Abstract
Purpose
Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disease characterized by dysregulated proliferation of myeloid marrow progenitors and subsequent organ infiltration. While LCH is associated with a favorable prognosis, some survivors may develop chronic health conditions (CHC) because of the disease. In this study, we aimed to assess the spectrum and prevalence of CHC among LCH survivors compared with siblings and identify factors associated with the development of CHC.
Methods
The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study sent questionnaires to all ≥ 5-year LCH survivors registered in the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry and diagnosed between 1976 and 2015. Siblings also received similar questionnaires. We compared CHC prevalence between LCH survivors and siblings and used logistic regression to identify determinants of CHC.
Results
A total of 123 LCH survivors participated in the study, with a response rate of 69%. Median time since diagnosis was 13 years (interquartile range 9–20). Among LCH survivors, 59% had at least one CHC. Cardiovascular (13% vs. 6%), endocrine (15% vs. 2%), musculoskeletal (22% vs. 13%), and digestive (15% vs. 8%) CHC were more common among LCH survivors compared to siblings (all p < 0.05). Factors most strongly associated with the occurrence of CHC were multisystem LCH, multifocal bone involvement, and involvement of the pituitary gland.
Conclusions
More than half of long-term LCH survivors suffered from one or more CHC and were affected considerably more than siblings.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
LCH survivors in follow-up care should be screened especially for cardiovascular, endocrine, musculoskeletal, and digestive conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disease characterized by dysregulated proliferation of myeloid marrow progenitors and subsequent organ infiltration caused by somatic mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway [1]. Incidence among children younger than 15 years is 4–9 per million per year [2,3,4,5]. LCH more often affects males than females with a ratio of 1.2–1.5:1 [2,3,4,5]. Clinical manifestations vary and range from spontaneously healing isolated osteolytic lesions to a lymphoma-like syndrome with fatal multiorgan failure [6]. Based on the number of organ systems affected, LCH is classified into single system disease (SS-LCH) and multisystem disease (MS-LCH) [7]. For SS-LCH, treatment options range from a “wait and see” approach, resection, topical steroids, and radiotherapy to systemic treatment with prednisone and vinblastine [8, 9]. For MS-LCH, systemic therapy includes prednisone and vinblastine over 12–24 months possibly escalated with mercaptopurine for patients with risk organ (hematopoiesis, liver, and spleen) involvement or with cytosine arabinosides for refractory disease [9, 10]. Although the 5-year survival rate of LCH without risk organ involvement is close to 100%, it is only 60–80% among MS-LCH patients with risk organ involvement [8, 9]. Since the LCH prognosis is rather favorable, the population of LCH survivors is growing worldwide.
Survivors of childhood cancer are at risk of chronic health conditions (CHC) [11] caused by the disease itself and from chemotherapy and radiotherapy [12]. Diabetes insipidus (DI), orthopedic abnormalities, hearing loss, and neurological consequences were reported as most common CHC among LCH survivors [13, 14]. However, no previous studies compared the prevalence of CHC to healthy peers [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Previous studies included only survivors of skeletal LCH [22], excluded survivors of single system unifocal LCH [14], and reported about survivors from single centers only [15, 16, 18, 19, 21] or only about survivors who received systemic therapy [14, 17]. Since a comprehensive, population-based description of CHC among LCH survivors is lacking, we describe the spectrum and prevalence of CHC among LCH survivors compared with siblings and describe factors associated with CHC in our study.
Methods
Design and study setting
The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (SCCSS) is a population-based, long-term follow-up study of all childhood cancer survivors (CCS) diagnosed with cancer between 1976 and 2015 who survived at least 5 years after diagnosis and were registered in the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry (ChCR) [23]. ChCR centrally registers all children and adolescents diagnosed with leukemia, lymphoma, central nervous system (CNS) tumors, malignant solid tumors, and Langerhans cell histiocytosis before age 21 in Switzerland [24, 25]. Cancer diagnoses in the ChCR were verified by a cytological or histological analysis in 94% of patients [24].
