Abstract
Strength criterion is fundamental to the study of the strength assessment and design of engineering structures under complex stress conditions. Through experiments with a range of concretes, a large number of multiaxial strength criteria have been proposed to date, with many new developments from 2010 to 2020.Even so, there has been minimal comparative analysis of the research results of different strength criteria. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the strength criteria of ordinary concrete, high-performance concrete and lightweight aggregate concrete from the past 10 years. First, the classic concrete strength criterion is summarized. Then, the research progress associated with the multiaxial strength criterion from 2010 to 2020 is reviewed. The accuracy of the concrete strength criterion proposed during this period is analysed and compared with the collected multiaxial strength experimental data of 777 groups of concrete using a statistical method. The analysis shows that the six-parameter strength criterion for ordinary concrete proposed by Ding-Wu, the three-parameter strength criterion based on the Willam-Warnke criterion for high-performance concrete proposed by He-Song and the six-parameter strength criterion for lightweight aggregate concrete proposed by Liu-Song are in good agreement with the experimental data collected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen WF (1982) Plasticity in reinforced concrete. McGraw-Hill, New York
Welche MO (1900) Umstande bedingen die Elastizitatsgrenze und den bruch eines materials. Z Ver Dtsch Ing 44:1524–1530
Seow PEC, Swaddiwudhipong S (2005) Failure surface for concrete under multiaxial load-a unified approach. Mater Civ Eng 17(2):219–228
Bresler B, Pister KS (1958) Strength of concrete under combined stresses. J Proc 55(9):321–345
William KJ, Warnke EP (1975) Constitutive models for the triaxial behavior of concrete. Proc Int Assoc Bridge Struct Eng, Bergamo, Italy, Zurich 19:1–30
Ottosen NS (1977) A failure criterion for concrete. J Eng Mech 103(4):527–535
Hesieh SS, Ting EC, Chen WF (1979) An elasticity-fracture model for concrete. In: Johnson CP (ed) Proceeding of 3rd Engineering Mechanics Division, Special Conference. ASCE, Austin, pp 437–440
Kotsovos MD, Lowe PG (1980) Discussion: a mathematical description of the strength properties of concrete under generalized stress. Mag Concr Res 32(112):186–187
Podgorski J (1984) General failure criterion for isotropic media. J Eng Mech 111(2):188–201
Wang C-Z, Guo Z-H, Zhang X-Q (1987) Experimental investigation of biaxial and triaxial compressive concrete strength. Mater J. https://doi.org/10.14359/1808
Jiang J-J (1994) Nonliner finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Shanxi Science and Technology Publishing House, Xi an (in Chinese)
Yupu S, Guofan Z, Fang P et al (1996) General failure criterion for different concrete materials under multiaxial stresses. Chin Civil Eng J 29(1):25–32 (in Chinese)
Yu MH (1983) Twin shear stress yield criterion. Int J Mech Sci 25(1):71–74
Yu MH, He LN, Song LY (1985) Twin shear stress theory and its generalization. Sci China, Ser A 28(11):1174–1183
Maohong Yu, Fengyu L (1988) Twin shear stress three parameter criterion and its corner model. Chin Civil Eng J 21(3):90–95 (in Chinese)
Yu MH, Liu FY, Li Y et al (1989) Twin shear stress five-parameter criterion and its smooth ridge model. Int Acad Pub 1:244–248
Maohong Yu, Fengyu L (1990) Smooth ridge model of generalized twin shear stress criterion. Acta Mech Sin 22(2):213–216 (in Chinese)
Maohong Yu, Fengyu L, Feng L et al (1990) A new general strength theory. Chin Civil Eng J 23(1):34–40 (in Chinese)
Maohong Yu (1989) A new model of material yield and damage under complex stress state and its series theory. Chinese J Theor Appl Mech S1:42–49
Yu MH, Zhao J, Guan LW (1998) Strength theory for rock and concrete: history, present situation and development. Prog Nat Sci 8(4):394–402
Yu MH (2002) Advances in strength theories for materials under complex stress state in the 20th century. Appl Mech Rev 55(3):169–218
Yu M-H, Kolupaev VA, Li Y-M, Li J-C (2011) Advances in unified strength theory and its generalization. Procedia Eng. 10:2508–2513
Ding FX, Yu ZW (2006) Strength criterion for plain concrete under multiaxial stress based on damage Poisson’s ratio. Acta Mech Solida Sin 19(4):307–315
Zhang J, Zhang ZX, Huang CP (2010) Representation based classification of strength theories of concrete. Adv Mater Res 168–170:74–77
Liu GJ (2014) Research status of concrete strength theory based on stress and strain. Appl Mech Mater 670–671:445–448
Muthukumar G, Kumar M (2014) Failure criteria of concrete- a review. Comput Concrete 14(5):503–526
Qin YF, Tian B, Xu G, Lu XC (2012) Review of strength and failure criteria for concrete after freeze-thaw damage. Appl Mech Mater 253–255:456–461
Zhu H, Hu Y, Ma R, Wang J, Li Q (2021) Concrete thermal failure criteria, test method, and mechanism: a review. Constr Build Mater 283:122762
