Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance Optimization in Photovoltaic Systems: A Review

  • Review article
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Photovoltaic (PV) systems are increasingly becoming a vital source of renewable energy due to their clean and sustainable nature. However, the power output of PV systems is highly dependent on environmental factors such as solar irradiance, temperature, shading, and aging. To optimize the energy harvest from PV modules, Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms are employed to continually track the maximum power point (MPP) of the PV system under varying conditions. MPPT controllers are widely classed as either standard or optimized. Previous approaches are straightforward, but they are inefficient because they cannot discriminate among localized and worldwide summits when partial shading happens. The utilization of AI based algorithms, hybrid approaches, advanced sensor technologies and shading mitigation strategies promises to significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of PV system contributing to the widespread adoption of renewable energy and a more sustainable future. As a result, this research presents a succinct categorization and assessment overview of MPPT techniques used in PV systems. According to the survey results, meta-heuristic algorithms are fast and exact in monitoring GMPP amid partial shading and rapidly varying sun exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eltawil MA, Zhao Z (2013) MPPT techniques for photovoltaic applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:793–813

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abou El Ela M, Roger JA (1984) Optimization of the function of a photovoltaic array using a feedback control system. Solar cells 13(2):107–119

    Google Scholar 

  3. Di X, Yundong M, Qianhong C (2014) A global maximum power point tracking method based on interval short-circuit current. In: 2014 16th European conference on power electronics and applications. IEEE, pp. 1–8

  4. Farayola AM, Hasan AN, Ali A (2017) Curve fitting polynomial technique compared to ANFIS technique for maximum power point tracking. In: 2017 8th international renewable energy congress (IREC). IEEE, pp. 1–6

  5. Malathy S, Ramaprabha R (2013) Maximum power point tracking based on look up table approach. Advanced materials research, vol 768. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, New York, pp 124–130

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mohamed SA, Abd El Sattar M (2019) A comparative study of P&O and INC maximum power point tracking techniques for grid-connected PV systems. SN Appl Sci 1(2):174

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moreno A, Julve J, Silvestre S, Castaner L (2000) A fuzzy logic controller for stand alone PV systems. In: Conference record of the twenty-eighth IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference-2000 (Cat. No. 00CH37036). IEEE, pp. 1618–1621

  8. Cheikh MA, Larbes C, Kebir GT, Zerguerras A (2007) Maximum power point tracking using a fuzzy logic control scheme. Revue des energies Renouvelables 10(3):387–395

    Google Scholar 

  9. Messalti S, Harrag A, Loukriz A (2017) A new variable step size neural networks MPPT controller: review, simulation and hardware implementation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68:221–233

    Google Scholar 

  10. Punitha K, Devaraj D, Sakthivel S (2013) Artificial neural network based modified incremental conductance algorithm for maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions. Energy 62:330–340

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lodhi E, Shafqat RN, Kerrouche KD, Lodhi Z (2017) Application of particle swarm optimization for extracting global maximum power point in PV system under partial shadow conditions. Int J Electron Electr Eng 5:223–229

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miyatake M, Toriumi F, Endo T, Fujii N (2007) A Novel maximum power point tracker controlling several converters connected to photovoltaic arrays with particle swarm optimization technique. In: 2007 European conference on power electronics and applications, pp. 1–10

  13. Chen LR, Tsai CH, Lin YL, Lai YS (2010) A biological swarm chasing algorithm for tracking the PV maximum power point. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 25:484–493

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ishaque K, Salam Z, Amjad M, Mekhilef S (2012) An improved particle swarm optimization (PSO)based MPPT for PV with reduced steady-state oscillation. IEEE Trans Power Electron 27:3627–3638

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chao RM, Nasirudin A, Wang IK, Chen PL (2016) Multicore PSO operation for maximum power point tracking of a distributed photovoltaic system under partially shading condition. Int J Photoenergy 2016:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boztepe M, Guinjoan F, Velasco-Quesada G, Silvestre S, Chouder A, Karatepe E (2013) Global MPPT scheme for photovoltaic string inverters based on restricted voltage window search algorithm. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 61(7):3302–3312

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hadji S, Gaubert JP, Krim F (2015) Theoretical and experimental analysis of genetic algorithms based MPPT for PV systems. Energy Procedia 74:772–787

