Skip to main content
Log in

Misclassification analysis of discriminant model

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper extends the criterion of the misclassification ratio of discriminant model and presents a new selection method of discriminant model. For selecting the discriminant model, this method establishes the rule of misclassification degree ratio through misclassification ratio of the discriminant model and misclassification degree of the samples. To test the effect of this method, this work uses seven UCI data sets. Numerical experiments on these examples indicate that this method has certain rationality and has a better effect to select a discriminant model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R A Fisher. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems, Annals of Human Genetics, 1936, 7(2): 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S Shinmura. New theory of discriminant analysis, In: new theory of discriminant analysis after R Fisher, Springer, Singapore, 2016.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. F L Song, P Lai, B H Shen, G S Cheng. Variance ratio screening for ultrahigh dimensional discriminant analysis, Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods, 2018, 47(24): 6034–6051.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Y F Li, J Lei. Sparse subspace linear discriminant analysis, Statistics, 2018, 52(4): 782–800.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A Hidaka, K Watanabe, T Kurita. Sparse discriminant analysis based on estimation of posterior probabilities, Journal of Applied Statistics, 2019, 46(15): 2761–2785.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. S C Chen, D H Li. Modified linear discriminant analysis, Pattern Recognition, 2005, 38(3): 441–443.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. A B Ji, H J Qiu, M H Ha. Fisher discriminant analysis based on choquet integral, Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities, 2009, 24(3): 348–352.(in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. L W Huang, L T Su. Hierarchical discriminant analysis and Its application, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 2013, 42(11): 1951–1957.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. X Z Xu, C W Huang, Y Jin, C Wu, L Zhao. Speech emotion recognition using semi-supervised discriminant analysis, Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 2014, 30(1): 7–12.(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. L W Huang. Modified Hybrid Discriminant Analysis Methods and Their Applications in Machine Learning, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1512391.

  11. E K Tang, P N Suganthan, X Yao, A K Qin. Linear dimensionality reduction using relevance weighted LDA, Pattern Recognition, 2005, 38(4): 485–493.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. W H Yang, D Q Dai, H Yan. Feature extraction and uncorrelated discriminant analysis for high-dimensional data, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2008, 20(5): 601–614.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Q Zhang, H S Wang. On BIC’s selection consistency for discriminant analysis, Statistica Sinica, 2011, 21(2): 731–740.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. J Pacheco, S Casado, S Porras. Exact methods for variable selection in principal component analysis: Guide functions and pre-selection, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 2013, 57(1): 95–111.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R A Mcdonald. The mean subjective utility score, a novel metric for cost-sensitive classifier evaluation, Pattern Recognition Letters, 2006, 27(13): 1472–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S R Pan, J Wu, XQ Zhu. CogBoost: boosting for fast cost-sensitive graph classification, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2015, 27(11): 2933–2946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A C Bahnsen, D Aouada, B Ottersten. Ensemble of example-dependent cost-sensitive decision trees, Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(19): 6609–6619.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P Cao, D Zhao, O Zaiane. An optimized cost-sensitive SVM for imbalanced data learning, In: Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2013, 7819: 280–292.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L W Huang. A selection method of discriminant model, Journal of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, 2013, 34(1): 96–99. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. D Dua, E Karra Taniskidou. UCI machine learning repository, Irvine, CA: university of california, school of information and computer science, http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-wen Huang.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52070119) and Key Laboratory of Financial Mathematics of Fujian Province University (Putian University) (JR201801).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Lw. Misclassification analysis of discriminant model. Appl. Math. J. Chin. Univ. 38, 180–191 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-023-3823-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-023-3823-8

MR Subject Classification

Keywords

Navigation