Abstract
With reducing the absorber layer thickness and processing temperature, the recombination at the back interface is severe, which both can result in the decrease of open-circuit voltage and fill factor. In this paper, we prepare Al2O3 by atomic layer deposition (ALD), and investigate the effect of its thickness on the performance of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) solar cell. The device recombination activation energy (EA) is increased from 1.04 eV to 1.11 eV when the thickness of Al2O3 is varied from 0 nm to 1 nm, and the height of back barrier is decreased from 48.54 meV to 38.05 meV. An efficiency of 11.57 % is achieved with 0.88-μm-thick CIGS absorber layer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Solar Frontier Achieves World Record Thin-Film Solar Cell Efficiency of 22.9%, https://doi.org/www.solar-frontier.com/eng/news/2017/1220_press.html.
M. Gloeckler and J.R. Sites, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 103703 (2005).
N. Amin, P. Chelvanathan, M.I. Hossain and K. Sopian, Energy Procedia. 15, 291(2012).
P. Reinhard, F. Pianezzi, L. Kranz, S. Nishiwaki, A. Chirila, S. Buecheler and A.N. Tiwati, Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 23, 281 (2015).
E. Jarzembowski, B. Fuhrmann, H. Leipner, W. Franzel and R. Scheer, Thin Solid Films 633, 61 (2017).
E. Jarzembowski, F. Syrowatka, K. Kaufmann, W. Franzel, T. Holscher and R. Scheer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 051601 (2015).
J.H. Yoon, J.H. Kim, W.M. Kim, J.K. Park, Y.J. Baik, T.Y. Seong and J.H. Jeong, Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 22, 90 (2014).
R. Caballero, M. Nichterwitz, A. Steigert, A. Eicke, I. Lauermann, H.W. Schock and C.A. Kaufmann, Acta Mater. 63, 54 (2014).
X.L. Zhu, Z. Zhou, Y.M. Wang, L. Zhang, A.M. Li and F.Q. Huang, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 101, 57 (2012).
J.H. Yoon, W.M. Kim, J.K. Park, Y.J. Baik, T.Y. Seong and J.H. Jeong, Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 22, 69 (2014).
P. Jackson, R. Wuerz, D. Hariskos, E. Lotter, W. Witte and M. Powalla, Phys. Status Solidi (RRL)-Rapid Res. Lett. 10, 583 (2016).
J.H. Yoon, T.Y. Seong and J.H. Jeong, Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 21, 58 (2013).
K. Granath, M. Bodegard and L. Stolt. Huang, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 60, 279 (2000).
J. Joel, B. Vermang, J. Larsen, O.D. Gargand and M. Edoff, Phys. Status Solidi RRL 9, 288 (2015).
B. Vermang, J.T. Watigen, V. Fjallstrom, F. Rostvall, M. Edoff, R. Kotipalli, F. Henry and D. Flandre, Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 22, 1023 (2014).
V. Nadenau, U. Rau, A. Jasenek and H.W. Schock, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 584 (2000).
T. Mise, S. Tajima, T. Fukano, K. Higuchi, T. Wasgio, K. Jimbo and H. Katagiri, Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 24, 1009 (2016).
S.S. Hegedus and W.N. Shafarman, Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 12, 155 (2004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.61774089 and 61504067), and the Yang Fan Innovative & Entrepreneurial Research Team Project (No.2014YT02N037).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Liu, W., Chen, MX. et al. The impact of Al2O3 back interface layer on low-temperature growth of ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Optoelectron. Lett. 14, 363–366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11801-018-8036-7
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11801-018-8036-7