Ding F, Wu X, Xiang P, Yu Z, Gong C (2020) Research progress in strength theory of concrete and isotropic rock. Eng Mech 37(02):1–15 (in Chinese)
Muhd Norhasri MS, Hamidah MS, Mohd Fadzil A (2017) Applications of using nano material in concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 133:91–97
Zhao ZQ, Sun RJ, Xin GF, Wei SS, Huang DW (2013) A review: application of nanomaterials in concrete. Appl Mech Mater 405–408:2881–2884
Yupu S, Guofan Z, Fang P et al (1993) Strength of lightweight concrete under triaxial compression. J Hydraul Eng 6:10–16 (in Chinese)
Yu Z, Sun X, Li F (2019) Experimental analysis and failure criterion of plain concrete subjected to biaxial loading under fixed lateral loading. Adv Civil Eng 2019:1–12
Yanxia Ye, Zhiyin Z, Yue L, Chunmiao Z (2019) Lightweight aggregate concrete strength criterion based on warhead type yielding. Eng Mech 36(01):138–145 (in Chinese)
Shang HS, Song YP (2013) Triaxial compressive strength of air-entrained concrete after freeze-thaw cycles. Cold Reg Sci Technol 90–91:33–37
Zhou W, Feng P, Lin H (2020) Constitutive relations of coral aggregate concrete under uniaxial and triaxial compression. Constr Build Mater 251:118957
Shang HS (2013) Triaxial T-C-C behavior of air-entrained concrete after freeze-thaw cycles. Cold Reg Sci Technol 89:1–6
Shi L, Wang L, Song Y, Shen L (2014) Dynamic multiaxial strength and failure criterion of dam concrete. Constr Build Mater 66:181–191
IWHR (1982) Chinese translation and collection of strength and failure of concrete. China Hydraulic Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Ma G, Zeng W (1990) Using a new three-parameter criterion to calculate three-dimensional stress in concrete. The second academic symposium on the basic theory and application of concrete structures, Vol. 1, pp .34–40). (in Chinese)
Mills LL, Zimmerman RM (1970) Compressive strength of plain concrete under multiaxial loading conditions. ACI J Proc 67(10):802–807
Rukhaiyar S, Sajwan G, Samadhiya NK (2017) Strength behavior of plain cement concrete subjected to true triaxial compression. NRC Res Press 45(3):179–196
Chuanzhi W, Zhenhai G, Xiuqin Z (1987) Strength test of concrete under biaxial and triaxial compression. Chin Civil Eng J 1:15–27 (in Chinese)
Shang H, Ji G (2014) Mechanical behaviour of different types of concrete under multiaxial compression. Mag Concr Res 66(17):870–876
Y. Song (2009) The multiaxial strength of large aggregate concrete after freeze -thaw cycles and failure criteria in octahedral stress space, Final Report to NNSFC (in Chinese)
Lee S-K, Song Y-C, Han S-H (2004) Biaxial behavior of plain concrete of nuclear containment building. Nucl Eng Des 227(2):143–153
Hampel T, Speck K, Scheerer S, Ritter R, Curbach M (2009) High-performance concrete under biaxial and triaxial loads. J Eng Mech 135(11):1274–1280
Zhou J, Pan J, Zhang L, Zhao J, Li Z (2020) Experimental study on mechanical behavior of high-strength high-performance concrete under biaxial loading. Constr Build Mater 258:119681
Jiajia Z, Jinlong P, Shaoke Y, Jun Z, Zhe Z (2018) Experimental study on triaxial tension and compression properties of high-strength and high-performance concrete. Eng Mech 35(04):144–150 (in Chinese)
Licheng W, Yupu S (2005) A four-parameter multiaxial strength criterion for lightweight aggregate concrete. Chin Civil Eng J 7:27–33 (in Chinese)
Guo Z, Zhang X, Zhang C, Wang R (1982) Experimental study on stress-strain curve of concrete. J Build Struct 01:1–12 (in Chinese)
Zhao G, Ren M, Qiu X, Xue Q (2018) The unified strength theory for plastic limit load analysis of vertical shaft lining. Adv Civil Eng 2018:1–6
Zhang N, Guo H, Khan T, Zhu E, Shi S, Wu Q, Tian Y, Xie X, de Sciarra FM (2018) Elastoplastic analysis of two-layered circular lining based on the unified strength theory. Math Prob Eng 2018:1–10
Liao Z, Tang D, Li Z, Xue Y, Shao L (2019) Study on explosion resistance performance experiment and damage assessment model of high-strength reinforcement concrete beams. Int J Impact Eng 133:103362
Qian X, Li X (2019) Multi-axial strength and safety index of concrete arch Dam. J Hohai Univ (Natural Science Edition) 03:230–237 (in Chinese)
Qian X, He X, Jiao C, Zhou J (2015) Safety coefficient of multiaxial strength of concrete and its Application. J Hohai Univ (Natural Science Edition) 02:121–126 (in Chinese)
Liu GJ, Wei ZL (2013) Research on concrete strength theory based on strain space. Appl Mech Mater 423–426:1068–1071
Zhou G, Shi J, Yu M, Zhang Y, Li X, Zhao Y (2019) Strength without size effect and formula of strength for concrete and natural marble. Materials 12(17):2685
Xiao J, Zhang Q, Xia X (2013) Preliminary study on concrete strength based on Mori-Tanaka method. Concrete 2013(09):18–21 (in Chinese)
Yu Z, Huang Q, Xie X, Xiao N (2018) Experimental study and failure criterion analysis of plain concrete under combined compression-shear stress. Constr Build Mater 179:198–206
Ma Q, Guo R, Zhao Z, Lin Z, He K (2015) Mechanical properties of concrete at high temperature—a review. Constr Build Mater 93:371–383
Xiao J, König G (2004) Study on concrete at high temperature in China—an overview. Fire Saf J 39(1):89–103
Liu X, Yang Z (2016) Failure mechanism criterion for multiaxial strength of concrete after exposure to normal and high temperatures. Constr Build Mater 125:105–118
Liu X, Yang Z (2017) Evaluation of several multiaxial failure criteria for concrete after freeze-thaw (F-T) cycles. Constr Build Mater 142:233–247
Chen Q, Zhang Y, Zhao T, Wang Z, Wang Z (2021) Mesoscale modelling of concretes subjected to triaxial loadings: mechanical properties and fracture behaviour. Materials 14:1099
Tang XW, Zhang CH (2009) Study on concrete in macro-and meso-scale mechanical properties based on homogenization theory. Chin J Comp Mech 26:876–881
Zhu WC, Tang CA, Wang SY (2005) Numerical study on the influence of mesomechanical properties on macroscopic fracture of concrete. Struct Eng Mech 19:519–533
Xiao J, Li W, Liu Q (2011) Meso-level numerical simulation on mechanical properties of modeled recycled concrete under uniaxial compression. J Tongji Univ 39:791–797 (in Chinese)
Zhang B (1998) Relationship between pore structure and mechanical properties of ordinary concrete under bending fatigue. Cem Concr Res 28:699–711
Rong C, Shi Q, Zhang T, Zhao H (2018) New failure criterion models for concrete under multiaxial stress in compression. Constr Build Mater 161:432–441
Rong C, Shi Q (2017) Axial-strength model for FRP-confined concrete based on the improved twin shear strength theory. Compos Struct 202:102–110
Ting Z, Ditao N, Chong R (2019) GFRP-confined coral aggregate concrete cylinders: the experimental and theoretical analysis. Elsevier 218:206–213
Ding F, Wu X, Xiang P, Yu Z (2021) Criteria for damage ratio strength of multiple types of concrete and isotropic rock. China Civil Eng J 54(02):50–64 (in Chinese)
Xiangdong Q, Hongdao J (2008) Definition and application of multi-axial strength safety factor. J Build Sci Eng 01:38–42 (in Chinese)
Zhenhai G (2013) Principles of reinforced concrete. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Sun J (2011) Research status and prospects on the ultra high performance concrete. Adv Mater Res 1068:1506–1508
Ansari F, Li Q (1998) High-strength concrete subjected to triaxial compression. ACI Mater J 95(6):747–755
Tan P, Zhao YM, Meng QH (2014) Test and application of high performance concrete. Adv Mater Res 908:30–33
Wu FH, Lv YL, Shou QY (2013) The application of high strength/performance concrete in chinese construction. Appl Mech Mater 357–360:1008–1011
He Z, Song Y (2008) Failure mode and constitutive model of plain high-strength high-performance concrete under biaxial compression after exposure to high temperatures. Acta Mech Solida Sin 21(2):149–159
Folino P, Etse G, Will A (2009) Performance dependent failure criterion for normal- and high-strength concretes. J Eng Mech 135(12):1393–1409
Hatami B, Ramezanianpour AM, Daryan AS (2018) Investigation on the effect of shrinkage reducing admixtures on shrinkage and durability of high-performance concrete. J Test Eval 46(1):141–150
Beushausen H, Dittmer T (2015) The influence of aggregate type on the strength and elastic modulus of high strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 74:132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.055
Metin H, Serhat G (2005) The effects of low temperature curing on the compressive strength of ordinary and high performance concrete. Constr Build Mater 19(1):49–53
Zhen-jun He, Yu-pu S (2010) Multiaxial tensile-compressive strengths and failure criterion of plain high-performance concrete before and after high temperatures. Constr Build Mater 24(4):498–504
Zhenjun He, Yupu S (2010) Multiaxial tension and compression properties of high-strength and high-performance concrete. Eng Mech 27(10):190–195 (in Chinese)
Pierre K, FrancËois-Dominique M, Daniel Q (2000) Spalling and pore pressure in HPC at high temperatures. Cem Concr Res 30(12):1915–1927
Gaifei P, Wenwu Y, Jie Z (2006) Explosive spalling and residual mechanical properties of fiber-toughened high-performance concrete subjected to high temperatures. Cem Concr Res 36(4):723–727
Chan SYN, Peng G, Chan JKW (1996) Comparison between high strength concrete and normal strength concrete subjected to high temperature. Mater Struct 29(10):616–619
He Z, Song Y (2010) Triaxial strength and failure criterion of plain high-strength and high-performance concrete before and after high temperatures. Cem Concr Res 40(1):171–178
Zhou JJ, Pan JL, Leung CKY, Li ZJ (2014) Experimental study on mechanical behavior of high performance concrete under multi-axial compressive stress. Sci China 57(12):2514–2522
Hussein A, Marzouk H (2000) Behavior of high strength concrete under bixial stresses. ACI Mater J 97:27–36
Wang Y-Z, Wang Y-B, Zhao Y-Z, Li G-Q, Lyu Y-F, Li H (2020) Experimental study on ultra-high performance concrete under triaxial compression. Constr Build Mater 263:120225
Zhou J, Pan J, Ma H, Zhao J, Li Z (2020) Behavior of high-performance concrete under multiaxial tensile-compressive loading. Constr Build Mater 260:119887
