Skip to main content
Log in

Determination method of load balance ranges for train operation safety under strong wind

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aerodynamic performances of a passenger car and a box car with different heights of windbreak walls under strong wind were studied using the numerical simulations, and the changes of aerodynamic side force, lift force and overturning moment with different wind speeds and wall heights were calculated. According to the principle of static moment balance of vehicles, the overturning coefficients of trains with different wind speeds and wall heights were obtained. Based on the influence of wind speed and wall height on the aerodynamic performance and the overturning stability of trains, a method of determination of the load balance ranges for the train operation safety was proposed, which made the overturning coefficient have nearly closed interval. A min(|A 1|+|A 2|), s.t. |A 1|→|A 2| (A 1 refers to the downwind overturning coefficient and A 2 refers to the upwind overturning coefficient) was found. This minimum value helps to lower the wall height as much as possible, and meanwhile, guarantees the operation safety of various types of trains under strong wind. This method has been used for the construction and improvement of the windbreak walls along the Lanzhou-Xinjiang railway (from Lanzhou to Urumqi, China).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SUZUKI M, TANEMOTO K, TATSUO M. Aerodynamics characteristics of train/vehicles under cross winds [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2003, 91(1): 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ANDERSSON E, HAGGSTROM J, SIMA M, SATICHEL S. Assessment of train-overturning risk due to strong cross-winds [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2004, 218(F3): 213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. GAO Guang-jun, TIAN Hong-qi, YAO Song, LIU Tang-hong, BI Guang-hong. Effect of strong cross-wind on the stability of trains running on the Lanzhou-Xinjiang railway [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2004, 26(4): 36–40. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. TIAN Hong-qi. Research progress in railway safety under strong wind condition in China [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2010, 41(6): 2435–2443. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. REZVANI M A, MOHEBBI M. Numerical calculations of aerodynamic performance for ATM train at crosswind conditions [J]. Wind and Structures, 2014, 18(5): 529–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. AVILA-SANCHEZ S, PINDADO S, LOPEZ-GARCIA O, SANZ-ANDRES A. Wind tunnel analysis of the aerodynamic loads on rolling stock over railway embankments: The effect of shelter windbreaks [J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 2014: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. CHELI F, CORRADI R, ROCCHI D, TOMASINI G, MAESTRINI E. Wind tunnel tests on train scale models to investigate the effect of infrastructure scenario [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98(6/7): 353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. LIU Tang-hong, ZHANG Jie. Effect of landform on aerodynamic performance of high-speed trains in cutting under cross wind [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(3): 830–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MIAO Xiu-juan, TIAN Hong-qi, GAO Guang-jun. Effect of railway environment on aerodynamic performance of train on embankment [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2010, 41(5): 2028–2033. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. TOMASINI G, GIAPPINO S, CORRADI R. Experimental investigation of the effects of embankment scenario on railway vehicle aerodynamic coefficients [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 131: 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. SCHOBER M, WEISE M, ORELLANO A, DEEG P, WETZEL W. Wind tunnel investigation of an ICE 3 end car on three standard ground scenarios [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98(6/7): 345–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. LI Yan-fei, TIAN Hong-qi, LIU Hui. Optimization of windbreak wall with holes in high-speed railway [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2011, 42(10): 3207–3212. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ZHANG Jie, GAO Guang-jun, LI Liang-juan. Height optimization of windbreak wall with holes on high-speed railway bridge [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2013, 13(6): 28–35. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. ZHANG T, XIA H, GUO W W. Analysis on running safety of train on bridge with wind barriers subjected to cross wind [J]. Wind and Structures, 2013, 17(2): 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. LIANG Xi-feng, XIONG Xiao-hui, YI Shi-he. Optimization research on aerodynamic figure of the box car under crosswinds [J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2006, 28(2): 26–30. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. HEMIDA H, KRAJNOVIC S. LES study of the influence of the nose shape and yaw angles on flow structures around trains [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98(1): 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ZHANG Jie, LIANG Xi-feng, LIU Tang-hong, LU Lin-feng. Optimization Research on aerodynamic shape of passenger car body with strong crosswind [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2011, 42(11): 3578–3584. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. CHELI F, RIPAMONTI F, ROCCHI D, TOMASINI G. Aerodynamic behaviour investigation of the new EMUV250 train to cross wind [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98(4/5): 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. TOSHIAKI I, TOSHISHIGE F, KATSUJI T, TAISUKE S, TATSUO M, HIROAKI I, YU H. New train regulation method based on wind direction and velocity of natural wind against strong winds [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90(12/15): 1601–1610.

    Google Scholar 

  20. GONG Jiong, WANG Peng. Research on gale monitoring & early warning system of high-speed railway [J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2012, 3(1): 5–8, 14. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. HOPPMANN U, KOENIG S, TIELKES T, MATSCHKE G. A short-term strong wind prediction model for railway application: design and verification [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90: 1127–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. JIA Yong-xing, MEI Yuan-gui. Development of strong winds early warning system in Japan high-speed railway [J]. Railway Locomotive & Car, 2008, 28(4): 16–19. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. GAO Guang-jun, ZHANG Jie, XIONG Xiao-hui. Location of anemometer along Lanzhou-Xinjiang railway [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(9): 3698–3704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. FUJII T, MAEDA T, ISHIDA H, IMAI T, TANEMOTO K, SUZUKI M. Wind-induced accidents of train/vehicles and their measures in Japan [J]. Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research Institute, 1999, 40(1): 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  25. LIU Feng-hua. Wind-proof effect of different kinds of wind-break walls on the security of trains [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2006, 37(1): 176–182. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. LI Kun. Research on new anti-wind facility of high-speed train in strong wind area [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2012, 43(2): 756–762. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. GAO Guang-jun, DUAN Li-li. Height of wind barrier on embankment of single railway line [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2011, 42(1): 254–259. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  28. ZHANG Jie, LIU Tang-hong. Optimization research on the slope angle of the earth type windbreak wall of Xinjiang single-track railway [J]. China Railway Science, 2012, 33(2): 28–32. (in Chinese)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. JIANG Cui-xiang, LIANG Xi-feng. Effect of the vehicle aerodynamic performance caused by the height and position of wind-break wall [J]. China Railway Science, 2006, 27(2): 66–70. (in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. MATSUMOTO M, MAEDA T. Train/vehicles wind-induced hazard and its mitigation [C]// Proceedings of the Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction. Washington, D C, USA: ASCE, 1996: 131–132.

    Google Scholar 

  31. ZHOU Dan, TIAN Hong-qi, YANG Ming-zhi, LU Zhai-jun. Comparison of aerodynamic performance of different kinds of wagons running on embankment of the Qinghai-Tibet railway under strong cross-wind [J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2007, 29(5): 32–36. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  32. LIANG Xi-feng, XIONG Xiao-hui. Analysis and comparison of lateral aerodynamic performance on four kinds of cars [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2006, 37(3): 607–612. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  33. GAO Guang-jun, DUAN Li-li, MIAO Xiu-juan. Overturning stability of boxcar on Qinghai-Tibet railway line with strong cross wind [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2011, 42(4): 1150–1155. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-qi Tian  (田红旗).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(U1334203) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, Hq. Determination method of load balance ranges for train operation safety under strong wind. J. Cent. South Univ. 22, 1146–1154 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2627-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2627-2

Key words

Navigation