Abstract
Period equations provided by seismic codes are generally derived by calibration with recorded period data of buildings located in high seismicity regions. These period-equations do not account for either the design level of seismicity or the permissible limit of lateral drift. Buildings designed under high level of seismicity are expected to display higher stiffness and shorter periods than buildings designed under low-to-medium seismicity levels. In addition, buildings designed with high level of permissible lateral-drift are expected to display lower stiffness and longer periods than buildings designed with low level of permissible lateral-drift. In this study, the theoretical fundamental-periods of an ensemble of regular reinforced concrete (RC) and steel moment-resisting frame (MRF) buildings having 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-stories and designed with various levels of seismicity and permissible lateral-drift are evaluated. The obtained outcome indicates the sensitivity of the MRF theoretical-periods to the design seismicity and the permissible lateral-drift. The results also indicate the need for modifying the current period equations to realistically account for the variations in the design seismicity and allowable lateral-drift of MRF buildings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abou-Elfath H (2019), “Evaluating the Inelastic Displacement Ratios of Moment-Resisting Steel Frames Designed According to the Egyptian Code,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 18(1): 159–170.
Abou-Elfath H and Elhout E (2019), “Evaluating the Code Approaches for Estimating the Seismic Drifts of Steel Frame Buildings Designed under Variable Levels of Seismicity,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 17(7): 4169–4191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00634-z.
ASCE 7–02 (2002), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA.
ATC (1978), Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings, ATC3–06, Applied Technology Council, Palo Alto, CA.
ECP-205 (2008), Egyptian Code for Practice for Steel Construction (LRFD), Research Center for Housing and Construction, Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Planning, Cairo, Egypt.
ECP-201 (2012), Egyptian Code for Calculating Loads and Forces in Structural Work and Masonry, Housing and Building National Research Center, Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Planning, Cairo, Egypt.
ECP-203 (2017), Egyptian Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures, Research Center for Housing and Construction, Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Planning, Cairo, Egypt.
Euro code 8 (2004), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions, and Rules for Buildings, EN 1998–1, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
Goel RK and Chopra AK (1997), “Period Formulas for Moment-Resisting Frame Buildings,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(11): 1454–1461.
Gong M, Sun J and Xue L (2011), “Empirical Formula of Fundamental Period for Steel Structure Based on Seismic Response Record,” International Conference on Electric Technology and Civil Engineering (ICETCE), Lushan, China, 283–286.
Kwon OS and Kim ES (2010), “Evaluation of Building Period Formulas for Seismic Design,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(14): 1569–1583.
UBC-88 (1988), International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO), Uniform Building Code, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Young K and Adeli H (2014), “Fundamental Period of Irregular Moment-Resisting Steel Frame Structures,” The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23: 1141–1157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abou-Elfath, H., Elhout, E. Theoretical-period characteristics of frame buildings designed under variable levels of seismicity and allowable-drift. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 19, 669–681 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-020-0588-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-020-0588-4