Skip to main content
Log in

Aerodynamic characteristics of moving vehicles of two trains passing each other on bridge under crosswinds

侧风作用下双车桥上交会的气动特性

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two trains passing each other is controlling factor for the wind-vehicle-bridge systems. To test the aerodynamic characteristics of moving vehicles under crosswinds when two trains are passing each other, a wind tunnel test device, which has two moving tracks, was developed. The rationality of the test result was discussed, the effects of intersection mode, yaw angle and lane spacing on the aerodynamic coefficients of the leeward train were analyzed, and the difference of aerodynamic coefficients between the head vehicle and the tail vehicle was discussed. The results show that the proposed test device has good repeatability. The intersection modes have a certain effect on the aerodynamic force of the leeward train when two trains are passing each other, and the results should be more reasonable during the two trains dynamic passing each other. With the decrease of yaw angle, the sudden change of train aerodynamic coefficients is more obvious. The decrease of lane spacing will increase the sudden change of leeward vehicles. In the process of two trains passing each other, the aerodynamic coefficients of the head vehicle and tail vehicle are significantly different, so the coupling vibration analysis of wind-vehicle-bridge system should be considered separately.

摘要

双车交会是风-车-桥耦合系统的控制因素。为测试在侧风作用下双车交会时列车的气动特性,研制了一种具有双条移动轨道的风洞试验装置。讨论了试验结果的合理性,分析了交会形式、偏航角和线间距对背风侧列车气动力的影响,并讨论了头车与尾车气动力系数的差异。实验结果表明,所提出的测试装置具有良好的重复性;双车交会时,交会方式对背风列车的气动力有一定的影响,动动交会时测试结果更加合理;随着偏航角的减小,列车气动系数的突变更为明显;线间距的减小会增加背风侧列车气动力的突变;列车交会过程中,头车与尾车的气动力系数存在较大差异,因此在进行风-车-桥耦合振动分析中应分开考虑。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NAGUMO Y, SUZUKI H. Statistical study on a method of assessing wind speed for use in train operation control [J]. JR East Technical Review, 2013(27): 23–28. https://trid.trb.org/view/1344564.

  2. LIU Tang-hong, SU Xin-chao, ZHANG Jie, et al. Aerodynamic performance analysis of trains on slope topography under crosswinds [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23(9): 2419–2428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3301-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ZAMPIERI A, ROCCHI D, SCHITO P, et al. Numerical-experimental analysis of the slipstream produced by a high speed train [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 196: 104022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. LI Yong-le, XIANG Huo-yue, WANG Bin, et al. Dynamic analysis of wind-vehicle-bridge coupling system during the meeting of two trains [J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2013, 16(10): 1663–1670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.10.1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. WANG Shi-bo, BURTON D, HERBST A H, et al. The effect of the ground condition on high-speed train slipstream [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 172: 230–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. LI Ming-shui, LEI Bo, LIN Guo-bin, et al. Field measurement of passing pressure and train induced airflow speed on high speed maglev vehicles [J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2006, 24(2): 209–212. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. MANCINI G, MALFATTI A. Full scale measurements on high speed train Etr 500 passing in open air and in tunnels of Italian high speed line [C]//TRANSAERO—A European Initiative on Transient Aerodynamics for Railway System Optimisation, 2002: 101–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45854-8_9.

  8. XIONG Xiao-hui, LIANG Xi-feng. Analysis of air pressure pulses in meeting of CRH2 EMU trains [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2009, 31(6): 15–20. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ZHANG Jie, LI Jing-juan, TIAN Hong-qi, et al. Impact of ground and wheel boundary conditions on numerical simulation of the high-speed train aerodynamic performance [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2016, 61: 249–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2015.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. LIU Tang-hong, CHEN Zheng-wei, CHEN Xiao-dong, et al. Transient loads and their influence on the dynamic responses of trains in a tunnel [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 66: 121–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.04.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. BAO Yu-long, XIANG Huo-yue, LI Yong-le, et al. Study of wind-vehicle-bridge system of suspended monorail during the meeting of two trains [J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2019, 22(8): 1988–1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219830255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. HUANG Sha, LI Zhi-wei, YANG Ming-zhi. Aerodynamics of high-speed maglev trains passing each other in open air [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019, 188: 151–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.02.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. CHEN Ye-gang, WU Qian. Study on unsteady aerodynamic characteristics of two trains passing by each other in the open air [J]. Journal of Vibroengineering, 2018, 20(2): 1161–1178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2018.18695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. HE Xu-hui, LI Huan, HU Liang, et al. Crosswind aerodynamic characteristics of a stationary interior railway carriage through a long-span truss-girder bridge [J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 210: 110350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. YANG Ming-zhi, DU Jun-tao, LI Zhi-wei, et al. Moving model test of high-speed train aerodynamic drag based on stagnation pressure measurements [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(1): e0169471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LI Yong-le, XIANG Huo-yue, WANG Bin, et al. Dynamic analysis of wind-vehicle-bridge coupling system during the meeting of two trains [J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2013, 16(10): 1663–1670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.10.1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. HE X H, ZOU Y F, WANG H F, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of a trailing rail vehicles on viaduct based on still wind tunnel experiments [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 135: 22–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. LI Yong-le, HU Peng, XU You-lin, et al. Wind loads on a moving vehicle-bridge deck system by wind-tunnel model test [J]. Wind and Structures, 2014, 19(2): 145–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2014.19.2.145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. LI Yong-le, HU Peng, CAI C S, et al. Wind tunnel study of a sudden change of train wind loads due to the wind shielding effects of bridge towers and passing trains [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 139(9): 1249–1259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. LI Xiao-zhen, WANG Ming, XIAO Jun, et al. Experimental study on aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed train on a truss bridge: A moving model test [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 179: 26–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.05.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. LI Xiao-zhen, TAN Yi-ling, QIU Xiao-wei, et al. Wind tunnel measurement of aerodynamic characteristics of trains passing each other on a simply supported box girder bridge [J]. Railway Engineering Science, 2021, 29(2): 152–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-021-00231-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. XIANG Huo-yue, LI Yong-le, CHEN Su-ren, et al. Wind loads of moving vehicle on bridge with solid wind barrier [J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 156: 188–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. XIANG Huo-yue, LI Yong-le, WANG Bin, et al. Numerical simulation of the protective effect of railway wind barriers under crosswinds [J]. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 2015, 3(3): 151–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2015.1054906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. XIANG Huo-yue, LI Yong-le, CHEN Su-ren, et al. A wind tunnel test method on aerodynamic characteristics of moving vehicles under crosswinds [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, 163: 15–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.01.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. BAKER C J. Train aerodynamic forces and moments from moving model experiments [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1986, 24(3): 227–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(86)90024-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XIANG Huo-yue provided the concept and edited the draft of manuscript. HU Hao conducted the literature review and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. LIU Ke-hong, ZHU Jin and LI Yong-le edited the draft of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huo-yue Xiang  (向活跃).

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Foundation item: Projects(51778544, 51978589, 51908472) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project (2682021CG014) supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, H., Xiang, Hy., Liu, Kh. et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of moving vehicles of two trains passing each other on bridge under crosswinds. J. Cent. South Univ. 29, 2558–2573 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-022-5111-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-022-5111-9

Key words

关键词

Navigation