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mohanty S, Subudhi B, Ray PK (2015) A new MPPT design using grey wolf optimization technique for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 7:181–188

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cherukuri SK, Rayapudi SR (2017) Enhanced Grey Wolf optimizer based MPPT algorithm of PV system under partial shaded condition. Int J Renew Energy Dev 6:203–212

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oshaba AS, Ali ES, Abd Elazim SM (2015) Artificial bee colony algorithm based maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic system. WSEAS Trans Power Syst 10:123–134

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bilal B (2013) Implementation of artificial bee colony algorithm on maximum power point tracking for PV modules. In: 2013 8th International Symposium on Advanced Topics in Electrical Engineering (ATEE), IEEE, 2013, pp. 1–4

  22. Jiang LL, Maskell DL, Patra JC (2013) A novel ant colony optimization based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems under partially shaded conditions. Energy Build 58:227–236

    Google Scholar 

  23. Titri S, Larbes C, Toumi KY, Benatchba K (2017) A new MPPT controller based on the Ant colony optimization algorithm for Photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions. Appl Soft Comput 58:465–479

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sundareswaran K, Peddapati S, Palani S (2014) MPPT of PV systems under partial shaded conditions through a colony of flashing fireflies. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 29:463–472

    Google Scholar 

  25. Safarudin YM, Priyadi A, Purnomo MH, Pujiantara M (2014) Maximum power point tracking algorithm for photovoltaic system under partial shaded condition by means updating β firefly technique. In: 2014 6th international conference on information technology and electrical engineering (ICITEE), IEEE, 2014, pp. 1–5

  26. Tajuddin MFN, AyobS M, Salam Z, Saad MS (2013) Evolutionary based maximum power point tracking technique using differential evolution algorithm. Energy Build 67:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaced K, Larbes C, Ramzan N, Bounabi M, Elabadine Dahmane Z (2017) Bat algorithm based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions. Sol Energy 158:490–503

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ahmed J, Salam Z (2015) A critical evaluation on maximum power point tracking methods for partial shading in PV systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47:933–953

    Google Scholar 

  29. Belhachat F, Larbes C (2015) Modeling, analysis and comparison of solar photovoltaic array configurations under partial shading conditions. Sol Energy 120:399–418

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liu YH, Chen JH, Huang JW (2014) Global maximum power point tracking algorithm for PV systems operating under partially shaded conditions using the segmentation search method. Sol Energy 103:350–363

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tey KS, Mekhilef S (2014) Modified incremental conductance algorithm for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions and load variation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61:5384–5392

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tey KS, Mekhilef S (2014) Modified incremental conductance MPPT algorithm to mitigate inaccurate responses under fast-changing solar irradiation level. Sol Energy 101:333–342

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zakzouk N, Abdelsalam AK, Helal A, Williams BW (2013) Modified variable-step incremental conductance maximum power point tracking technique for photovoltaic systems. In: Proceedings of the IECON 2013–39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 1741–1748

  34. Chauhan U, Rani A, Singh V, Kumar B (2020) A modified incremental conductance maximum power point technique for standalone PV system. In: Proceedings of the 2020 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN); Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 61–64

  35. Andrean V, Chang PC, Lian KL (2018) A review and new problems discovery of four simple decentralized maximum power point tracking algorithms-perturb and observe, incremental conductance, golden section search, and Newton’s quadratic interpolation. Energies 11:2966

    Google Scholar 

  36. Senjyu T, Uezato K (2002) Maximum power point tracker using fuzzy control for photovoltaic arrays. In: Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE international conference on industrial technology ICIT’94; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 143–147

  37. Huang Y-P, Hsu S-Y (2016) A performance evaluation model of a high concentration photovoltaic module with a fractional open circuit voltage-based maximum power point tracking algorithm. Comput Electr Eng 51:331–342

    Google Scholar 

  38. Efendi Z, Sunarno E, Murdianto FD, Eviningsih RP, Raharja LPS, Wahyudi D (2020) A maximum power point tracking technique using modified hill climbing (MHC) method in DC microgrid application. AIP Conf Proc 2228:30007

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mohamed MAE, Nasser Ahmed S, Eladly Metwally M (2023) Arithmetic optimization algorithm based maximum power point tracking for grid-connected photovoltaic system. Sci Rep 13(1):5961

