Skip to main content
Log in

Maximum entropy approach for solving pessimistic bilevel programming problems

  • Mathematics
  • Published:
Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences

Abstract

Bilevel programming problems are of growing interest both from theoretical and practical points of view. In this paper, we study a pessimistic bilevel programming problem in which the set of solutions of the lower level problem is discrete. We first transform such a problem into a single-level optimization problem by using the maximum-entropy techniques. We then present a maximum entropy approach for solving the pessimistic bilevel programming problem. Finally, two examples illustrate the feasibility of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dempe S. Annottated bibliography on bilevel programming and mathematical problems with equilibrium constraints [J]. Optimization, 2003, 52: 333–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bard J F. Practical Bilevel Optimization: Algorithms and Applications [M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Dempe S. Foundations of Bilevel Programming,Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications Series [M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G. An overview of bilevel optimization [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2007, 153: 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shimizu K, Ishizuka Y, Bard J F. Nondifferentiable and Two-Level Mathematical Programming [M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang G, Wan Z, Wang X. Bibliography on bilevel programming [J]. Advances in Mathematics, 2007, 36: 513–529(Ch).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lu J, Han J, Hu Y, et al. Multilevel decision-making: A survey [J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 346: 463–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Loridan P, Morgan J. Weak via strong Stackelberg problem: New results [J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 1996, 8: 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aboussoror A, Mansouri A. Weak linear bilevel programming problems: Existence of solutions via a penalty method [J]. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2005, 304: 399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aboussoror A, Mansouri A. Existence of solutions to weak nonlinear bilevel problems via MinSup and d.c. problems [J]. RAIRO Operations Research, 2008, 42: 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aboussoror A, Adly S, Jalby V. Weak nonlinear bilevel problems: existence of solutions via reverse convex and convex maximization problems [J]. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2011, 7: 559–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lignola M B, Morgan J. Topological existence and stability for Stackelberg problems [J]. Journal of Optimization Theory Applications, 1995, 84: 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Loridan P, Morgan J. New results on approximate solutions in two-level optimization [J]. Optimization, 1989, 20: 819–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Loridan P, Morgan J. e-regularized two-level optimization problems: approximation and existence results [C] // Proceeding of the Fifth French-German Optimization Conference. New York: Springer -Verlag, 1989: 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dassanayaka S. Methods of Variational Analysis in Pessimistic Bilevel Programming [D]. Detroit: Wayne State University, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dempe S, Mordukhovich B S, Zemkoho A B. Necessary optimality conditions in pessimistic bilevel programming [J]. Optimization, 2014, 63: 505–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiesemann W, Tsoukalas A, Kleniati P, et al. Pessimistic bi-level optimisation [J]. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 2013, 23: 353–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cervinka M, Matonoha C, Outrata J V. On the computation of relaxed pessimistic solutions to MPECs [J]. Optimization Methods and Software, 2013, 28: 186–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng Y, Wan Z, Sun K, et al. An exact penalty method for weak linear bilevel programming problem [J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, 2013, 42: 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu B, Wan Z, Chen J, et al. Optimality conditions for pessimistic semivectorial bilevel programming problems [J]. Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2014, 1: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng Y, Fang D, Wan Z. A solution approach to the weak linear bilevel programming problems [J]. Optimization, 2016, 65: 1437–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mallozzi L, Morgan J. Hierarchical systems with weighted reaction set [C] // Nonlinear Optimization and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996:271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Templeman A B, Li X. A maximum entropy approach to constrained non-linear programming [J]. Engineering Optimization, 1987, 12: 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tawarmalani M, Sahinidis N V. A polyhedral branch-and-cut approach to global optimization [J]. Mathematical Programming, 2005, 103: 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yue Zheng.

Additional information

Foundation item: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11501233), the Key Project of Anhui Province University Excellent Youth Support Plan ( gxyqZD2016102)

Biography: ZHENG Yue, male, Associate professor, research direction: optimization theory and application.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Y., Zhuo, X. & Chen, J. Maximum entropy approach for solving pessimistic bilevel programming problems. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 22, 63–67 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-017-1217-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11859-017-1217-6

Keywords

CLC number

Navigation