Abstract
A number of developing countries have implemented forest tenure reforms, including community forestry, to achieve social justice. While many studies have assessed the impact of community forestry, few have examined how interventions of local forest institutions influence the conditions of forests and forest dwellers. This study addresses this gap by examining the impacts of forest management policies implemented by the Federation of Vista Hills, Kalongkong and Kakilingan Upland Farmers, Inc. (Federation) in Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines. Specifically, the study aimed to: (1) examine these interventions in relation to livelihood, income, forest condition, and equity (LIFE) indicators; (2) measure the impacts of these interventions on LIFE indicators; (3) analyze relations between the interventions and LIFE indicators; and (4) identify policy implications to promote sustainable and equitable benefits from local forest governance. Data were compiled from a household-level survey, interviews, satellite image analysis, and a secondary data review. Correlation analysis was performed on the survey results. The Federation’s interventions were found to have improved forest condition and equity. However, they had limited impact on livelihoods and no significant effect on household incomes. Hence, the Federation needs to undertake household-level initiatives to improve the financial capital of forest-dependent populations. Moreover, policy-makers should devolve the issuance of resource use permits to local Department of Environment and Natural Resources offices. Central forest policies, particularly those on forest resource utilization, require adaptation to local situations as incentives for forest-dependent populations to sustainably manage forest resources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya KP (2005) Private, collective, and centralized institutional arrangements for managing forest “commons” in Nepal. Mountain Res Dev 25:269–277
Agrawal A (2001) Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev 29(10):1649–1672
Agrawal A, Gupta K (2005) Decentralization and participation: the governance of common pool resources in Nepal’s Terai. World Dev 33(7):1101–1114
Agrawal A, Konomen M, Perrin N (2009) The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. Social development working papers. The World Bank, Paper No. 118/June
Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2001) Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Polit Soc 29(4):485–514
Agrawal A, Perrin N (2008) Climate adaptation, local institutions, and rural livelihoods. International Forestry Resources and Institutions Working paper # W08I–6
Agrawal A, Yadama GN (1997) How do local institutions mediate market and population pressures on resources? Forest Panchayats in Kumaon, India. Dev Change 28:435–465
Balooni K, Pulhin JM, Inoue M (2008) The effectiveness of decentralization reforms in the Philippines’ forestry sector. Geoforum 39:2122–2131
Barry D, Larson AM, Colfer CJP (2010) Forest tenure reform: an orphan with only uncles. In: Larson AM, Barry D, Dahal GR, Colfer CJP (eds) Forest for people: community rights and forest tenure reform. Earthscan, London, pp 19–40
Brockhaus M, Djoudi H, Kambire H (2012) Multi-level governance and adaptive capacity in West Africa. Int J Commons 6(2):200–232
Dahal GR, Capistrano D (2006) Forest governance and institutional structure: an ignored dimension of community-based forest management in the Philippines. Int For Rev 8(4):377–394
Dugan P, Pulhin M (2007) Forest harvesting in community- based forest management in the Philippines: Simple tools versus complex procedures. In: Oberndorf R, Durst PB, Mahanty S, Burslem K and Suzuki R (Eds.) A cut for the poor: proceedings of the international conference on managing forests for poverty reduction: capturing opportunities in forest harvesting and wood processing for the benefit of the poor. Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam, 3–6 October 2006. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/ag131e/ag131e00.htm. Accessed 26 Dec 2014
Department of Environment and Natural Resources—International Tropical Timber Organization (DENR-ITTO) (2001) Final report: flora and fauna resources inventory and biodiversity assessment. DENR-ITTO. Nueva Vizcaya Province: Philippines. http://www.itto.int/outputs/id=3314. Accessed 26 Dec 2014
Fisher RJ, Durst PB, Enters T, Victor M (2000) Overview of themes and issues in devolution and decentralization of forest management in Asia and the Pacific. In: Enters T, Durst PB, Victor M (eds) Decentralization and devolution of forest management in Asia and the Pacific. RECOFTC Report 18 and RAP Publication 2000/1. Bangkok, Thailand, pp 6–10. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/x6898e/x6898e00.htm. Accessed 26 Dec 2014
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2013) Improving governance of forest tenure. Governance of tenure technical guide 2. Rome: Italy. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3249e.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2016