    Google Scholar 

  40. Renaudineau H, Houari A, Martin J, Pierfederici S, Meibody-Tabar F, Gérardin B (2011) A new approach in tracking maximum power under partially shaded conditions with consideration of converter losses. Sol Energy 85:2580–2588

    Google Scholar 

  41. Elbaset AA, Khaled M, Ali H, Sattar MA-E, Elbaset AA (2016) Implementation of a modified perturb and observe maximum power point tracking algorithm for photovoltaic system using an embedded microcontroller. IET Renew Power Gener 10:551–560

    Google Scholar 

  42. Javed K, Ashfaq H, Singh R (2019) A new simple MPPT algorithm to track MPP under partial shading for solar photovoltaic systems. Int J Green Energy 17:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tan B, Ke X, Tang D, Yin S (2019) Improved perturb and observation method based on support vector regression. Energies 12:1151

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mohd MA, Ammirrul M, Zainuri AM, Abd NI, Abdul RZ. Dual-Fuzzy MPPT in Photovoltaic-DC Analysis for Dual-load Operation with SEPIC Converter

  45. Remoaldo D, Jesus I (2021) Analysis of a traditional and a fuzzy logic enhanced perturb and observe algorithm for the MPPT of a photovoltaic system. Algorithms 14(1):24

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Panigrahi A, Bhuya KC (2016) Fuzzy logic based maximum power point tracking algorithm for photovoltaic power generation system. J Green Eng 6(4):403–426

    Google Scholar 

  47. Choudhury S, Rout PK (2015) Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Based MPPT Control for PV System under Partial Shading Condition. Int J Renew Energy Res (IJRER) 5(4):1252–1263

    Google Scholar 

  48. Guenounou O, Dahhou B, Chabour F (2014) Adaptive fuzzy controller based MPPT for photovoltaic systems. Energy Convers Manage 78:843–850

    Google Scholar 

  49. Villegas-Mier CG, Rodriguez-Resendiz J, Álvarez-Alvarado JM, Rodriguez-Resendiz H, Herrera-Navarro AM, Rodríguez-Abreo O (2021) Artificial Neural Networks in MPPT algorithms for optimization of photovoltaic power systems: a review. Micromachines 2021(12):1260

    Google Scholar 

  50. Divyasharon, R.; Banu, R.N.; Devaraj, D. Artificial Neural Network based MPPT with CUK Converter Topology for PV Systems Under Varying Climatic Conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Techniques in Control, Optimization and Signal Processing (INCOS), Tamilnadu, India, 11–13 April 2019; pp. 1–6.

  51. Rizzo SA, Scelba G (2015) ANN based MPPT method for rapidly variable shading conditions. Appl Energy 145:124–132

    Google Scholar 

  52. Primo F (2016) Design and Implementation of a MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic Panels Based on Neural Networks. Ph.D. Thesis, Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Rome, Italy

  53. Cui Y, Yi Z, Duan J, Shi D, Wang Z (2019) A Rprop-Neural-Network-Based PV Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm with Short-Circuit Current Limitation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), Washington, DC, USA, 18–21 February 2019; pp. 1–5

  54. Robles Algarín C, Sevilla Hernández D, Restrepo Leal D (2018) A low-cost maximum power point tracking system based on neural network inverse model controller. Electronics 7:4

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zecevic Z, Rolevski M (2020) Neural network approach to MPPT Control and Irradiance Estimation. Appl Sci 10:5051

    Google Scholar 

  56. Loza-Lopez MJ, Lopez-Garcia TB, Ruiz-Cruz R, Sánchez E (2017) Neural Control for Photovoltaic Panel Maximum Power Point Tracking. Ing Electrón Autom Comun 38:89

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bouselham L, Hajji M, Hajji B, Bouali H (2017) A new MPPT-based ANN for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions. Energy Procedia 111:924–933

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ahmed S, Muhammad Adil HM, Ahmad I, Azeem MK, e Huma Z, Abbas Khan S (2020) Supertwisting Sliding Mode Algorithm Based Nonlinear MPPT Control for a Solar PV System with Artificial Neural Networks Based Reference Generation. Energies 13:3695

    Google Scholar 

  59. Khan SU, Yang S, Wang L, Liu L (2015) A modified particle swarm optimization algorithm for global optimizations of inverse problems. IEEE Trans Magn 52:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  60. Liu Y-H, Huang S-C, Liang W-C, Huang J-W (2012) A particle swarm optimization-based maximum power point tracking algorithm for PV systems operating under partially shaded conditions. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 27:1027–1035