Thienel K-C, Haller T, Beuntner N (2020) Lightweight concrete—from basics to innovations. Materials 13(5):1120
Ruebner K, Schnell A, Haamkens F (2012) Lightweight concrete with tailor-made expanded aggregates. Chem Ing Tec 84(10):1792–1797
Nie Lu, Zhang Y (2011) Study on the application of lightweight aggregate ceramsite concrete in building. Appl Mech Mater 71–78:573–576
Haug AK, Fjeld S (1996) A floating concrete platform hull made of lightweight aggregate concrete. Eng Struct 18(11):831–836
Tachibana D (1990) Qualities of high-strength lightweight concrete used for construction of arctic offshore platform. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 112(1):27
Abd Elrahman M (2019) Effect of different expanded aggregates on the properties of lightweight concrete. Magaz Concr Res 71(2):95–107
Karthika RB, Vidyapriya V, Nandhini Sri KV, Merlin Grace Beaula K, Harini R, Sriram M (2021) Experimental study on lightweight concrete using pumice aggregate. Mater Today Proc 43:1606–1613
Kockal NU, Ozturan T (2011) Durability of lightweight concretes with lightweight fly ash aggregates. Constr Build Mater 25(3):1430–1438
Liu X, Chia KS, Zhang M-H (2010) Development of lightweight concrete with high resistance to water and chloride-ion penetration. Cem Concr Compos 32(10):757–766
Ren Y, Yu Z, Huang Q, Ren Z (2018) Constitutive model and failure criterions for lightweight aggregate concrete: a true triaxial experimental test. Constr Build Mater 171:759–769
Liu H, Song Y (2010) Experimental study of lightweight aggregate concrete under multiaxial stresses. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A 11(8):545–554
Wang WZ, Chen YJ, Chen FY (2011) An egg shaped failure criterion for lightweight aggregate concrete. Adv Mater Res 250–253:2085–2088
Wanzhen W (2014) Failure surface model of lightweight aggregate concrete. J Build Mater 17(01):60–65 (in Chinese)
Licheng W, Yupu S (2005) A four-parameter multi-axial strength criterion for lightweight aggregate concrete. Chin Civil Eng J 38(7):27–33 (in Chinese)
Licheng W, Kiyoshi H (2006) Multi-axial strength criterion for lightweight aggregate concrete based on the unified strength theory. Eng Mech 23(5):125–131 (in Chinese)
Ding FX, Wu X, Xiang P, Yu ZW (2021) New damage ratio strength criterion for concrete and lightweight aggregate concrete. ACI Struct J 118(6):165–178
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52179128); National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51579085); National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1508603).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XC: Conceptualization, Methodology, Calculation and analysis, Writing-original draft, Writing-editing, Data collection. DZ: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing-review. XW: Writing-review, Data collection, Calculation and analysis. CL: Form and word-editing, Calculation and analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1 The strength of different normal–strength concrete (NSC) under different stress states
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25.6 | − 10.5 | − 24 | − 95.8 | 23.03 | 0 | 0 | − 23.03 |
− 11.8 | − 52.7 | − 105.4 | − 5.79 | − 5.79 | − 53.1 | ||
− 10 | − 69.3 | − 92.4 | − 5.79 | − 11.59 | − 57.93 | ||
1.5 | − 1.5 | − 6 | − 5.79 | − 17.38 | − 53.1 | ||
1.4 | − 2.9 | − 5.7 | − 5.79 | − 23.17 | − 65.17 | ||
1.4 | − 4.3 | − 5.7 | − 5.79 | − 28.97 | − 67.59 | ||
0.9 | 0 | − 18.2 | − 5.79 | − 40.55 | − 60.34 | ||
1.4 | 0 | − 14.5 | − 5.79 | − 47.86 | − 56.83 | ||
1.9 | 0 | − 6.3 | − 2.9 | − 50.69 | − 50.69 | ||
2.4 | 0 | − 4.9 | − 8.69 | − 14.48 | − 72.41 | ||
0 | − 7.7 | − 31 | − 8.69 | − 8.69 | − 62.76 | ||
0 | − 15.9 | − 31.7 | − 8.69 | − 67.59 | − 77.24 | ||
0 | − 22.5 | − 30 | − 8.69 | − 20.28 | − 79.66 | ||
0 | − 29.1 | − 29.1 | − 8.69 | − 31.86 | − 77.24 | ||
− 5.3 | − 68.6 | − 68.6 | − 8.69 | − 37.66 | − 82.07 | ||
− 10 | − 85 | − 85 | − 8.69 | − 55.72 | − 81.52 | ||
− 16.7 | − 106.4 | − 106.4 | − 8.69 | − 60.83 | − 82.07 | ||
− 30.8 | − 149.8 | − 149.8 | − 8.69 | − 72.41 | − 72.41 | ||
0.5 | − 12.4 | − 12.4 | − 2.9 | − 2.9 | − 41.03 | ||
1 | − 8.7 | − 8.7 | − 2.9 | − 8.69 | − 53.1 | ||
1.7 | − 6.9 | − 6.9 | − 2.9 | − 24.14 | − 57.93 | ||
2.7 | 0 | 0 | − 2.9 | − 20.28 | − 55.52 | ||
0 | 0 | − 25.6 | − 2.9 | − 31.86 | − 57.93 |
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19.29 | − 2.9 | − 37.24 | − 55.52 | ||||
[38] | − 0.31 | − 7.73 | − 30.9 | − 2.9 | − 49.31 | − 57.93 | |
− 0.34 | − 17.01 | − 34.02 | − 2.9 | − 53.1 | − 53.1 | ||
− 0.33 | − 24.94 | − 33.25 | − 2.9 | − 2.9 | − 43.45 | ||
0.66 | − 1.65 | − 6.61 | − 5.79 | − 63.79 | − 65.17 | ||
0.6 | − 2.99 | − 5.97 | |||||
0.59 | − 4.4 | − 5.87 | 26.93 | 0 | 0 | − 26.93 | |
0 | − 6.39 | − 25.56 | [41] | − 0.62 | − 50.69 | − 50.69 | |
0 | − 13.44 | − 26.87 | − 0.62 | − 45.86 | − 45.86 | ||
0 | − 19.73 | − 26.3 | − 1.24 | − 49.66 | − 53.1 | ||
0.49 | 0 | − 9.8 | − 1.24 | − 50.69 | − 50.69 | ||
0.68 | 0 | − 6.8 | − 2.9 | − 62.76 | − 62.76 | ||
