Abstract
Although boundaries are considered important semi-natural environments and refugia for biodiversity in areas dominated by intensive agriculture, the ways local communities manage species diversity has received little attention. Hence, this study has characterized major boundary types and the associated woody species diversity and socioeconomic role of boundary agroforestry in northwestern Ethiopia. One hundred and twenty households were randomly selected for household surveys and vegetation inventories were carried out in 80 purposively selected boundary agroforestry sites. Variation in Simpson, Shannon–Wiener and Evenness indices among boundary types was analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Four different boundary types were identified, based on place and purpose of establishment. Altogether, 58 woody species representing 33 families were recorded. The mean number of woody species was 22, while the mean Simpson, Shannon–Wiener and Evenness indices for woody species were 0.61, 2.33, and 0.67, respectively. Survey results showed that woody species diversity was significantly higher in homestead boundaries. Lower diversity was calculated for in-farm boundaries. Similarity in composition of woody species among boundary types ranged between 0.33 and 0.38. Eucalyptus globulus ranked first in terms of the Importance Value Index, while Justicia schimperiana was the most woody woody species. Private production of seedlings was the main source of planting material for establishment of boundaries. Tending, pruning, pollarding, coppicing, and firming were the most important management practices. Seventeen use types were recorded, each represented by 6–56 species. Boundary agroforestry constitutes 9.40% of the annual income for the local community. Generally, the study showed that boundaries accommodated high species diversity and are important for household livelihood improvement, beautification of landscapes and biodiversity conservation in arable landscapes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aavik T, Liira J (2010) Quantifying the effect of organic farming, field boundary type and landscape structure on the vegetation of field boundaries. Agric Ecosyst Environ 135(3):178–186
Abere F, Belete Y, Kefalew A, Soromessa T (2017) Carbon stock of banja forest in banja district, amhara region, ethiopia: an implication for climate change mitigation. MSc Thesis Addis Ababa University
Abiem I, Ifeduba AM, Ali AD, Elisha EB (2017) Plant diversity in natural and cultivated hedgerows in the laminga area of jos east, North Central Nigeria. J Nat Sci Res ISSN 2224–3186 (Paper), ISSN 2225-0921 (Online), 7(2)
Agger P, Brandt J (1988) Dynamics of small biotopes in Danish agricultural landscapes. Lands Ecol 1:227–240
Assefa B, Glatzel G, Buchmann C (2010) Ethnomedicinal uses of Hagenia abyssinica (Bruce) JF Gmel among rural communities of Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 6(1):1–10
Bekele A (2007) Useful trees and Shrubs of Ethiopia: identification, propagation and management in 17 agroecological zones. RELMA in ICRAF Project, World Agroforestry Centre – Eastern Africa Region Programme, p 552. http://apps.worldagroforestry.org/usefultrees/frontpages/Useful_Trees_Ethiopia.pdf
Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18(4):182–188
Bii C, Korir KR, Rugutt J, Mutai C (2010) The potential use of Prunus africana for the control, treatment and management of common fungal and bacterial infections. J Med Plants Res 4(11):995–998. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR09.227
BWAD (2012) Socio-economic survey of Banja Woreda. Unpublished data from the Banja Woreda Agricultural Development Office
Chojnacky DC, Milton M (2008) Measuring carbon in shrubs. In: Field measurements of forest carbon monitoring: a landscape-scale approach. Springer, pp 45–72
Ermias D (2011) Natural Database for Africa (NDA) On CD-ROM Version 2.0.
