Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conception and Management of a Poorly Understood Spectrum of Dermatologic Neoplasms: Atypical Fibroxanthoma, Pleomorphic Dermal Sarcoma, and Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma

  • Skin Cancer (SZ Aasi, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion Statement

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) tumors share many clinical, etiologic, and histologic features and likely represent components of a tumor spectrum. In dermatologic oncology, differentiating between AFX and PDS is pivotal as tumors with histological features consistent with PDS are more likely to behave in a clinically aggressive manner. Importantly, the term “pleomorphic dermal sarcoma” (PDS) is a more appropriate designation than “undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma” (UPS) for describing deeper, more aggressive, histologically high-grade cutaneous tumors that otherwise resemble AFX. Surgery remains the gold standard for treatment. In the setting of AFX, excision with the Mohs micrographic technique appears to offer superior tumor control rates while maintaining greater tissue preservation over wide local excision and should be considered first line. In the setting of PDS, optimal management is less clear given the paucity of available data. However, due to its greater propensity to recur and metastasize, extirpation with complete tumor margin control appears paramount. The roles of imaging and SLNB in management and clinical outcomes of AFX and PDS are unclear given the lack of available data. In reality, these tools are unlikely to be helpful in most cases of AFX. However, in the setting of PDS, emerging literature indicates that these tumors are inherently higher risk, and thus, imaging and SLNB may be helpful in select cases. Additionally, radiation therapy may be of adjuvant benefit for these tumors when clear surgical margins cannot be obtained. While traditional chemotherapy has been largely ineffectual, the recent discovery of key oncogenetic mutations has allowed for the identification of several potential molecular drug targets that may have a therapeutic role with future study. In the unfortunate setting of metastatic disease, a multidisciplinary approach is optimal. Further studies are needed to establish definitive conclusions regarding risk stratification and best management practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Fretzin DF, Helwig EB. Atypical fibroxanthoma of the skin. A clinicopathologic study of 140 cases. Cancer. 1973;31:1541–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Helwig EB, May D. Atypical fibroxanthoma of the skin with metastasis. Cancer. 1986;57:368–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Iorizzo LJ, Brown MD. Atypical fibroxanthoma: a review of the literature. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37:146–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. •• Miller K, Goodlad JR, Brenn T. Pleomorphic dermal sarcoma. Adverse histologic features predict aggressive behavior and allow distinction from atypical fibroxanthoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:1317–26. One of the first papers clearly defining adverse histologic features differentiating PDS from AFX and demonstrating local recurrence and metastatic rates for PDS.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. •• Brenn T. Pleomorphic dermal neoplasms: a review. Adv Anat Pathol. 2014;21:108–30. Review of the spectrum of dermal neoplasms.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. •• McCalmont TH. AFX: what we now know. J Cutan Pathol. 2011;38:853. Contemporary review defining the current histopathologic characteristics of AFX.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper JZ, Newman SR, Scott GA, Brown MD. Metastasizing atypical fibroxanthoma (cutaneous malignant histiocytoma): report of five cases. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:221–5. Discussion 225

  8. Fletcher CD. Pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma: fact or fiction? A critical reappraisal based on 159 tumors diagnosed as pleomorphic sarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16:213–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCalmont TH. Correction and clarification regarding AFX and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2012;39:8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weedon D, Kerr JF. Atypical fibroxanthoma of skin: an electron microscope study. Pathology. 1975;7:173–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barr RJ, Wuerker RB, Graham JH. Ultrastructure of atypical fibroxanthoma. Cancer. 1977;40:736–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aasi SZ, Leffell DJ, Lazova RZ. Atlas of practical Mohs histopathology. New York: Springer; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Thum C, Husain EA, Mulholland K, Hornick JL, Brenn T. Atypical fibroxanthoma with pseudoangiomatous features: a histological and immunohistochemical mimic of cutaneous angiosarcoma. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2013;17(6):502–7. doi:10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2013.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Diaz-Cascajo C, Weyers W, Borghi S. Pigmented atypical fibroxanthoma: a tumor that may be easily mistaken for malignant melanoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003;25:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patterson JW, Konerding H, Kramer WM. “Clear cell” atypical fibroxanthoma. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1987;13:1109–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright NA, Thomas CG, Calame A, et al. Granular cell atypical fibroxanthoma: case report and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37:380–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim J, McNiff JM. Keloidal atypical fibroxanthoma: a case series. J Cutan Pathol. 2009;36:535–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hollmig ST, Rieger KE, Henderson MT, West RB, Sundram UN. Reconsidering the diagnostic and prognostic utility of LN-2 for undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and atypical fibroxanthoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2013 Apr;35(2):176–9. doi:10.1097/DAD.0b013e318265fb9e.

