Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of top management teams on firm innovativeness: a configurational analysis of demographic characteristics, leadership style and team power distribution

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In past studies, the impact of the top management team (TMT) on firm innovativeness was explained by reference to either the upper echelons theory or the transformational leadership theory. This study takes a different approach by investigating both TMT demographic characteristics and leadership style dimensions in a joint configurational analysis. To do so, qualitative interviews with 44 TMT members in 24 multinational European companies were conducted. By means of a fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, we investigated multiple combinations of TMT demographic characteristics, leadership style and contextual factors. By combining these factors, we found distinct causal recipes that better explain firm innovativeness. This study shows that firm innovativeness reflects the fit of the TMT to its tasks and that, therefore, diverse strategic paths can lead to the same output of innovative performance. This insight is of special relevance for firms in order to enhance the impact of TMTs on firm innovativeness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexiev AS, Jansen JJP, Van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2010) Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: the moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. J Manag Stud 47(7):1343–1364

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison PD (1987) Measures of inequality. Am Sociol Rev 43(6):865–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1998) How to kill creativity. Harvard Bus Rev 76(9):77–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Amason AC, Shrader RC, Tompson GH (2006) Newness and novelty: relating top management team composition to new venture performance. J Bus Ventur 21(1):125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiou N, Nigh D (2000) Internationalization, tacit knowledge and the top management teams of MNCs. J Int Bus Stud 32(3):471–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio BJ (1999) Full leadership development: building the vital forces in organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Bantel KA (1993) Top team, environment, and performance effects on strategic planning formality. Group Org Manag 18(4):436–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strateg Manag J 10(S1):107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (1990) From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organ Dyn 18(3):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (2008) The Bass handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications, 4th edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Jung DI, Berson Y (2003) Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. J Appl Psychol 88(2):207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basurto X, Speer J (2012) Structuring the calibration of qualitative data as sets for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Field Method 24(2):155–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau PM (1977) Inequality and heterogeneity: a primitive theory of social structure. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bono JE, Judge TA (2004) Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 89(5):901–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camelo-Ordaz C, Hernández-Lara AB, Valle-Cabrera R (2005) The relationship between top management teams and innovative capacity in companies. J Manag Dev 24(8):683–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter MA (2002) The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strat Manag J 23(3):275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter MA, Fredrickson JW (2001) Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Acad Manag J 44(3):533–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J Manag 30(6):749–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Certo ST, Lester RH, Dalton CM, Dalton DR (2006) Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: a meta-analytic examination. J Manag Stud 43(4):813–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child J (1972) Organizational structure, environment, and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociol 6(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child J (1974) Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance. J Manag Stud 11(3):175–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse B, Moray N (2004) A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off. J Bus Ventur 19(1):55–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey A, Atkinson P (1996) Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin Sci Quart 35(1):128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin J, Strauss A (2015) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 4th edn. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions, 3rd edn. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2014) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings LL, O’Connell MJ (1978) Organizational innovation: a model and needed research. J Bus Res 6(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daellenbach US, McCarthy AM, Schoenecker TS (1999) Commitment to innovation: the impact of top management team characteristics. R&D Manage 29(3):199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels E (2002) The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strateg Manag J 23(12):1095–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis J, Langley A, Cazale L (1996) Leadership and strategic change under ambiguity. Org Stud 17(4):673–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis J, Lamothe L, Langley A (2001) The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Acad Manag J 44(4):809–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewett T (2004) Creativity and strategic management: individual and group considerations concerning decision alternatives in TMTs. J Manag Psychol 19(1):156–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesing P (1962) Reason in society. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Bourgeois LJ (1988) Politics of strategic decision making in high velocity environments: toward a midrange theory. Acad Manag J 31(4):737–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50(1):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1990) Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Admin Sci Quart 35(3):504–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin Sci Quart 40(1):84–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elenkov DS, Manev IM (2005) Top management leadership and influence on innovation: the role of sociocultural context. J Manag 31(3):381–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Elenkov DS, Judge W, Wright P (2005) Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: an international multi-cluster comparative study. Strateg Manag J 26(7):665–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero-Ferrero I, Fernández-Izquierdo MA, Muñoz-Torres MJ (2012) The impact of the board of directors characteristics on corporate performance and risk-taking before and during the global financial crisis. Rev Manag Sci 6(3):207–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1990) Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Admin Sci Quart 35(3):484–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss PC (2007) A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1180–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad Manag J 54(2):393–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goll I, Rasheed AA (2005) The relationships between top management demographic characteristics, rational decision making, environmental munificence, and firm performance. Org Stud 26(7):999–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goll I, Brown Johnson N, Rasheed AA (2008) Top management team demographic characteristics, business strategy, and firm performance in the US airline industry. Manag Decis 46(2):201–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumusluoglu L, Ilsev A (2009) Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. J Bus Res 62(4):461–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK (1984) Contingency linkages between strategy and general manager characteristics: a conceptual examination. Acad Manag Rev 9(3):399–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Haleblian J, Finkelstein S (1993) Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: the moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Acad Manag J 36(4):844–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC (1994) Top management groups: a conceptual integration and reconsideration of the ‘team’ label. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 171–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC (2007) Upper echelons theory: an update. Acad Manage Rev 32(2):334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC, Mason P (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manage Rev 9(2):193–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC, Cho TS, Chen M (1996) The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms competitive moves. Admin Sci Quart 41(4):659–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz SK, Horwitz IB (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: a meta-analytic review of team demography. J Manage 33(6):987–1015

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell JM, Avolio BJ (1993) Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovations: key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. J Appl Psychol 78(6):891–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell JM, Higgins CA (1990) Champions of technological innovation. Admin Sci Quart 35(2):317–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost P-J (2013) An economic theory of leadership styles. Rev Manag Sci 7(4):365–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung DI, Chow C, Wu A (2003) The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: hypotheses and some preliminary findings. Leadersh Quart 14(4/5):525–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung D, Wu A, Chow CW (2008) Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of CEOs’ transformational leadership on firm innovation. Leadersh Quart 19(5):582–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight D, Pearce CL, Smith KG, Olian JD, Sims HP, Smith KA, Flood P (1999) Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strateg Manag J 20(5):445–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli AK, Jaworski BJ (1990) Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J Market 54(2):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor YY (2006) Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strateg Manag J 27(11):1081–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence BS (1997) Perspective: the black box of organizational demography. Org Sci 8(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe KB, Kroeck K, Sivasubramaniam N (1996) Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadersh Quart 7(3):385–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makri M, Scandura TA (2010) Exploring the effects of creative CEO leadership on innovation in high-technology firms. Leadersh Quart 21(1):75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall C, Rossman GB (1999) Designing qualitative research, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Matzler K, Schwarz E, Deutinger N, Harms R (2008) The relationship between transformational Leadership, product innovation and performance in SMEs. J Small Bus Entrep 21(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menz M (2012) Functional top management team members: a review, synthesis, and research agenda. J Manag 38(1):45–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H, Waters JA (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strateg Manag J 6(3):257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J (2002) Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods 1(2):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford MD, Scott GM, Gaddis B, Strange JM (2002) Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadersh Quart 13(6):705–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray AI (1989) Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 10(S1):125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio W (1994) Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960–1990. Adm Sci Q 39(2):285–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly CA, Caldwell DF, Barnett WP (1989) Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin Sci Quart 34(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis VM, Barwise P (2002) How much do CEOs and top managers matter in strategic decision-making? Brit J Manag 13(1):83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AM (1992) On studying managerial elites. Strateg Manag J 13(S2):163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J (1981) Power in organizations. Pitman, Marshfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher P, Smith AD (2001) Top management team heterogeneity: personality, power and proxies. Org Sci 12(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock TG, Fisher HM, Wade JB (2002) The role of power and politics in the repricing of executive options. Acad Manag J 45(6):1172–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priem RL (1990) Top management team group factors, consensus, and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 11(6):469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priem RL, Lyon DW, Dess GG (1999) Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. J Manag 25(6):935–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC (1987) The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC (2000) Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC (2006) Set relations in social research: evaluating their consistency and coverage. Polit Anal 14(3):291–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC (2008) Re-designing social inquiry. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC, Drass KA, Davey S (2006) Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0. Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson

  • Reger RK (1997) Strategic leadership: top executives and their effects on organizations. Acad Manage Rev 22(3):802–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN, Buchholtz AK (2001) Agency relationships in family firms: theory and evidence. Org Sci 12(2):99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott SG, Bruce RA (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manag J 37(3):580–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin S, Zhou J (2003) Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: evidence from Korea. Acad Manag J 46(6):703–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KG, Smith KA, Olian JD, Sims HP, O’Bannon DP, Scully JA (1994) Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication. Admin Sci Quart 39(3):412–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Houghton SM, Hood JN, Ryman JA (2006) Power relationships among top managers: does top management team power distribution matter for organizational performance? J Bus Res 59(5):622–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosik JJ, Avolio BJ, Kahai SS (1997) Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. J Appl Psychol 82(1):89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera R, Lee-Ray J (1977) A generalized index of concentration. Sociol Method Res 5(3):367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RN (1975) Age and experience as determinants of managerial information processing and decision making performance. Acad Manag J 18(1):74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson VA (1965) Bureaucracy and innovation. Admin Sci Quart 10(S1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi L, Ellstrand AE, Daily CM, Dalton DR (2000) Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. J Manage 26(6):1157–1177

    Google Scholar 

  • Tóth Z, Thiesbrummel C, Henneberg SC, Naudé P (2015) Understanding configurations of relational attractiveness of the customer firm using fuzzy set QCA. J Bus Res 68(3):723–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman T, Nadler D (1986) Organizing for innovation. Calif Manage Rev 28(3):74–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman ML, O’Reilly CA (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif Manage Rev 38(4):8–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro IG, Jansen JJ, Van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2012) Management innovation and leadership: the moderating role of organizational size. J Manag Stud 49(1):28–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Aa W, Elfring T (2002) Realizing innovation in services. Scand J Manag 18(2):155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner WG, Pfeffer J, O’Reilly CA (1984) Organizational demography and turnover in top-management group. Admin Sci Quart 29(1):74–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman DA, Javidan M (2013) Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: taking a new look at upper echelons theory. In: Avolio BJ, Yammarino FJ (eds) Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition, 2nd edn. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 201–227

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman DA, Javidan M, Varella P (2004) Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: a new application of upper echelons theory. Leadersh Quart 15(3):355–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West MA, Anderson NR (1996) Innovation in top management teams. J Appl Psychol 81(6):680–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West MA, Borrill CS, Dawson JF, Brodbeck F, Shapiro DA, Haward B (2003) Leadership clarity and team innovation in health care. Leadersh Quart 14(4/5):393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema MF, Bantel KA (1992) Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad Manage J 35(1):91–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad Manag Rev 18(2):293–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu PL, Yeh SS, Huan T-C, Woodside AG (2014) Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations. J Bus Res 67(8):1647–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi’na Y, Guo Z, Fang E (2014) An examination of how and when the top management team matters for firm innovativeness: the effects of TMT functional backgrounds. Innov-Manag Policy P 16(3):323–342

  • Yadav MS, Prabhu JC, Chandy RK (2007) Managing the future: CEO attention and innovation outcomes. J Market 71(4):84–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Wang D (2014) The impacts of top management team characteristics on entrepreneurial strategic orientation. Manag Decis 52(2):378–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2003) Case study research design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon W, Kim SJ, Song J (2015) Top management team characteristics and organizational creativity. Rev Manag Sci (forthcoming)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chair of Innovation Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, Economics, and Business Administration, Otto-Friedrich-University of Bamberg, Kaerntenstrasse 7, 96052, Bamberg, Germany

    Sonja Sperber

  2. Faculty of Economics and Management, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100, Bolzano, Italy

    Christian Linder

Authors
  1. Sonja Sperber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Linder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Sperber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sperber, S., Linder, C. The impact of top management teams on firm innovativeness: a configurational analysis of demographic characteristics, leadership style and team power distribution. Rev Manag Sci 12, 285–316 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0222-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0222-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation