Skip to main content
Log in

Is the combined use of ultrasonography (USG) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) safe in parotis masses? Retrospective comprehensive comparison of 123 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of the study was to compare final pathology results with ultrasonography (USI) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) results in parotis masses.

Methods

A total of 123 patients with primary parotis mass who applied to our center between 2010 and 2020 were selected for the study. Among these, 100 patients with preoperative USI, preoperative FNAB, and postoperative final pathology were included in the study. USI, FNAB, pathology results, surgery types, and demographic characteristics of the patients were analyzed.

Results

According to the postoperative final pathology, preoperative USI sensitivity was found to be 100%, specificity was 55, positive predictive value was 84.31%, negative predictive value was 100%, and accuracy was 86.89%. Preoperative FNAB had a sensitivity of 85.7%, a specificity of 92.1%, a positive predictive value of 82.1%, a negative predictive value of 90.2%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 89.3%, according to the postoperative final pathology.

Conclusion

Preoperative USI and preoperative FNAB are very valuable diagnostic tools in the evaluation of parotis lesions. When used together, they provide highly accurate and important data for the surgeon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shah, Jatin Patel S (2020) Head and neck surgery and oncology. Elsevier 115–56

  2. Heidari F, Heidari F, Rahmaty B et al (2020) The role of core needle biopsy in parotid glands lesions with inconclusive fine needle aspiration. Am J Otolaryngol 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJOTO.2020.102718

  3. Stoia S, Băciuț G, Lenghel M et al (2021) Ultrasonography techniques in the preoperative diagnosis of parotid gland tumors – an updated review of the literature. Med Ultrason 23:194–202. https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-2652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamour AF, O’Connell D, Biron VL et al (2021) Clinical diagnostic utility of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in parotid masses. Ear Nose Throat J 014556132110589. https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613211058922

  5. Chauhan N, Shah JA (2019) Parotid gland tumours: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71:378–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12070-018-1413-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tryggvason G, Gailey MP, Hulstein SL et al (2013) Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration and imaging in the preoperative workup of salivary gland mass lesions treated surgically. Laryngoscope 123:158–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/LARY.23613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aasen MH, Hutz MJ, Yuhan BT, Britt CJ (2022) Deep lobe parotid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surg 60–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998211009235

  8. Yariv O, Popovtzer A, Wasserzug O et al (2020) Usefulness of ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology of major salivary gland lesions.American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head Neck Medicine Surg 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJOTO.2019.102293

  9. Gudmundsson JK, Ajan A, Abtahi J (2016) The accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for diagnosis of parotid gland masses: a clinicopathological study of 114 patients. J Appl Oral Sci 24:561–567. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720160214

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt RL, Hall BJ, Wilson AR, Layfield LJ (2011) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for parotid gland lesions. Am J Clin Pathol 136:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPOIE0CZNAT6SQ

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suzuki M, Kawata R, Higashino M et al (2019) Values of fine-needle aspiration cytology of parotid gland tumors: a review of 996 cases at a single institution. Head Neck 41:358–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/HED.25503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fakhry N, Antonini F, Michel J et al (2012) Fine-needle aspiration cytology in the management of parotid masses: evaluation of 249 patients. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 129:131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANORL.2011.10.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Allison DB, McCuiston AM, Kawamoto S et al (2017) Cystic major salivary gland lesions: utilizing fine needle aspiration to optimize the clinical management of a broad and diverse differential diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 45:800–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/DC.23780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cengiz AB, Tansuker HD, Gul R et al (2021) Comparison of preoperative diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy in parotid gland neoplasms. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278:4067–4074. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00405-021-07022-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jafari A, Royer B, Lefevre M et al (2009) Value of the cytological diagnosis in the treatment of parotid tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:381–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OTOHNS.2008.10.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dhanani R, Iftikhar H, Awan MS et al (2020) Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of parotid gland tumors: analysis of 193 cases. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 24:508–512. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu CC, Jethwa AR, Khariwala SS et al (2016) Sensitivity, specificity, and posttest probability of parotid fine-needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surg (United States) 154:9–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599815607841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Comoglu S, Ozturk E, Celik M et al (2018) Comprehensive analysis of parotid mass: a retrospective study of 369 cases. Auris Nasus Larynx 45:320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANL.2017.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carrillo JF, Ramírez R, Flores L et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy in preoperative diagnosis of patients with parotid gland masses. J Surg Oncol 100:133–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/JSO.21317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Altin F, Alimoglu Y, Acikalin RM, Yasar H (2019) Is fine needle aspiration biopsy reliable in the diagnosis of parotid tumors? Comparison of preoperative and postoperative results and the factors affecting accuracy. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 85:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BJORL.2018.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erkan Yıldız.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Ethics committee approval was obtained (Afyonkarahisar Health Science University Clinical Ethic Committee 2021/12).

Consent to participate

Consent was obtained from the families of the patients.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yıldız, E., Kuzu, S., Günebakan, Ç. et al. Is the combined use of ultrasonography (USG) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) safe in parotis masses? Retrospective comprehensive comparison of 123 cases. Ir J Med Sci 192, 1861–1865 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-022-03155-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-022-03155-y

Keywords

Navigation