Skip to main content
Log in

Carbon sequestration effects of shrublands in Three-North Shelterbelt Forest region, China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three-North Shelterbelt Forest (TSF) program, is one of six key forestry programs and has a 73-year construction period, from 1978 to 2050. Quantitative analysis of the carbon sequestration of shrubs in this region is important for understanding the overall function of carbon sequestration of the forest and other terrestrial ecosystems in China. This study investigated the distribution area of shrubland in the TSF region based on remote sensing images in 1978 and 2008, and calculated the carbon density of shrubland in combination with the field investigation and previous data from published papers. The carbon sequestration quantity and rate from 1978 to 2008 was analyzed for four sub-regions and different types of shrubs in the TSF region. The results revealed that: 1) The area of shrubland in the study area and its four sub-regions increased during the past thirty years. The area of shrubland for the whole region in 2008 was 1.2 × 107 ha, 72.8% larger than that in 1978. The Inner Mongolia-Xinjiang Sub-region was the largest shrubland distribution area, while the highest coverage rate was found in the North China Sub-region. 2) In decreasing order of their carbon sequestration, the four types of shrubs considered in this study were Hippophae rhamnoides, Caragana spp., Haloxylon ammodendron and Vitex negundo var. heterophylla. The carbon sequestration of H. rhamnoides, with a maximum mean carbon density of 16.5 Mg C/ha, was significantly higher than that of the other three species. 3) The total carbon sequestration of shrubland in the study region was 4.5 × 107 Mg C with a mean annual carbon sequestration of 1.5 × 106 Mg C. The carbon density in the four sub-regions decreased in the following order: the Loess Plateau Sub-region, the North China Sub-region, the Northeast China Sub-region and the Inner Mongolia-Xinjiang Sub-region. The paucity of studies and data availability on the large-scale carbon sequestration of shrub species suggests this study provides a baseline reference for future research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An S, Mentler A, Mayer H et al., 2010. Soil aggregation, aggregate stability, organic carbon and nitrogen in different soil aggregate fractions under forest and shrub vegetation on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 81(3): 226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2010.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandeis T J, Delaney M, Parresol B R et al., 2006. Development of equations for predicting Puerto Rican subtropical dry forest biomass and volume. Forest Ecology and Management, 233: 133–142. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellvi F, Snyder R L, Baldocchi D D, 2008. Surface energy-balance closure over rangeland grass using the eddy covariance method and surface renewal analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(6–7): 1147–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Jimin, Cheng Jie, Yang Xiaomei, 2011. Grassland Vegetation and Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Loess Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 26(3): 401–411. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerepowicz L, Case B S, Doscher C, 2012. Using satellite image data to estimate aboveground shelterbelt carbon stocks across an agricultural landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 156(1): 142–150. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai Xiaobing, 1989. The seasonal dynamics of the biomass of Vitex shrubland in mountainous area of Huairou County in Beijing. Acta Botanica Sinica, 31(4): 307–315. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang J Y, Guo Z D, Piao S L et al., 2007. Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China, 1981–2000. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 50(9): 1341–1350. doi: 10.1007/s11430-007-0049-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Jingyun, Chen Anping, 2001. Dynamic forest biomass carbon pools in China and their significance. Acta Botanica Sinica, 43(9): 967–973. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Jingyun, Chen Anping, Zhao Shuqing et al., 2002. Estimating biomass carbon of China’s forests: Supplementary notes on report published in Science (291: 2320–2322) by Fang et al. (2001). Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 26(2): 243–249. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Jingyun, Liu Guohua, Xu Songling, 1996. Biomass and net production of forest vegetation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 16(5): 497–505. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Bureau of Three-North, 1993. The Construction Master Plan of Chinese Three-North Shelterbelt Forest System. Yinchuan: Ningxia People’s Publishing House. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory N G, 1995. The role of shelterbelts in protecting livestock: A review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 38(4): 423–450. doi: 10.1080/00288233.1995.9513146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J S, Wang Q B, Hu D, 1997. Studies on the biomass of typical shrubland and their regeneration capacity after cutting. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 21(6): 512–520. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Huifeng, Wang Zheheng, Liu Guohua et al., 2006. Vegetation carbon storage of major shrublands in China. Journal of Plant Ecology, 30(4): 539–544. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang G, Zhao X Y, Li Y Q et al., 2012. Restoration of shrub communities elevates organic carbon in arid soils of northwestern China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 47: 123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2007. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: Pachauri R K (eds.). Contribution of Working Group II to the Forth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaonga M L, Bayliss-Smith T P, 2010. Allometric models for estimation of aboveground carbon stocks in improved fallows in eastern Zambia. Agroforestry Systems, 78(3): 217–232. doi: 10.1007/s10457-009-9253-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieth H, Whittaker R H, 1975. Primary Productivity of Biosphere. New York: Spring-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li Gangtie, Zhang Mizhu, Zhang Buzai et al., 1995. Study on biomass of Haloxylon ammodendron forest. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry College, 17(2): 35–43. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Jiangui, Ning Husen, Liu Bin, 2003. Study on character structure and distribution pattern of Haloxylon ammodendron. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 26(3): 51–54. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Guohua, Ma Keming, Fu Bojie et al., 2003. Aboveground biomass of main shrubs in dry valley of Minjiang River. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23(9): 1757–1764. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Qijing, 2009. Nested regression for establishing tree biomass equations. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33(2): 331–337. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y Q, Stanturf J, Lu H Q, 2008. Modeling the Potential of the Northern China Forest Shelterbelt in Improving Hydroclimate Conditions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44(5): 1176–1192. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00240.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Zengwen, Gao Guoxiong, Lv Yueling et al., 2007. Comparison of biomass and its estimation of Hippophae rhamoides L. under different climatic and soil conditions. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 31(1): 37–41. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Zhenlong, Gong Xiaosheng, 2009. Progress on the research of shrub biomass estimation. Forest Inventory and Planning, 34(4): 37–40, 45. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Piao S L, Fang J Y, Ciais P et al., 2009. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature, 458(7241): 1009–1013. doi: 10.1038/nature07944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Peinado R, Moreno G, Juarez E et al., 2013. The contribution of two common shrub species to aboveground and belowground carbon stock in Iberian dehesas. Journal of Arid Environments, 91: 22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Forestry Administration of China, 1986. China Forestry Statistical Yearbook 1949-1986. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • State Forestry Administration of China, 2010. China Forestry Statistical Yearbook 2009. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy K R, Amitkumar C, Nagarajaiah C et al., 2012. Growth performance, biomass and carbon sequestration of different tree species planted in shelterbelt-agroforestry system of northern transitional zone of Karnataka. Environment and Ecology, 30(3): 620–623. doi: 20123270655

