Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Digital nerve injury: to repair or not?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There are very few studies comparing patients with and without repair after digital nerve injury. It is still controversial whether digital nerve repair is necessary.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with unilateral isolated digital nerve injury who underwent surgical repair and those who did not.

Methods

Seventy-four patients with unilateral digital nerve injury were included in the study. Of these, the patients who underwent surgical repair were determined as group A (n = 42), the patients without repair as group B (n = 32), and the groups were divided into subgroups according to injury levels. Results were evaluated with a minimum follow-up of 24 months.

Results

When the S2PD results were evaluated overall, it was found that those who had digital nerve repair (group A) had significantly better outcomes compared to those without repair (group B) (p = 0.012). When the subgroups were evaluated according to the injury localization, no significant difference was observed at the distal levels, while it was observed that the patients who underwent repair in the proximal levels showed significantly better results (p = 0.003, p = 0.012).

Conclusion

In this study, it was seen that there was no difference between the results of repair and non-repair of unilateral nerve injuries distal to the middle level of the middle phalanx, but repair is required in injuries proximal to this level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manley OWG, Wormald JCR, Furniss D (2019) The changing shape of hand trauma: an analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics in England. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 44:532–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419828986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thorsén F, Rosberg H-E, Steen Carlsson K, Dahlin LB (2012) Digital nerve injuries: epidemiology, results, costs, and impact on daily life. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 46:184–190. https://doi.org/10.3109/2000656X.2012.676554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Means KR, Rinker BD, Higgins JP et al (2016) A multicenter, prospective, randomized, pilot study of outcomes for digital nerve repair in the hand using hollow conduit compared with processed allograft nerve. HAND 11:144–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944715627233

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chevrollier J, Pedeutour B, Dap F, Dautel G (2014) Evaluation of emergency nerve grafting for proper palmar digital nerve defects: a retrospective single centre study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100:605–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.05.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lohmeyer JA, Sommer B, Siemers F, Mailänder P (2009) Nerve injuries of the upper extremity—expected outcome and clinical examination. Plast Surg Nurs 29:88–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PSN.0000356867.18220.73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. He B, Zhu Q, Chai Y et al (2015) Safety and efficacy evaluation of a human acellular nerve graft as a digital nerve scaffold: a prospective, multicentre controlled clinical trial. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 9:286–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunlop RLE, Wormald JCR, Jain A (2019) Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review. BMJ Open 9:e025443. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025443

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Oruç M, Ozer K, Çolak Ö et al (2016) Does crossover innervation really affect the clinical outcome? A comparison of outcome between unilateral and bilateral digital nerve repair. Neural Regen Res 11:1499. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.191226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chow SP, Ng C (1993) Can a divided digital nerve on one side of the finger be left unrepaired? J Hand Surg 18:629–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(93)90020-G

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. He B, Zhu Z, Zhu Q et al (2014) Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries. Neural Regen Res 9:661. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.130094

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Haug A, Bartels A, Kotas J, Kunesch E (2013) Sensory recovery 1 year after bridging digital nerve defects with collagen tubes. J Hand Surg Am 38:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moberg E (1962) Criticism and studvy of methods for examining sensibility in the hand*. Neurology 12:8–8. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.12.1.8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mermans JF, Franssen BBGM, Serroyen J, van der Hulst RRWJ (2012) Digital nerve injuries: a review of predictors of sensory recovery after microsurgical digital nerve repair. HAND 7:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9433-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yildiran G, Sutcu M, Akdag O, Tosun Z (2020) Long-term outcomes of digital nerve repair accompanied by digital artery injury in flexor zone 2. Surg J 06:e7–e9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3400229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bowden JL, McNulty PA (2013) Age-related changes in cutaneous sensation in the healthy human hand. Age (Omaha) 35:1077–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-012-9429-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Ghazal SK, Kiernan MM, Khan K, Cann JM (1994) Results of clinical assessment after primary digital nerve repair. J Hand Surg 19:255–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(94)90180-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Piquet M, Obert L, Laveaux C et al (2010) Influence de la perméabilité de l’artère digitale palmaire sur la récupération nerveuse dans les lésions des nerfs digitaux palmaires. Chir Main 29:94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.main.2009.12.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dautel G, MERLE M (1992) The blood supply of digital nerves: a microanatomical study of superficial and deep palmar venous networks. J Hand Surg 17:632–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(92)90189-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Godde B, Stauffenberg B, Spengler F, Dinse HR (2000) Tactile coactivation-induced changes in spatial discrimination performance. J Neurosci 20:1597–1604. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-04-01597.2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lundborg G, ROSÉN B (2004) The two-point discrimination test – time for a re-appraisal? J Hand Surg 29:418–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHSB.2004.02.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Private Silivri Anadolu Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

    Çağdaş Pamuk

Authors
  1. Çağdaş Pamuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Single-author article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Çağdaş Pamuk.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Istanbul Medipol University Review Board Decision No: E-10840098–772.02–762.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pamuk, Ç. Digital nerve injury: to repair or not?. Ir J Med Sci 192, 2235–2241 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-022-03268-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-022-03268-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation