Abstract
Due to the randomness of earthquake wave magnitude and direction, and the uncertain direction of strong axis and weak axis in the construction of engineering structures, the effect of the direction of ground motion on a structure are studied herein. Ground motion records usually contain three vertical ground motion data, which are obtained by sensors arranged in accordance with the EW (East -West) direction, NS (South- North) direction and perpendicular to the surface (z) direction, referring to the construction standard of seismic stations. The seismic records in the EW and NS directions are converted to Cartesian coordinates in accordance with the rotation of θ = 0°−180°, and consequently, a countless group of new ground motion time histories are obtained. Then, the characteristics of the ground motion time history and response spectrum of each group were studied, resulting in the following observations: (1) the peak and phase of ground motion are changed with the rotation of direction θ, so that the direction θ of the maximum peak ground motion can be determined; (2) response spectrum values of each group of ground motions change along with the direction θ, and their peak, predominant period and declining curve are also different as the changes occur; then, the angle θ in the direction of the maximum peak value or the widest predominant period can be determined; and (3) the seismic response of structures with different directions of ground motion inputs has been analyzed under the same earthquake record, and the results show the difference. For some ground motion records, such as the Taft seismic wave, these differences are significant. Next, the Lushan middle school gymnasium structure was analyzed and the calculation was checked using the proposed method, where the internal force of the upper space truss varied from 25% to 28%. The research results presented herein can be used for reference in choosing the ground motion when checking the actual damage to structures following earthquakes and explaining the seismic damage. Meanwhile, it also provides a reference value for research into the most severe ground motion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boore DM (2010), “Orientation-independent, Nongeometric-mean Measures of Seismic Intensity from Two Horizontal Components of Motion,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(4): 1830–1835.
Boore DM and Atkinson GM (2008) “Ground-motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal 99 Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s,” Earthquake Spectra, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 24(1): 99–138.
China National Strong Motion Network Center (2014), Report on Strong Earthquake Motion Records in China (2014), 17(1), Beijing: Seismological Press. (in Chinese)
Grant DN, Padilla D and Greening PD (2011), “Orientation Dependence of Earthquake Ground Motion and Structural Response,” Matjaž Dolšek, Protection of Built Environment Against Earthquake, Chapter 4, Berlin: Springer Netherlands.
Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, China Earthquake Administration (2008), Report on Strong Earthquake Motion Records in China, 12(1), Beijing: Seismological Press. (in Chinese)
Fan Feng, Qian Hongliang and Xie Lili (2004), “Applications of the Severest Ground Motion to Anti-seismic Design for Reticulated Shells,” World Earthquake Engineering, 19(3): 17–21. (in Chinese)
Hu Yuxian (2005), Earthquake Engineering, 2nd ed, Beijing: Seismological Press. (in Chinese)
Li Quanwang, Fan Jiansheng and Nie Jianguo (2010), “Effect of Directional Uncertainty of Earthquake Ground Motion on Structural Responses,” Engineering Mechanics, 27(12): 135–140. (in Chinese)
Li Xiaozhen, Hong Qinye, Lei Hujun and Liu Zhenjie (2015), “Effect of Input Directions of Seismic Ground Motion Seismic Responses of a Railway Extradosed Bridge,” Bridge Construction, 45(1): 26–32. (in Chinese)
Ren Yefei, Dai Zhiyong and Wen Ruizhi (2011), “A New Method for Computing the Orientation-independent Parameters of Horizontal Ground Motion,” World Earthquake Engineering, 27(3): 134–141. (in Chinese)
Wang Tao, Guo Endong, Zhang Lina and Hu Yuwen (2007), “The Critical Direction of the Earthquake Input for Dynamic Analysis of a Long Span Cable-stayed Bridge,” World Earthquake Engineering, 23(4): 107–111. (in Chinese)
Wu Zhaoying (2007), “Study of the Worst Seismic Motion Input for Earth-dam Seismic Stability under the Oblique Incidence Condition,” Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics. (in Chinese)
Xie Lili and Zhai Changhai (2003), “Study on the Severest Real Ground Motion for Seismic Design and Analysis,” Acta Seismologica Sinica, 25(3): 250–261. (in Chinese)
Yang Hong, Yang Xiaoyi and Huang Hao (2013), “Effects of Seismic Wave Input Angles on Nonlinear Response Characteristics of Spatial Frames,” Industrial Construction, 43(7): 43–51. (in Chinese)
Yang Qingshan, Liu Wenhua and Tian Yuji (2008), “Response Analysis of National Stadium under Special Variable Earthquake Ground Motions,” China Civil Engineering Journal, 41(2): 35–41. (in Chinese)
Zhai Changhai and Xie Lili (2002), “A Comprehensive Method for Estimating and Comparing the Damage Potential of Strong Ground Motion,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 22(5): 1–7. (in Chinese)
Zhao Baoyou, Ma Zhenyue and Ding Xiuli (2010), “Seismic Response of a Large Underground Rock Cavern Groups Considering Different Incident Angles of Earthquake Waves,” Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 29(Supp.1): 3395–3402. (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by: National Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China under Grant No. 2015BAK17B03; National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program) under Grant No. 51278152; National Science & Technology Pillar Program (2015BAK17B06); Program for Innovation Research Team in China Earthquake Administration
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, M., Fan, F., Sun, B. et al. Study on the effect of ground motion direction on the response of engineering structure. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 15, 649–656 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0355-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0355-8