Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Business freedom, corruption and the performance of trusting cooperation partners: empirical findings from six European countries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we investigate the impact of trust on the performance of cooperating firms, taking into account two core aspects: First, we look at environmental uncertainty, which shows in the degree of change there is in business freedom. Second, we account for behavioral uncertainty—captured as the average level of freedom from corruption in a country. Based on survey data from 791 firms engaged in national cooperation in Austria, the Czech Republic, Finland, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia, we find that behavioral coordination based on trust impacts on cooperating firms’ performance positively in dynamic and negatively in stable contexts. Freedom from corruption enhances firm performance in dynamic contexts but is not a significant predictor in stable contexts. Further, we find the trust–performance relationship to be moderated by freedom from corruption in dynamic but not in stable contexts. The findings contribute to a more contextualized research on trust and interorganizational cooperation, as has been called for recently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler P (2001) Market, hierarchy, and trust: the knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organ Sci 12(2):215–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman M (2009) The transition process from alternative theoretical prisms: a comparative analysis of Eastern European and former Soviet Block economies. Int J Soc Econ 36(7):716–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E, Weitz B (1992) The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. J Mark Res 29(1):18–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman R (2001) Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organ Stud 22(2):337–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman R (2011) At the crossroads: future directions in trust research. J Trust Res 1(2):203–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman R, Inkpen C (2011) Understanding institutional-based trust building processes in inter-organizational relationships. Organ Stud 32(2):281–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan P (1997) Corruption and development: a review of issues. J Econ Lit 35(3):1320–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett WP, Carroll GR (1995) Modeling internal organizational change. Annu Rev Sociol 21:217–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB, Hansen MH (1994) Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 15:175–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Becerra M, Gupta AK (2003) Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: the moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organ Sci 14(1):32–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn K, Forgues-Puccio G (2009) Why is corruption less harmful in some countries than others? J Econ Behav Organ 72:797–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradach JL, Eccles RG (1989) Price, authority and trust: from ideal types to plural forms. Annu Rev Sociol 15:97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers KD, Gelderman M, Arens P (2007) The influence of ownership on performance: stakeholder and strategic contingency perspectives. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 59(3):225–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley PJ, Glaister KW, Klijn E, Tan H (2009) Knowledge accession and knowledge acquisition in strategic alliances: the impact of supplementary and complementary dimensions. Br J Manag 20(4):598–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson SJ, Madhok A, Varman R, John G (2003) Information processing moderators of the effectiveness of trust-based governance in interfirm R&D collaboration. Organ Sci 14(1):45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Carton RB, Hofer CW (2006) Measuring organizational performance—metrics for entrepreneurship and strategic management research. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs JG, Ketchen DJ (1999) Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strateg Manag J 20(9):867–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen JB, Johnson JL, Sakano T (2000) Success through commitment and trust: the soft side of strategic alliance management. J World Bus 35(3):638–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Currall S, Judge TA (1995) Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 64(2):151–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Das TK, Rahman N (2010) Determinants of partner opportunism in strategic alliances: a conceptual framework. J Bus Psychol 25(1):55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Das TK, Teng B (1998) Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Acad Manag Rev 23(3):491–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JH, Chu W (2003) The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: empirical evidence from the United States, Japan and Korea. Organ Sci 14(1):57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • EBRD—European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2008) Transition report 2008. EBRD, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Am Sociol Rev 27:31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson K, Sharma DD (2002) Modeling uncertainty in buyer–seller cooperation. J Bus Res 55:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003) Commission recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Off J Eur Union L124:36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrin DL, Bligh MC, Kohles JC (2008) It takes two to tango: an interdependence analysis of the spiralling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 107(2):161–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink M (2010) Trust-based cooperation relationships between SMEs—are family firms any different? Int J Entrep Ventur 1(4):382–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink M, Harms R (2012) Contextualizing the relationship between self-commitment and performance: environmental and behavioural uncertainty in (cross-border) alliances of SMEs. Entrep Reg Dev 24(3–4):161–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink M, Kessler A (2010) Cooperation, trust and performance: empirical results from three countries. Br J Manag 21(2):469–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2002) Social capital and development: the coming agenda. SAIS Rev 22(1):23–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal S, Moran P (1996) Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad Manag Rev 21:13–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham S, Healey P (1999) Relational concepts of space and place: issues for planning theory and practice. Eur Plan Stud 7(5):623–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad Manag J 38(1):85–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatak I, Roessl D (2010) Trust within interfirm cooperation: a conceptualization. Our Econ Rev Curr Issues Econ 56(5–6):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington SP (1968) Political order in changing societies. Yale U. Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo JC (1988) On strategic networks. Strateg Manag J 9(1):31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz BG, Owen J (2005) Moving toward the rule of law in the face of corruption: re-examining the big-bang. Stern School of Business Department of Economics Working Paper EC-04-34, revised 8/05

