Skip to main content
Log in

Emotional inference by means of Choquet integral and λ-fuzzy measurement in consideration of ambiguity of human mentality

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on human emotions has started to address psychological aspects of human nature and has advanced to the point of designing various models that represent them quantitatively and systematically. Based on the findings, a method is suggested for emotional space formation and emotional inference that enhance the quality and maximize the reality of emotion-based personalized services. In consideration of the subjective tendencies of individuals, AHP was adopted for the quantitative evaluation of human emotions, based on which an emotional space remodeling method is suggested in reference to the emotional model of Thayer and Plutchik, which takes into account personal emotions. In addition, Sugeno fuzzy inference, fuzzy measures, and Choquet integral were adopted for emotional inference in the remodeled personalized emotional space model. Its performance was evaluated through an experiment. Fourteen cases were analyzed with 4.0 and higher evaluation value of emotions inferred, for the evaluation of emotional similarity, through the case studies of 17 kinds of emotional inference methods. Matching results per inference method in ten cases accounting for 71% are confirmed. It is also found that the remaining two cases are inferred as adjoining emotion in the same section. In this manner, the similarity of inference results is verified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SAATY T L. The analytical hierarchy process [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980: 281.

    Google Scholar 

  2. SAATY T L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48: 9–26.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. ZADEH L A. Fuzzy sets [J]. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. ZADEH L A. Fuzzy sets and systems [C]// Proc Symp on Systems Theory, Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn. New York, 1965: 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  5. QIN Y, ZHANG X, YING H. A Hmm-based fuzzy affective model for emotional speech synthesis [C]// 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing Systems (ICSPS). Dalian, 2010: 525–528.

    Google Scholar 

  6. KOVÁCS S. Fuzzy reasoning and fuzzy automata in user adaptive emotional and information retrieval systems [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference On Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Hammamet, 2002: 6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. SALMERON J L. Fuzzy cognitive maps for artificial emotions forecasting [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2012, 12(2): 3704–3710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. EIICHIRO T. On identification methods of λ-fuzzy measures using weights and λ [J]. Japanese Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 12(5): 665–676.

    Google Scholar 

  9. SUGENO M, TERANO T. A model of learning based on fuzzy information [J]. Kybernetes, 1977, 6(3): 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. KANG Ying-shi, WANG Hai-ning. Uncertain Choquet integral operator and its application to product design selection [J]. JCIT: Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 2011, 6(6): 1–6.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. FENG Hui-min, LI Xue-fei, CHEN Ai-xia, WANG Bin. The relationship between diversity and the accuracy of classifier fusion based on Choquet integral [J]. JCIT: Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 2013, 8(1): 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. THAYER R E. The biopsychology of mood and arousal [M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1989: 234.

    Google Scholar 

  13. PLUTCHIK R. Emotion: theory, research, and experience. Vol. 1: Theories of emotion [M]. New York: Academic, 1980: 423.

    Google Scholar 

  14. PLUTCHIK R. Emotions and life: Perspectives from psychology, biology, and evolution [M]. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2002: 381.

    Google Scholar 

  15. PLUTCHIK R, HOPE C R. Circumplex models of personality and emotions [M]. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997: 484.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. MALKAWI M, MURAD O. Artificial neuro fuzzy logic system for detecting human emotions [J]. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences 2013, 3(1): 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang-yong Lee.

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2012R1A1A2042625) supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwon, Ik., Lee, Sy. Emotional inference by means of Choquet integral and λ-fuzzy measurement in consideration of ambiguity of human mentality. J. Cent. South Univ. 23, 160–168 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3059-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3059-3

Key words

Navigation