Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Duplex Post-processing Treatment on the Surface Texture Characteristics of AlSi10Mg Alloy Processed by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Technique

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of duplex post-processing treatment on the surface characteristics of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy is studied. Duplex treatment consists of post-heat treatment and shot-peening processes, resulting in enhanced surface finish and hardness compared to as-printed samples. The multi-scale roughness parameters were determined, such as amplitude and spatial parameters and statistical functions. Shot peening decreased the amplitude parameter values by ~ 50% more than as-printed samples. The spatial parameter analysis indicated that the SP process transformed the surface more uniformly than the as-printed samples. The surface under the SP with peening pressure (6 bar) condition has non-uniformity compared with the surface under peening pressure with 3 bar condition due to higher peening pressure resulting in strong directional textures. The material ratio curves revealed uniform surface morphology development due to shot peening and fewer surface irregularities than the as-printed samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared as the data also form part of an ongoing study.

References

  1. I. Gibson, D.W. Rosen, B. Stucker, and M. Khorasani, Additive Manufacturing Technologies (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2021).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. M.K. Thompson, G. Moroni, T. Vaneker, G. Fadel, R.I. Campbell, I. Gibson, A. Bernard, J. Schulz, P. Graf, B. Ahuja, and F. Martina, CIRP Ann. 65, 737 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.M. Avedesian, and H. Baker, ASM Specialty Handbook: Magnesium and Magnesium Alloys (ASM international, 1999).

  4. S. Anand Kumar, A. Sudarshan Reddy, S. Mathias, A. Shrivastava, and P. Raghupatruni, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. L: J. Mater.: Des. Appl. (2021).

  5. A. Townsend, N. Senin, L. Blunt, R.K. Leach, and J.S. Taylor, Precis. Eng. 46, 34 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N.N. Kumbhar, and A.V. Mulay, J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 99, 481 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Bagherifard, R. Ghelichi, and M. Guagliano, Appl. Surf. Sci. 259, 186 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Avanzini, D. Battini, M. Gelfi, L. Girelli, C. Petrogalli, A. Pola, and M. Tocci, Procedia Struct. Integr. 18, 119 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N.E. Uzan, S. Ramati, R. Shneck, N. Frage, and O. Yeheskel, Addit. Manuf. 21, 458 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Sugavaneswaran, A.V. Jebaraj, M.D.B. Kumar, K. Lokesh, and A.J. Rajan, Surf. Interfaces 12, 31 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A.H. Maamoun, M.A. Elbestawi, and S.C. Veldhuis, J. Manuf. Mater. Proces. 2, 40 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D.B. Hann, J. Iammi, and J. Folkes, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 44, 445401 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Salarian, H. Asgari, and M. Vlasea, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 769, 138525 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Wang, Y. Zhang, H.Y. Chia, and W. Yan, Npj Comput. Mater. 8, 1 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N.T. Aboulkhair, I. Maskery, C. Tuck, I. Ashcroft, and N.M. Everitt, Mater. Des. 104, 174 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A.K. Subramaniyan, A.S. Reddy, S. Mathias, A. Shrivastava, and P. Raghupatruni, Surf. Coat. Technol. 425, 127679 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H.E. Boyer, and T.L. Gall, Metals Handbook, Desk. (American Society for Metals, United States, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Kirk, Shot Peener 21, 24 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Novovic, R.C. Dewes, D.K. Aspinwall, W. Voice, and P. Bowen, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 44, 125 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Bigerelle, and A. Iost, Tribol. Int. 40, 1319 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. W.P. Dong, P.J. Sullivan, and K.J. Stout, Wear 178, 29 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Z. Lipa, and D. Tomanícková, Ann. Fac. Eng. Hunedoara 9, 223 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. C.-C. Lin, C.-C. Hu, and T.-C. Lee, Surf. Coat. Technol. 204, 448 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ISO 11562:1996 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) — Surface texture: Profile method — Metrological characteristics of phase correct filters

  25. B. Griffiths, Manufacturing Surface Technology: Surface Integrity & Functional Performance (CRC Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. Pawlus, R. Reizer, M. Wieczorowski, and G. Krolczyk, Precis. Eng. 65, 240 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R. Laheurte, P. Darnis, N. Darbois, O. Cahuc, and J. Neauport, Opt. Express 20, 13551 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. C.A. Brown, A. William, P. Johnson, and D. Charles, US5307292A (1992).

  29. D. Gogolewski, and W. Makieła, Teh. Vjesn. 28, 305 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Rudzitis, N. Bulaha, J. Lungevics, O. Linins, and K. Berzins, Latv. J. Phys. Tech. Sci. 54, 55 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. Itoh and S. Shukla (ed.), in Advanced Surface Enhancement: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advanced Surface Enhancement (INCASE 2019)—Research Towards Industrialisation (Springer, Singapore, 2020).

  32. Z.H. Zhang, L.B. Guo, H. Cui, and B. Zhang, Appl. Mech. Mater. 138–139, 1251 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Fu, and F. Cheng, T. Tjahjowidodo, in Advanced Surface Enhancement. ed. by S. Itoh, and S. Shukla (Springer, Singapore, 2020), pp. 155–162.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. J.P. Davim, Surface Integrity in Machining (Springer, London, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. S. Kunaporn, M. Ramulu, M. Hashish, and J. Hopkins, Shot Peener 20, 6 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. Sedlaček, L.S. Vilhena, B. Podgornik, and J. Vižintin, Stroj. Vestn.-J. Mech. Eng. 57, 674 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. E. ISO 4287, International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland (1997).

  38. M. Sedlaček, P. Gregorčič, and B. Podgornik, Tribol. Trans. 60, 260 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R. Leach, Characterisation of Areal Surface Texture (Springer, 2013).

  40. V. Bačová, and D. Draganovska, Mater. Sci. 40, 125 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. K. Anselme, P. Davidson, A.M. Popa, M. Giazzon, M. Liley, and L. Ploux, Acta Biomater. 6, 3824 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ​Additive Manufacturing Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, 181221, India

    Subramaniyan Anand Kumar & Abhishek Shrivastava

  2. Technology Development Cell, Intech Additive Solutions, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560058, India

    Sudarshan Reddy Anigani, Snehith Mathias & Prasad Raghupatruni

Authors
  1. Subramaniyan Anand Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sudarshan Reddy Anigani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Snehith Mathias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abhishek Shrivastava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Prasad Raghupatruni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subramaniyan Anand Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 22 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anand Kumar, S., Anigani, S.R., Mathias, S. et al. Effect of Duplex Post-processing Treatment on the Surface Texture Characteristics of AlSi10Mg Alloy Processed by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Technique. JOM 75, 1672–1683 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-023-05770-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-023-05770-1

Search

Navigation