Forest Management Bureau (2014) Philippines forestry statistics. Quezon City, Philippines
German LA, Keeler A (2010) “Hybrid institutions”: applications of common property theory beyond discrete regimes. Int J Commons 4(1):71–596
Guiang ES, Borlagdan SB, Pulhin JM (2001) Community-based forest management in the Philippines: a preliminary assessment. Institute of Philippine Culture, Ateneo de Manila University, Manila
Hobley M, Shah K (1996) What makes a local organization robust? Evidence from India and Nepal. Natural resource perspective 11. Overseas Dev Lond. http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/2969.pdf. Accessed 23 Dec 2014
Inoue M (2011) Prototype design guidelines for ‘collaborative governance’ of natural resource. In: Presented at 13th Biennial conference of the international association for the study of the commons, Hyderabad, India, January 12. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/7321/146.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 26 Dec 2014
Islam KK, Kimihiko H, Tani M, Krott M, Sato N (2014) Actors’ power, livelihood assets and participatory forestry in Bangladesh: evidence from the Sal forests area. Open J For 4:1–9
Lai CK, Catacutan D, Mercado AR Jr (2000) Decentralizing natural resource management: emerging lessons from ICRAF collaboration in Southeast Asia. In: Enters T, Durst PB, Victor M (eds) Decentralization and devolution of forest management in Asia and the Pacific. RECOFTC report no. 18 and RAP Publication 2000/1. Bangkok, Thailand, pp 103–116. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/x6898e/x6898e00.htm. Accessed 26 Dec 2014
Larson AM, Barry D, Dahal GR (2010) Tenure change in the global south. In: Larson AM, Barry D, Dahal GR, Colfer CJP (eds) Forest for people: community rights and forest tenure reform. Earthscan, London, pp 3–18
Larson AM, Dahal GR (2012) Forest tenure reform: new resource rights for forest-based communities? Conserv Soc 10(2):77–90
Larson AM, Pulhin JM (2012) Enhancing forest tenure reforms through more responsive regulations. Conserv Soc 10(2):103–113
Lemos MC, Agrawal A (2006) Environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:297–325
Mwangi E, Wardell A (2012) Multi-level governance of forest resources. Int J Commons 6(2):79–103
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pacheco P, Paudel NS (2010) Communities and forest markets: assessing the benefits from divers forms of engagement. In: Larson AM, Barry D, Dahal GR, Colfer CJP (eds) Forest for people: community rights and forest tenure reform. Earthscan, London, pp 160–179
Paudel NS, Monterroso I, Cronkleton P (2012) Secondary level organization and the democratization of forest governance: case studies from Nepal and Guatemala. Conserv Soc 10(2):124–135
Pulhin JM, Inoue M (2008) Devolution process in the management of the Philippine forest. Int J Soc For 1(1):1–26
Pulhin JM, Inoue M, Enters T (2007) Three decades of community-based forest management in the Philippines: emerging lessons for sustainable and equitable forest management. Int For Rev 19(4):865–883
Pulhin JM, Dizon JT, Cruz RVO, Gevaña DT, Dahal GR (2008) Tenure reform on Philippine forest lands: assessment of socio-economic and environmental impacts. College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines Los Baños, College, Laguna, Philippines
Ribot JC, Agrawal A, Larson AM (2006) Recentralizing while decentralizing: how national government re-appropriates forest resource. World Dev 34(11):1864–1886
Schlager E, Ostrom E (1992) Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ 68(3):249–262
Uphoff N (1992) Local institutions and participation for sustainable development. Gatekeeper Series 31, International Institute for Environment and Development, London
Yami M, Vogl C, Hauser M (2009) Comparing the effectiveness of informal and formal institutions in common pool resources management in Sub-Sahara Africa. Conserv Soc 7(3):153–164
Westoby J (1987) The purpose of forest: follies of development. Blackwell, Oxford
Acknowledgments
We express our sincere gratitude to our respondents, namely members of the Federation of Vista Hills, Kalongkong, and Kakilingan Upland Farmers Inc., staff of the Nueva Vizcaya Provincial Environment and Natural Resource Office and the Community Environment and Natural Resource Office Bayombong, and to Dr. Serlie Jamias, Dr. Sheila Simat, Dr. Dixon Gevaña, Joseph Paquit, Liezl Grefalda and Bea Parungo for their professional advices.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hashiguchi, H., Pulhin, J.M., Dizon, J.T. et al. Impacts of Community-Based Forest Management Policies Implemented by a Local Forest Institution: A Case Study from Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines. Small-scale Forestry 15, 335–355 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-016-9324-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-016-9324-3