Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic damage analysis of the outlet piers of arch dams using the finite element sub-model method

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to analyze seismic damage of reinforced outlet piers of arch dams by the nonlinear finite element (FE) sub-model method. First, the dam–foundation system is modeled and analyzed, in which the effects of infinite foundation, contraction joints, and nonlinear concrete are taken into account. The detailed structures of the outlet pier are then simulated with a refined FE model in the sub-model analysis. In this way the damage mechanism of the plain (unreinforced) outlet pier is analyzed, and the effects of two reinforcement measures (i.e., post-tensioned anchor cables and reinforcing bar) on the dynamic damage to the outlet pier are investigated comprehensively. Results show that the plain pier is damaged severely by strong earthquakes while implementation of post-tensioned anchor cables strengthens the pier effectively. In addition, radiation damping strongly alleviates seismic damage to the piers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alembagheri M and Ghaemian M (2013), “Damage Assessment of a Concrete Arch Dam through Nonlinear Incremental Dynamic Analysis,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 44: 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar A, Sevim B and Altunisik AC (2011), “Finite Element Model Updating Effects on Nonlinear Seismic Response of Arch Dam-reservoir-foundation Systems,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 47(2): 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanovich AE and Kizhakkethara I (1999), “Threedimensional Finite Element Analysis of Double-lap Composite Adhesive Bonded Joint Using Sub-modeling Approach,” Composites Part B: Engineering, 30(6): 537–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK (2012), “Earthquake Analysis of Arch Dams: Factors to Be Considered,” Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 138(2): 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciptokusumo J, Weide-Zaage K and Aubel O (2009), “Investigation of Stress Distribution in via Bottom of Cu-via Structures with Different via Form by Means of Sub-modeling,” Microelectronics Reliability, 49(9): 1090–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dassault Systèmes Simulia (2009), ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual Version 6.9, Providence, RI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DL5073-2000 (2000), Specification of Seismic Design of Hydraulic Structures, China Electric Power Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1999), “Arch Dams,” in Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects, Chapter 11, Washington, DC 20426, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giglio M (1999), “FEM Sub-modelling Fatigue Analysis of a Complex Helicopter Component,” International Journal of Fatigue, 21(5): 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hariri-Ardebili MA and Mirzabozorg HA (2013), “A Comparative Study of Seismic Stability of Coupled Arch Dam-foundation-reservoir Systems Using Infinite Elements and Viscous Boundary Models,” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 13(6): 1350032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan VR, Hui CY and Long R (2008), “Finite Strain Crack Tip Fields in Soft Incompressible Elastic Solids,” Langmuir, 24(24): 14245–14253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuntiyawichai K and Burdekin FM (2003), “Engineering Assessment of Cracked Structures Subjected to Dynamic Loads Using Fracture Mechanics Assessment,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 70(15): 1991–2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo J (1982), “Fluid-structure Interactions: Added Mass Computations for Incompressible Fluid,” Report No. UCB/EERC-82/09, University of California Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JL and Fenves GL (1998), “Plastic-damage Model for Cyclic Loading of Concrete Structures,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 124(3): 892–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li DY, Tu J and Ouyang JH (2013), “Nonlinear Seismic Response Analysis on Xiluodu Arch Dam with Orifices and Piers,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 44(11): 1366–1371. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li TC, Yan YY and Zhao LH (2008), “FEM Analysis of the Orifice Anti-seismic Reinforcement for High Arch Dam,” Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. S13-075, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J and Li B (2005), “A Unified Viscous-spring Artificial Boundary for 3-D Static and Dynamic Applications,” Science in China Series E: Engineering & Materials Science, 48(5): 570–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long YC, Zhang CH and JIN F (2008), “Numerical Simulation of Reinforcement Strengthening for High-Arch Dams to Resist Strong Earthquakes,” Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 37: 1739–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucht T (2009), “Finite Element Analysis of Three Dimensional Crack Growth by the Use of a Boundary Element Sub Model,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 76(14): 2148–2162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao C, Ricles J, Lu LW and Fisher J (2001), “Effect of Local Details on Ductility of Welded Moment Connections,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(9): 1036–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mircevska V, Nastev M, Hristovski V and Bulajic I (2014), “Arch Dam-fluid Interaction Considering Reservoir Topology,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 18(7): 1083–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan JW, Zhang CH, Wang JT and Xu YJ (2009), “Seismic Damage-cracking Analysis of Arch Dams Using Different Earthquake Input Mechanisms,” Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 52: 518–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song LF, Wu MX, Wang JT and Xu YJ (2014), “FE Sub-model Method for Seismic Response Analysis of Orifice Region in Arch Dams,” Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 33(3): 216–222. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang GL, Pekau OA, Zhang CH and Wang SM (2000), “Seismic Fracture Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams Based on Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 65: 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JT, Lv DD, Jin F and Zhang CH (2013), “Earthquake Damage Analysis of Arch Dams Considering Damwater-foundation Interaction,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 49: 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CH and Jin F (2008), “Seismic Safety Evaluation of High Concrete Dams Part I: State of the Art Design and Research,” Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. S13-080, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong H, Lin G, Li X and Li J (2011), “Seismic Failure Modeling of Concrete Dams Considering Heterogeneity of Concrete,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31: 1678–1689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinting Wang.

Additional information

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 51179093 and 91215301, and Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education under Grant No. 20130002110032

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, L., Wu, M., Wang, J. et al. Seismic damage analysis of the outlet piers of arch dams using the finite element sub-model method. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 15, 617–626 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0348-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0348-7

Keywords

Navigation