    Google Scholar 

  • Vann D R, Palmiotto P A, Strimbeck G R, 1998. Allometric equations for two South American conifers: Test of a non-destructive method. Forest Ecology and Management, 106(2–3): 55–71. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00215-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan N E, Lenton T M, 2011. A review of climate geoengineering proposals. Climatic Change, 109(3–4): 745–790. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0027-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Chunling, Guo Quanshui, Tan Deyuan et al., 2005. Haloxylon ammodendron community patterns in different habitats along southeastern edge of Zhunger Basin. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 16(7): 1224–1229. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X M, Zhang C X, Hasi E et al., 2010. Has the Three Norths Forest Shelterbelt Program solved the desertification and dust storm problems in arid and semiarid China? Journal of Arid Environments, 74(1): 13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Yu, 1983. Importance and development advise of shrubs and shrubbery in the Three North Shelterbelt System. Research of Agricultural Modernization, (5): 19–23. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman G, Kort J, Walker D, 2009. Quantification of shelterbelt characteristics using high-resolution imagery. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 131(1): 111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Lin, Wang Limao, 2010. Dynamic forest carbon density and storage in the “Three North” protective forest system. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 24(8): 136–140. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Xiao, Zhu Jiaojun, 2013. Estimation of Shelterbelt Forest area in Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program region based on multi-sensor remote sensing data. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(8): 2257–2264. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhi Ling, Xu Wenqiang, Hong Jiayi et al., 2008. Evaluation of forest carbon sink—A case study on artificial plantation of the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest System Program in China. Forestry Economics, (3): 41–44. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Yurong, Yu Zhenliang, Zhao Shidong, 2000. Carbon storage and budget of major Chinese forest types. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 24(5): 518–522. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiaojun Zhu or Lile Hu.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA05060400)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Zhu, J., Jia, Q. et al. Carbon sequestration effects of shrublands in Three-North Shelterbelt Forest region, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 24, 444–453 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0698-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0698-x

Keywords

Navigation