Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Empirical Formulation for Bow Flare Slamming and Deck Wetness for Displacement Vessels

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Application Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents an empirical method to calculate bow flare slamming pressure and the green water load. Many empirical formulae for various types of vessels have been provided by rules of ship classification societies. In the present work, attempt is made to develop generalized formulations for all types of displacement vessels. Extreme sea conditions are considered. Bow flare pressure is derived in terms of flare and waterline angles. Specific condition for limiting waterline angle is derived based on 2D numerical simulations. Deck wetness is derived in terms of static and dynamic swell-up and the relative motion. Variation of static swell along the length is determined based on potential solution based analyses considering variation in vessels’ hull. 2D wedge simulations are carried out to validate the formulation of dynamic swell-up. Results of the calculated bow flare and deck pressures are compared with various ship classification society formulations and the trends are found to be in good agreement in general barring at bow flare where lower pressure is found in most of the presented cases. Also IACS UR S21A (2018) governing minimum pressure for deck scantlings is found to be conservative in few of the presented cases. Although scantlings assessment is not performed, the presented new formulations may help in realistic assessment of scantlings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

L :

vessel length, m

B :

vessel breadth, m

C b :

block coefficient of the vessel at design draft

U :

vessel design speed, m/s

Fn :

Froude number = \( U/\sqrt{gL} \)

h s :

static swell-up, m

ζ B :

elevation due to bow wave, m

ζ s :

sinkage due to speed, m

ζ :

wave elevation, m

λ w :

wave length, m

L e :

length of entrance on water plane, m

h d :

dynamic swell-up, m

l :

distance of the CG from the considered section, m

s(l):

vertical displacement at l, m

z :

heave displacement, m

θ :

pitch displacement, rad

ω :

wave frequency, rad/s

ω e :

encounter wave frequency, rad/s

Z(l):

freeboard height above design waterline at l, m

Subscripts:

“sig” and “ext” denote significant and extreme values respectively.

References

  • ABS (2018a) Rules for building and classing steel vessels (part 5A & 5B Specific vessel types). American Bureau of Shipping, Houston

  • ABS (2018b) Rules for building and classing steel vessels (part 5C Specific vessel types). American Bureau of Shipping, Houston

  • ABS (2018c) Rules for building and classing high-speed naval craft. American Bureau of Shipping, Houston

  • Aly AM, Asai M, Sonoda Y (2011) Simulation of free falling rigid body into water by a stabilized incompressible SPH method. Ocean Systems Engineering 1(3):207–222. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2011.1.3.207

  • Bajič D, Prpić-Oršić J, Turk A (2010) Bow flare impact loads on containerships. Proceedings of the XIX Symposium Theory and Practice of Shipbuilding, in Memoriam Prof. Leopold Sorta, Lumbarda, Italy, 344–351

  • Bhattacharyya R (1978) Dynamics of marine vehicles. A Wiley Interscience Publication, Maryland, pp 153–155

  • BV (2017a) Rules for the classification of steel ships. Bureau Veritas, Neuilly-sur-Seine Cedex

  • BV (2017b) Rules for the classification of naval ships, part D. Bureau Veritas, Neuilly-sur-Seine Cedex

  • Carvalho e Silva DF, Rossi R (2014) Green water loads determination for FPSOs exposed to beam sea conditions, Proceedings of the 23rd OMAE. San Francisco, USA

  • Carvalho e Silva DF, Coutinho Alvaro LGA, Esperança Paulo TT (2017) Green water loads on FPSOs exposed to beam and quartering seas, part II: CFD simulations. Ocean Eng 140:434–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.008

  • CSR (2015) Common structural rules for bulk carriers and oil tankers. IACS

  • Dhavalikar S, Dabbi PN, Awasare S, Poojari D, Joga R, Kar AR (2018) Development of empirical formulations of slamming loads for displacement vessels. Ocean Eng 159:563–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.02.042

  • DNV-GL (2015) Rules for classification: Naval vessels, Hovik

  • DNV-GL (2017) Rules for Classification: Ships, Hovik

  • Drummen I, Holtmann M (2014) Benchmark study of slamming and whipping. Ocean Eng 86:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.12.012

  • Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ (1977) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Royal Astronautical Society 181:375–389

