Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Forests, Timber and Rural Livelihoods: Implications for Social Safeguards in the Ghana-EU Voluntary Partnership Agreement

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on detailed income data of 478 rural households, the nexus between forest, trees and rural livelihoods in Ghana is investigated and applied to assess implications of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) between the EU and Ghana on illegal logging. It is found that, after crops, environmental income (cash and subsistence) is the most important contributor to households’ total yearly net income. Fuelwood, bushmeat and wild foods from plants are the most important environmental products. The survey shows meagre income from timber and poles, but is likely to underreport this source due to its illegal nature. Yet, when the likely incomes from illegal timber harvesting as estimated by other studies are compared with this study’s comprehensive livelihood data, it is obvious that an imagined full implementation of the VPA would have limited impact on the majority of rural households. Rather than focusing on social safeguards to mitigate any perceived or real negative impacts in the short-term, policy makers in Ghana—and the donors supporting them—should focus on other aspects of the VPA, notably forest policy reforms and in particular reforms that devolve management rights and benefits to trees on farm and fallow land to those occupying and cultivating the land. Such efforts would provide incentive for timber production and thus enhance rural livelihoods, while combatting illegal logging, deforestation and forest degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In designated forest reserves, the so-called Globally Significant Biodiversity Areas (GSBAs), all harvest and collection, even of NTFPs, is strictly prohibited.

  2. The survey was undertaken prior to the outbreak of Ebola in West Africa in 2013 which—at least temporarily—may have reduced consumption of bush meat.

  3. Shocks include crop loss, serious illness in household, death of a productive household member, livestock loss or death (due to theft, disease or drought), asset loss (due to fire, theft or flooding) and organisation of an expensive social event (e.g. funeral or wedding). Illness, death and crop failure were the most common shocks.

  4. See also Hansen (2011) on payments to farmers from chainsaw operators.

  5. Additional jobs are created in domestic timber markets, estimated at 27,000 in re-sawing and 2000 in retailing.

  6. An effort was made in the survey to inform households of the purpose of the investigation and that the research was not associated with law enforcement.

References

  • Acheampong E (2003) Sustainable livelihoods of forest fringe communities: Forests, trees and household livelihood strategies in Southern Ghana. PhD thesis, University of Hull, UK

  • Amanor K (1996) Managing trees in the farming system. The perspectives of farmers. Forest Department, Kumasi

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelsen A, Wunder S (2003) Exploring the forest-poverty link: key concepts, issues and research implications. CIFOR Bogor, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelsen A, Larsen HO, Lund JF, Smith-Hall C, Wunder S (2011) Measuring livelihoods and environmental dependence: Methods for research and fieldwork. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, Belcher B, Hogarth NJ, Bauch S, Borner J, Smith-Hall C, Wunder S (2014) Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Dev 64(1):S12–S28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appiah MR, Blay D, Damnyag L, Dwomoh FK, Pappinen A, Luukkanen O (2007) Dependence on forest resources and tropical deforestation in Ghana. Environ Dev Sustain 11(3):471–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arts B, Wiersum FK (2010) Illegal or incompatible? Managing the consequences of timber legality standards on local livelihoods. In: Timber legality, local livelihoods and social safeguards: implications of FLEGT/VPA in Ghana. Workshop Proceedings 8. Tropenbos International Ghana, pp. 6–21

  • Babulo B, Muys B, Nega F, Tollens E, Nyssen J, Dekkers J, Mathijs E (2009) The economic contribution of forest resources to rural livelihoods in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. For Policy Econ 11(2):109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boni S (2005) Clearing the Ghanaian forest: theories and practices of acquisition, transfer and utilisation of farming titles in the Sefwi-Akan area. Institute of African Studies, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana

  • Cavendish W (2000) Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationships of rural households. Evidence from Zimbabwe. World Dev 28(11):1979–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhatre A, Lakhanpul S, Larson AM, Nelson F, Ojha H, Rao J (2012) Social safeguards and co-benefits of REDD+: a review of the adjacent possible. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4(6):654–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derkyi M, Ros-Tonen MAF, Kyereh B, Dietz T (2013) Emerging forest regimes and livelihoods in the Tano Offin forest reserve, Ghana: implications for social safeguards. For Policy Econ 32(2013):49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2000). FRA 2000. On definitions of forest and forest change. Forest Resources Assessment WP 33, Rome, 2 Nov 2000

  • Fisher M (2004) Household welfare and forest dependence in Southern Malawi. Environ Dev Econ 9(2):135–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GoG-EU (2009) Voluntary partnership agreement between the European community and the Republic of Ghana on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products into the Community. Official Journal of the European Union L 70/3

  • Hall JB, Swaine MD (1981) Distribution and ecology of vascular plants in the tropical rain forest. Forest vegetation in Ghana. Springer, The Hague

