroallergens in insects/mites (e.g., Bla g 8, German cockroach) (Fig. 1c, Table 1).
Sarcoplasmic Calcium-binding Protein
SCBP are classified as invertebrate muscle proteins exhibiting a calcium buffering function, being commonly considered as food allergens, especially in crustaceans. SCBP structure is greatly compact and globular with a hydrophobic core, contrarily to the dumbbell-shaped structure of troponin C [34]. So far, only one aeroallergen (Aed a 5) was identified in the yellow fever mosquito (Fig. 1d, Table 1). The clinical expression of this aeroallergen is still unknown, although it is considered a minor allergen [35].
Profilin Superfamily
Profilins are a family of actin-binding proteins composed of 125–153 amino acids, with MW of 12–15 kDa and isoelectric points (PI) between 4.3–9.2 [36]. They have been characterized as monomers, although dimers and tetramers have also been reported for profilin structures [37]. These proteins are key regulators of actin polymerization in the cytoskeleton, participating in several cellular processes, including motility, metabolism, endocytosis, signal transduction, and gene transcription [38]. Profilins are ubiquitous in most eucaryotic cells, exhibiting high sequence identity (> 70%), and structural homology, even among distantly related family members, rendering their classification as panallergens [29] and presenting high levels of cross-reactivity among plant-allergenic sources (Table 1). However, the high structural homology between plant and mite profilins might not result in clinically relevant respiratory allergies, as there is no evidence of cross-reactivity between these 2 groups [39]. Bet v 2 (European white birch) pollen (Fig. 1e) was the first allergenic profilin to be identified in 1991 and since then, other allergenic profilins have been discovered in pollen, latex, and plant foods. Bet v 2 is constituted by a central 6-stranded antiparallel β-sheet and two helices, one at the amino-terminal side perpendicular to the sheet and another parallel at the C-terminal side.
Presently, profilins share the first place with EF-hand family in terms of the number of identified molecules, accounting for 28 profilins classified as aeroallergens [17]. Allergenic inhalant profilins are mainly found in plant pollens (e.g., Cro s 2, saffron) and mites (e.g., Tyr p 36, storage mite), being important triggers of RA (e.g., allergic asthma) and relevant primary sensitizers of FA. Profilins have been recognized as clinically relevant aeroallergens, with sensitized/allergic subjects clinically reacting to multiple allergen sources [40]. Typically, profilins are associated with mild respiratory symptoms, but recent data seem to highlight their importance as causative agents for severe/systemic allergic reactions like anaphylaxis, especially in FA [40]. In Europe, 20–30% of individuals allergic to pollen are IgE-reactive to profilins [41, 42], leading to a minor allergen classification. However, there is no correlation between the level of IgE-reactivity of individual patients to specific profilins and their sensitizing source, signifying that sensitization could be linked to any aeroallergenic profilin. This fact highlights the usefulness of profilins as a common marker for polysensitization for diagnosis and therapeutic approaches [43].
Calycin Protein Superfamily
The calycin superfamily is widely dispersed throughout all kingdoms and gathers a miscellaneous group of proteins known for their ability to bind small hydrophobic molecules. These proteins are involved in a variety of biological processes, including transport and storage of lipids, regulation of gene expression, and immune responses. The calycin core fold encompasses an eight-stranded calyx-shaped antiparallel β-barrel, which forms a hydrophobic binding cavity [44]. This calycin superfamily is composed of different families of allergenic proteins, namely lipocalins and fatty acid-binding proteins (FABP), ranking the second position in terms of the total number of identified aeroallergens (27 proteins) (Table 1) [44].
Lipocalins
Lipocalins are a diverse group of proteins with multiple biological roles that include (i) the transport of small hydrophobic molecules and (ii) the regulation of various metabolic, development, and immunological processes [45]. Lipocalins present 150–250 residues and a MW of 17–25 kDa, being extracellularly located. Although the sequence identity among lipocalins is generally low (20–30%), it can be higher than 50% in some cases, and with well-preserved 3D structures, sharing an eight-stranded antiparallel β-barrel motif that forms a ligand-binding pocket, and an α-helix (Table 1). Allergenic lipocalins sensitize efficiently, with an average sensitization rate > 50%. Presently, 21 lipocalins are classified as aeroallergens, including allergens like Bla g 4 (cockroaches) (Fig. 1f), Mus m 1 (mouse urine), and Can f 1 and Can f 2 (dog), most of them behaving as major allergens. Lipocalins are predominantly abundant in mucosa and skin epithelia, being extensively observed in body fluids and secretions, which makes them prevalent in indoor aeroallergens [17].
Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins
Cytosolic (cytoplasmic) fatty acid-binding proteins (FABP) are a family of proteins primarily located in the cytosol, playing a crucial role in lipid metabolism by acting as intracellular transporters of hydrophobic metabolic intermediates and as carriers of lipids between membranes. FABP exhibit significant sequence and structural similarity, being small soluble proteins with 12–18 kDa and 110–160 residues. They are typically monomers but with tendency to form self-associated structures [46]. These proteins have a mixed α-β structure, with a classic β-barrel made up of 10 antiparallel β-strands and covered with a pair of α-helices at one end, creating an internal cavity that serves as the ligand-binding site [47, 48]. Ligand specificity and affinity are influenced by the side chains of amino acids that extend into the cavity, particularly polar residues that engage in hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions with the polar head groups of the ligands. For instance, arginine binds fatty acids, while glutamine binds retinoids. The antiparallel β-barrel fold is also common to lipocalins, which similarly bind small hydrophobic molecules. However, sequence similarity between FABP and lipocalins is limited to a short N-terminal motif. Presently, 6 FABP are identified as aeroallergens, all belonging to mites (e.g., Der f 13, American house dust mite (HDM)) (Fig. 1g, Table 1) [17].
Prolamin Superfamily
Proteins of the prolamin superfamily are composed of a high content of glutamine and proline residues, which is the typical trace of prolamins. Members of this superfamily show little sequence homology, although preserving a common cysteine skeleton and α-helical structures [49]. They have a preserved pattern of eight cysteine residues, being responsible for their 3D structure stabilization, presenting a right-handed super-helix formed by four α-helices. Prolamin superfamily includes several protein families, but their identified aeroallergens are mainly included in the nsLTP and α-amylase families. Presently, this superfamily occupies the third place in terms of identified aeroallergens, totalizing 24 molecules [17].
nsLTP
The nsLTP constitute a large family of proteins that are abundant in all plants. Most nsLTP are extracellular proteins associated with cell walls, possessing lipid-binding specificity in their 3D structure. nsLTP are also known as the PR-14 family, whose members can intervene in the modulation of lipid composition, lipid transfer, vesicular trafficking, and signal transduction. nsLTP are small proteins with 9.5–10.5 kDa, presenting compact 3D structures [50], consisting of four α‐helices, which are stabilized by four highly conserved disulphide bridges and connected by flexible loops [51], forming an internal, tunnel‐like, hydrophobic cavity, responsible for the transport of various lipids. Allergic reactions triggered by inhalant nsLTP can range from mild to potentially life-threatening, such as anaphylaxis [52]. nsLTP are classified as panallergens due to their high homology and wide presence among plant species. Presently, 16 nsLTP have been identified as aeroallergens (e.g. Amb a 6, ragweed) (Fig. 1h) in pollens and leaves (Table 1) [17]. For several years, nsLTP-sensitized allergies were more prevalent in the Mediterranean region, but currently, this paradigm has changed with nsLTP progressively functioning as primary sensitizers in other geographical areas [51, 53, 54]. The nsLTP are related to important clinical conditions, such as LTP syndrome and pollen-food allergy syndrome (PFAS) [55].
α-Amylases
α-Amylases are metalloenzymes found in distinct glycoside hydrolase families, being ubiquitously distributed. They are present in different sources, namely microorganisms, plants and animals, displaying biological functions that regard the catalysis of α-1,4-glucosidic bonds in starch and related α-glucans with retention of α-anomeric configuration in the products [56]. The amylolytic digestion produces glucose, maltose, and maltodextrins. In addition, many α-amylases are also able to catalyze transglycosylation. Structurally, α-amylases encompass a single polypeptide chain folded into three domains (A, B and C). These enzymes present a characteristic (β/α)8-barrel with conserved catalytic core (domain A), a protrusion between the third strand and the third helix of (β/α)8-barrel having irregular β-like structure (domain B) and a C-terminal end of the amino acid sequence with key motif (domain C) (Table 1) [57].
Presently, 8 α-amylases have been identified as aeroallergens in mites (e.g., Der p 4, European HDM) (Fig. 1i), insects (e.g., Bla g 11, German cockroach), and fungi (e.g., Asp o 21, rice mold). α-Amylases have been described to cause occupational asthma due to the inhalation of flours and powders commonly present at bakeries, as well as in pharmaceutical and laboratory facilities [58, 59]. More recently, α-amylase from yellow mealworm has also been reported to be the culprit aeroallergen-inducing occupational allergy in workers contacting with mealworms in different circumstances, namely in pet stores, live fish bait or infested stored grains, as well as in mealworm farming for animal feed and human consumption [60].
