Skip to main content
Log in

From the Aesthetic Theme to the Aesthetic Myth: a Reflection on the Trinitarian God’s Connection to Nature and the Problem of Evil

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article begins with a reflection on the ‘conversation between mythologies’ present in the debate between C. Robert Mesle and John Hick on the role of Irenaean theodicy and process theology to tackle convincingly the problem of evil in the contemporary and future context of scientific advancement. I argue that, although these two authors consider their mythological perspectives to be widely different, there is a possibility of advancing toward conciliating the two views. I call the resulting myth the ‘aesthetic myth,’ which focuses on the Trinitarian God, seen concomitantly as omnipotent and limited. Inspired also by the thought of St. Francis of Assisi and St. Maximus the Confessor, this myth asserts nature’s free initiative as co-creator with the Logos and the natural evil emerging from this initiative. Moral evil comes from natural evil; thus, ‘original sin’ shows no unsurpassable gap between God and humanity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. M. (1999). Horrendous evils and the goodness of God. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultmann, R. (1989). New Testament and mythology and other basic writings. Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, W. (1990). Tragic vision and divine compassion: A contemporary theodicy. Westminster John Knox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, J. (1991). Response to Mesle. In C. Robert Mesle (Ed.), John Hick’s Theodicy: A process humanist critique (with a response by John Hick) (pp. 115–134). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, J. (2010 (1966)). Evil and the God of love. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Hoye, W. J. (2013). The emergence of eternal life. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, F. (2013). A system of moral philosophy (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. S. (1957). The problem of pain. Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesle, C. R. (1986). The problem of genuine evil: A critique of John Hick’s Theodicy. The Journal of Religion, 66(4), 412–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesle, C. R. (1991). John Hick’s Theodicy: A process humanist critique (with a response by John Hick). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyendorff, J. (1983). Byzantine theology: Historical trends and doctrinal themes. Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. G. (2001). Language, thought, and other biological categories: New foundations for realism. 4th edition (1984). The MIT Press.

  • Nasou, J. P. (2012). Meditations on the Holy Scriptures for Orthodox Christians. Trafford Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, A. (2003). Complexity, emergence, and divine creativity. In N. Henrik Gregersen (Ed.), From complexity to life: On the emergence of life and meaning, 187–205. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. (1974). The nature of necessity. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santurri, E. N. (1982). Theodicy and social policy in Malthus’ thought. Journal of the History of Ideas, 43(2), 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell, R. D. (1988). St. Francis of Assisi and nature: Tradition and innovation in Western Christian attitudes toward the environment. Oxford University Press.

  • St. Maximus the Confessor. (2010). Questions and doubts. Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoeber, M. (1992). Evil and the mystics’ God: Towards a mystical theodicy. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeber, M. (2005). Reclaiming theodicy: Reflections on suffering, compassion and spiritual transformation. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R. (1998). Providence and the problem of evil. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R. (2004). The existence of God. Second Edition (1979). Clarendon Press.

  • Tallon, P. (2012). The poetics of evil: Toward an aesthetic theodicy. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tollefsen, T. T. (2008). The Christocentric cosmology of St Maximus the Confessor. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ***, The Bible, New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (NRSVCE). https://www.biblegateway.com. Accessed 17 Nov 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ionut Untea.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Untea, I. From the Aesthetic Theme to the Aesthetic Myth: a Reflection on the Trinitarian God’s Connection to Nature and the Problem of Evil. SOPHIA 61, 839–868 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-021-00868-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-021-00868-y

Keywords

Navigation