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow M, Lin W (1985) Numerical simulation of nonlinear free surface flows generated by wedge entry and wave maker motions. 4th international conference on numerical ship hydrodynamics, Washington, DC

  • Guo BD, Qu QL, Wu JL, Liu PQ (2013) Fluid-structure interaction modeling by ALE and SPH. Appl Mech Mater 275:393–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermundstad OA, Moan T (2005) Numerical and experimental analysis of bow flare slamming on a Ro–Ro vessel in regular oblique waves. J Mar Sci Technol 10:105–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-005-0192-3

  • Hirata N (2015) A workshop on CFD in ship hydrodynamics: JBC test data in NMRI, Tokyo

  • IACS UR S21A (2018) Requirements concerning strength of ships. Req. 2011/rev.1 2015/Corr.1 2018,

  • ICLL (1966) International convention on load lines, Part-1

  • IRS (2017) Rules and regulations for the construction and classification of steel ships. Indian Register of Shipping, Mumbai

  • ISSC (2012) Impulsive pressure loading and response assessment. Proceedings of the 18th international ship and offshore structures congress, 2, Rostock, Germany 275 – 330

  • ISSC (2015) Loads. Proceedings of the 19th international ship and offshore structures congress, 1. Cascais, Portugal 73 – 140

  • Joga R, Saripilli J, Dhavalikar S, Kar AR (2014) Numerical simulations to compute rate of water ingress into open holds due to green waters, Proceedings of ISOPE2014, Busan, Korea, 739–745

  • Kapsenberg GK (2011) Slamming of ships: where are we now? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369:2892–2919

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kapsenberg GK, Thornhill ET (2010) A practical approach to ship slamming in waves. 28th Symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Pasadena, California USA

  • Kim S, Kim CY, Cronin D (2013) Green water impact loads on breakwaters of large container carriers. Proceedings of the PRADS2013, Changwon City Korea, 619 – 624

  • KRS (2017) Rules for the classification of steel ships.Korean Register of Shipping, Busan

  • LRS (2017a) Rules and regulations for the classification of ships. Lloyd's Register of Shipping, London

  • LRS (2017b) Rules and regulations for the classification of naval ships. Lloyd's Register of Shipping, London

  • Luo H, Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2011) Numerical prediction of slamming loads on a rigid wedge subjected to water entry using an explicit finite element method. In: Guedes Soares C, Fricke W (eds) Advances in Marine Structures. Taylor &Francis, Didcot, pp 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10771-7

  • Luo H, Wang H, Guedes Soares C (2012) Numerical and experimental study of hydrodynamic impact and elastic response of one free-drop wedge with stiffened panels. Ocean Eng 40:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.11.004

  • Ochi MK (1964) Extreme behavior of a ship in rough seas – slamming and shipping of green water, The SNAME annual meeting, New York, USA

  • Oger G, Doring M, Alessandrini B, Ferrant P (2006) Two-dimensional SPH simulations of wedge water entries. J Comput Phys 213(2):803–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.09.004

  • Pakozdi C, Östman A, Stansberg C, Carvalho e Silva DF, (2014) Green water on FPSO analyzed by a coupled potential-flow-NS-VOF method, Proceedings of the 23rd OMAE. San Francisco, USA

  • Rahaman MM (2012) Analysis of the mechanism of slamming on the bow flare region of ship’s hull by using RaNS CFD method, PhD. Thesis, The University of Tokyo

  • Rajendran S, Vasquez G, Guedes Soares C (2016) Effect of bow flare on the vertical ship responses in abnormal waves and extreme seas. Ocean Eng 124:419–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.07.020

  • Ruggeri F, Watai RA, Brisson H, Mello PA, Sampaio CMP, Carvalho e Silva DF, Vieira DP, (2013) Numerical prediction of green water events in beam seas, Proceedings of the PRADS 2013, Changwon City Korea, 892 – 897

  • Sames PC, Schellin TE (2001) Assessment of sloshing loads for tankers, Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, 1, 637–643

  • Sasson M, Chai S, Beck G, Jin Y, Rafieshahraki J (2016) A comparison between smoothed-particle hydrodynamics and RANS volume of fluid method in modelling slamming. J Ocean Eng Sci 1(2):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2016.03.004