Between 2007 and 2022, all ≥ 5-year survivors received a standardized SCCSS questionnaire which is based on those used in North American and the British childhood cancer survivor studies [26, 27]. For CCS aged 5–15 years, parents were asked to complete the questionnaire [28]. CCS of age ≥ 16 years completed the questionnaire by themselves [29]. We asked survivors for consent to contact their siblings as the comparison group. Siblings received the same questionnaire between 2009 and 2022 without cancer-related questions. For our study, we analyzed questionnaires completed by LCH survivors and siblings of all participating CCS as a control group. Survivors of relapsed or refractory LCH were included.
Outcome: chronic health conditions
From the questionnaire, we collected information on CHC involving cardiovascular, pulmonary, endocrine, auditory, visual, musculoskeletal, renal, digestive, and neurological systems. For better comparability with other CCS studies [26, 27], and to investigate also conditions which were previously not described in connection with LCH, we included a broad spectrum of conditions. These can be found in Supplemental Table S1. If at least one corresponding CHC was present, we classified survivors as having an affected organ system. If information about health conditions was missing, we assumed conditions were not present, as done previously [29]. For informative purposes, we calculated proportions of missing information about CHC among LCH survivors and siblings.
Explanatory variables
Questionnaires included information about age at study, sex, migration background, and language region in Switzerland. We obtained the following clinical and treatment-related characteristics from ChCR: age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, treatment period, and LCH classification (single system and multisystem). ChCR further provided information on involvement of the following organ systems: bone unifocal; bone multifocal; skin; lymph nodes; lung; CNS; pituitary gland; and other organs. We coded treatment modalities (wait and see; surgery; chemotherapy; radiotherapy) and chemotherapeutic agents used (prednisone; vinblastine; mercaptopurine; other drugs) as binary variables. The “wait and see” approach was determined as lack of any treatment. In the case of surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, combination with another treatment modality is possible. To avoid misinterpretation, we did not include data on LCH reactivations from the ChCR, since these were underreported in our population (8%) compared to other studies (30–36%) [30, 31]. We calculated body mass index (BMI) based on self-reported height and weight. We classified BMI according to the World Health Organization definition [32].
Statistical analysis
For better comparison of LCH survivors with siblings, we standardized siblings for sex, age at study, migration background, and Swiss language region according to the distribution of survivors [33, 34]. We used multivariable logistic regression with sibling status as outcome to calculate appropriate weights. We set the weight for LCH survivors at 1; we based all subsequent analyses on weighted siblings.
To allow comparisons with previous studies [14, 22], we additionally stratified survivors into two groups: single system bone unifocal disease (SS BU) and other LCH forms combined. We used chi-squared tests to compare CHC prevalence affecting different organ systems between survivors and weighted siblings. We included organ systems significantly more affected (p < 0.05; Supplemental Table S1) among survivors than siblings into the logistic regression. We fitted logistic regression models to identify associations between organ-specific CHC and demographic, clinical, and treatment-related explanatory variables. We created separate models for each organ system. Based on previous literature and to avoid overfitting given the low number of LCH survivors, we decided a priori to adjust each model for two potential confounding factors: age at study and sex [35,36,37]. We performed all analyses using Stata, version 16.1 (College Station, TX, USA).
Results
Characteristics of study population
Of 196 eligible LCH survivors, 1 had died and 16 could not be contacted for lack of valid address. We sent 179 remaining survivors questionnaires by post; 123 survivors returned completed questionnaires (response rate 69%; Supplemental Fig. 1). Participating survivors were older than non-participants and more likely treated with surgery (Supplemental Table S2). We identified no other differences between participating and non-participating LCH survivors. Sixty-three percent of survivors were male, median age at study 20 years (interquartile range [IQR] 15–26), and median age at diagnosis 5 years (IQR 2–10; Table 1). Twenty percent of survivors suffered from MS-LCH. Sites most often involved were unifocal bone involvement (56%), multifocal bone involvement (24%), and skin (15%). Forty-six percent of survivors were treated with surgery, 47% with chemotherapy, and 9% with radiotherapy. Prednisone (47%), vinblastine (43%), and mercaptopurine (17%) were chemotherapeutics most often used. Median BMI of participants was 22 (IQR 20–25). The sibling population included 999 participants (Table 1).
