Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a new connection for precast concrete walls subjected to cyclic loading

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Industrialized Building System (IBS) was recently introduced to minimize the time and cost of project construction. Accordingly, ensuring the integration of the connection of precast components in IBS structures is an important factor that ensures stability of buildings subjected to dynamic loads from earthquakes, vehicles, and machineries. However, structural engineers still lack knowledge on the proper connection and detailed joints of IBS structure construction. Therefore, this study proposes a special precast concrete wall-to-wall connection system for dynamic loads that resists multidirectional imposed loads and reduces vibration effects (PI2014701723). This system is designed to connect two adjacent precast wall panels by using two steel U-shaped channels (i.e., male and female joints). During casting, each joint is adapted for incorporation into a respective wall panel after considering the following conditions: one side of the steel channel opens into the thickness face of the panel; a U-shaped rubber is implemented between the two channels to dissipate the vibration effect; and bolts and nuts are used to create an extension between the two U-shaped male and female steel channels. The developed finite element model of the precast wall is subjected to cyclic loads to evaluate the performance of the proposed connection during an imposed dynamic load. Connection performance is then compared with conventional connections based on the energy dissipation, stress, deformation, and concrete damage in the plastic range. The proposed precast connection is capable of exceeding the energy absorption of precast walls subjected to dynamic load, thereby improving its resistance behavior in all principal directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araújo DdL, Curado MC and Rodrigues PF (2014), “Loop Connection with Fibre-reinforced Precast Concrete Components in Tension,” Engineering Structures, 72: 140–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arulselvan Suyamburaja and Subramanian K (2008), “Experimental Investigation on Three Dimensional RC Infilled Frame-RC Plane Frame Interactions with Slab for Seismic Resistance,” American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(4): 328–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baur Kenneth C (1992), Connection for Joining Precast Concrete Panels, Google Patents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondini Fabio, Dal Lago Bruno and Toniolo Giandomenico (2012), “Seismic Behaviour of Precast Buildings with Cladding Panels,” 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondini Fabio, Dal Lago Bruno and Toniolo Giandomenico (2013), “Role of Wall Panel Connections on the Seismic Performance of Precast Structures,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11(4): 1061–1081. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9418-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondini Fabio, Titi A and Toniolo Giandomenico (2012), “Pseudo Dynamic Tests and Numerical Simulation on a Full Scale Prototype of Amulti-storey Precast Structure,” 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkeland Philip W and Birkeland Halvard W (1966), “Connections for Precast Concrete Construction,” ACI Journal Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bora Can, Oliva Michael G, Nakaki Suzanne Dow and Becker Roger (2007), “Development of a Precast Concrete Shear-wall System Requiring Special Code Acceptance,” PCI Journal, 52(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bournas Dionysios A, Negro Paolo and Molina Francisco J (2013), “Pseudodynamic Tests on a Full-scale 3-storey Precast Concrete Building: Behavior of the Mechanical Connections and Floor Diaphragms,” Engineering Structures, 57: 609–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruggeling ASG and Huyghe GF (1991), Prefabrication with Concrete, CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti SC, Nayak GC and Paul DK (1988), “Shear Characteristics of Cast-in-place Vertical Joints in Storyhigh Precast Wall Assembly,” ACI Structural Journal, 85(1): 30–45. doi:10.14359/2965

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang YN (2011), “Finite Element Modeling of Precast Wall Using Grout-filled Splice Sleeve Connector,” Universiti Teknology of Malaysia, Johor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough DP and Engineers ABAM (1986), “Design of Connections for Precast Prestressed Concrete Buildings for the Effects of Earthquake”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragosavič M, van den Beukel A and Gijsbers FBJ (1975), Loop Connections between Precast Concrete Components Loaded in Bending, Stevin-laboratory of the Department of Civil Engineering, Delft University of Technology; Reijswik (ZH): Institute TNO for Building Materials and Building Structures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi Mohammad, Sharifian Hesam and Ahangar Mohammad (2010), “Seismic Response Evaluation of Moment Resistant Frame with Built-up Column Section,” American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 37–41. doi:10.3844/ajeassp.2010.37.41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott Kim (2002), Precast Concrete Structures, United Kingdom: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott Kim and Jolly Colin (2013), Multi-storey Precast Concrete Framed Structures, John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman Sidney (1999), “Loadbearing Architectural Precast Concrete Wall Panels,” PCI Journal, 44(5): 92–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frosch Robert J (1999), “Panel Connections for Precast Concrete Infill Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, 96(4): 467–472. doi:10.14359/682

