Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of coal separation characteristics based on different separating approaches in dry coal beneficiation flowsheet

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The separation characteristic of raw coal from Luoyang mining area, China, was investigated by applying a dry coal beneficiation flowsheet with the dense medium gas-solid fluidized bed as main separating equipment. The experimental and simulation results indicate that the dense medium gas-solid fluidized bed can provide uniform distribution and stable fluctuation of bed densities at various heights. Two types of different separating approaches were compared using the dry coal beneficiation flowsheet. Compared with obtaining cleaning coal in the first stage of the flowsheet, a higher yield of the cleaning coal and better separation efficiency can be achieved when discharging gangue in the first stage. Finally, the results indicate that 64.86% pure cleaning coal with an ash content of 11.77% and 13.53% middlings were obtained, and 21.61% gangue was removed in two successive separation stages with the probable errors of 0.05 and 0.07 g/cm3, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. HEINBERG R, FRIDLEY D. The end of cheap coal [J]. Nature Comment, 2010, 468: 367–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. HAN Ke-qi, WANG Yu-jun. Developing trend and expectation of energy consume in China [J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2004, 33(1): 1–8. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. World energy outlook 2010 [R]. International Energy Agency, 2010.

  4. LU Yong-xiang. Energy science & technology in China: A roadmap to 2050 [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. SAHU A K, BISWAL S K, PARIDA A. Development of air dense medium fluidized bed technology for dry beneficiation of coal-A review [J]. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 2009, 29: 216–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MOHANTA S, RAO C S, DARAM A B, CHAKRABORTY S, MEIKAP B C. Air dense medium fluidized bed for dry beneficiation of coal: Technological challenges for future [J]. Particulate Science and Technology, 2013, 31: 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van HOUWELINGEN J A, de JONG T P R. Dry cleaning of coal: Review, fundamentals and opportunities [J]. Geologica Belgica, 2004, 7: 335–343.

    Google Scholar 

  8. HONAKER R Q, SARACOGLU M, THOMPSON E, BRATTON R, LUTTRELL G H, RICHARDSON V. Upgrading coal using a pneumatic density based separator [J]. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 2008, 28: 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MACPHERSON S A, IVESON S M, GALVIN K P. Density based separations in the reflux classifier with an air-sand dense-medium and vibration [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2010, 23: 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. SAHU A K, TRIPATHY A, BISWAL S K. Study on particle dynamics in different cross sectional shapes of air dense medium fluidized bed separator [J]. Fuel, 2013, 111: 472–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. EBRAHIM A, SHAYAN K, MOSHFIQUR R, JOZEF S, RAJENDER G. Evaluation of the performance of air dense medium fluidized bed (ADMFB) for low-ash coal beneficiation. Part 1: Effect of operating conditions [J]. Energy & Fules, 2013, 27: 5595–5606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. EBRAHIM A, SHAYAN K, MOSHFIQUR R, JOZEF S, RAJENDER G. Evaluation of the performance of air dense medium fluidized bed (ADMFB) for low-ash coal beneficiation. Part 2: Characteristics of the beneficiated coal [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27: 5607–5616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. GEORGE V F, MUHAMAD F, OSHITANI J. Copper ore density separations by float/sink in a dry sand fluidised bed dense medium [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2013, 121: 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. CHEN Qing-ru, YANG Yu-fen. Development of dry beneficiation of coal in China [J]. Coal Preparation, 2003, 23: 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ZHAO Yue-min, LUO Zhen-fu, CHEN Qing-ru. Fundamental and practical developments of dry coal cleaning in China: A review [J]. Coal Preparation Society of America Journal, 2004, 3: 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ZHAO Yue-min, LI Gong-min, LUO Zhen-fu, LIANG Chun-cheng, TANG Li-gang, CHEN Zeng-qiang, XING Hong-bo. Modularized dry coal beneficiation technique based on gas-solid fluidized bed [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18(2): 374–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ZHAO Yue-min, WEI Lu-bin. Rheology of gas-solid fluidized bed [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, 68: 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. LUO Zhen-fu, CHEN Qing-ru. Dry beneficiation technology of coal with an air dense-medium fluidized bed [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2001, 63: 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. LUO Zhen-fu, FAN Mao-min, ZHAO Yue-min, TAO Xiu-xiang, CHEN Qing-ru, CHEN Zeng-qiang. Density-dependent separation of dry fine coal in a vibrated fluidized bed [J]. Powder Technology, 2008, 187: 119–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. LUO Zhen-fu, ZHAO Yue-min, CHEN Qing-ru, FAN Mao-min, TAO Xiu-xiang. Separation characteristics for fine coal of the magnetically fluidized bed [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2002, 79: 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. HE Jing-feng, ZHAO Yue-min, LUO Zhen-fu, ZHAO Jie, DUAN Chen-long, HE Ya-qun. Improving separation efficiency of 6-1 mm coal by introducing vibration energy to dense medium gas-solid fluidized bed [J]. Physicochemistry Problems of Mineral Processing, 2015, 51(1): 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  22. HE Jing-feng, ZHAO Yue-min, HE Ya-qun, LUO Zhen-fu, DUAN Chen-long. Numerical simulation and experimental verification of bubble size distribution in an air dense medium fluidized bed [J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2013, 23(2): 387–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. HE Jing-feng, HE Ya-qun, ZHAO Yue-min, DUAN Chen-long, YE Cui-ling. Numerical simulation of the pulsing air separation field based on CFD [J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2012, 22(2): 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. HONAKER R Q, BIMPONG C. Alternative materials for dense medium separations [J]. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 2009, 29: 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. OBENG D P, MORRELL S. The JK three-product cyclone-performance and potential applications [J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2003, 69: 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. HE Jing-feng. Numerical simulation of multiphase fluid dynamic in air dense medium fluidized bed based on Euler-Euler model [D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2012. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jing-feng He  (贺靖峰) or Yue-min Zhao  (赵跃民).

Additional information

Foundation item: Projects(51221462) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(2014QNA28) supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Jf., Zhao, Ym., He, Yq. et al. Comparison of coal separation characteristics based on different separating approaches in dry coal beneficiation flowsheet. J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 1651–1659 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2683-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2683-7

Key words

Navigation