Prevalence of CHC
Fifty-nine percent of participants with LCH had one or more CHC (Supplemental Table S1) and presented more often CHC compared with siblings (p = 0.027). Neurological (27%), musculoskeletal (22%), endocrine, visual, and digestive (each 15%) were the most common CHC (Fig. 1). Musculoskeletal (22% vs. 13%), endocrine (15% vs. 2%), digestive (15% vs. 8%), and cardiovascular (13% vs. 6%) CHC were more common among LCH survivors than siblings (p < 0.05). We observed neurological CHC in 27% of LCH survivors and 22% of siblings (p = 0.202). Among musculoskeletal CHC, prolonged pain in bones or joints (14%) and scoliosis (10%) were most often reported. Common health complications also included diabetes insipidus (11%), growth hormone deficiency (7%), and hypo- or hyperthyroidism (7%) in endocrine CHC, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (10%) and frequent nausea (7%) in digestive CHC, and hypertension (7%) and arrhythmia (5%) in cardiovascular CHC (Supplemental Table S1).
After stratifying LCH survivors into single system unifocal bone and other LCH survivors, we then repeated our analysis. Only musculoskeletal (23% vs. 13%) CHC were more prevalent among single system unifocal bone survivors compared with siblings (Fig. 2; Supplemental Table S3). Among survivors of other LCH forms, neurological (37% vs. 22%), endocrine (24% vs. 2%), visual (21% vs 12%), digestive (21% vs. 8%), and cardiovascular (18% vs. 6%) CHC were more prevalent compared with siblings (all p < 0.05). In total, 51% of single system unifocal bone survivors had one or more CHC, while 68% of survivors of other LCH forms had one or more CHC. An overview of the proportions of missing information about CHC among LCH survivors and siblings can be found in Supplemental Table S4.
Factors associated with CHC among survivors
Endocrine CHC (Table 2) were associated with MS-LCH (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.3–12.0), multifocal bone involvement (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.1–10.1), pituitary gland involvement (OR 47.5; 95% CI 5.2–432.7), chemotherapy (OR 5.1; 95% CI 1.5–16.9), and the chemotherapeutic agents prednisone (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.2–11.5), vinblastine (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.4–14.2), and mercaptopurine (OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.4–12.6). LCH survivors treated with surgery were less likely to suffer from musculoskeletal CHC (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1–0.9). We found that LCH survivors with multifocal bone involvement (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.4–12.7) treated with mercaptopurine (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.2–11.7) or those with overweight or obesity (OR 10.4; 95% CI 2.2–48.4) more likely experienced cardiovascular CHC. Digestive CHC were associated with involvement of pituitary gland (OR 12.0; 95% CI 2.2–64.6). LCH survivors with unifocal bone involvement (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1–1.0) and treated with surgery (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1–0.9) were less likely to experience digestive CHC.
Discussion
In this nationwide and population-based study, we showed that LCH survivors suffered more often from CHC compared with siblings. This was particularly pronounced for musculoskeletal, endocrine, digestive, and cardiovascular CHC. Most prominent factors associated with occurrence of these CHC were MS-LCH, multifocal bone involvement, involvement of pituitary gland, and treatment with chemotherapeutic agents.
In our study, 59% of LCH survivors reported at least one CHC, which aligns with findings of previous studies. Chow et al. reported 56% of 70 LCH survivors suffered from CHC in a single-center study of retrospectively reviewed medical records after a median follow-up time of 10 years [21]. Similarly, Willis et al. reported 64% of 51 LCH survivors with median time since diagnosis of 8 years with CHC in a single-center study [18]. Ceci et al. reported 48% of 90 LCH survivors with CHC in their prospective multicenter study of < 5-year LCH survivors [17]. In contrast, a Japanese study reported only 34% of 317 LCH survivors with multifocal bone involvement or MS-LCH treated with cytarabine-based protocols presented with CHC at a median follow-up of 12 years [14]. Differences in inclusion criteria and CHC assessment may explain varying frequencies of CHC.