Edwards S, Tadese M, Hedberg I (1995) Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea vol. 2, Part 2: canellaceae to euphorbiaceae, online database, AAU. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=ET9700291
Endale Y, Derero A, Argaw M, Muthuri C (2017) Farmland tree species diversity and spatial distribution pattern in semi-arid East Shewa, Ethiopia. For Trees Livelihoods 26(3):199–214
Fichtl R, Adi A (1994) Honeybee flora of Ethiopia. Margraf Verlag, Weikersheim
Gazette B (2007) Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Extra-ordinary Issue of 28-8-2007, amended by Notifications S.R.O 29-Law/2002, S.R.O 234-Law/2002 and S.R.O 88-Law/2003
Gebreselassie Y, Amdemariam T, Haile M, Yamoah C (2009) Lessons from upstream soil conservation measures to mitigate soil erosion and its impact on upstream and downstream users of the Nile River, Banja Shikudad District, Ethiopia. Int Water Manag Inst 170–183
Goodman LA (1961) Snowball sampling. Ann Math Stat 32(1):148–170
Harvey CA, Tucker N, Estrada A (2004) Live fences, isolated trees and windbreaks: tools for conserving biodiversity in fragmented tropical landscapes? In: Schroth GA, Fonseca B, Harvey CA, Gascon C, Vasconcelos HL, Izac AMN (eds) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp 261–289
Hitinayake HMGSB, Priyadarshana GVU, Waidyarathna DMK (2018) Living fences, a widespread agroforestry practice in Sri Lanka: two cases from dry and intermediate zones. Int J Environ Agric Biotech 3(2):701–709. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/3.2.52
Jamnadass R, Place F, Torquebiau E, Malézieux E, Iiyama M, Sileshi GW, Kehlenbeck K, Masters E, McMullin S, Weber JC, Dawson IK (2013) Agroforestry, food and nutritional security. ICRAF Working Paper Nairobi, World Agroforestry Centre. No. 170. http://apps.worldagroforestry.org/downloads/Publications/PDFS/WP13054.pdf
Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. Wiley, New York, p 319
Le Coeur D, Baudry J, Burel F, Thenail C (2002) Why and how we should study field boundary biodiversity in an agrarian landscape context. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89(1):23–40
Manhoudt AGE, de Snoo GR (2003) A quantitative survey of semi-natural habitats on Dutch arable farms. Agric Ecosysts Environ 97:235–240
Maroyi A (2017) Ethnopharmacological uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacological properties of Croton macrostachyus Hochst. Ex Delile: a comprehensive review. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2017:17
Martin FW, Sherman S (1992) Agroforestry Principles. ECHO Technical Note, North Fort Myers, FL (EUA). http://apps.worldagroforestry.org/treesandmarkets/inaforesta/documents/agrof_cons_biodiv/Agroforestry_principles.pdf
Nyirenda C (2011) Project design document for the Trees of Hope Plan Vivo Project. Trees of Hope Project, Lilongwe, Malawi. Clinton Development Initiative. http://cotap.org/wp-content/uploads/_proj_pdd/TreesofHope_CDI_PDD_Aug_2011.pdf
Postma-Blaauw MB, De Goede RGM, Bloem J, Faber JH, Brussaard L (2012) Agricultural intensification and de-intensification differentially affect taxonomic diversity of predatory mites, earthworms, nematodes and bacteria. Appl Soil Ecol 57:39–49
Pulido-Santacruz P, Renjifo LM (2011) Live fences as tools for biodiversity conservation: a study case with birds and plants. Agrofor Syst 81(1):15–30
Schmelzer GH, Gurib-Fakim A (2008) Plant resources of tropical africa 11(1) Medicinal plants 1. PROTA Foundation, Wageningen, Netherlands, p 790
Shewo BS, Girma B (2017) Review on nutritional and medicinal values of Vernonia amygdalina and its uses in human and veterinary medicines. Glob Vet 19(3):562–568
Smart SM, Bunce RG, Firbank LG, Coward P (2002) Do field boundaries act as refugia for grassland plant species diversity in intensively managed agricultural landscapes in Britain? Agric Ecosyst Environ 91(1–3):73–87
Sullivan CA, Finn JA, Gormally MJ, Skeffington MS (2013) Field boundary habitats and their contribution to the area of semi-natural habitats on lowland farms in east Galway western Ireland. Biology and environment: proceedings of the royal irish academy. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, pp 187–199
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to the Agricultural Development and Natural Resources Conservation Offices of Banja District; and Gashuna Akayta and Chewusa Kebeles’ natural resource conservation experts for their cooperation during the reconnaissance survey and continuous assistance during all the period of data collection. Our appreciation also goes to all key informants and households for willingness to share their experiences. Finally, we are thankful to Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources for funding the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Tables
9 and
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kassa, A.W., Nigussie, Z.A. Management and Woody Species Diversity in Boundary Agroforestry of Banja District, Northwestern Ethiopia. Small-scale Forestry 21, 393–415 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-022-09503-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-022-09503-1