Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The patient experience of dental implant surgery: a literature review of pertinent qualitative studies

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review aims to identify and summarise the findings of published qualitative studies relating to patients’ experiences of dental implant surgery, by means of textual narrative synthesis. A comprehensive two-stage electronic and manual search of the literature identified relevant qualitative studies up to January 2020. Included primary studies (n = 15) used qualitative research methods including interviews and focus groups to investigate patients’ experiences of dental implant treatment. They looked at the experience of tooth loss, the decision making process, the pre-implant experience, motivating factors and barriers for treatment and the post-implant experience with the prosthesis. There is a deficiency in the exploration of the patients’ intraoperative dental surgical experience and the adjunctive effects of conscious sedation. The included studies give considerable insight into patients’ experiences of the dental implant journey, which in the main, had overall positive consensus. The limited information available regarding patients’ experience of the intra operative dental implant surgery with or without conscious sedation warrants further investigation. This information is a fundamental step to understanding the patients’ preferences, needs and values and ultimately enhancing the quality of patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Health in Ireland: key trends (2018) https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/-health-in-ireland-key-trends-pdf. Accessed 03/04/2020

  2. Aideen Sheehan CM, Brian O’Connell (2017) Oral health and wellbeing in older Irish adults. TILDA

  3. Hakeberg M, Berggren U, Carlsson SG (1992) Prevalence of dental anxiety in an adult population in a major urban area in Sweden. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 20(2):97–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1992.tb00686.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlsson V, Hakeberg M, Blomkvist K, Wide Boman U (2014) Orofacial esthetics and dental anxiety: associations with oral and psychological health. Acta Odontol Scand 72(8):707–713. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.898786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernson JM, Elfström ML, Hakeberg M (2013) Dental coping strategies, general anxiety, and depression among adult patients with dental anxiety but with different dental-attendance patterns. Eur J Oral Sci 121(3 Pt 2):270–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kutkut A, Bertoli E, Frazer R, Pinto-Sinai G, Fuentealba Hidalgo R, Studts J (2018) A systematic review of studies comparing conventional complete denture and implant retained overdenture. J Prosthodont Res 62(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cronin M, Meaney S, Jepson NJ, Allen PF (2009) A qualitative study of trends in patient preferences for the management of the partially dentate state. Gerodontology 26(2):137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sherwood G (1999) Meta-synthesis: merging qualitative studies to develop nursing knowledge. Int J Hum Caring 3(1):37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Programme CAS (2018) CASP checklist: 10 questions to help you make sense of a qualitative research. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists. Accessed 02/04/2020

  10. Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S, Smith JA (2004) The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Health Care 13(3):223–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nogueira TE, Dias DR, Rios LF, Silva ALM, Jordão LMR, Leles CR (2019) Perceptions and experiences of patients following treatment with single-implant mandibular overdentures: a qualitative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 30(1):79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kashbour WA, Rousseau N, Thomason JM, Ellis JS (2017) Patients' perceptions of implant placement surgery, the post-surgical healing and the transitional implant prostheses: a qualitative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 28(7):801–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abrahamsson KH, Wennstrom JL, Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I (2017) Altered expectations on dental implant therapy; views of patients referred for treatment of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 28(4):437–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang G, Gao X, Lo EC (2015) Public perceptions of dental implants: a qualitative study. J Dent 43(7):798–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Atieh MA, Morgaine KC, Duncan WJ (2016) A qualitative analysis on participants' perspectives on oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 27(3):383–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Exley C, Rousseau N, Donaldson C, Steele JG (2012) Beyond price: individuals' accounts of deciding to pay for private healthcare treatment in the UK. BMC Health Serv Res 12:53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rousseau N, Steele J, May C, Exley C (2014) ‘Your whole life is lived through your teeth’: biographical disruption and experiences of tooth loss and replacement. Sociol Health Illn 36 (3):462–476

  18. Grey EB, Harcourt D, O'Sullivan D, Buchanan H, Kilpatrick NM (2013) A qualitative study of patients’ motivations and expectations for dental implants. Br Dent J 214:E1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lantto A, Wardh I (2013) Dental implants in the functionally impaired: experience from the patients' perspective. Acta Odontol Scand 71(3–4):525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Osman RB, Morgaine KC, Duncan W, Swain MV, Ma S (2014) Patients’ perspectives on zirconia and titanium implants with a novel distribution supporting maxillary and mandibular overdentures: a qualitative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 25(5):587–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Narby B, Hallberg U, Bagewitz IC, Soderfeldt B (2012) Grounded theory on factors involved in the decision-making processes of patients treated with implant therapy. Int J Prosthodont 25(3):270–278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johannsen A, Westergren A, Johannsen G (2012) Dental implants from the patients perspective: transition from tooth loss, through amputation to implants - negative and positive trajectories. J Clin Periodontol 39(7):681–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ellis JS, Levine A, Bedos C, Mojon P, Rosberger Z, Feine J, Thomason JM (2011) Refusal of implant supported mandibular overdentures by elderly patients. Gerodontology 28(1):62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hyland R, Ellis J, Thomason M, El-Feky A, Moynihan P (2009) A qualitative study on patient perspectives of how conventional and implant-supported dentures affect eating. J Dent 37(9):718–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Trulsson U, Engstrand P, Berggren U, Nannmark U, Branemark PI (2002) Edentulousness and oral rehabilitation: experiences from the patients' perspective. Eur J Oral Sci 110(6):417–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Esposito M, Grusovin M, Shane Chew Y, Coulthard P, Worthington H (2009) One-stage versus two-stage implant placement. A Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials, vol 2

  28. Lalabonova CK (2015) Impact of dental anxiety on the decision to have implant treatment. Folia Med 57(2):116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Sinéad O′ Dwyer had the idea for the review article, performed the literature search and data analysis, and drafted the work. It was then critically revised by Dr. Richeal Ni Riordain.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinéad O’ Dwyer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’ Dwyer, S., Riordain, R.N. The patient experience of dental implant surgery: a literature review of pertinent qualitative studies. Ir J Med Sci 190, 835–842 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02327-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02327-y

Keywords

Navigation