The spectrum of CHC after LCH differs based on LCH form. While survivors of single system unifocal bone LCH suffer more often from musculoskeletal CHC only, survivors of other LCH forms may experience neurological, endocrine, visual, digestive, and cardiovascular CHC—important information for clinicians to provide better-tailored follow-up care. Neurological, endocrine (especially diabetes insipidus), and musculoskeletal CHC were reported previously as most prevalent CHC among LCH survivors, which corresponds with our findings [13, 14, 21]. Cardiovascular CHC have not been described in the context of LCH so far while digestive and visual only rarely [13, 14]. For cardiovascular CHC, we saw a strong association with overweight—an established cardiovascular risk factor. Since digestive CHC are most strongly associated with pituitary gland involvement, the cause of these CHC might be the use of desmopressin in patients with diabetes insipidus. The most common side effects of desmopressin are digestive conditions, such as nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal pain [38]. Higher prevalence of visual CHC among survivors of other LCH forms could be caused by the therapeutical use of prednisone in MS-LCH which has been associated with ophthalmological late effects [39].
High prevalence (37%) of neurological CHC among survivors of other LCH forms (i.e., mainly MS-LCH) is remarkable. Weakness or inability to move arms or legs, balance disorders, and dysphagia or chewing difficulties—conditions more often reported among survivors of other LCH forms in our study—could be compatible with neurodegenerative CNS-LCH (ND-CNS-LCH) disease [40]. ND-CNS-LCH is one of the most devastating, yet rare consequences of LCH characterized clinically by progressive cerebellar ataxia, cognitive disorders, and impairment of cranial nerves [41] and radiologically by magnetic resonance imaging signal changes in cerebellum, basal ganglia, or pons [42]. CD8 + lymphocytes infiltrating the brain of affected individuals are a possible pathophysiological explanation of this disease [42]. Diagnosis of this poorly understood condition is challenging and often missed, and comprises imaging and neurocognitive assessments [43, 44]. It is unclear how many of our participants have been diagnosed with ND-CNS-LCH, but some might have been affected.
MS-LCH is a known risk factor for developing CHC in LCH survivors [13, 22]. In our study, MS-LCH was particularly associated with endocrine CHC, which is probably from the frequent involvement of the pituitary gland in MS-LCH causing diabetes insipidus, hypogonadism, and growth hormone deficiency. Our study also showed multifocal bone involvement was associated with CHC, especially cardiovascular and endocrine CHC. Some survivors with multifocal bone involvement may have had concurrent involvement of the pituitary gland (as part of their MS-LCH), which could explain the association between multifocal bone involvement and endocrine CHC. Chemotherapy and individual chemotherapeutic agents also showed an association with endocrine CHC. Neither prednisone nor vinblastine or mercaptopurine is known as causing endocrine CHC. Therefore, we interpreted the association of chemotherapy also as a proxy for MS-LCH.