  • Shao S (2009) Incompressible SPH simulation of water entry of a free-falling object. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 59(1):91–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1813

  • Stenius I, Rosn A, Kuttenkeuler J (2006) Explicit FE-modeling of fluid-structure interaction in hull-water impacts. Int Shipbuild Prog 53:1031–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenius I, Rosn A, Kuttenkeuler J (2007) Explicit FE-modelling of hydroelasticity in panel-water impacts. Int Shipbuild Prog 54(2/3):111–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Faltinsen OM (2006) Water impact of horizontal circular cylinders and cylindrical shells. Appl Ocean Res 28(5):299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2007.02.002

  • Temarel P, Bai W, Bruns A, Derbanne Q, Dessi D, Dhavalikar S, Fonseca N, Fukasawa T, Gui X, Nestegård A, Papanikolaou A, Parunov J, Song K, Wang S (2016) Prediction of wave-induced loads on ships: progress and challenges. Ocean Eng 119:274–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.03.030

  • Veen DJ, Gourlay TP (2012) A combined strip theory and smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach for estimating slamming loads on a ship in head seas. Ocean Eng 43:64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.01.026 

  • Voogt A J, Buchner B (2004) Prediction of wave impact loads on ship type offshore structures in steep fronted waves. Proceedings of the ISOPE2004, paper no 2004 JSC-343. Toulon, France

  • Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2012) Analysis of the Water impact of symmetric wedges with a multi-material Eulerian formulation. Int J Marit Eng 154(A4). https://doi.org/10.3940/rina.ijme.2012.a4.249

  • Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2013) Slam induced loads on bow-flared sections with various roll angles. Ocean Eng 67:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.04.009 

  • Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2014a) Asymmetrical water impact of two-dimensional wedges with roll angle. Int J Marit Eng 156(A2):115–130. https://doi.org/10.3940/rina.ijme.2014.a2.280

  • Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2014b) Numerical study on the water impact of 3D bodies by explicit finite element method. Ocean Eng 78:73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.12.008 

  • Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2014c) Numerical study on hydroelastic water entry of a wedge. In: Guedes Soares C, López Peña F (eds) Developments in maritime transportation and exploitation of sea resources. Francis & Taylor Group, London, pp 199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2016) Experimental and numerical study of the slamming load on the bow of a chemical tanker in irregular waves. Ocean Eng 111:369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.11.012

  • Wang S, Guedes Soares C (2017) Review of ship slamming loads and responses. J Mar Sci Appl 16(4):427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-017-1437-3

  • Wang S, Luo HB, Guedes Soares C (2014) Numerical prediction of slamming loads on a bow-flared section during water entry. Int J Marit Eng 156:A303–A314. https://doi.org/10.3940/rina.ijme.2014.a4.304

  • Wu G (2012) Numerical simulation for water entry of a wedge at varying speed by a high order boundary element method. J Mar Sci Appl 11(2):143–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-012-1116-3

  • Xiao J, Batra R (2016) Local water slamming of curved rigid hulls. Multiphysics 6(3):305–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu GD, Duan WY, Wu GX (2008) Numerical simulation of oblique water entry of an asymmetrical wedge. Ocean Eng 35:1597–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.08.002 

  • Yettou EM, Desrochers A, Champoux Y (2006) Experimental study on the water impact of a symmetrical wedge. Fluid Dyn Res 38:47–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluiddyn.2005.09.003

  • Zhao R, Faltinsen OM (1993) Water entry of two-dimensional bodies. J Fluid Mech 246:593–612. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211209300028X

  • Zhao R, Faltinsen OM, Aarsnes JV (1996) Water entry of arbitrary two-dimensional sections with and without flow separation. Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Trondheim, 408–423

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their earnest gratitude to the Indian Register of Shipping (IRS), Mumbai, for supporting the reported work. Authors would like to thank Mr. A. R. Kar, Vice President of the Research Division of IRS for his valuable guidence.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharad Dhavalikar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhavalikar, S., Dabbi, P.N., Poojari, D. et al. Development of Empirical Formulation for Bow Flare Slamming and Deck Wetness for Displacement Vessels. J. Marine. Sci. Appl. 17, 414–431 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-018-0045-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-018-0045-1

Keywords

Navigation