Subtilisin-like Serine Protease
Subtilisin-like proteases (subtilases) are a family of serine proteases exhibiting a characteristic catalytic triad consisting of aspartate, histidine, and serine [61]. These enzymes have a unique structural fold, comprising a highly twisted seven-stranded β-sheet flanked by two layers of α-helices. Subtilases are typically monomers although homodimerization can also occur [62]. Their MW varies from 34–58 kDa [17], depending on the location of the enzymes (vacuolar versus extracellular) (Table 1). Their physiological role depends on the allergen source, participating in the production of nutrients (through protein cleavage), protein turnover, fungi/plant defense system, and immune evasion [63]. Allergenic subtilases can alter the epithelial integrity through degradation of tight or adherens junctions, thus facilitating their penetration into submucosal tissues. Their contact with immune cells, facilitated by the epithelial barrier degradation, allows the cleavage of surface receptors on target cells, which optimizes the Th2-biased inflammatory response. Presently, it is the fourth family gathering more aeroallergens, totalizing 21 subtilases belonging to different sources, namely fungi (e.g., Cur l 4, mold) (Fig. 1j) and mites (e.g., Per a 10, American cockroach). Allergic symptoms associated with subtilisin sensitization may include breathlessness, sweating, and wheezing at exposures, contributing to occupational asthma [64].
Expansin Superfamily
The expansin superfamily encompasses a set of secreted proteins (25–27 kDa) expressed in plants and divided into four families: α-expansin, β-expansin, expansin-like A, and expansin-like B. Current identified aeroallergenic β-expansins are included in the commonly known Grass group-1 allergens. Their biological role is related to cell wall loosening processes, thereby aiding in the pollination process [65]. The β-expansins are greatly preserved, sharing 60–70% of sequence identity among different grass species, thus contributing to their high potential cross-reactivity phenomenon [66, 67]. The β-expansins are structurally divided into two domains: (i) the N-terminal domain 1, which is similar to the catalytic domain of family 45 glycoside hydrolases (GH45); and (ii) domain 2 that entails β-sheets with 36% sequence identity to group 2 and 3 grass pollen allergens (Table 1) [65].
Presently, there are 14 β-expansins (e.g., Zea m 1, maize) (Fig. 1k) identified as important plant aeroallergens. They are known to cause IgE-reactivity in more than 90% of grass pollen-allergic patients [68], being considered major pollen allergens based on their high prevalence and potency, especially in the Poaceae family. Additionally, two expansin-like proteins have also been identified as aeroallergens, namely Sor h 2 (Johnson grass) and Phl p 3 (timothy), belonging to group 2 and 3 grass pollen allergens, respectively, containing a C-terminal expansin domain. Like the β-expansins, these expansin-like proteins are also considered major allergens, revealing IgE-reactivity with more than 50% of the human sera tested [69, 70].
Ole e 1-like Proteins
The Ole e 1-like protein family can originate exclusively from various plant pollens [71]. The Ole e 1-like proteins usually range from 15–20 kDa, with Ole e 1, the main allergen of this family, displaying a MW of around 16 kDa [17]. Ole e 1-like protein family encompasses a seven-strand β-barrel fold stabilized by three conserved disulfide bonds and the [EQT]-G-x-V–Y-C-D-[TNP]-C-R consensus pattern [71, 72]. The biological role of these proteins is yet to be fully described, although they are reported to be mostly related to plant fertilization (Table 1) [73]. In fact, protein content is increased right before the plant initiates pollen tube emergence. Pollen grains conserve the metabolic mechanism at the dehydrated stage to reserve an important quantity of Ole e 1-like proteins to aid in pollen tube growth [73].
Fra e 1 from ash pollen also constitutes the major allergen of the source and contributes mainly to spring pollinosis [74]. Ole e 1-like proteins exhibit a high degree (> 82%) of sequence identity among Oleaceae members [71]. Presently, 16 Ole e 1-like proteins are predominantly identified as aeroallergens in pollens (e.g., Lig v 1, privet) (Fig. 1l) and fungi (e.g., Asp f 35, common mold). These allergens are well-known for causing pollen-related symptoms such as asthma, seasonal allergic rhinitis, and oral allergy syndrome.
PR-10 Protein (Bet v 1) Family
The PR-10 proteins represent a significant group of allergens found in birch pollen-related allergies, also known as Bet v 1 family of proteins. PR-10 proteins typically have a MW of 15–17 kDa, exhibit slight acidity and resistance to proteases, being structurally different from the other PR proteins. Although presenting low sequence identity, PR-10 proteins share a highly conserved structure featuring a curved, seven-stranded antiparallel β-sheet enveloping a 25-amino acid α-helix (α3) at the C-terminus. Additionally, two short α-helices (α1 and α2) positioned between the β1 and β2 strands complete the framework, forming a hydrophobic core that serves as a ligand-binding site. Functionally, PR-10 proteins are used for plant defense mechanisms, providing answers to biotic/abiotic stresses, and transporting amphiphilic compounds (fatty acids, cytokines, flavonoids, and sterols) across cellular barriers (Table 1) [75].
