Skip to main content
Log in

Effective communication enhances the patients’ endoscopy experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Undergoing an endoscopy is a stressful experience for patients.

Aims

To audit the endoscopy pathway to improve patient satisfaction.

Methods

A prospective survey of endoscopy patients to identify system improvements that were then implemented.

Results

The survey was performed before (N = 71) and after (N = 60) process improvements identified by the initial survey. Information provision and staff communication skills were identified for optimisation. Patient anxiety at home was significantly reduced (median 2 vs. 1, p < 0.01). Education of endoscopy staff significantly improved the quality of information provided before and after the procedure with regard to sedation (median 4 vs. 5, p < 0.01), discomfort (median 4 vs. 5, p < 0.01), complications (28 vs. 82 %, p < 0.01), findings (89 vs. 100 %, p < 0.01) and follow-up (73 vs. 90 %, p = 0.015). Gloucester Comfort Scores during endoscopy improved (median 1 vs. 0, p < 0.01) without increasing sedation levels. Patient feelings of invasion/trauma significantly decreased. Overall 95 % of patients were satisfied.

Conclusion

Structured information leaflets and improved staff communication skills reduce anxiety and enhance patients’ experiences. They are now standard operating procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones MP, Ebert CC, Sloan T et al (2004) Patient anxiety and elective gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 38(1):35–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baudet JS, Aguirre-Jaime A (2012) The sedation increases the acceptance of repeat colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24(7):775–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hiyama T, Tanaka S, Yoshihara M et al (2006) Medical malpractice litigation related to gastrointestinal endoscopy in Japan: a two decade review of civil court cases. World J Gastroenterol 12(42):6857–6860

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kopacova M, Bures J (2012) Informed consent for digestive endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 4(6):227–230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bal B, Crowell M, Kohli D et al (2012) What factors are associated with the difficult to sedate endoscopy patient? Dig Dis Sci 57(10):2527–2534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Azmi N, Chan W, Goh K (2012) Evaluation of patient satisfaction of an outpatient gastroscopy service in an Asian tertiary care hospital. BMC Gastroenterol 12:96–106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hazewinkel Y, Dekker E (2011) Colonoscopy: basic principles and novel techniques. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:554–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee J, Anhn M, Kim E et al (2012) The effect of preparatory education program on discomfort and retching of examinees during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Korean J Fam Med 33:219–228

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Leung FW (2008) Methods of reducing discomfort during colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 53(6):1462–1467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearson S, Maddern G, Hewett P (2005) Interacting effects of preoperative information and patient choice in adaptation to colonoscopy. DCR 48:2047–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luck A, Pearson S, Maddern G, Hewett P (1999) Effects of video information of precolonoscopy anxiety and knowledge: a randomised trial. Lancet 352:2032–2035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thanvi BR, Munshi SK, Vijayakumar N et al (2003) Acceptability of oesophagogastroduodenoscopy without intravenous sedation: patients’ versus endoscopist’s perception with special reference to older patients. Postgrad Med J 79(937):650–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. P. Toomey.

Appendices

Appendix 1

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d

Appendix 2

figure e
figure f

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toomey, D.P., Hackett-Brennan, M., Corrigan, G. et al. Effective communication enhances the patients’ endoscopy experience. Ir J Med Sci 185, 203–214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1270-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1270-0

Keywords

Navigation