Our study is a nationwide, population-based study on the prevalence and factors associated with the development of CHC among LCH survivors. We included involvement of all organs, all clinical manifestations of LCH, and all treatment regimens applied nationally. Previous studies were often single-center studies, included MS-LCH only, or certain treatment regimens [14, 16, 18]. Importantly, our study included siblings as the healthy comparison group. Our high 69% response rate supports the representativeness of our study population. We previously showed non-response bias plays only a minor role in SCCSS [45], which is supported by our comparison of participating and non-participating LCH survivors. We cover all treatment periods from 1976 to 2015. Another strength of our study lies in the high-quality clinical and treatment-related data provided by ChCR. However, using self-reported data on health conditions can also introduce reporting bias since certain conditions, such as mild hearing loss, often remain unnoticed unless clinically tested [46]. Given LCH rarity, our numbers of survivors with certain clinical characteristic were relatively small and our study possibly lacks statistical power in certain subgroup analyses. As a result, some associations between CHC and survivor characteristics, such as the identified association between multifocal bone LCH and cardiovascular CHC, might have occurred by chance and need to be confirmed in other populations. Additionally, the long duration of study enrollment with eligibility since 1976 means that LCH survivors from very different treatment eras are included and put together. Therefore, findings regarding CHC in our sample are representative for LCH patients treated in the past, but may not be generalizable (or necessarily relevant) to those treated nowadays with novel treatment modalities such as BRAF or MEK inhibitors.
Another limitation of our study is that all CHC of study participants were captured in our analysis, irrespective whether they occurred first before or after LCH diagnosis. However, as we use siblings as control group, we get an estimation of the CHC burden independent of LCH diagnosis. Also, we did not stratify CHC according to severity. Therefore, mild and severe CHC are equated, which is a further limitation of our study.
We showed more than half of long-term LCH survivors suffered from at least one chronic health condition and were affected considerably more than siblings. Clinicians in pediatric cancer survivorship programs should be vigilant regarding musculoskeletal, endocrine, neurological, digestive, and cardiovascular CHC in multisystem LCH, multifocal bone disease survivors, and those with pituitary gland involvement. LCH survivors with suspected neurological symptoms or deficits should be referred early to a neurologist for further evaluation including neuropsychological assessment and imaging studies.
Data availability
Researchers interested in collaborative work can contact the corresponding author (Christina Schindera; christina.schindera@unibe.ch) to discuss planned projects or analyses of existing data.
References
Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, Akkari Y, Alaggio R, Apperley JF, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36(7):1703–19.
Stalemark H, Laurencikas E, Karis J, Gavhed D, Fadeel B, Henter JI. Incidence of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children: a population-based study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;51(1):76–81.
Guyot-Goubin A, Donadieu J, Barkaoui M, Bellec S, Thomas C, Clavel J. Descriptive epidemiology of childhood Langerhans cell histiocytosis in France, 2000–2004. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;51(1):71–5.
Kaatsch P, Haaf G, Michaelis J. Childhood malignancies in Germany–methods and results of a nationwide registry. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A(6):993–9.
Salotti JA, Nanduri V, Pearce MS, Parker L, Lynn R, Windebank KP. Incidence and clinical features of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in the UK and Ireland. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(5):376–80.
Arico M, Egeler RM. Clinical aspects of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1998;12(2):247–58.
Haupt R, Minkov M, Astigarraga I, Schafer E, Nanduri V, Jubran R, et al. Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH): guidelines for diagnosis, clinical work-up, and treatment for patients till the age of 18 years. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60(2):175–84.
Sterlich K, Minkov M. Childhood langerhans cell histiocytosis: epidemiology, clinical presentations, prognostic factors, and therapeutic approaches. In: T. Valarmathi M, editor. Rare Diseases - Diagnostic and Therapeutic Odyssey [Internet]. IntechOpen; 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92919
Minkov M. Multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children: current treatment and future directions. Paediatr Drugs. 2011;13(2):75–86.
Gadner H, Minkov M, Grois N, Potschger U, Thiem E, Arico M, et al. Therapy prolongation improves outcome in multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2013;121(25):5006–14.
Hudson MM, Mertens AC, Yasui Y, Hobbie W, Chen H, Gurney JG, et al. Health status of adult long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. JAMA. 2003;290(12):1583–92.
Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, Kawashima T, Hudson MM, Meadows AT, et al. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(15):1572–82.
Haupt R, Nanduri V, Calevo MG, Bernstrand C, Braier JL, Broadbent V, et al. Permanent consequences in Langerhans cell histiocytosis patients: a pilot study from the Histiocyte Society-Late Effects Study Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004;42(5):438–44.