1.07 | 0 | − 4.28 | − 1.45 | − 1.45 | − 41.52 | ||
1.31 | 0 | − 2.62 | − 2.9 | − 2.9 | − 41.76 | ||
0.53 | − 5.33 | − 5.33 | − 4.83 | − 5.24 | − 56.28 | ||
0.46 | − 9.17 | − 9.17 | − 7.24 | − 7.24 | − 71.24 | ||
0 | − 70.3 | − 70.3 | − 1.45 | − 21.72 | − 58.9 | ||
0 | − 63.84 | − 63.84 | − 2.9 | − 36.21 | − 66.14 | ||
0 | − 3.75 | − 41.42 | − 2.9 | − 28.97 | − 68.83 | ||
− 7.6 | − 27.018 | − 114.76 |
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
− 7.6 | − 28.842 | − 116.28 | 36.1 | 0 | 0 | − 36.1 | |
− 7.6 | − 53.2 | − 125.78 | [41] | − 0.62 | − 47.1 | − 48.28 | |
− 7.6 | − 56.24 | − 131.48 | − 0.62 | − 51.66 | − 51.1 | ||
− 7.6 | − 80.56 | − 132.24 | − 1.24 | − 60.34 | − 61.31 | ||
− 7.6 | − 85.12 | − 140.98 | − 1.24 | − 50.69 | − 51.24 | ||
− 7.6 | − 113.62 | − 154.28 | − 2.9 | − 67.59 | − 68.83 | ||
− 7.6 | − 142.12 | − 142.12 | − 1.45 | − 1.45 | − 54.55 | ||
− 7.6 | − 135.28 | − 135.28 | − 2.9 | − 2.9 | − 59.38 | ||
− 15.2 | − 30.134 | − 144.78 | − 1.45 | − 21.72 | − 63.24 | ||
− 15.2 | − 34.276 | − 153.9 | − 2.9 | − 28.97 | − 72.9 | ||
− 15.2 | − 61.56 | − 164.92 | − 4.83 | − 5.24 | − 64 | ||
− 15.2 | − 70.68 | − 175.56 | − 4.83 | − 4.83 | − 73.1 | ||
− 15.2 | − 93.1 | − 167.2 | − 1.45 | − 26.55 | − 66.41 | ||
− 15.2 | − 102.6 | − 180.88 | − 2.9 | − 28.97 | − 68.83 | ||
− 15.2 | − 124.26 | − 178.98 | |||||
− 15.2 | − 156.94 | − 156.94 | 9.37 | 0 | 0 | − 9.37 | |
− 22.8 | − 30.43 | − 164.16 | [10] | − 3.9 | − 3.87 | − 37 | |
− 22.8 | − 30.97 | − 170.24 | − 2.98 | − 3.87 | − 29.79 | ||
− 22.8 | − 35.87 | − 171 | − 4.39 | − 8.51 | − 45.29 | ||
− 22.8 | − 35.56 | − 179.36 | − 5.7 | − 14.26 | − 46.61 | ||
− 22.8 | − 68.78 | − 188.86 | − 4.55 | − 18.82 | − 46.13 | ||
− 22.8 | − 106.78 | − 197.98 | − 4.23 | − 17.14 | − 43.25 | ||
− 22.8 | − 102.22 | − 201.78 | − 5.05 | − 26.57 | − 52.86 | ||
− 22.8 | − 102.22 | − 210.52 | − 15.69 | − 15.22 | − 74.97 | ||
− 22.8 | − 136.04 | − 210.52 | − 12.42 | − 11.54 | − 58.15 | ||
− 22.8 | − 143.64 | − 207.48 | − 14.79 | − 14.1 | − 67.28 | ||
− 22.8 | − 144.02 | − 188.1 | − 29.03 | − 28.65 | − 96.11 | ||
− 22.8 | − 181.26 | − 181.26 |
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
− 22.8 | − 177.84 | − 177.84 | 10.74 | 0 | 0 | − 10.74 | |
− 22.8 | − 175.18 | − 175.18 | [10] | − 5.05 | − 9.46 | − 45.17 | |
0.82 | − 4.1 | − 4.1 | − 4.88 | − 14.26 | − 49.02 | ||
0.94 | − 3.14 | − 3.14 | − 4.72 | − 23.85 | − 47.57 | ||
− 0.29 | − 29.41 | − 29.41 | − 4.72 | − 36 | − 48.05 | ||
− 2.4 | − 47.93 | − 47.93 | − 4.23 | − 32.64 | − 43.25 | ||
0 | − 25.9 | − 25.9 | − 3.9 | − 34.08 | − 38.44 | ||
1.71 | 0 | 0 | − 3.74 | − 37.12 | − 38.44 | ||
− 0.25 | − 2.52 | − 25.17 | − 18.47 | − 27.37 | − 91.3 | ||
− 1.83 | − 1.83 | − 36.69 | − 17.49 | − 25.93 | − 86.02 | ||
− 0.21 | − 0.21 | − 20.82 | − 18.31 | − 36.48 | − 91.3 | ||
0 | 0 | − 19.29 | − 17.82 | − 43.03 | − 84.58 | ||
28.88 | 34.2 | ||||||
[39] | − 12.92 | − 64.2 | − 128.4 | 1.2 | 0 | − 23.56 | |
− 10.9 | − 81.6 | − 108.8 | 1.98 | 0 | − 12.97 | ||
1.43 | − 1.43 | − 5.83 | 2.3 | 0 | − 9.31 | ||
1.37 | − 2.74 | − 5.48 | 3.14 | 0 | 0 | ||
1.32 | − 3.96 | − 5.28 | 0 | − 10.75 | − 43.01 | ||
0 | − 8.78 | − 35.12 | 0 | − 22.75 | − 45.49 | ||
0 | − 27.24 | − 36.32 | 0 | − 31.88 | − 42.5 | ||
0.95 | 0 | − 19.04 | 0 | − 40.7 | − 40.7 | ||
1.41 | 0 | − 14.06 | − 13.56 | − 34.25 | − 134.66 | ||
1.85 | 0 | − 7.23 | − 14.33 | − 72.05 | − 141.82 | ||
2.03 | 0 | − 4.06 | − 12.56 | − 93.15 | − 126.78 |
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
− 9.84 | − 98.6 | − 98.2 | 23.32 | ||||
1.67 | − 6.68 | − 6.68 | [45] | 0.87 | − 2.24 | − 4.48 | |
1.09 | − 10.8 | − 10.8 | 0.82 | − 3.56 | − 4.58 | ||
0.58 | − 11.9 | − 11.9 | 0 | − 7.15 | − 28.6 | ||
0 | − 33.3 | − 33.3 | 0 | − 15.44 | − 30.87 | ||
2.34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | − 22.29 | − 29.72 | ||
− 11.26 | − 28.15 | − 112.6 | 0.72 | 0 | − 14.34 | ||
0 | 0 | − 28.88 | 1.02 | 0 | − 10.26 | ||
38 | 1.41 | 0 | − 5.62 | ||||
[39] | 0 | 0 | − 38 | 1.61 | 0 | − 3.22 | |
0 | − 8.25 | − 44.84 | 0 | − 27.98 | − 27.98 | ||
0 | − 2.91 | − 44.46 | 1.85 | 0 | 0 | ||
0 | − 13.26 | − 56.62 | 0.87 | − 4.08 | − 4.08 | ||
0 | − 14.71 | − 61.56 | 0.59 | − 5.8 | − 5.8 | ||
0 | − 26.14 | − 57.76 | 0.28 | − 6.9 | − 6.9 | ||
0 | − 38 | − 61.56 | 0.89 | − 1.13 | − 4.86 | ||
0 | − 36.06 | − 68.78 | − 22.8 | − 173.28 | − 173.28 | ||
0 | − 51.3 | − 69.16 | − 22.8 | − 22.8 | − 151.62 | ||
0 | − 58.14 | − 70.68 | − 30.4 | − 38.38 | − 190.38 | ||
− 30.4 | − 189.24 | − 188.86 | − 30.4 | − 74.48 | − 207.1 | ||
− 30.4 | − 39.52 | − 199.5 | − 30.4 | − 114.38 | − 213.56 | ||
− 30.4 | − 77.9 | − 225.34 | − 30.4 | − 154.66 | − 227.62 | ||
− 38 | − 41.04 | − 206.34 | − 30.4 | − 193.04 | − 192.28 | ||
− 38 | − 121.98 | − 237.5 | 0 | 0 | − 23.32 | ||
− 38 | − 169.86 | − 247 |
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24.51 | 22.35 | 0 | 0 | − 22.35 | |||
[38] | 2.32 | 0 | 0 | [70] | 0 | − 27.41 | − 27.41 |
0 | 0 | − 24.51 | − 325.34 | − 325.34 | − 325.34 | ||
0 | − 8.69 | − 34.74 | − 5.45 | − 5.57 | − 52.83 | ||
0 | − 18.61 | − 37.22 | − 7.15 | − 17.53 | − 72.87 | ||