In Northern-European countries, the PR-10 protein family comprise the prime triggers of PFAS, with European white birch pollen Bet v 1 (Fig. 1m) triggering primary sensitization [76]. Bet v 1 is the best-characterized PR-10 member and it is the major causative agent of seasonal allergies in Central Europe and North America [77], being considered a major allergen of RA. In the referred regions, more than 95% of patients are allergic to birch pollen, with almost 60% being exclusively sensitized to Bet v 1 [78].
Birch pollen allergy is the leading cause of winter and spring pollinosis in the temperate climate zones of the Northern Hemisphere, affecting over 100 million allergic individuals sensitized to Bet v 1 [79]. This aeroallergen is characterized as a highly promiscuous ligand acceptor, being potentially responsible for its strong allergenicity. Bet v 1 allergen has unique structural properties, which may contribute to its high allergenic potential. Additionally, birch pollen extracts have been found to possess proteolytic activity, which can degrade tight junction proteins [79]. Clinically, the significance of PR-10 proteins lies in their association with a wide array of symptoms, ranging from mild to potentially life-threatening, especially when correlated with FA [80]. Currently, twelve PR-10 proteins are identified as aeroallergens in pollen, being the common cause of respiratory allergies, like asthma or allergic rhinitis.
Tropomyosins
Tropomyosin is ubiquitously expressed in animals and fungi, serving as a universal regulator of the actin cytoskeleton. Tropomyosins are composed of ~ 284 residues (MW of 34–38 kDa), forming coiled-coil homo- or heterodimeric structures that polymerize along the length of actin. Each tropomyosin molecule consists of two parallel α-helices featuring two sets of 7 alternating actin-binding sites, being only biologically active when in dimers (Table 1) [81]. Known primarily for regulating the actin-myosin interaction during muscle contraction, tropomyosins are also fundamental for the organization and dynamics of the cytoskeleton [82]. Tropomyosins are essential contractile elements, presenting highly conserved sequences and structures across vertebrates and invertebrates.
Tropomyosins are only allergenic in invertebrates, being important food allergens in various shellfish species, but they are also minor aeroallergens in arthropods (HDM and cockroaches), where they can constitute up to 1% of muscle mass [83, 84]. So far, 11 tropomyosins have been identified as aeroallergens in insects/mites (e.g., Der p 10, European HDM) (Fig. 1n) [17].
Tropomyosin was the first identified allergen implicated in the cross-reactivity among dust mites, crustaceans, and insects, with > 80% of the crustacean-sensitized patients reacting to tropomyosin and exhibiting severe allergic symptoms. Tropomyosins evidence exceptionally high sequence identity among crustaceans (95–100%) and a great degree of sequence homology (75–83%) with HDM and insect tropomyosins [85]. Tropomyosin Der p 10 shares > 65% of identical residues with other invertebrate tropomyosins [86] and its sensitization prevalence varies between 9–18%, in Europe [87]. Half of the European patients allergic to HDM and sensitized to Der p 10 are at risk of experiencing clinically relevant cross-reactivity when consuming seafood [88] or their vapors during cooking.
Conclusions
Since allergenic proteins have been recognized as important biological/immunological triggers, their identification, characterization, and systematization have been attempted. Their inclusion into protein families sharing physicochemical properties aims at facilitating their study, while predicting their likelihood to be identified as potential allergens. Therefore, user-friendly databases, efficiently compiling data on allergens, are much needed. Presently, few databases with relevant information are freely available for consultation, but they frequently lack updates. In this Part 1 review, it was also verified that most works on aeroallergen characterization/identification were published in the 1990’s or early beginning of 2000’s, whose data were rarely refined or re-analyzed with new analytical methodologies. This suggests that key data on the immunological/chemical characterization of some aeroallergens are still scarce. This fact highlights the need to revise and confirm the data generated with obsolete analytical tools in order to provide clear answers, namely in the inclusion of allergens into different protein families.
In summary, the inclusion of aeroallergens in their correct protein families should facilitate the prediction of the physicochemical properties linked to protein allergenicity. Evaluating the impact of such features might provide some valuable insights in predicting the allergenicity of novel inhalant proteins, which justifies the need of extending this review to Part 2.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Husna SMN, Tan HT, Shukri NM, Ashari NSM, Wong KK. Allergic rhinitis: A clinical and pathophysiological overview. Front Med. 2022;9:874114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.874114.
Ellwood P, Asher MI, Billo NE, Bissell K, Chiang C-Y, Ellwood EM, et al. The Global Asthma Network rationale and methods for phase I global surveillance: prevalence, severity, management and risk factors. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(1):1601605. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01605-2016.