    Google Scholar 

  61. Takano H, Asano H, Gupta N (2020) Application Example of Particle Swarm Optimization on Operation Scheduling of Microgrids BT-Frontier Applications of Nature Inspired Computation; Khosravy M, Gupta N, Patel N, Senjyu T (eds). Springer, Singapore, pp. 215–239

  62. Ishaque K, Salam Z (2012) A deterministic particle swarm optimization maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic system under partial shading condition. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 60:3195–3206

    Google Scholar 

  63. Miyatake M, Veerachary M, Toriumi F, Fujii N, Ko H (2011) Maximum power point tracking of multiple photovoltaic arrays: a PSO approach. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 47(1):367–380

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ishaque K, Salam Z, Amjad M, Mekhilef S (2012) An improved particle swarm optimization (PSO)-based MPPT for PV with reduced steady state oscillation. IEEE Trans Power Electron 27(8):3627–3638

    Google Scholar 

  65. Chao KH, Lin YS, Lai UD (2015) Improved particle swarm optimization for maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic module arrays. Appl Energy 1158:609–618

    Google Scholar 

  66. Babu TS, Rajasekar N, Sangeetha K (2015) Modified particle swarm optimization technique based maximum power point tracking for uniform and under partial shading condition. Appl Soft Comput J 34:613–624

    Google Scholar 

  67. Abdulkadir M, Yatim A (2018) Optimization of an MPPT-based controller for PV system using PSO. Eur J Adv Eng Technol 5:218–229

    Google Scholar 

  68. Díaz Martínez D, Trujillo Codorniu R, Giral R, Vázquez Seisdedos L (2021) Evaluation of particle swarm optimization techniques applied to maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic systems. Int J Circuit Theory Appl 49:149–1867

    Google Scholar 

  69. Mohanty S, Subudhi B, Ray PK (2016) A grey wolf optimization based MPPT for PV system under changing insolation level. In: 2016 IEEE Students’ Technology Symposium (TechSym). IEEE, pp. 175–179

  70. Motamarri R, Bhookya N, Chitti Babu B (2021) Modified grey wolf optimization for global maximum power point tracking under partial shading conditions in photovoltaic system. Int J Circuit Theory Appl 49:1884–1901

    Google Scholar 

  71. Atici K, Sefa I, Altin N (2019) Grey wolf optimization based MPPT algorithm for solar PV system with SEPIC converter. In: 2019 4th international conference on power electronics and their Applications (ICPEA). IEEE, pp. 1–6

  72. Hadj Salah ZB, Krim S, Hajjaji MA, Alshammari BM, Alqunun K, Alzamil A, Guesmi T (2023) A New Efficient Cuckoo Search MPPT algorithm based on a super-twisting sliding mode controller for partially shaded standalone photovoltaic system. Sustainability 15(12):9753

    Google Scholar 

  73. Baset A, Halim A, Saad N, El-Sattar A (2019): A Comparative Study Between Perturb and Observe and Cuckoo Search Algorithm for Maximum Power Point Tracking. In Proceedings of the 2019 21st International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON), Cairo, Egypt, 17–19 December 2019; p. 723

  74. Mohammedi A, Benslimane T (2021) Development of rapid and reliable cuckoo search algorithm for global maximum power point tracking of solar PV systems in partial shading condition. Arch Control Sci 31:495–526

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ali EM, Abdelsalam AK, Youssef KH, Hossam-Eldin AA (2021) An enhanced cuckoo search algorithm fitting for photovoltaic systems’ global maximum power point tracking under partial shading conditions. Energies 14:7210

    Google Scholar 

  76. Eltamaly AM (2021) An improved cuckoo search algorithm for maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions. Energies 14:953

    Google Scholar 

  77. Mansoor M, Mirza AF, Ling Q (2020) Harris hawk optimization-based MPPT control for PV systems under partial shading conditions. J Clean Prod 274:122857

    Google Scholar 

  78. Jiang LL, Maskell DL, Patra J (2013) A novel ant colony optimization-based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems under partially shaded conditions. Energy Build 58:227–236