0 | − 26.84 | − 35.78 | − 7.82 | − 21.38 | − 71.77 | ||
0 | − 33.52 | − 33.52 | − 6.81 | − 36.15 | − 69.82 | ||
0.67 | 0 | − 13.4 | − 6.08 | − 45.77 | − 61.65 | ||
0.92 | 0 | − 9.2 | − 5.73 | − 56.96 | − 57.23 | ||
1.45 | 0 | − 5.8 | − 37.73 | − 38.29 | − 150.36 | ||
1.81 | 0 | − 3.62 | − 45.47 | − 55.89 | − 188.01 | ||
− 2.11 | − 2.11 | − 42.14 | − 46.57 | − 135.71 | − 187.28 | ||
− 0.28 | − 0.28 | − 27.62 | − 41.73 | − 163.47 | − 166.59 | ||
− 0.31 | − 3.1 | − 31.02 | − 25.05 | − 83.35 | − 83.96 | ||
− 0.34 | − 8.55 | − 34.19 | 39.0 | ||||
− 0.36 | − 18.06 | − 36.12 | [46] | 0 | 0 | − 39 | |
− 0.38 | − 28.85 | − 38.46 | 0 | − 9.75 | − 48.75 | ||
− 0.35 | − 35.45 | − 35.45 | 0 | − 24.96 | − 49.92 | ||
− 2.7 | − 53.93 | − 53.93 | 0 | − 45.63 | − 45.63 | ||
0.92 | − 2.31 | − 9.24 | 1.57 | 0 | − 31.43 | ||
0.87 | − 4.36 | − 8.71 | 2.29 | 0 | − 22.93 | ||
0.69 | − 5.18 | − 6.9 | 2.96 | 0 | − 14.78 | ||
0.61 | − 6.13 | − 6.13 | 2.98 | 0 | − 9.95 | ||
0.51 | − 10.27 | − 10.27 | 4.29 | 0 | 0 | ||
1.19 | − 5.96 | − 5.96 | 4.56 | 0.91 | 0 | ||
1.46 | − 4.85 | − 4.85 | 4.1 | 2.05 | 0 |
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
31.7 | 3.16 | 3.16 | 0 | ||||
[40] | − 5 | − 5 | − 51 | 30.03 | |||
− 10 | − 10 | − 69.3 | [46] | 0 | 0 | − 30.03 | |
− 15 | − 15 | − 86.9 | 0 | − 7.63 | − 38.14 | ||
− 20 | − 20 | − 106.3 | 0 | − 19.97 | − 39.94 | ||
− 25 | − 25 | − 123.2 | 0 | − 34.95 | − 34.95 | ||
− 30 | − 30 | − 147.2 | 1.23 | 0 | − 24.62 | ||
42.7 | 1.43 | 0 | − 14.32 | ||||
[40] | − 10 | − 10 | − 7.64 | 1.9 | 0 | − 9.49 | |
− 15 | − 15 | − 103 | 2.07 | 0 | − 6.91 | ||
− 20 | − 20 | − 113.4 | 2.88 | 0 | 0 | ||
− 30 | − 30 | − 144 | 3 | 0.65 | 0 | ||
48.6 | 3.12 | 1.56 | 0 | ||||
[40] | − 5 | − 5 | − 97.5 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 0 | |
− 10 | − 10 | − 119.4 | 21.14 | ||||
− 15 | − 15 | − 148.3 | [33] | 0 | 0 | − 21.14 | |
− 20 | − 20 | − 169.4 | 1.93 | 0 | 0 | ||
− 5 | − 15 | − 116 | 1.66 | 0 | − 26.78 | ||
− 5 | − 20 | − 126.8 | 1.34 | 0 | − 27.73 | ||
− 10 | − 20 | − 136.5 | 1.22 | 0 | − 29.82 | ||
− 10 | − 25 | − 146.5 | 0.93 | 0 | − 27.15 | ||
− 10 | − 30 | − 163.3 | 0.83 | 0 | − 30.23 | ||
− 15 | − 25 | − 171 | 45.45[33] |
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20[32] | 0 | 0 | − 45.45 | ||||
0 | 0 | − 20 | 2.67 | 0 | 0 | ||
− 5.2 | − 5.2 | − 52.43 | 2.33 | 0 | − 50.13 | ||
− 7.36 | − 18.4 | − 73.6 | 2.2 | 0 | − 58.65 | ||
− 7.18 | − 21.53 | − 71.77 | 1.99 | 0 | − 60.99 | ||
− 7.02 | − 35.1 | − 70.2 | 1.78 | 0 | − 60.37 | ||
− 6.21 | − 46.6 | − 62.13 | 0.96 | 0 | − 56.08 | ||
− 6.17 | − 61.71 | − 61.71 | 27.61[33] | ||||
− 37.34 | − 37.34 | − 149.35 | 0 | 0 | − 27.61 | ||
− 47 | − 56.4 | − 188.01 | 2.55 | 0 | 0 | ||
− 46.82 | − 93.64 | − 187.28 | 2.28 | 0 | − 38.45 | ||
− 44.04 | − 176.17 | − 176.17 | 1.99 | 0 | − 43.56 | ||
1.76 | 0 | − 42.67 | |||||
1.48 | 0 | − 47.08 | |||||
1.23 | 0 | − 38.29 |
Appendix 2 The strength of different high performance concrete (HPC) under different stress states
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
60.16 | 0 | 0 | –60.16 | 44.13 | 0 | 0 | –44.13 |
5.08 | 0 | 0 | [94] | 1.1 | –2.21 | –22.68 | |
2.2 | 0 | –43.92 | 1.06 | –5.38 | –21.89 | ||
3.23 | 0 | –32.26 | 1.01 | –10.33 | –20.65 | ||
4.28 | 0 | –17.11 | 0.97 | –14.70 | –19.59 | ||
4.73 | 0 | –9.45 | 0.88 | –17.74 | –17.74 | ||
4.86 | 0 | –6.48 | 1.46 | –1.46 | –15.14 | ||
2.23 | –44.64 | –44.64 | 1.41 | –3.53 | –14.17 | ||
3.02 | –30.18 | –30.18 | 1.37 | –6.88 | –13.77 | ||
3.76 | –15.05 | –15.05 | 1.28 | –9.66 | –12.93 | ||
4.11 | –11.73 | –11.73 | 1.15 | –11.47 | –11.47 | ||
4.19 | –8.37 | –8.37 | 1.41 | –0.71 | –7.10 | ||
4.22 | –5.63 | –5.63 | 1.59 | –1.32 | –5.34 | ||
4.23 | –4.23 | –4.23 | 2.03 | –2.03 | –4.10 | ||
0 | –66.78 | –66.78 | 2.82 | –2.82 | –3.75 | ||
–14.36 | –38.78 | –143.63 | 2.91 | –2.91 | –2.91 | ||
–15.34 | –64.43 | –153.4 | 3.27 | 0 | 0 | ||
–15.77 | –82.03 | –157.74 | |||||
–15.25 | –117.45 | –152.53 | 66.43 | 0 | 0 | –66.43 | |
–13.16 | –131.64 | –131.64 | [94] | 1.33 | –2.66 | –29.43 | |
0 | –13.52 | –67.58 | 1.33 | –6.51 | –27.24 | ||
0 | –20.99 | –69.97 | 1.26 | –12.49 | –26.31 | ||
0 | –30.33 | –75.83 | 1.13 | –17.21 | –22.92 | ||
0 | –36.93 | –73.85 | 1.06 | –21.79 | –21.79 | ||
0 | –51.28 | –68.37 | 1.86 | –1.86 | –18.40 | ||
1.73 | –4.32 | –17.21 |
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
46.09 | –5.07 | –20.28 | –102.78 | 1.59 | –8.10 | –16.14 | |
[47] | –5.07 | –63.60 | –106.47 | 1.53 | –11.36 | –15.15 | |
–4.61 | –88.49 | –93.1 | 1.46 | –14.42 | –14.42 | ||
–14.29 | –29.04 | –144.72 | 2.26 | –2.26 | –11.23 | ||
–16.59 | –100.02 | –166.85 | 2.52 | –2.52 | –8.37 | ||
–13.37 | –129.51 | –136.43 | 2.79 | –2.79 | –5.51 | ||
–30.42 | –41.02 | –204.64 | 3.12 | –3.12 | –4.12 | ||
–34.57 | –139.19 | –231.83 | 3.19 | –3.19 | –3.19 | ||
–27.65 | –176.99 | –186.2 | 4.45 | 0 | 0 | ||
0 | –7.91 | –79.52 | |||||
72.73 | –7.27 | –28.36 | –144.01 | 0 | –21.59 | –86.29 | |
[47] | –8 | –100.37 | –167.28 | 0 | –44.84 | –89.75 | |
–7.27 | –141.82 | –149.1 | 0 | –66.03 | –88.09 | ||