Vlaski E, Lawson JA. Urban–rural differences in asthma prevalence among young adolescents: The role of behavioural and environmental factors. Allergol Immunopathol. 2015;43(2):131–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aller.2013.09.016.
Maslan J, Mims JW. What is asthma? Pathophysiology, demographics, and health care costs. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2014;47(1):13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2013.09.010.
Kardan M, Rafiei A, Ghaffari J, Valadan R, Morsaljahan Z, Haj-ghorbani ST. Effect of ginger extract on expression of GATA3, T-bet and ROR-γt in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with Allergic Asthma. Allergol Immunopathol. 2019;47(4):378–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aller.2018.12.003.
Dharmage SC, Perret JL, Custovic A. Epidemiology of asthma in children and adults. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00246.
Sin B, Togias A. Pathophysiology of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011;8(1):106–14. https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.201008-057RN.
Cingi C, Gevaert P, Mösges R, Rondon C, Hox V, Rudenko M, et al. Multi-morbidities of allergic rhinitis in adults: European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force Report. Clin Transl Allergy. 2017;7(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-017-0153-z.
Li S, Zhao C-J, Hua H-L, Deng Y-Q, Tao Z-Z. The association between allergy and sinusitis: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2005–2006. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021;17(1):135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-021-00642-2.
Kennedy JL, Borish L. Chronic sinusitis pathophysiology: The role of allergy. Amer J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27(5):367–71. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2013.27.390.
Battisti AS, Modi P, Pangia J. Sinusitis. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright© 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2024.
Bachert C, Pawankar R, Zhang L, Bunnag C, Fokkens WJ, Hamilos DL, et al. ICON: chronic rhinosinusitis. World Allergy Organ J. 2014;7:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-4551-7-25.
Anderson SE, Long C, Dotson GS. Occupational allergy Eur Med J (Chelmsf). 2017;2(2):65–71. https://doi.org/10.33590/emj/10311285.
Raulf M. Occupational respiratory allergy: risk factors, diagnosis, and management. In: Traidl-Hoffmann C, Zuberbier T, Werfel T, editors. Allergic Diseases – From Basic Mechanisms to Comprehensive Management and Prevention. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 213–25.
Migueres M, Dávila I, Frati F, Azpeitia A, Jeanpetit Y, Lhéritier-Barrand M, et al. Types of sensitization to aeroallergens: definitions, prevalences and impact on the diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory disease. Clin Transl Allergy. 2014;4:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-4-16.
Myszkowska D, Bogawski P, Piotrowicz K, Bosiacka B, Grinn-Gofroń A, Berger UE, et al. Co-exposure to highly allergenic airborne pollen and fungal spores in Europe. Sci Total Environ. 2023;905:167285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167285.
WHO/IUIS - World Health Organization/International Union of Immunological Societies (WHO/IUIS) Allergen Nomenclature Sub-committee [Internet]. Available from: http://www.allergen.org/. Accessed 13 May 2024.
ALLERGOME database, the platform for allergen knowledge, Latina, Italy. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.allergome.org. Accessed 13 May 2024.
AllergenOnline database from Food Allergy Research and Resource Program (FARRP) [Internet]. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Available from: http://allergenonline.org/. Accessed 13 May 2024.
COMPARE - COMprehensive Protein Allergen REsource (COMPARE) [Internet]. HESI - Health and Environmental Sciences Institute. Available from: https://db.comparedatabase.org/. Accessed 20 May 2024.
Sudharson S, Kalic T, Hafner C, Breiteneder H. Newly defined allergens in the WHO/IUIS Allergen Nomenclature Database during 01/2019-03/2021. Allergy. 2021;76(11):3359–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15021.
UniProt (Universal Protein Resource) Consortium, a collaboration between the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI), the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB) and the Protein Information Resource (PIR) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.uniprot.org/. Accessed 2 May 2024.
NCBI - National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. Accessed 20 May 2024.
van Ree R, Sapiter Ballerda D, Berin MC, Beuf L, Chang A, Gadermaier G, et al. The COMPARE database: A public resource for allergen identification, adapted for continuous improvement. Front Allergy. 2021;2. https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2021.700533.
Goodman RE, Ebisawa M, Ferreira F, Sampson HA, van Ree R, Vieths S, et al. AllergenOnline: A peer-reviewed, curated allergen database to assess novel food proteins for potential cross-reactivity. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60(5):1183–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201500769.
AllFam - The database of allergen families, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria [Internet]. Available from: http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/allfam/. Accessed 13 May 2024.
Mistry J, Chuguransky S, Williams L, Qureshi M, Salazar Gustavo A, Sonnhammer ELL, et al. Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D412–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa913.