    Google Scholar 

  79. Adly M, Besheer A (2012) An optimized fuzzy maximum power point tracker for stand alone photovoltaic systems: Ant colony approach. In: Proceedings of the 2012 7th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA); Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 113–119

  80. Kinattingal S, Simon SP, Nayak PSR, Sundareswaran K (2020) MPPT in PV systems using ant colony optimisation with dwindling population. IET Renew Power Gener 14:1105–1112

    Google Scholar 

  81. Nivetha V, Gowri G (2015) V Maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic system using ant colony and particle swam optimization algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2015 2nd International Conference on Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS); IEEE: Coimbatore, India, pp. 948–952

  82. Emerson N, Srinivasan S (2015) Integrating hybrid power source into islanded microgrid using ant colony optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 1–4

  83. Besheer A, Adly M (2012) Ant colony system based PI maximum power point tracking for stand alone photovoltaic system. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 693–698

  84. Nguyen TT, Vo DN, Truong AV, Dieu VN (2014) Cuckoo search algorithm for short-term hydrothermal scheduling. Appl Energy 132:276–287

    Google Scholar 

  85. Hussaian-Basha CH, Bansal V, Rani C, Brisilla RM, Odofin S. Development of Cuckoo Search MPPT

  86. Yang X, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo Search via Lévy flights. In: Proceedings of the 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC); IEEE: Coimbatore, India, pp. 210–214

  87. Yang X-S, Deb S (2013) Multiobjective cuckoo search for design optimization. Comput Oper Res 40:1616–1624

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  88. Ahmed J, Chin VJ (2014) A Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) for PV system using Cuckoo Search with partial shading capability. Appl Energy 119:118–130

    Google Scholar 

  89. Keyrouz F, Georges S (2011) Efficient multidimensional Maximum Power Point Tracking using Bayesian fusion. In: Proceedings of the 2011 2nd International Conference on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems (EPECS); Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 1–5

  90. Ramaprabha R, Mathur B, Ravi A, Aventhika S (2010) Modified Fibonacci Search Based MPPT Scheme for SPVA Under Partial Shaded Conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2010 3rd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp. 379–384

  91. Heydari-Doostabad H, Keypour R, Khalghani MR, Khooban MH (2013) A new approach in MPPT for photovoltaic array based on Extremum Seeking Control under uniform and non-uniform irradiances. Sol Energy 94:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  92. Zhou L, Chen Y, Liu Q, Wu J (2012) Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) control of a photovoltaic system based on dual carrier chaotic search. J Control Theory Appl 10:244–250

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  93. Taheri H, Salam Z, Ishaque K (2010) A novel Maximum Power Point tracking control of photovoltaic system under partial and rapidly fluctuating shadow conditions using Differential Evolution. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA); IEEE: Penang, Malaysia, pp. 82–87

  94. Kulaksız AA, Akkaya R (2012) A genetic algorithm optimized ANN-based MPPT algorithm for a stand-alone PV system with induction motor drive. Sol Energy 86:2366–2375

    Google Scholar 

  95. Bhukya L, Nandiraju S (2020) A novel photovoltaic maximum power point tracking technique based on grasshopper optimized fuzzy logic approach. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:9416–9427

    Google Scholar 

  96. Kobayashi K, Takano I, Sawada Y (2005) A study of a two-stage maximum power point tracking control of a photovoltaic system under partially shaded insolation conditions. Electr Eng Jpn 153:39–49

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, AVS Engineering College, Salem, Tamilnadu, India

    B. Sangeetha

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, New Horizon College of Engineering, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

    K. Manjunatha

  3. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Rajalakshmi Engineering College, Tamilnadu, India

    P. Thirusenthil Kumaran

  4. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai, Tamil Nadu, India

    A. Sheela

  5. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sona College of Technology, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

    K. S. Yamuna

  6. Department of Physics, Government Arts College (Autonomous), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

    S. Sivakumar

Authors
  1. B. Sangeetha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Manjunatha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Thirusenthil Kumaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Sheela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. S. Yamuna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Sivakumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, BS and KM; methodology, BS and KM; investigation, BS; resources, PTK, AS, KSY and SS; writing—KM, KSY and SS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Sangeetha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sangeetha, B., Manjunatha, K., Thirusenthil Kumaran, P. et al. Performance Optimization in Photovoltaic Systems: A Review. Arch Computat Methods Eng 31, 1507–1518 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-10023-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-10023-0

Search

Navigation