Abstract
Automotive engine control has been continuously improved due to the strong demands from the society and the market since introducing electronic controls but not always following control theories. Therefore, it is not easy for researchers from academia and even engineers from the automotive industry to grasp the whole aspect of engine control. To encounter the issue, important features of engine control are extracted and generalized from the standpoint of control engineering. Comparisons of the control and model predictive control (MPC) showed an outstanding performance of the control generalized from engine controls and how to apply MPC in the framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. D. Cairano, D. Yanakiev, A. Bemporad, et al. Model predictive powertrain control: an application to idle speed regulation. Automotive Model Predictive Control. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 183–194.
A. Kamik, D. Pachner, A. M. Fuxman, et al. Model Predictive Control for Engine Powertrain Thermal Management Applications. SAE Technical paper 2015-01-0336. Detroit: SAE International,2015.
L. He, T. Shen, L. Yu, et al. A model-predictive control-based torque demand control approach for parallel hybrid powertrains. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2013, 62(3): 1041–1052.
A. Lagerberg, B. Egardt. Model predictive control of automotive powertrains with backlash. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2005, 38(1): 1–6.
D. E. Rivera, M. Morari, S. Skogestad. Internal model control: PID controller design. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 1986, 25(1): 252–265.
T. N. Hein, O. Kaneko, S. Yamamoto. Fictitious reference iterative tuning of internal model controllers for non-minimum phase systems: A Laguerre expansion approach. SICE Journal of Control, and System Integration, 2013, 6(1): 38–44.
K. Ohnishi, M. Shibata, T. Murakami. Motion control for advanced mechatronics. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1996, 1(1): 56–67.
A. Ohata. Automotive engine control with rational function satisfying inequality constraint. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2016, 49(11): 673–678.
T. Ohtsuka, H. A. Fujii. Real-time optimization algorithm for nonlinear receding-horizon control. Automatica, 1997, 33(6): 1147–1154.
E. J. Davison, H. W. Smith. Pole assignment in linear timeinvariant multivariable systems with constant disturbances. Automatica, 1971, 7(4): 489–498.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Akira OHATA graduated from Tokyo Institute of Technology in 1973, and directly joined Toyota Motor Corporation. He was involved in exhaust gas emission control, variable intake system, HEV control, vehicle controls, model-based development (MBD), and the education of advanced control theory at Toyota. He had the standardization activity of software dependability assurance of consumer devices in Object Management Group (OMG). He was a senior general manager of Toyota Motor Corporation, a research fellow of Information Technology Agency (IPA) under the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry. He retired from Toyota and joined TECHNOVA as a senior adviser. He received the most outstanding paper award in convergence 2004, technical contribution award from JSAE in 2009, and others in 2012, 2015, and 2016.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ohata, A. Comparison of generalized engine control and MPC based on maximum principle. Control Theory Technol. 15, 150–157 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-017-7002-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-017-7002-4