Gifford JL, Walsh MP, Vogel HJ. Structures and metal-ion-binding properties of the Ca2+-binding helix–loop–helix EF-hand motifs. Biochem J. 2007;405(2):199–221. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20070255.
Hauser M, Roulias A, Ferreira F, Egger M. Panallergens and their impact on the allergic patient. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2010;6(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1710-1492-6-1.
Asero R, Mistrello G, Amato S. IgE reactivity to polcalcins varies according to pollen source. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2016;26(6):362–5. https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.0054.
Asero R, Jimeno L, Barber D. Preliminary results of a skin prick test-based study of the prevalence and clinical impact of hypersensitivity to pollen panallergens (polcalcin and profilin). J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2010;20(1):35–8. https://www.jiaci.org/summary/vol20-issue1-num553. Accessed 2 May 2024.
Hindley J, Wünschmann S, Satinover SM, Woodfolk JA, Chew FT, Chapman MD, Pomés A. Bla g 6: A troponin C allergen from Blattella germanica with IgE binding calcium dependence. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117(6):1389–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.02.017.
Pomés A, Chapman MD, Wünschmann S. Indoor allergens and allergic respiratory disease. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016;16(6):43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-016-0622-9.
Vijay-Kumar S, Cook WJ. Structure of a sarcoplasmic calcium-binding protein from Nereis diversicolor refined at 2·0 Å resolution. J Mol Biol. 1992;224(2):413–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(92)91004-9.
Cantillo JF, Puerta L, Puchalska P, Lafosse-Marin S, Subiza JL, Fernández-Caldas E. Allergenome characterization of the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Allergy. 2017;72(10):1499–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13150.
Santos A, Van Ree R. Profilins: mimickers of allergy or relevant allergens? Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011;155(3):191–204. https://doi.org/10.1159/000321178.
Korupolu RV, Achary MS, Aneesa F, Sathish K, Wasia R, Sairam M, et al. Profilin oligomerization and its effect on poly (l-proline) binding and phosphorylation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2009;45(3):265–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.06.001.
Olson EN, Nordheim A. Linking actin dynamics and gene transcription to drive cellular motile functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(5):353–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2890.
O’Malley A, Sankaran S, Carriuolo A, Khatri K, Kowal K, Chruszcz M. Structural homology of mite profilins to plant profilins is not indicative of allergic cross-reactivity. Biol Chem. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2023-0366.
Rodríguez del Río P, Díaz-Perales A, Sánchez-García S, Escudero C, Ibáñez MD, Méndez-Brea P, Barber D. Profilin, a change in the paradigm. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2018;28(1):1–12.
Wopfner N, Gruber P, Wallner M, Briza P, Ebner C, Mari A, et al. Molecular and immunological characterization of novel weed pollen pan-allergens. Allergy. 2008;63(7):872–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01635.x.
Valenta R, Duchene M, Pettenburger K, Sillaber C, Valent P, Bettelheim P, et al. Identification of profilin as a novel pollen allergen; IgE autoreactivity in sensitized individuals. Science. 1991;253(5019):557–60. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1857985.
Sirvent S, Tordesillas L, Villalba M, Díaz-Perales A, Cuesta-Herranz J, Salcedo G, Rodríguez R. Pollen and plant food profilin allergens show equivalent IgE reactivity. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011;106(5):429–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2011.01.001.
Chiu H-J, Bakolitsa C, Skerra A, Lomize A, Carlton D, Miller MD, et al. Structure of the first representative of Pfam family PF09410 (DUF2006) reveals a structural signature of the calycin superfamily that suggests a role in lipid metabolism. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst. 2009;66(10):1153–9. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1744309109037749.
Ganfornina MD, Sanchez D, Greene LH, Flower DR. The lipocalin protein family: protein sequence, structure and relationship to the calycin superfamily. In: Åkerstrom B, Borregaard N, Flower D, Salier JP, editors. Lipocalins. Georgetown: Landes Bioscience; 2006. p. 17–27.
Gillilan RE, Ayers SD, Noy N. Structural basis for activation of fatty acid-binding protein 4. J Mol Biol. 2007;372(5):1246–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.040.
Flower DR. The lipocalin protein family: structure and function. Biochem J. 1996;318(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3180001.
Chan SL, Ong ST, Ong SY, Chew FT, Mok YK. Nuclear magnetic resonance structure-based epitope mapping and modulation of dust mite group 13 allergen as a hypoallergen. J Immunol. 2006;176(8):4852–60. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.176.8.4852.
Radauer C, Breiteneder H. Evolutionary biology of plant food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(3):518–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2007.07.024.
Salminen TA, Blomqvist K, Edqvist J. Lipid transfer proteins: classification, nomenclature, structure, and function. Planta. 2016;244(5):971–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-016-2585-4.
