Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and optimum operating conditions for FCCU using artificial neural network

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A self-organizing radial basis function (RBF) neural network (SODM-RBFNN) was presented for predicting the production yields and operating optimization. Gradient descent algorithm was used to optimize the widths of RBF neural network with the initial parameters obtained by k-means learning method. During the iteration procedure of the algorithm, the centers of the neural network were optimized by using the gradient method with these optimized width values. The computational efficiency was maintained by using the multi-threading technique. SODM-RBFNN consists of two RBF neural network models: one is a running model used to predict the product yields of fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) and optimize its operating parameters; the other is a learning model applied to construct or correct a RBF neural network. The running model can be updated by the learning model according to an accuracy criterion. The simulation results of a five-lump kinetic model exhibit its accuracy and generalization capabilities, and practical application in FCCU illustrates its effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. KHOSHJAVAN S, MAZLOUMI M, REZAI B. Artificial neural network modeling of gold dissolution in cyanide media [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18(6): 1976–1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. TAN Jun, CHEN Xing-shu, DU Min, ZHU Kai. A novel internet traffic identification approach using wavelet packet decomposition and neural network [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19: 2218–2230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ILIYAS S A, ELSHAFEI M, HABIB M A, ADENIRAN A A. RBF neural network inferential sensor for process emission monitoring [J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2013, 21(7): 962–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. U Lean, LAI Kin-Keung, WANG Shou-yang. Multistage RBF neural network ensemble learning for exchange rates forecasting [J]. Neurocomputing, 2008, 71(16/17/18): 3295–3302.

    Google Scholar 

  5. GAN Min, PENG Hui, CHEN Li-yuan. A global-local optimization approach to parameter estimation of RBF-type models [J]. Information Sciences, 2012, 197: 144–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. LI Wei-guo, YU Qian, LUO Ri-cheng. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and neural network in power transformer risk assessment [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19: 982–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. MARSADEK M, MOHAMED A. Risk based security assessment of power system using generalized regression neural network with feature extraction [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(2): 466–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. GAN Min, PENG Hui, DONG Xue-ping. A hybrid algorithm to optimize RBF network architecture and parameters for nonlinear time series prediction [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2012, 36(7): 2911–2919.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. NIROS A D, TSEKOURAS G E. A novel training algorithm for RBF neural network using a hybrid fuzzy clustering approach [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2012, 193: 62–84.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. BILLINGS S A, WEI H L, BALIKHIN M A. Generalized multiscale radial basis function networks [J]. Neural Networks, 2007, 20(10): 1081–1094.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. LI Quan-shan, ZHANG Yi-shan, CAO Liu-lin, LIN Xiao-lin, CUI Jia. An improved radial basis function network for structural reliability analysis [J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, 2011, 62(8): 2345–2349. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ZEYDAN M. The comparison of artificial intelligence and traditional approaches in FCCU modeling [J]. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 2008, 15(1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. MIHEŢ M, CRISTEA V M, AGACHI P Ş. FCCU simulation based on first principle and artificial neural network models [J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2009, 4(6): 878–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. TAŞKIN H, KUBAT C, UYGUN Ő, ARSLANKAYA S. FUZZYFCC: Fuzzy logic control of a fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) to improve dynamic performance [J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2006, 30(5): 850–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. VIEIRA W G, SANTOS V M L, CARVALHO F R, PEREIRA, JAF R, FILETI A M F. Identification and predictive control of a FCC unit using a MIMO neural model [J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2005, 44(8): 855–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. YEH T M, HUANG M C, HUANG C T. Estimate of process compositions and plantwide control from multiple secondary measurements using artificial neural networks [J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2003, 27(1): 55–72.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. HAN Hong-gui, QIAO Jun-fei, CHEN Qi-li. Model predictive control of dissolved oxygen concentration based on a self-organizing RBF neural network [J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2012, 20(4): 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. HAN Hong-gui, CHEN Qi-li, QIAO Jun-fei. An efficient self-organizing RBF neural network for water quality prediction [J]. Neural Networks, 2011, 24(7): 717–725.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. FISCH D, HOFMANN A, SICK B. On the versatility of radial basis function neural networks: A case study in the field of intrusion detection [J]. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(12): 2421–2439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. MOODY J, DARKEN C J. Fast learning in networks of locally-tuned processing units [J]. Neural Computation, 1989, 1(2): 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. HAYKIN S. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation [M]. New Jersey, US: Prentice Hall PTR, 1999: 278–339.

    Google Scholar 

  22. MILLINGTON T M, CASSIDY N J. Optimising GPR modelling: A practical, multi-threaded approach to 3d FDTD numerical modeling [J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2010, 36(9): 1135–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ANCHEYTA-JUÁREZ J, LÓPEZ-ISUNZA F, AGUILAR-RODRÍGUEZ E. 5-lump kinetic model for gas oil catalytic cracking [J]. Applied Catalysis A: General, 1999, 177(2): 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. CHEN Yu-shi. Dynamic modeling and simulation of the riser reactor and the regenerator for FCCU [D]. Xiamen, China: Xiamen University, 2007. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. JIANG Jing-jie, ZHEN Xin-ping, LI Quan-shan, WEI Huan, JIN Qi-bing, PAN Li-deng. An identification method based on the improved NLJ algorithm and its application [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2007, 15(1): 88–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Da-zi Li  (李大字).

Additional information

Foundation item: Projects(60974031, 60704011, 61174128) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Qs., Li, Dz. & Cao, Ll. Modeling and optimum operating conditions for FCCU using artificial neural network. J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 1342–1349 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2651-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2651-2

Key words

Navigation