Sakamoto K, Morimoto A, Shioda Y, Imamura T, Imashuku S, Japan LCHSG. Long-term complications in uniformly treated paediatric Langerhans histiocytosis patients disclosed by 12 years of follow-up of the JLSG-96/02 studies. Br J Haematol. 2021;192(3):615–20.
Kusumakumary P, James FV. Permanent disabilities in childhood survivors of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2000;17(5):375–81.
Nanduri VR, Pritchard J, Levitt G, Glaser AW. Long term morbidity and health related quality of life after multi-system Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(15):2563–9.
Ceci A, de Terlizzi M, Colella R, Loiacono G, Balducci D, Surico G, et al. Langerhans cell histiocytosis in childhood: results from the Italian Cooperative AIEOP-CNR-H.X ’83 study. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1993;21(4):259–64.
Willis B, Ablin A, Weinberg V, Zoger S, Wara WM, Matthay KK. Disease course and late sequelae of Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis: 25-year experience at the University of California, San Francisco. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(7):2073–82.
Bernstrand C, Sandstedt B, Ahstrom L, Henter JI. Long-term follow-up of Langerhans cell histiocytosis: 39 years’ experience at a single centre. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94(8):1073–84.
Mittheisz E, Seidl R, Prayer D, Waldenmair M, Neophytou B, Potschger U, et al. Central nervous system-related permanent consequences in patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;48(1):50–6.
Chow TW, Leung WK, Cheng FWT, Kumta SM, Chu WCW, Lee V, et al. Late outcomes in children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102(9):830–5.
Lau LM, Stuurman K, Weitzman S. Skeletal Langerhans cell histiocytosis in children: permanent consequences and health-related quality of life in long-term survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50(3):607–12.
Kuehni CE, Rueegg CS, Michel G, Rebholz CE, Strippoli MP, Niggli FK, et al. Cohort profile: the Swiss childhood cancer survivor study. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1553–64.
Michel G, von der Weid NX, Zwahlen M, Adam M, Rebholz CE, Kuehni CE, et al. The Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry: rationale, organisation and results for the years 2001–2005. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137(35–36):502–9.
Sommer G, Schindler M, Redmond S, Pfeiffer V, Konstantinoudis G, Ammann RA, et al. Temporal trends in incidence of childhood cancer in Switzerland, 1985–2014. Cancer Epidemiol. 2019;61:157–64.
Robison LL. The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a resource for research of long-term outcomes among adult survivors of childhood cancer. Minn Med. 2005;88(4):45–9.
Hawkins MM, Lancashire ER, Winter DL, Frobisher C, Reulen RC, Taylor AJ, et al. The British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: objectives, methods, population structure, response rates and initial descriptive information. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50(5):1018–25.
Mader L, Rueegg CS, Vetsch J, Rischewski J, Ansari M, Kuehni CE, et al. Employment situation of parents of long-term childhood cancer survivors. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0151966.
Belle FN, Slama T, Schindera C, Diesch-Furlanetto T, Kartal-Kaess M, Kuehni CE, et al. Body image in adolescent survivors of childhood cancer: the role of chronic health conditions. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022;69(11):e29958.
Pollono D, Rey G, Latella A, Rosso D, Chantada G, Braier J. Reactivation and risk of sequelae in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;48(7):696–9.
Cai HC, Chen J, Liu T, Cai H, Duan MH, Li J, et al. Langerhans cell histiocytosis in adolescent patients: a single-centre retrospective study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17(1):268.
Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1–253.
Kasteler R, Belle F, Schindera C, Barben J, Gumy-Pause F, Tinner EM, et al. Prevalence and reasons for smoking in adolescent Swiss childhood cancer survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019;66(1):e27438.
Wengenroth L, Rueegg CS, Michel G, Essig S, Ammann RA, Bergstraesser E, et al. Life partnerships in childhood cancer survivors, their siblings, and the general population. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(3):538–45.