–20.36 | –40.73 | –203.64 | 0 | –80.51 | –80.51 | ||
–22.55 | –134.55 | –224.74 | 1.46 | 0 | –33.15 | ||
–20.36 | –192.73 | –202.92 | 1.86 | 0 | –21.32 | ||
–40 | –53.09 | –266.19 | 2.39 | 0 | –10.89 | ||
–40 | –161.46 | –268.37 | 2.99 | 0 | –6.71 | ||
–35.64 | –226.92 | –238.55 | 3.72 | 0 | –4.25 | ||
4.45 | 1.13 | 0 | |||||
83.44 | –8.34 | –33.38 | –167.71 | 5.18 | 2.59 | 0 | |
[47] | –8.34 | –102.63 | –171.89 | 4.85 | 3.65 | 0 | |
–7.51 | –148.52 | –156.87 | 5.05 | 5.05 | 0 | ||
–22.53 | –45.89 | –228.63 | |||||
–23.36 | –141.01 | –235.3 | 90.64 | 0 | 0 | –90.64 | |
–20.86 | –201.09 | –211.94 | 1.45 | –2.99 | –29.55 | ||
–44.22 | –58.41 | –292.87 | 1.36 | –6.89 | –27.46 | ||
–42.55 | –268.68 | –282.86 | 1.27 | –13.05 | –26.10 | ||
1.18 | –18.04 | –24.02 |
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
61.17 | 0 | 0 | –61.17 | 1.09 | –22.30 | –22.30 | |
[47] | 0 | –3.67 | –69.73 | 1.99 | –1.99 | –20.03 | |
0 | –16.52 | –78.30 | 1.9 | –4.80 | –19.03 | ||
0 | –34.26 | –81.97 | 1.81 | –9.15 | –18.40 | ||
0 | –53.22 | –85.64 | 1.81 | –13.32 | –17.77 | ||
0 | –70.35 | –84.41 | 1.72 | –17.22 | –17.22 | ||
0 | –76.46 | –77.07 | 2.72 | –2.72 | –13.69 | ||
3.17 | –3.17 | –10.70 | |||||
72.44 | 0 | 0 | –72.44 | 3.44 | –3.44 | –6.89 | |
[47] | 0 | –4.35 | –90.55 | 3.72 | –3.72 | –4.89 | |
0 | –18.83 | –94.90 | 3.9 | –3.90 | –3.90 | ||
0 | –38.39 | –96.35 | 5.17 | 0 | 0 | ||
0 | –55.78 | –93.45 | |||||
0 | –68.09 | –85.48 | 47.07 | 0 | –5.79 | –58.04 | |
0 | –76.79 | –81.13 | [46] | 0 | –15.72 | –62.84 | |
0 | –32.81 | –65.62 | |||||
94.2 | 0 | 0 | –94.20 | 0 | –47.68 | –63.54 | |
[47] | 0 | –5.65 | –105.50 | 0 | –57.10 | –57.10 | |
0 | –23.55 | –113.04 | 1.18 | 0 | –26.50 | ||
0 | –49.93 | –119.63 | 1.6 | 0 | –18.36 | ||
0 | –71.59 | –113.98 | 2.12 | 0 | –9.65 | ||
0 | –93.26 | –112.10 | 2.59 | 0 | –5.93 | ||
0 | –102.68 | –103.62 | 3.06 | 0 | –3.48 | ||
3.58 | 0.89 | 0 |
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
60.15 | 4.27 | 0 | 0 | 3.67 | 1.84 | 0 | |
[47] | 2.29 | 0 | –4.81 | 3.44 | 2.59 | 0 | |
2.41 | 0 | –12.03 | 3.58 | 3.58 | 0 | ||
1.86 | 0 | –18.65 | 0 | 0 | –47.07 | ||
1.44 | 0 | –28.87 | 3.53 | 0 | 0 | ||
1.02 | 0 | –40.90 | |||||
0 | 0 | –60.15 | 87.96 | 0 | –10.20 | –102.39 | |
[46] | 0 | –27.80 | –111.27 | ||||
69.17 | 4.91 | 0 | 0 | 0 | –57.88 | –115.67 | |
[47] | 2.97 | 0 | –3.46 | 0 | –85.15 | –113.56 | |
2.56 | 0 | –4.84 | 0 | –104.23 | –104.23 | ||
2.77 | 0 | –13.83 | 1.58 | 0 | –36.77 | ||
2.21 | 0 | –21.44 | 2.02 | 0 | –22.78 | ||
1.8 | 0 | –35.97 | 2.55 | 0 | –11.61 | ||
1.11 | 0 | –45.65 | 3.43 | 0 | –7.83 | ||
0 | 0 | –69.17 | 4.4 | 0 | –5.10 | ||
5.19 | 0 | 0 | |||||
87.44 | 5.16 | 0 | 0 | 5.45 | 1.32 | 0 | |
[47] | 4.63 | 0 | –6.12 | 5.19 | 2.64 | 0 | |
3.24 | 0 | –6.12 | 5.1 | 3.87 | 0 | ||
2.89 | 0 | –13.99 | 5.28 | 5.28 | 0 | ||
2.62 | 0 | –26.23 | 0 | 0 | –87.96 | ||
1.66 | 0 | –33.23 | |||||
1.22 | 0 | –49.84 | |||||
0 | 0 | –87.44 |
Appendix 3 The strength of normal–strength concrete(NSC) at different temperatures[63]
T/℃ | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | T/℃ | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
200 ℃ | 0 | 0 | –32.60 | 400 ℃ | 0 | 0 | –23.80 |
–12.85 | –32.01 | –126.31 | –11.58 | –29.31 | –114.37 | ||
–13.65 | –68.22 | –135.42 | –12.15 | –60.43 | –120.56 | ||
–12.16 | –90.25 | –119.30 | –11.17 | –83.48 | –110.35 | ||
–9.53 | –94.28 | –95.67 | –8.92 | –87.56 | –88.42 | ||
0 | –22.40 | –44.80 | 0 | –7.93 | –32.70 | ||
0 | –31.73 | –42.30 | 0 | –17.30 | –34.60 | ||
0 | –38.73 | –39.50 | 0 | –25.05 | –33.40 | ||
1.24 | 0 | –12.30 | 0 | –29.70 | –29.70 | ||
1.62 | 0 | –8.79 | 0.81 | 0 | –8.10 | ||
1.78 | 0 | –7.12 | 0.98 | 0 | –5.21 | ||
2.7 | 0 | 0 | 1.16 | 0 | –4.25 | ||
0 | –10.30 | –41.20 | 1.42 | 0 | 0 | ||
300 ℃ | 0 | 0 | –30.05 | 500 ℃ | 0 | 0 | –19.50 |
–12.24 | –31.05 | –123.32 | –11.03 | –27.55 | –107.81 | ||
–13.35 | –66.08 | –130.41 | –11.75 | –59.36 | –116.35 | ||
–11.62 | –87.21 | –115.38 | –10.73 | –80.21 | –106.40 | ||
–9.41 | –93.52 | –92.12 | –8.59 | –86.31 | –85.52 | ||
0 | –9.63 | –38.50 | 0 | –6.00 | –24.00 | ||
0 | –20.75 | –41.50 | 0 | –13.75 | –27.50 | ||
0 | –29.70 | –39.60 | 0 | –20.25 | –27.00 | ||
0 | –35.20 | –35.20 | 0 | –25.20 | –25.20 | ||
1.13 | 0 | –11.30 | 0.57 | 9 | –5.85 | ||
1.48 | 0 | –6.85 | 0.74 | 0 | –3.84 | ||
1.61 | 0 | –6.02 | 0.81 | 0 | –3.25 | ||
2.01 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 |
Appendix 4 The strength of high performance concrete (HPC) at different temperatures[77,78,87]
T/℃ | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | T/℃ | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
200 ℃ | 0 | 0 | –63.96 | 400 ℃ | –11.38 | –11.38 | –113.84 |
4.81 | 0 | 0 | –13.68 | –36.95 | –136.83 | ||
2.07 | 0 | –41.33 | –14.57 | –61.18 | –145.66 | ||
2.98 | 0 | –29.75 | –14.81 | –77.02 | –148.12 | ||
3.7 | 0 | –14.81 | –14.13 | –108.76 | –141.25 | ||
4.27 | 0 | –8.54 | –12.24 | –122.36 | –122.36 | ||
4.57 | 0 | –6.09 | |||||
1.94 | –38.71 | –38.71 | 500 ℃ | 0 | 0 | –35.72 | |
2.75 | –27.52 | –27.52 | 1.82 | 0 | 0 | ||
