Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The strength of seeds and their destruction by granivorous insects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of seed structure and strength on their destruction by granivores is central to understanding the dynamics of granivore-plant interactions. For up to nine seed species, the effects of seed size (cm3), mass (mg), density (mg/cm3) and coat strength (MPa) on the damage inflicted by three post-dispersal granivores (Harpalus pensylvanicus, Anisodactylus sanctaecrucis, and Gryllus pennsylvanicus) were evaluated. Seed destruction rates by G. pennsylvanicus were statistically unrelated to the size and toughness of the seeds. Seed densities significantly affected their destruction by A. sanctaecrucis and H. pensylvanicus, as did seed size, mass, and strength in H. pensylvanicus under choice conditions. The carabid beetles destroyed more of the small, denser seeds with stronger seed coats. The results show that different granivores are able to distinguish the structural strength and physical density of seeds as well as seed size. The relative ability of granivores to detect these seed characteristics offers a way in which diverse communities of post-dispersal insect granivores can persist within a single habitat. The authors redefine how the strength of biological structures should be evaluated in ecological studies, using guidelines commonplace in the field of engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azcarate FM, Arqueros L, Sanchez AM, Peco B (2005) Seed and fruit selection by harvester ants, Messor barbarus, in Mediterranean grassland and scrubland. Funct Ecol 19:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie AJ, Culver DC (1981) The guild of myrmecochores in the herbaceous flora of West Virginia forests. Ecology 62:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell EA, Janzen DH (1971) Medical and ecological considerations of L-Dopa and 5–HTP in seeds. Nature 229:136–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg RY (1975) Myrmecochorous plants in Australia and their dispersal by ants. Aust J Bot 23:475–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL, Reichman OJ, Davidson DW (1979) Granivory in desert systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:201–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brust GE, House GJ (1988) Weed seed destruction by arthropods and rodents in low-input soybean agroecosystems. Am J Alternative Agric 3:19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardina J, Norquay HM, Stinner BR, McCartney DA (1996) Postdispersal predation of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds. Weed Science 44:534–539

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona DM, Menalled FD, Landis DA (1999) Gryllus pennsylvanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): laboratory weed seed predation and within field activity-density. J Econ Entomol 92:825–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2000) Seed predators and plant population dynamics. In: Fenner M (ed) Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. 2nd edn. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK, pp 167–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist TO, MacMahon JA (1992) Harvester ant foraging and shrub-steppe seeds: interactions of seed resources and seed use. Ecology 73:1768–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallandt ER, Molloy T, Lynch RP, Drummond FA (2005) Effect of cover-cropping systems on invertebrate seed predation. Weed Sci 53:69–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Honek A, Martinkova Z, Jarosik V (2003) Ground beetles (Carabidae) as seed predators. Eur J Entomol 100:531–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1971) Seed predation by animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:465–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1982) Removal of seeds from horse dung by tropical rodents: Influence of habitat and amount of dung. Ecology 63:1887–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH, Juster HB, Liener IE (1976) Insecticidal action of phytohemagglutinin in black beans on a bruchid beetle. Science 192:795–796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren JG (2005) Ground beetles as weed control agents: the influence of farm management on granivory. Am Entomol 51:224–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren JG, Shaw JT, Zaborski ER, Eastman CE (2006) The influence of organic transition systems on beneficial ground-dwelling arthropods and predation of insects and weed seeds. Renew Agricul Food Syst 21:227–237

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon JA, Mull JF, Crist TO (2000) Harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.): Their community and ecosystem influences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:265–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauschline AL, Watson SJ, Brown VK, Froud-Williams RJ (2005) Post-dispersal seed predation of non-target weeds in arable crops. Weed Res 45:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menalled FD, Marino PC, Renner KA, Landis DA (2000) Post-dispersal weed seed predation in Michigan corn fields as a function of agricultural landscape structure. Agricul Ecosyst Environ 77:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison JEJ, Williams DF, Oi DH, Potter KN (1997) Damage to dry crop seed by red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Econ Entomol 90:218–222

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dowd DJ, Hay ME (1980) Mutualism between harvester ants and a desert ephemeral: seed escape from rodents. Ecology 61:531–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pausch RD, Pausch LM (1980) Observations on the biology of the slender seedcorn beetle, Clivina impressifrons (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Great Lakes Entomol 13:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizo MA, Oliveira PS (2001) Size and lipid content of nonmyrmecochorous diaspores: Effects on the interaction with litter-foraging ants in the the Atlantic rainforest of Brazil. Plant Ecol 157:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Brand MR (1975) The production and utilization of seeds in plains grassland of Southeastern Arizona. Ecology 56:1158–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ready CC, Vinson SB (1995) Seed selection by the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the laboratory. Environ Entomol 24:1422–1431

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgerson L (1998) Mechanical defense in seeds adapted for ant dispersal. Ecology 79:1669–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CC (1970) The coevolution of pine squirrels (Tamiasciurus) and conifers. Ecol Monogr 40:350–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ, Smith TB (1989) Portable device for measuring seed hardness. J Field Ornithol 60:56–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TB (1990) Resource use of a bill morph of an african finch: evidence for intraspecific competition. Ecology 71:1246–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroshine R (2001) Physical Properties of Agricultural Materials and Food Products. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT Software I (2004) SYSTAT 11. In. Systat Software, Inc., Richmond, CA

  • Tevis LJ (1958) Interrelations between the harvestor ant Veromessor pergandei (Mayr) and some desert ephemerals. Ecology 39:695–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meij MAA, Bout RG (2000) Seed selection in the Java sparrow (Padda oryzivora): preference and mechanical constraint. Can J Zool 78:1668–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meij MAA, Bout RG (2004) Scaling of jaw muscle size and maximal bite force in finches. J Exp Biol 207:2745–2753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Alyssa Bechen, Gabriella Carrasco, Jenna Carsrud, Janet Fergen, Matt Jones, Lacey Kruse, Juan Carlos Laso, and Malissa Mayer for technical assistance with conducting the research and collating the data. Frank Drummond and Louis Hesler provided helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript. Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute an endorsement or a recommendation by the USDA for its use.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan G. Lundgren.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Stanislav Gorb

The U.S. Government’s right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright is acknowledged

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lundgren, J.G., Rosentrater, K.A. The strength of seeds and their destruction by granivorous insects. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 1, 93–99 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-007-9008-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-007-9008-1

Keywords

Navigation