Hinton W, McGovern A, Coyle R, Han TS, Sharma P, Correa A, et al. Incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular disease in English primary care: a cross-sectional and follow-up study of the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC). BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e020282.
Lee J, Lee S, Jang S, Ryu OH. Age-related changes in the prevalence of osteoporosis according to gender and skeletal site: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2010. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2013;28(3):180–91.
Golden SH, Robinson KA, Saldanha I, Anton B, Ladenson PW. Clinical review: Prevalence and incidence of endocrine and metabolic disorders in the United States: a comprehensive review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(6):1853–78.
Zachoval R, Krhut J, Sottner O, Hanus T, Martan A, Horcicka L, et al. Nocturnal polyuria, treatment with desmopressin. Ceska Gynekol. 2013;78(4):385–9.
Alloin AL, Barlogis V, Auquier P, Contet A, Poiree M, Demeocq F, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of cataract after chemotherapy with or without central nervous system irradiation for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: an LEA study. Br J Haematol. 2014;164(1):94–100.
Imashuku S, Okazaki N, Nakayama M, Fujita N, Fukuyama T, Koike K, et al. Treatment of neurodegenerative CNS disease in Langerhans cell histiocytosis with a combination of intravenous immunoglobulin and chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50(2):308–11.
Le Guennec L, Decaix C, Donadieu J, Santiago-Ribeiro M, Martin-Duverneuil N, Levy R, et al. The cognitive spectrum in neurodegenerative Langerhans cell histiocytosis. J Neurol. 2014;261(8):1537–43.
Allen CE, Flores R, Rauch R, Dauser R, Murray JC, Puccetti D, et al. Neurodegenerative central nervous system Langerhans cell histiocytosis and coincident hydrocephalus treated with vincristine/cytosine arabinoside. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;54(3):416–23.
Autier L, Gaymard B, Bayen E, Del Cul A, Cohen-Aubart F, Martin-Duverneuil N, et al. Eye movement abnormalities in neurodegenerative langerhans cell histiocytosis. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(11):6539–46.
Heritier S, Barkaoui MA, Miron J, Thomas C, Moshous D, Lambilliotte A, et al. Incidence and risk factors for clinical neurodegenerative Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a longitudinal cohort study. Br J Haematol. 2018;183(4):608–17.
Rueegg CS, Gianinazzi ME, Michel G, Zwahlen M, von der Weid NX, Kuehni CE, et al. No evidence of response bias in a population-based childhood cancer survivor questionnaire survey - results from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0176442.
Ramage-Morin PL, Banks R, Pineault D, Atrach M. Unperceived hearing loss among Canadians aged 40 to 79. Health Rep. 2019;30(8):11–20.
Acknowledgements
We thank all survivors and siblings for participating in our study, the study team of the Childhood Cancer Research Group, the data managers of the Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group, and the team of the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. We also thank Kristin Marie Bivens for her editorial work on our manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Bern. Swiss Cancer Research and Swiss Cancer League (Grant no. KFS-5027–02-2020, KFS-5302–02-2021, KLS/KFS-4825–01-2019); Childhood Cancer Switzerland; Kinderkrebshilfe Schweiz; Stiftung für krebskranke Kinder—Regio Basiliensis; and the University of Basel Research Fund for Excellent Junior Researchers supported our work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Tomáš Sláma: formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, visualization; Luzius Mader: formal analysis, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, project administration, investigation, resources; Maša Žarković: writing—review and editing; Reta Malär: writing—review and editing; Alexandra Schifferli: writing—review and editing; Nicolas X von der Weid: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, supervision; Claudia E Kuehni: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, supervision; Christina Schindera: writing—review and editing, funding acquisition, supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The Ethics Committee of the Canton of Bern (166/2014; 2021–01462) granted ethical approval for ChCR and SCCSS.
Consent to participate
All participants or their parents provided their informed consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sláma, T., Mader, L., Žarković, M. et al. Chronic health conditions after childhood Langerhans cell histiocytosis: Results from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Cancer Surviv (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-024-01544-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-024-01544-z