Skypala IJ, Asero R, Barber D, Cecchi L, Diaz Perales A, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, et al. Non-specific lipid-transfer proteins: Allergen structure and function, cross-reactivity, sensitization, and epidemiology. Clin Transl Allergy. 2021;11(3):e12010. https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12010.
Lopez JFF, Enriquez JQ, de Saavedra Alías JMA, de San Pedro BS, Casañez EM. An allergen from Olea europaea pollen (Ole e 7) is associated with plant-derived food anaphylaxis. Allergy. 2002;57(s71):53–9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.057s71053.x.
Skypala IJ, Cecchi L, Shamji MH, Scala E, Till S. Lipid transfer protein allergy in the United Kingdom: Characterization and comparison with a matched Italian cohort. Allergy. 2019;74(7):1340–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13747.
Salcedo G, Sanchez-Monge R, Diaz-Perales A, Garcia-Casado G, Barber D. Plant non-specific lipid transfer proteins as food and pollen allergens. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34(9):1336–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02018.x.
Costa J, Mafra I. Rosaceae food allergy: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(25):7423–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2045897.
Kandra L, Gyémánt G, Remenyik J, Hovánszki G, Lipták A. Action pattern and subsite mapping of Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase (BLA) with modified maltooligosaccharide substrates. FEBS Lett. 2002;518(1–3):79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(02)02649-2.
Svensson B. Protein engineering in the α-amylase family: catalytic mechanism, substrate specificity, and stability. Plant Mol Biol. 1994;25(2):141–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023233.
Houba R, Vanrun P, Doekes G, Heederik D, Spithoven J. Airborne levels of α-amylase allergens in bakeries. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99(3):286–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6749(97)70044-7.
Losada E, Hinojosa M, Quirce S, Sanchezcano M, Moneo I. Occupational asthma caused by α-amylase inhalation: Clinical and immunologic findings and bronchial response patterns. J Allergy Clinical Immunol. 1992;89(1):118–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6749(05)80048-X.
Ganseman E, Leven T, Frans G, Coorevits L, Pörtner N, Martens E, et al. Alpha-amylase as the culprit in an occupational mealworm allergy case. Front Allergy. 2022;3. https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2022.992195.
Dodson G, Wlodawer A. Catalytic triads and their relatives. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23(9):347–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01254-7.
Ottmann C, Rose R, Huttenlocher F, Cedzich A, Hauske P, Kaiser M, et al. Structural basis for Ca2+-independence and activation by homodimerization of tomato subtilase 3. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(40):17223–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907587106.
Soh WT, Zhang J, Hollenberg MD, Vliagoftis H, Rothenberg ME, Sokol CL, et al. Protease allergens as initiators–regulators of allergic inflammation. Allergy. 2023;78(5):1148–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15678.
Nielsen GD, Larsen ST, Hansen JS, Poulsen LK. Experiences from occupational exposure limits set on aerosols containing allergenic proteins. Ann Occup Hyg. 2012;56(8):888–900. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mes035.
Yennawar NH, Li L-C, Dudzinski DM, Tabuchi A, Cosgrove DJ. Crystal structure and activities of EXPB1 (Zea m 1), a β-expansin and group-1 pollen allergen from maize. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2006;103(40):14664–71. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605979103.
Cosgrove DJ, Bedinger P, Durachko DM. Group I allergens of grass pollen as cell wall-loosening agents. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1997;94(12):6559–64. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.12.6559.
Gangl K, Niederberger V, Valenta R, Nandy A. Marker allergens and panallergens in tree and grass pollen allergy. Allergo J Int. 2015;24(5):158–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-015-0055-3.
Hrabina M, Peltre G, Van Ree R, Moingeon P. Grass pollen allergens. Clin Exp Allergy Rev. 2008;8(1):7–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-9733.2008.00126.x.
Petersen A, Suck R, Lindner B, Georgieva D, Ernst M, Notbohm H, et al. Phl p 3: structural and immunological characterization of a major allergen of timothy grass pollen. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36(6):840–9.
Campbell BC, Gilding EK, Timbrell V, Guru P, Loo D, Zennaro D, et al. Total transcriptome, proteome, and allergome of Johnson grass pollen, which is important for allergic rhinitis in subtropical regions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(1):133–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.06.034.
Wildner S, Elsässer B, Stemeseder T, Briza P, Soh WT, Villalba M, et al. Endolysosomal degradation of allergenic Ole e 1-like proteins: analysis of proteolytic cleavage sites revealing T cell epitope-containing peptides. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(8):1780. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081780.
Stemeseder T, Freier R, Wildner S, Fuchs JE, Briza P, Lang R, et al. Crystal structure of Pla l 1 reveals both structural similarity and allergenic divergence within the Ole e 1–like protein family. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(1):277–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.10.035.