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Barbier E (2009) Chapter 9: Valuing ecosystem services. In: Hanley N, Barbier E (eds) Pricing nature: cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 205–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen CP (2011) Forest law compliance and enforcement. The case of on-farm timber extraction in Ghana. J Environ Manage 92(3):575–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen CP, Lund JF (2011) The political economy of timber taxation: the case of Ghana. For Policy Econ 13(8):630–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen CP, Treue T (2008) Assessing illegal logging in Ghana. Int For Rev 10(4):573–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen CP, Damnyag L, Obiri BD, Carlsen K (2012) Revisiting illegal logging and the size of the domestic timber market: the case of Ghana. Int For Rev 14(1):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne WD, Abu-Juam M (1995) Forest protection in Ghana with particular reference to vegetation and plant species. World Conservation Union (IUCN), Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • “Illegal or Incompatible?” Project team (2010) Social safeguards in the Ghana-EU Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA). Triggering improved forest governance or an afterthought? Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen University and Research Centre

  • Jagger P, Luckert MK, Banana A, Bahati J (2012) Asking questions to understand rural livelihoods: comparing disaggregated vs. aggregated approaches to household livelihood questionnaires. World Dev 40(9):1810–1823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamanga P, Vedeld P, Sjaastad E (2009) Forest incomes and rural livelihoods in Chiradzulu District, Malawi. Ecolog Econ 68(3):613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korwin S, Ribet U, Rey D (2014) Analyzing synergies and overlaps in safeguard approaches. ETFRN News 55:60–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamo G, Sjaastad E, Vedeld P (2007) Economic dependence on forest resources. A case from Dendi District, Ethiopia. For Policy Econ 9(8):916–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marfo E (2010) Chainsaw milling in Ghana. Context, drivers and impacts. Tropenbos International, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Marfo E, Acheampong E (2011) Estimating the number of jobs created by chainsaw activities in Ghana. Ghana J For 27:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Marfo E, Acheampong E, Opuni-Frimpong E (2012) Fractured tenure, unaccountable authority, and benefit capture: constraints to improving community benefits under climate change mitigation schemes in Ghana. Conserv Soc 10(2):161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obiri BD, Damnyag L (2011) Socio-economic contribution of illegal chainsaw milling to the Ghanaian rural economy. Ghana J For 27:50–67

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) What are equivalence scales? http://www.oecd.org/eco/growth/OECD-Note-EquivalenceScales.pdf. Accessed 03 Aug 2011

  • PEN (2007) PEN Technical guidelines version 4. http://www.cifor.org/pen/research-tools/the-pen-technical-guidelines.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2012

  • PEN (2008) Prototype questionnaire, version 4.4. http://www.cifor.org/pen/research-tools/the-pen-prototype-questionnaire.html. Accessed 25 Aug 2012

  • Pouliot M, Treue T (2013) Rural people’s reliance on forests and the non-forest environment in West Africa: evidence from Ghana and Burkina Faso. World Dev 43:180–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramcilovic-Souminen S, Gritten D, Saastamoinen O (2010) Concept of livelihood in the FLEGT voluntary partnership agreement and the expected impacts on the livelihood of forest communities in Ghana. Int For Rev 12(4):361–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Ros-Tonen MAF, Insaidoo TFG, Acheampong E (2013) Promising start, bleak outlook: the role of Ghana’s modified taungya system as a social safeguard in timber legality processes. For Policy Econ 32(2013):57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton S, Delang CO, Angelsen A (2011) From subsistence to safety nets and cash income: exploring the diverse values of non-timber forest products for livelihioods and poverty alleviation. In: Delang CO, Angelsen A, Shackleton S (eds) Non-timber forest products in the global context. Tropical forestry, vol 7. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 55–81

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad E, Angelsen A, Vedeld P, Bojö J (2005) What is environmental income? Ecol Econ 55:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tieguhong JC, Nkamgnia EM (2012) Household dependence on forests around Lobeke National Park. Cameroon Int For Rev 14(2):196–212

    Google Scholar 

  • UNStats (2010) Purchasing power parities (PPP) conversion factor, local currency unit to international dollar. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/mdg/Metadata.aspx?IndicatorId=0&SeriesId=699. Accessed 26 May 2011

  • Vedeld P, Angelsen A, Bojö J, Sjaastad E, Berg GK (2007) Forest environmental income and the rural poor. For Policy Econ 9(7):869–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visseren-Hamakers IJ, McDermott C, Vijge MJ, Cashore B (2012) Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: current debates on the breadth of REDD+. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4(6):646–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner MR, Cobbinah JR (1993) Deforestation and sustainability in Ghana: the role of tropical forests. Ghana J For 91:36–39

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012) Climate change knowledge portal. http://sdwebx.worldbank.org/climateportal/index.cfm?page=country_historical_climate&ThisRegion=Africa&ThisCCode=GHA. Accessed 29 Aug 2012

  • Wunder S, Borner J, Shively G, Wyman M (2014) Safety nets, gap filling and forests: a global-comparative perspective. World Dev 64:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the households who participated in the survey and the enumerators employed at the Forestry Research Institute of Ghana (FORIG) who carried out the fieldwork. We acknowledge the excellent comments and suggestions from two anonymous reviewers and from the editor, Steve Harrison. The work was supported by the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), the Danish International Development Assistance (Danida), the University of Copenhagen and FORIG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian P. Hansen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hansen, C.P., Pouliot, M., Marfo, E. et al. Forests, Timber and Rural Livelihoods: Implications for Social Safeguards in the Ghana-EU Voluntary Partnership Agreement. Small-scale Forestry 14, 401–422 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-015-9295-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-015-9295-9

Keywords

Navigation