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan Chin Heng (2008), “Behaviour of Vertical Shear Keyed Connection in Precast Concrete Wall under Shear Load,” Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejazi F, Noorzaei J, Jaafar MS and Abdullah AA (2009), “Earthquake Analysis of Reinforce Concrete Framed Structures with Added Viscous Dampers,” International Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology, 5(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejazi Farzad, Kojouri Samira Jilani, Noorzaei Jamal, Jaafar MS, Thanoon WA and Abdullah A (2011), “Inelastic Seismic Response of RC Building with Control System,” Key Engineering Materials, 462: 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowiak Tomasz and Lodygowski T (2005), “Identification of Parameters of Concrete Damage Plasticity Constitutive Model,” Foundations of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 6: 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joergensen Henrik B and Hoang Linh C (2013), “Tests and Limit Analysis of Loop Connections between Precast Concrete Elements Loaded in Tension,” Engineering Structures, 52: 558–569. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaloo Ali R and Parastesh H (2003a), “Cyclic Loading of Ductile Precast Concrete Beam-column Connection,” ACI Structural Journal, 100(3): 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaloo Ali R and Parastesh H (2003b), “Cyclic Loading Response of Simple Moment-resisting Precast Concrete Beam-column Connection,” ACI Structural Journal, 100(4): 440–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metta Siek (1964), Thin Precast Wall Panel Construction, Google Patents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong Hern Yee (2010), “Experimental Study of Grout Filled Splice Sleeve Integrated with Shear Key for Precast Concrete Connection,” Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong Khim Chiye Gary, Hao JB and Paramasivam P (2006a), “Flexural Behavior of Precast Joints with Horizontal Loop Connections,” ACI Structural Journal, 103(5): 664–671. doi:10.14359/16918

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong Khim Chiye Gary, Hao JB and Paramasivam P (2006b), “A Strut-and-tie Model for Ultimate Loads of Precast Concrete Joints with Loop Connections in Tension,” Construction and Building Materials, 20(3): 169–176. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantelides CP, Reaveley LD and McMullin PW (2003), “Design of CFRP Composite Connector for Precast Concrete Elements,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 22(15): 1335–1351. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parastesh Hossein, Hajirasouliha Iman and Ramezani Reza (2014), “A New Ductile Momentresisting Connection for Precast Concrete Frames in Seismic Regions: An Experimental Investigation,” Engineering Structures, 70: 144–157. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossley Nabila, Aziz Aznieta Abdul, Nora Farah, Chew Heng Chiang and Farzadnia Nima (2014), “Behaviour of Vertical Loop Bar Connection in Precast Wall Subjected to Shear Load,” Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 8(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryu Hyung-Keun, Kim Young-Jin and Chang Sung-Pil (2007), “Experimental Study on Static and Fatigue Strength of Loop Joints,” Engineering Structures, 29(2): 145–162. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seckin M and Fu HC (1990), “Beam-column Connections in Precast Reinforced Concrete Construction,” ACI Structural Journal, 87(3): 252–261. doi:10.14359/2614

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz AE, Magana RA, Trados MK and Huo X (1994), “Experimental Study of Joint Connections in Precast Concrete Walls,” 5th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Chicago, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari Rohit, Chakraborty Tanusree and Matsagar Vasant (2015), Dynamic Analysis of Curved Tunnels Subjected to Internal Blast Loading Advances in Structural Engineering (pp. 405–415), Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toniolo Giandomenico (2012), “European Research on Seismic Behaviour of the Connections of Precast Structures,” 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaghei Ramin, Hejazi Farzad, Taheri Hafez, Jaafar Mohd Saleh and Ali Abang Abdullah Abang (2014), “Evaluate Performance of Precast Concrete Wall to Wall Connection,” APCBEE Procedia, 9: 285–290. doi:10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaghei Ramin, Hejazi Farzad, Taheri Hafez, Jaafar Mohd Saleh, Ali Abang Abdullah Abang and Farah Nora Aznieta Abdul Aziza (2016), “A New Precast Wall Connection Subjected to Monotonic Loading,” Computers and Concrete, 17(1): 1–27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.17.1.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee Patrick TL, Adnan Azlan B, Mirasa Abdul K and Rahman Ahmad BA (2011), “Performance of IBS Precast Concrete Beam-column Connections under Earthquake Effects: A Literature Review,” American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4(1): 93–101. doi:10.3844/ajeassp.2011.93.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work received financial support from the Housing Research Center of UPM and NAEIM Company. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzad Hejazi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vaghei, R., Hejazi, F., Taheri, H. et al. Development of a new connection for precast concrete walls subjected to cyclic loading. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 16, 97–117 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0371-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0371-3

Keywords

Navigation