Fernández-González M, González-Fernández E, Fernández-González D, Rodríguez-Rajo FJ. Secondary outcomes of the Ole e 1 proteins involved in pollen tube development: impact on allergies. Frontier Plant Sci. 2020;11:974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00974.
Barderas R, Purohit A, Papanikolaou I, Rodríguez R, Pauli G, Villalba M. Cloning, expression, and clinical significance of the major allergen from ash pollen, Fra e 1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(2):351–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2004.10.001.
Liu J-J, Ekramoddoullah AKM. The family 10 of plant pathogenesis-related proteins: Their structure, regulation, and function in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2006;68(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2006.06.004.
Wintrebert G, Perotin JM, Giusti D, Sabouraud-Leclerc D. PR10-related food allergies in French birch allergic children. Rev Fr Allergol. 2024;64(2):103802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reval.2024.103802.
Ipsen H, Løwenstein H. Isolation and immunochemical characterization of the major allergen of birch pollen (Betula verrucosa). J Allergy Clinl Immunol. 1983;72(2):150–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(83)90523-7.
Jarolim E, Rempold H, Endler AT, Ebner H, Breitenbach M, Scheiner O, Kreft D. IgE and IgG antibodies of patients with allergy to birch pollen as tools to define the allergen profile of Betula verrucosa. Allergy. 1989;44(6):385–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.1989.tb04169.x.
Asam C, Batista AL, Moraes AH, de Paula VS, Almeida FCL, Aglas L, et al. Bet v 1 – a Trojan horse for small ligands boosting allergic sensitization? Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44(8):1083–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12361.
Costa J, Bavaro SL, Benedé S, Diaz-Perales A, Bueno-Diaz C, Gelencser E, et al. Are physicochemical properties shaping the allergenic potency of plant allergens? Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022;62:37–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-020-08810-9.
Gimona M. Dimerization of tropomyosins. In: Gunning P, editor. tropomyosin. NY: Springer New York: New York; 2008. p. 73–84.
Wang CLA, Coluccio LM. New insights into the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton by tropomyosin. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2010;281:91–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1937-6448(10)81003-2.
Miegel A, Kobayashi T, Maéda Y. Isolation, purification and partial characterization of tropomyosin and troponin subunits from the lobster tail muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1992;13(6):608–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01738250.
Klueber J, Costa J, Randow S, Codreanu-Morel F, Verhoeckx K, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al. Homologous tropomyosins from vertebrate and invertebrate: Recombinant calibrator proteins in functional biological assays for tropomyosin allergenicity assessment of novel animal foods. Clin Exp Allergy. 2020;50:105–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.13503.
Ayuso R, Reese G, Leong-Kee S, Plante M, Lehrer SB. Molecular basis of arthropod cross-reactivity: IgE-binding cross-reactive epitopes of shrimp, house dust mite and cockroach tropomyosins. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002;129(1):38–48. https://doi.org/10.1159/000065172.
Shafique RH, Inam M, Ismail M, Chaudhary FR. Group 10 allergens (tropomyosins) from house-dust mites may cause covariation of sensitization to allergens from other invertebrates. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2012;3(2):e74-90. https://doi.org/10.2500/ar.2012.3.0036.
Weghofer M, Thomas WR, Kronqvist M, Mari A, Purohit A, Pauli G, et al. Variability of IgE reactivity profiles among European mite allergic patients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2008;38(12):959–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.02048.x.
Resch Y, Weghofer M, Seiberler S, Horak F, Scheiblhofer S, Linhart B, et al. Molecular characterization of Der p 10: a diagnostic marker for broad sensitization in house dust mite allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011;41(10):1468–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03798.x.
Funding
Open access funding provided by FCT|FCCN (b-on). This work was funded by national funds (FCT, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia) through project HYPOALLERGEN (PTDC/BAA-AGR/4005/2021), and the strategic funding of UIDB/50006/2020 from FCT/MCTES. C. Villa, I. Mafra and J. Costa thank FCT for funding through the Individual Call to Scientific Employment Stimulus (2023.07644.CEECIND, 2021.03670.CEECIND/CP1662/CT0011 and 2021.03583.CEECIND/CP1662/CT0012, respectively).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.S.S.T, B.C.-S. and J.C. wrote the main manuscript text. C.S.S.T prepared Fig. 1. All authors contributed to the study’s conception, design, data collection, and analysis. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Teixeira, C.S.S., Carriço-Sá, B., Villa, C. et al. Can Physicochemical Properties Alter the Potency of Aeroallergens? Part 1 – Aeroallergen Protein Families. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-024-01172-8
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-024-01172-8