Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acute multiple sclerosis lesion pathology does not predict subsequent clinical course—a biopsy study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Knowledge of the clinical outcome in tumefactive demyelination remains limited.

Aims

This study aims to characterise the natural history of biopsy-proven, pathogen-free, cerebral demyelination in an adult Irish population.

Methods

We identified all patients with biopsy-proven demyelination in a single neuropathology centre between 1999 and 2017. A baseline, and at least one follow-up MRI scan was available in each instance (mean of 3 scans per patient), together with both the presenting and most recent clinical details including disability level and disease-modifying drugs.

Results

In 21 patients, white matter biopsies showed the following: macrophages with myelin debris, myelin-axonal dissociation, reactive astrocytes and occasional lymphocytes. During a mean follow-up time of 8 years (± 4.4), 17 patients developed MS, confirmed both clinically and on MRI, using the 2010 McDonald criteria: 11 relapsing remitting (RR) MS, four secondary progressive and two primary progressive MS. Four patients had a monophasic illness with lesion regression, without clinical or radiological evidence of any further disease activity on follow-up. The patients with progressive MS had significantly higher levels of physical disability than either the RRMS or monophasic patients.

Conclusion

Uniform white matter subacute demyelination is associated with a diverse clinical course ranging from a monophasic illness to progressive MS, suggesting that extraneous factors distinct from the basic pathology significantly influence the clinical course in MS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Barkhof F, Brück W, Chen JT, Comi G, DeLuca G, de Stefano N, Erickson BJ, Evangelou N, Fazekas F, Geurts JJ, Lucchinetti C, Miller DH, Pelletier D, Popescu BF, Lassmann H, Attendees of the Correlation between Pathological MRI findings in MS workshop (2012) Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 11:349–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70003-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lucchinetti C, Brück W, Parisi J et al (2000) Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination. Ann Neurol 47:707–717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Annesley-Williams D, Farrell MA, Staunton H, Brett FM (2000) Acute demyelination, neuropathological diagnosis, and clinical evolution. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 59:477–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lucchinetti CF, Gavrilova RH, Metz I, Parisi JE, Scheithauer BW, Weigand S, Thomsen K, Mandrekar J, Altintas A, Erickson BJ, Konig F, Giannini C, Lassmann H, Linbo L, Pittock SJ, Bruck W (2008) Clinical and radiographic spectrum of pathologically confirmed tumefactive multiple sclerosis. Brain 131:1759–1775. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn098

