Skip to main content
Log in

Industrial Tests to Modify Molten Copper Slag for Improvement of Copper Recovery

  • Toward Resources and Processes Sustainability: Part II
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, to improve the recovery of copper from copper slag by flotation process, industrial tests of the modification process involving addition of a composite additive into molten copper slag were conducted, and the modified slag was subjected to the flotation process to confirm the modification effect. The phase evolution of the slag in the modification process was revealed by thermodynamic calculations, x-ray diffraction, optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The results show that more copper was transformed and enriched in copper sulfide phases. The magnetite content in the modified slag decreased, and that of “FeO” increased correspondingly, leading to a better fluidity of the molten slag, which improved the aggregation and growth of fine particles of the copper sulfide minerals. Closed-circuit flotation tests of the original and modified slags were conducted, and the results show that the copper recovery increased obviously from 69.15% to 73.38%, and the copper grade of concentrates was elevated slightly from 20.24% to 21.69%, further confirming that the industrial tests of the modification process were successful. Hence, the modification process has a bright future in industrial applications for enhancing the recovery of copper from the copper slag.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Gorai, R. Jana, and M. Premchand, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 39, 299 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Shen and E. Forssberg, Waste Manag 23, 10 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J.H. Heo, B.S. Kim, and J.H. Park, MMTB 44, 1352 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Shibayama, Y. Takasaki, T. William, A. Yamatodani, Y. Higuchi, S. Sunagawa, and E. Ono, J. Hazard. Mater. 181, 1016 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Z.Q. Guo, D.Q. Zhu, J. Pan, and T.J. Wu, Metals 6, 86 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Z.Q. Guo, D.Q. Zhu, J. Pan, and F. Zhang, JOM 69, 2341 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Subrata, D. Amlan, and R. Sandeep, Int. J. Miner. Process. 143, 43 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Bruckard, M. Somerville, and F. Hao, Miner. Eng. 17, 495 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Li, I. Perederiy, and V.G. Papangelakis, J. Hazard. Mater. 152, 607 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Urosevic, M. Dimitrijevic, Z. Jankovic, and D. Antic, Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 51, 71 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Panda, S. Mishra, D.S. Rao, N. Pradhan, U. Mohapatra, S. Angadi, and B.K. Mishra, Korean J. Chem. Eng. 32, 667 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Li, Y. Chen, C. Tang, S. Yang, J. He, and M. Tang, J. Hazard. Mater. 322, 402 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O. Herreros, R. Quiroz, E. Manzano, C. Bou, and J. Vinals, Hydrometallurgy 49, 87 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C.B. Tang, Y. Li, Y.M. Chen, S.H. Yang, L.G. Ye, and H.T. Xue, in 6th International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Processing (2016), p. 429.

  15. P.K. Gbor, V. Mokri, and C.Q. Jia, J. Environ. Sci. Health A 35, 147 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Zhu, Z. Guo, J. Pan, and F. Zhang, Metals 6, 123 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. B.A. Wills and T. Napier-Munn, Wills’ Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery, 7th ed. (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006), pp. 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Cui, Nonferr. Metals (Smelt. Part) 4, 10 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Peng and J. He, Modern Copper Metallurgy, 2nd ed. (Beijing: Science Press, 2002), pp. 175–182.

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Sohn and D.J. Min, Steel Res. Int. 7, 83 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. K.C. Mills and A.B. Fox, ISIJ Int. 43, 10 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Aydın, G. Ahmet, and A. Yavuz, Solid State Sci. 14, 1702 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Z.Q. Guo, D.Q. Zhu, J. Pan, and F. Zhang, JOM 69, 1688 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Z.Q. Guo, D.Q. Zhu, J. Pan, and F. Zhang, Minerals 7, 8 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Z.Q. Guo, D.Q. Zhu, J. Pan, and F. Zhang, Metals 6, 10 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their thanks to the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (No. 2013BAB03B04) for the financial support of this research and would like to thank the Co-Innovation Center for Clean and Efficient Utilization of Strategic Metal Mineral Resources of Hunan Province for supplying the facilities and funds to complete the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deqing Zhu.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 598 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Z., Zhu, D., Pan, J. et al. Industrial Tests to Modify Molten Copper Slag for Improvement of Copper Recovery. JOM 70, 533–538 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2671-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2671-5

Navigation