3.53 | –14.12 | –14.12 | 0.72 | 0 | –14.30 | ||
3.55 | –10.15 | –10.15 | 1.05 | 0 | –10.49 | ||
3.98 | –7.96 | –7.96 | 1.26 | 0 | –5.04 | ||
3.94 | –5.25 | –5.25 | 1.33 | 0 | –2.65 | ||
4.19 | –4.19 | –4.19 | 1.02 | 0 | –1.36 | ||
0 | –67.48 | –67.48 | 0.66 | –13.11 | –13.11 | ||
–12.10 | –12.10 | –121.00 | 0.9 | –9.04 | –9.04 | ||
0 | –14.42 | –72.10 | 1.06 | –4.22 | –4.22 | ||
0 | –20.69 | –68.98 | 1.17 | –3.34 | –3.34 | ||
0 | –29.06 | –72.65 | 1.43 | –2.86 | –2.86 | ||
0 | –36.80 | –73.59 | 1.49 | –1.98 | –1.98 | ||
0 | –53.22 | –70.96 | 1.52 | –1.52 | –1.52 | ||
–14.77 | –39.89 | –147.74 | 0 | –8.38 | –41.91 | ||
–15.01 | –63.05 | –150.11 | 0 | –13.72 | –45.73 | ||
–15.53 | –80.76 | –155.31 | 0 | –18.70 | –46.74 | ||
–14.60 | –112.42 | –146.00 | 0 | –25.36 | –50.72 | ||
–12.38 | –123.78 | –123.78 | 0 | –35.78 | –47.70 | ||
0 | –42.26 | –42.26 |
T/℃ | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | T/℃ | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
300 ℃ | 0 | 0 | –61.64 | –8.87 | –8.87 | –88.65 | |
4.14 | 0 | 0 | –11.03 | –29.77 | –110.27 | ||
1.86 | 0 | –37.22 | –11.31 | –47.50 | –113.09 | ||
2.34 | 0 | –23.41 | –11.88 | –61.76 | –118.77 | ||
3.11 | 0 | –12.43 | –11.60 | –89.34 | –116.03 | ||
3.48 | 0 | –6.97 | –9.62 | –96.16 | –96.16 | ||
3.81 | 0 | –5.08 | |||||
1.68 | –33.51 | –33.51 | 600 ℃ | 0 | 0 | –24.90 | |
2.22 | –22.22 | –22.22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
2.7 | –10.80 | –10.80 | 0.39 | 0 | –7.82 | ||
3.15 | –9.00 | –9.00 | 0.52 | 0 | –5.20 | ||
3.42 | –6.85 | –6.85 | 0.58 | 0 | –2.33 | ||
3.56 | –4.74 | –4.74 | 0.99 | 0 | –1.98 | ||
3.47 | –3.47 | –3.47 | 0.76 | 0 | –1.01 | ||
0 | –66.69 | –66.69 | 0.35 | –7.00 | –7.00 | ||
–12.30 | –12.30 | –123.00 | 0.46 | –4.65 | –4.65 | ||
0 | –13.03 | –65.16 | 0.61 | –2.42 | –2.42 | ||
0 | –21.21 | –70.70 | 0.68 | –1.93 | –1.93 | ||
0 | –28.54 | –71.35 | 0.73 | –1.46 | –1.46 | ||
0 | –37.59 | –75.18 | 0.77 | –1.02 | –1.02 | ||
0 | –53.08 | –70.77 | 0.81 | –0.81 | –0.81 | ||
–12.30 | –12.30 | –123.00 | 0 | –5.98 | –29.90 | ||
–13.89 | –37.49 | –145.85 | 0 | –10.15 | –33.83 | ||
–16.05 | –67.41 | –160.50 | 0 | –14.18 | –35.46 | ||
–15.69 | –81.60 | –156.92 | 0 | –18.31 | –36.61 | ||
–15.41 | –118.63 | –154.07 | 0 | –25.39 | –33.85 | ||
–12.82 | –128.22 | –128.22 | 0 | –30.65 | –30.65 | ||
–6.79 | –6.79 | –67.86 | |||||
400 ℃ | 0 | 0 | –49.70 | –7.74 | –20.90 | –77.41 | |
2.99 | 0 | 0 | –8.99 | –37.75 | –89.89 | ||
1.59 | 0 | –31.80 | –9.05 | –47.07 | –90.51 | ||
2.08 | 0 | –20.79 | –8.77 | –67.51 | –87.67 | ||
2.19 | 0 | –8.75 | –7.55 | –75.46 | –75.46 | ||
2.26 | 0 | –4.52 | |||||
2.5 | 0 | –3.33 | |||||
1.07 | –21.48 | –21.48 | |||||
1.59 | –15.91 | –15.91 | |||||
1.84 | –7.34 | –7.34 | |||||
2.09 | –5.98 | –5.98 | |||||
2.22 | –4.44 | –4.44 | |||||
2.48 | –3.30 | –3.30 | |||||
2.52 | –2.52 | –2.52 | |||||
0 | –11.41 | –57.04 | |||||
0 | –17.81 | –59.36 | |||||
0 | –24.67 | –61.68 | |||||
0 | –32.21 | –64.41 | |||||
0 | –42.21 | –60.28 | |||||
0 | –55.88 | –55.88 |
Appendix 5 The strength of Lightweight aggregate concrete (LAC) under different stress states
Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) | Fc/MPa | \(\sigma_{1}\) | \(\sigma_{2}\) | \(\sigma_{3}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16.68 | 0 | 0 | –16.68 | 0.86 | 0.15 | –1.15 | |
[50] | 1.75 | 0 | 0 | 0.65 | 0.13 | –1.30 | |
0 | –21.35 | –21.35 | 0.41 | 0.21 | –4.10 | ||
–2.82 | –2.82 | –28.17 | 0.6 | 0.6 | –0.80 | ||
–3.15 | –7.87 | –31.49 | 0.58 | 0.58 | –2.30 | ||
–3.10 | –9.30 | –31.00 | 0.71 | –2.84 | –2.84 | ||
–3.42 | –17.08 | –34.15 | 1.97 | –2.62 | –2.62 | ||
–3.18 | –23.85 | –31.80 | 1.72 | –1.72 | –1.72 | ||
–3.03 | –30.32 | –30.32 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | ||
–11.30 | –13.56 | –45.19 | 1.23 | 0.62 | 0.62 | ||
–12.08 | –24.16 | –48.31 | 1.84 | 0.46 | 0.46 | ||
–10.98 | –32.93 | –43.90 | 0 | –5.25 | –20.98 | ||
–9.77 | –39.09 | –39.09 | 0 | –10.28 | –20.56 | ||
–15.20 | –15.20 | –50.66 | 0 | –15.06 | –20.08 | ||
–15.32 | –25.53 | –51.05 | 0 | –21.35 | –21.35 | ||
–14.21 | –47.38 | –47.38 | |||||
–29.43 | –29.43 | –58.86 | 25.5 | –5.0 | –10.0 | –43.1 | |
–25.74 | –38.60 | –51.47 | [36] | –5.0 | –15.0 | –49.5 | |
–25.66 | –51.31 | –51.31 | –7.5 | –10.0 | –48.3 | ||
–41.96 | –41.96 | –55.94 | –7.5 | –15.0 | –56.9 | ||
–38.03 | –50.70 | –50.70 | –10.0 | –15.0 | –61.2 | ||
–57.74 | –57.74 | –57.74 | –10.0 | –17.5 | –62.3 | ||
0.48 | 0 | –9.69 | –12.5 | –15.0 | –63.5 | ||
1.25 | 0 | –4.99 | –3.0 | –10.0 | –45.7 | ||
0.63 | 0 | –6.33 | –5.0 | –10.0 | –54.9 | ||
1.8 | 0 | –3.60 | –5.0 | –15.0 | –65.5 | ||
1.98 | 0 | –2.64 | –7.5 | –15.0 | –65.5 | ||
–10.59 | –10.59 | –42.34 | –10.0 | –15.0 | –75.9 | ||
0.9 | 0.09 | –0.90 | –12.5 | –15.0 | –82.5 |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Zheng, D., Wu, X. et al. A Review of Three Common Concrete Multiaxial Strength Criteria from 2010 to 2020. Arch Computat Methods Eng 30, 811–829 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09822-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09822-8