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardy TA, Chataway J (2013) Tumefactive demyelination: an approach to diagnosis and management. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84:1047–1053. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-304498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pittock SJ, McClelland RL, Achenbach SJ, Konig F, Bitsch A, Brück W, Lassmann H, Parisi JE, Scheithauer BW, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG, Lucchinetti CF (2005) Clinical course, pathological correlations, and outcome of biopsy proved inflammatory demyelinating disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1693–1697. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2004.060624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Love S (2006) Demyelinating diseases. J Clin Pathol 59:1151–1159. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2005.031195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Young NP, Weinshenker BG, Lucchinetti CF (2008) Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: current understanding and controversies. Semin Neurol 28:84–94. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1019130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Valk P, De Groot CJA (2000) Staging of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions: pathology of the time frame of MS. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 26:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2990.2000.00217.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, Fujihara K, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Montalban X, O'Connor P, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Waubant E, Weinshenker B, Wolinsky JS (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurtzke JF (1955) A new scale for evaluating disability in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 5:580–580. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.5.8.580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Milic M, Rees JH (2017) Acute demyelination following radiotherapy for glioma: a cautionary tale. Pract Neurol 17:35–38. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2016-001432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA et al (2014) Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology 83:278–286. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Scolding N, Barnes D, Cader S, Chataway J, Chaudhuri A, Coles A, Giovannoni G, Miller D, Rashid W, Schmierer K, Shehu A, Silber E, Young C, Zajicek J (2015) Association of British Neurologists: revised (2015) guidelines for prescribing disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis. Pract Neurol 15:273–279. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2015-001139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Poser S, Luer W, Bruhn H et al (1992) Acute demyelinating disease. Classification and non-invasive diagnosis. Acta Neurol Scand 86:579–585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller DH, Weinshenker BG, Filippi M, Banwell BL, Cohen JA, Freedman MS, Galetta SL, Hutchinson M, Johnson RT, Kappos L, Kira J, Lublin FD, McFarland H, Montalban X, Panitch H, Richert JR, Reingold SC, Polman CH (2008) Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach. Mult Scler J 14:1157–1174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zarei M, Chandran S, Compston A, Hodges J (2003) Cognitive presentation of multiple sclerosis: evidence for a cortical variant. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:872–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Siri A, Carra-Dalliere C, Ayrignac X, Pelletier J, Audoin B, Pittion-Vouyovitch S, Debouverie M, Lionnet C, Viala F, Sablot D, Brassat D, Ouallet JC, Ruet A, Brochet B, Taillandier L, Bauchet L, Derache N, Defer G, Cabre P, de Seze J, Lebrun Frenay C, Cohen M, Labauge P (2015) Isolated tumefactive demyelinating lesions: diagnosis and long-term evolution of 16 patients in a multicentric study. J Neurol 262:1637–1645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7758-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wattamwar PR, Baheti NN, Kesavadas C, Nair M, Radhakrishnan A (2010) Evolution and long term outcome in patients presenting with large demyelinating lesions as their first clinical event. J Neurol Sci 297:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2010.06.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rush CA, MacLean HJ, Freedman MS (2015) Aggressive multiple sclerosis: proposed definition and treatment algorithm. Nat Rev Neurol 11:379–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pilz G, Harrer A, Wipfler P, Oppermann K, Sellner J, Fazekas F, Trinka E, Kraus J (2013) Tumefactive MS lesions under fingolimod: a case report and literature review. Neurology 81:1654–1658. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000435293.34351.11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Twyman C, Berger JR (2010) A giant MS plaque mimicking PML during natalizumab treatment. J Neurol Sci 291:110–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2010.01.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Enzinger C, Strasser-Fuchs S, Ropele S, Kapeller P, Kleinert R, Fazekas F (2005) Tumefactive demyelinating lesions: conventional and advanced magnetic resonance imaging. Mult Scler J 11:135–139. https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458505ms1145oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Butteriss DJ, Ismail A, Ellison DW, Birchall D (2003) Use of serial proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to differentiate low grade glioma from tumefactive plaque in a patient with multiple sclerosis. Br J Radiol 76:662–665. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/85069069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kearney H, Miller DH, Ciccarelli O (2015) Spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis - diagnostic, prognostic and clinical value. Nat Rev Neurol 11:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim DS, Na DG, Kim KH, Kim JH, Kim E, Yun BL, Chang KH (2009) Distinguishing tumefactive demyelinating lesions from glioma or central nervous system lymphoma: added value of unenhanced CT compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 251:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2512072071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Revesz T, Kidd D, Thompson AJ, Barnard RO, McDonald WI (1994) A comparison of the pathology of primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 117:759–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kremenchutzky M, Rice GPA, Baskerville J, Wingerchuk DM, Ebers GC (2006) The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study 9: observations on the progressive phase of the disease. Brain 129:584–594. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hartung HP, Grossman RI (2001) ADEM: distinct disease or part of the MS spectrum? Neurology 56:1257–1260. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.56.10.1257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dale RC (2005) Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis or multiple sclerosis: can the initial presentation help in establishing a correct diagnosis? Arch Dis Child 90:636–639. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2004.062935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Bogaert L (1950) Post-infectious encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis; the significance of perivenous encephalomyelitis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 9:219–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hart MN, Earle KM (1975) Haemorrhagic and perivenous encephalitis: a clinical-pathological review of 38 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38:585–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fisniku LK, Brex PA, Altmann DR, Miszkiel KA, Benton CE, Lanyon R, Thompson AJ, Miller DH (2008) Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis. Brain 131:808–817. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rovaris M, Judica E, Sastre-Garriga J, Rovira A, Pia Sormani M, Benedetti B, Korteweg T, de Stefano N, Khaleeli Z, Montalban X, Barkhof F, Miller DH, Polman C, Thompson AJ, Filippi M (2008) Large-scale, multicentre, quantitative MRI study of brain and cord damage in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J 14:455–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458507085129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lucchinetti CF, Popescu BFG, Bunyan RF, Moll NM, Roemer SF, Lassmann H, Brück W, Parisi JE, Scheithauer BW, Giannini C, Weigand SD, Mandrekar J, Ransohoff RM (2011) Inflammatory cortical demyelination in early multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 365:2188–2197. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1100648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ramagopalan SV, Dobson R, Meier UC, Giovannoni G (2010) Multiple sclerosis: risk factors, prodromes, and potential causal pathways. Lancet Neurol 9:727–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugh Kearney.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kearney, H., Price, T., Cryan, J. et al. Acute multiple sclerosis lesion pathology does not predict subsequent clinical course—a biopsy study. Ir J Med Sci 188, 1427–1434 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-01983-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-01983-z

Keywords

Navigation