Abstract
Experimental investigations have been carried out to study morpho-hydraulic characteristics such as scour geometry and turbulent flow properties around tandem piers in alluvial channels. Experiments were carried out in a plane sand bed with two circular piers of same diameter arranged in tandem manner under no seepage, 10% seepage and 20% seepage conditions. Downward seepage minimizes the scour depth around piers and restrains the development of scour depth with time. Strong reversal flow is found near the bed at upstream of piers and near free surface at downstream of piers where velocity and Reynolds shear stress are found to be negative which reduce in magnitude with downward seepage. The flow is more critical within the gap between two piers where velocity is lesser near free surface and gradually increasing towards bed. Quadrant analysis shows that contribution of each event to the total Reynolds shear stress increases with downward seepage. Sedimentation effect prevails within the scour hole whereas outside the scour hole erosive forces become more dominant. Reduced reversal flow at upstream of pier because of downward seepage results in decreasing higher order moments and turbulent kinetic energy. At downstream of piers, secondary currents are dominant due to wake vortices. Strouhal number decreases in case of seepage runs than no seepage condition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed F, Rajaratnam N, 1998. Flow around bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 124(3), 288–300. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:3(288)
Ataie-Ashtiani B, Aslani-Kordkandi A, 2013. Flow field around single and tandem piers. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 90(3), 471–490. DOI: 10.1007/s10494-012-9427-7
Ataie-Ashtiani B, Baratian-Ghorghi Z, Beheshti AA, 2010. Experimental investigation of clear-water local scour of compound piers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 136(6), 343–351. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2010)136:6(343)
Ataie-Ashtiani B, Beheshti AA, 2006. Experimental investigation of clear-water local scour at pile groups. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 132(10), 1100–1104. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:10(1100)
Beg M, 2010. Characteristics of developing scour holes around two piers placed in transverse arrangement. Scour and Erosion, ASCE, 76–85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41147(392)6#sthash.2PdT77GQ.dpuf
Chavan R, Sharma A, Kumar B, 2017. Effect of downward seepage on turbulent flow characteristics and bed morphology around bridge piers. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 16(1), 60–72. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-017-1394-x
Chiew YM, Melville BW, 1987. Local scour around bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 25(1), 15–26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221688709499285
Deshpande V, Kumar B, 2016. Turbulent flow structures in alluvial channels with curved cross-sections under conditions of downward seepage. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 41(8), 1073–1087. DOI: 10.1002/esp.3889
Devi TB, Kumar B, 2015. Turbulent flow statistics of vegetative channel with seepage. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 123, 267–276. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.11.002
Ferraro D, Tafarojnoruz A, Gaudio R, Cardoso AH, 2013. Effects of pile cap thickness on the maximum scour depth at a complex pier. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(5), 482–491. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000704
Goring DG, Nikora VI, 2002. Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128(1), 117–126. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:1(117)
Graf WH, Istiarto I, 2002. Flow pattern in the scour hole around a cylinder. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 40(1), 13–20. DOI: 10.1080/00221680209499869
Igarashi T, 1981. Characteristics of the flow around two circular cylinders arranged in tandem: 1st report. Bulletin of JSME, 24(188), 323–331. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.24.323
Izadinia E, Heidarpour M, Schleiss AJ, 2013. Investigation of turbulence flow and sediment entrainment around a bridge pier. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 27(6), 1303–1314. DOI 10.1007/s00477-012-0666-x
Kinzli KD, Martinez M, Oad R, Prior A, Gensler D, 2010. Using an ADCP to determine canal seepage loss in an irrigation district. Agricultural water management, 97(6), 801–810. DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.12.014
Lu SS, Willmarth WW, 1973. Measurements of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 60(3), 481–511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112073000315
Maity H, Mazumder BS, 2012. Contributions of burst-sweep cycles to Reynolds shear stress over fluvial obstacle marks generated in a laboratory flume. International Journal of Sediment Research, 27(3), 378–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(12)60042-0
Martin CA, Gates TK, 2014. Uncertainty of canal seepage losses estimated using flowing water balance with acoustic Doppler devices. Journal of Hydrology, 517, 746–761. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.074
Nezu I, Nakagawa H, 1993. Turbulence in open-channel flows. Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Palau-Salvador G, Stoesser T, Rodi W, 2008. LES of the flow around two cylinders in tandem. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 24(8), 1304–1312. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.07.002
Patel M, Deshpande V, Kumar B, 2015. Turbulent characteristics and evolution of sheet flow in an alluvial channel with downward seepage. Geomorphology, 248, 161–171. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.042
Qi M, Chiew YM, Hong JH, 2012. Suction effects on bridge pier scour under clear-water conditions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(6), 621–629. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000711
Rao AR, Sreenivasulu G, Kumar B, 2011. Geometry of sand-bed channels with seepage. Geomorphology, 128(3), 171–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.01.003
Raupach MR, 1981. Conditional statistics of Reynolds stress in rough-wall and smooth-wall turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 108, 363–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112081002164
Said NM, Mhiri H, Bournot H, Le Palec G, 2008. Experimental and numerical modelling of the three-dimensional incompressible flow behaviour in the near wake of circular cylinders. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(5), 471–502. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2007.12.001
Salim M, Jones JS, 1998. Scour around exposed pile foundations. Compilation of Conference Scour Papers (1991-1998), ASCE.
Simpson RL, Chew YT, Shivaprasad BG, 1981. The structure of a separating turbulent boundary layer. Part 2. Higher-order turbulence results. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 113, 53–73.
Sumner D, Wong SST, Price SJ, Paidoussis MP, 1999. Fluid behaviour of side-by-side circular cylinders in steady cross-flow. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 13(3), 309–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0205
Tafarojnoruz A, Gaudio R, Calomino F, 2012a. Bridge pier scour mitigation under steady and unsteady flow conditions. Acta Geophysica, 60(4), 1076–1097. DOI: 10.2478/S11600-012-0040-X
Tafarojnoruz A, Gaudio R, Calomino F, 2012b. Effects of a slotted bridge pier on the approach flow. Proc. XXXIII Convegno Nazionale Di Idraulica E Construzioni Idrauliche IDRA 2012, Brescia, Italy, 1–10.
Tanji KK, Kielen NC, 2002. Agricultural drainage water management in arid and semi-arid areas. FAO.
Zhao Y, Zong Z, Zou L, Wang TL, 2015. Turbulence model investigations on the boundary layer flow with adverse pressure gradients. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 14(2), 170–174. DOI: 10.1007/S11804-015-1303-0
Zhuang Y, Liu ZY, 2007. Experimental study on the width of the turbulent area around bridge pier. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 6(1), 53–57. DOI: 10.1007/S11804-007-6048-Y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chavan, R., Kumar, B. Experimental investigation on flow and scour characteristics around tandem piers in sandy channel with downward seepage. J. Marine. Sci. Appl. 16, 313–322 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-017-1426-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-017-1426-6