  19. De Feraudy S, Mar N, McCalmont TH. Evaluation of CD10 and procollagen 1 expression in atypical fibroxanthoma and dermatofibroma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:1111–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Monteagudo C, Calduch L, Navarro S, et al. CD99 immunoreactivity in atypical fibroxanthoma: a common feature of diagnostic value. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117:126–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hartel PH, Jackson J, Ducatman BS, Zhang P. CD99 immunoreactivity in atypical fibroxanthoma and pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma: a useful diagnostic marker. J Cutan Pathol. 2006;33(Suppl 2):24–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lazova R, Moynes R, May D, Scott G. LN-2 (CD74). A marker to distinguish atypical fibroxanthoma from malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Cancer. 1997;79:2115–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. •• Hanlon A, Stasko T, Christiansen D, Cyrus N, Galan A. LN, CD, and Ezrin do not distinguish between atypical fibroxanthoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma or predict clinical outcome. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(3):431–6. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001000. Paper evaluating the ability and utility of various immunohistochemical stains in differentiating between AFX and UPS.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Woyke S, Domagala W, Olszewski W, Korabiec M. Pseudosarcoma of the skin. An electron microscopic study and comparison with the fine structure of spindle-cell variant of squamous carcinoma. Cancer. 1974;33:970–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weiss SW, Goldblum JR. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma). In: Enzinger & Weiss’s soft tissue tumors. 5th ed. Mosby: Elsevier; 2008. p. 403–27.

    Google Scholar 

  26. •• Helbig D, Ihle MA, Putz K, Tantcheva-Poor I, Mauch C, Buttner R, et al. Oncogene and therapeutic target analyses in atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal scarcomas. Oncotarget. 2016;7(16):21763–74. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.7845. Paper identifying genetic mutations and therapeutic drug targets in AFX and PDS.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. •• Griewank KG, Schilling B, Murali R, Bielefeld N, Schwamborn M, Sucker A, et al. TERT promoter mutations are frequent in atypical fibroxanthomas and pleomorphic dermal sarcomas. Mod Pathol. 2014;27(4):502–8. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2013.168. First Paper identifying genetic mutations and therapeutic drug targets in AFX and PDS.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. •• Ang GC, Roenigk RK, Otley CC, Kim Phillips P, et al. More than 2 decades of treating atypical fibroxanthoma at Mayo Clinic: what have we learned from 91 patients? Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:765–72. Largest case series of its kind demonstrating tumor control between MMS and WLE.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Seavolt M, McCall M. Atypical fibroxanthoma: review of the literature and summary of 13 patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:435–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Davis JL, Randle HW, Zalla MJ, Roenigk RK, et al. A comparison of Mohs micrographic surgery and wide excision for the treatment of atypical fibroxanthoma. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23:105–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lum DJ, King AR. Peritoneal metastases from an atypical fibroxanthoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:1041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmitt AR, Brewer JD, Bordeaux JS, Baum CL. Staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma as a predictor of sentinel lymph node biopsy results: meta-analysis of American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria and a proposed alternative system. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stadler FJ, Scott GA, Brown MD. Malignant fibrous tumors. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1998;17:141–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brown MD, Swanson NA. Treatment of malignant fibrous histiocytoma and atypical fibrous xanthomas with micrographic surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989;15:1287–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gonzalez-Garcia R, Nam-Cha SH, Munoz-Guerra MF, et al. Atypical fibroxanthoma of the head and neck: report of 5 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:526–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Huether MJ, Zitelli JA, Brodland DG. Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of spindle cell tumors of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44:656–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. •• Tardío JC, Pinedo F, Aramburu JA, Suárez-Massa D, Pampín A, Requena L, et al. Pleomorphic dermal sarcoma: a more aggressive neoplasm than previously estimated. J Cutan Pathol. 2016;43(2):101–12. doi:10.1111/cup.12603. One of the first papers clearly defining adverse histologic features differentiating PDS from AFX and demonstrating local recurrence and metastatic rates for PDS.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Karia PS, Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Harrington DP, Murphy GF, Qureshi AA, Schmults CD. Evaluation of American Joint Committee on Cancer, International Union Against Cancer, and Brigham and Women’s Hospital tumor staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(4):327–34. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Duran J, Morgan FC, Karia PS, Schmults CD. An evaluation of high-stage cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma outcomes by gender. Br J Dermatol. 2016; doi:10.1111/bjd.15208.

  40. • HH MC, Christiansen D, Stasko T, Washington C, Martinez JC, Brown MD, et al. Clinical spectrum of atypical fibroxanthoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in solid organ transplant recipients: a collective experience. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(2):230–9. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02180.x. Overview of tumoral subtypes seen in immunosuppressed patients.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hager S, Makowiec F, Henne K, Hopt UT, Wittel UA. Significant benefits in survival by the use of surgery combined with radiotherapy for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12(1):29. doi:10.1186/s13014-017-0769-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Beck JT, Ismail A, Tolomeo C. Targeting the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway: an emerging treatment strategy for squamous cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40:980–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Janku F, Wheler JJ, Westin SN, Moulder SL, Naing A, Tsimberidou AM, et al. PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in patients with breast and gynecologic malignancies harboring PIK3CA mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:777–82.

  44. Engelman JA, Chen L, Tan X, Crosby K, Guimaraes AR, Upadhyay R, et al. Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers. Nat med. 2008;14:1351–6.

  45. Massacesi C, Di Tomaso E, Urban P, Germa C, Quadt C, Trandafir L, et al. PI3K inhibitors as new cancer therapeutics: implications for clinical trial design. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:203–10. doi:10.2147/OTT.S89967.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teo Soleymani MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

The authors have no financial disclosures to report.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Skin Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soleymani, T., Tyler Hollmig, S. Conception and Management of a Poorly Understood Spectrum of Dermatologic Neoplasms: Atypical Fibroxanthoma, Pleomorphic Dermal Sarcoma, and Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 18, 50 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-017-0489-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-017-0489-6

Keywords

Navigation