  • Kautonen T, Zolin R, Kuckertz A, Viljamaa A (2010) Ties that blind? How strong ties affect small business owner-managers’ perceived trustworthiness of their advisors. Entrep Reg Dev 22:189–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimuyu P (2007) Corruption, firm growth and export propensity in Kenya. Int J Soc Econ 34(3):197–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad I, Wiig A (2008) Is transparency the key to reducing corruption in resource-rich countries? World Dev 37(3):521–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps D, Milgrom P, Robert J, Wilson R (1982) Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. J Econ Theory 27(2):245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan R, Martin X, Noorderhaven NG (2006) When does trust matter to alliance performance? Acad Manag J 49(5):894–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Stern LW, Anderson JC (1993) Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad Manag J 36(6):1633–1651

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon YC (2009) Antecedents and consequences of international joint venture partnerships: a social exchange perspective. Int Bus Rev 17(5):559–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Lado AA, Dant RR, Teleab AG (2008) Trust-opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: evidence from the retail industry. Strateg Manag J 29:401–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane PJ, Salk JE, Lyles MA (2001) Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strateg Manag J 22:1139–1161

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang R, Kibler E, Fink M (2013) Understanding place-based entrepreneurship in rural central Europe—a comparative institutional analysis. Int Small Bus J. doi:10.1177/0266242613488614

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavie D (2006) The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view. Acad Manag Rev 31(3):638–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Le S, Boyd R (2006) Evolutionary dynamics of the continuous iterated prisoner’s dilemma. J Theor Biol 245(2):258–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee DJ (1998) Developing international strategic alliances between exporters and importers: the case of Australian exporters. Int J Res Mark 15:335–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff NH (1964) Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. Am Behav Sci 8(2):8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin M, Satarov G (2000) Corruption and institutions in Russia. Eur J Polit Econ 16(1):113–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy M, Loebbecke C, Powell P (2003) SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems. Eur J Inf Syst 12(1):3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1989) Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexitaet. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukas C, Schoendube JR (2010) Trust and adaptive learning in implicit contracts. RMS 6(1):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil IR (1980) Power, contract, and the economic model. J Econ Issues 11:909–923

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhok A (1995) Revisiting multinational firms’ tolerance for joint ventures: a trust-based approach. J Int Bus Stud 37(1):117–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra D, Murninghan JK (2002) The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Adm Sci Q 47(3):534–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel M, Tomšík V (2008) External balance in a transition economy: the role of foreign direct investments. East Eur Econ 46(4):5–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Masurel E, Janszen R (1998) The relationship between SME cooperation and market concentration: evidence from small retailers in the Netherlands. J Small Bus Manag 36(2):68–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integration model of organizational trust. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):709–735

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvily B, Zaheer A (2006) Does trust still matter? Research on the role of trust in interfirm exchange. In: Bachmann R, Zaheer A (eds) Handbook of trust research. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 280–300

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvily B, Perrone V, Zaheer A (2003) Trust as an organizing principle. Organ Sci 14:91–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D, Friesen PH (1980) Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Acad Manag J 23:591–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller AT, Kim AB (2013) Defining economic freedom. In: Miller AT, Holmes KR, Feulner EJ (eds) 2013 Index of Economic Freedom. The Heritage Foundation & The Wall Street Journal, New York, pp 87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller AT, Holmes KR, Feulner EJ (2013) 2013 Index of Economic Freedom. The Heritage Foundation & The Wall Street Journal, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moellering G (2002) Perceived trustworthiness and inter-firm governance: empirical evidence from the UK printing industry. Camb J Econ 26(2):139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Moellering G, Bachmann R, Soo Hee L (2004) Understanding organizational trust—foundations, constellations, and issues of operationalisation. J Manag Psychol 15(6):556–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr A, Puck J (2013) Revisiting the trust–performance link in strategic alliances. Manag Int Rev 53:269–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr J, Speckman R (1994) Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strateg Manag J 15:135–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B (1996) Trust, opportunism and governance: a process and control model. Organ Stud 17(6):985–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B (2002) Trust. Forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi W (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Manag Sci 25:833–848

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliances structuring: a game-theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad Manag J 36(4):794–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Patzelt H, Shepherd DA (2008) The decision to persist with underperforming alliances: the role of trust and control. J Manag Stud 45:1217–1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausch A (2011) Reconstruction of decision-making behavior in shareholder and stakeholder theory: implications for management accounting systems. RMS 5(2–3):137–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie M, Kopp L, Lemon W (2010) Exploring trust and the auditor-client relationship: factors influencing the auditor’s trust of a client representative. Auditing 29:279–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring PS, Van de Ven A (1992) Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strateg Manag J 13:483–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson MJ, Skarmeas D, Spyropoulou S (2006) Behavioral attributes and performance in international strategic alliances: review and future directions. Int Mark Rev 23(6):585–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson M, Katsikeas C, Bello D (2008) Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: the role of organizational complexity. Organ Sci 19(4):647–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Roessl D, Fink M, Kraus S (2008) Partner assessment as a key to entrepreneurial success: towards a balanced scorecard approach. J Enterp Cult 16(3):257–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogelberg SG, Stanton JM (2007) Introduction: understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organ Res Methods 10:195–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako M (1998) Does trust improve business performance? In: Lane C, Bachmann R (eds) Trust within and between organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 88–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako M, Helper S (1998) Determinants of trust in supplier relations: evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States. J Econ Behav Organ 34:387–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane SA (2003) A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro SP (1987) The social control of impersonal trust. Am J Sociol 93:623–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe K (2003) Plans, commitments and practical norms of reason. Int J Soc Econ 30(7/8):893–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallbone D, Welter F (2001) The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Bus Econ 16(4):249–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonin K (2003) Why the rich may favor poor protection of property rights. J Comp Econ 31:715–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Svetlicic M, Sicherl P (2006) Slovenia catching up with the developed countries: when and how? Int J Emerg Mark 1(1):48–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan JJ, Litschert RJ (1994) Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications: an empirical study of the Chinese electronics industry. Strateg Manag J 15(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Teraji S (2008) Property rights, trust and economic performance. J Socio Econ 37(4):1584–1596

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorgren S, Wincent J (2011) Interfirm trust: origins, dysfunctions and regulation of rigidities. Br J Manag 22:21–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (2012) 2012 Corruption Perceptions Index. http://www.transparency.org/cpi2012/results. Accessed 30 May 2013

  • Van de Ven AH, Ring PS (2006) Relying on trust in cooperative inter-organizational relationships. In: Bachmann R, Zaheer A (eds) Handbook of trust research. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 144–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Vangen S, Huxham C (2003) Nurturing collaborative relations: building trust in interorganizational collaboration. J Appl Behav Sci 39:5–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall F, Greiling D (2011) Accounting information for managerial decision-making in shareholder management versus stakeholder management. RMS 5(2–3):91–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Wathne KH, Heide JB (2000) Opportunism in interfirm relationships: forms, outcomes, and solutions. J Mark 64(4):36–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter F (2011) Contextualising entrepreneurship: conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrep Theory Pract 35(1):165–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter F, Kautonen T, Chepurenko A, Malieva E, Venesaar U (2004) Trust environments and entrepreneurial behavior—exploratory evidence from Estonia, Germany and Russia. J Enterp Cult 12(4):327–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitefield S (2002) Political cleavages and post-communist politics. Annu Rev Polit Sci 5(1):181–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland J (2001) The ethics of governance. Bus Ethics Q 11(1):73–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M (2001) In whom we trust: group membership as an affective context for trust development. Acad Manag Rev 26:377–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Adm Sci Q 36:269–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt U (1986) Evolution and stability of cooperation without enforceable contracts. Kyklos 39(2):245–266

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2002) Voices of the firms 2000: investment climate and governance findings of the World Business Environment Survey (WBES). World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer A, Venkatraman N (1995) Relational governance as an interfirm strategy: an empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strateg Manag J 16(5):373–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V (1998) Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interfirm and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ Sci 9(2):141–158

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Fink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hatak, I., Fink, M. & Frank, H. Business freedom, corruption and the performance of trusting cooperation partners: empirical findings from six European countries. Rev Manag Sci 9, 523–547 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0127-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0127-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation