Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of childhood leukemia on siblings: their long-term perception of family functioning and its relationship with their psychosocial characteristics using structural equation modeling

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In the context of pediatric cancer, siblings’ adaptation and needs have been previously investigated; however, research on the long-term consequences on siblings, especially on their family environment, is scarce.

We aimed to (1) assess the family functioning (FF) perceived by siblings of childhood leukemia survivors long after diagnosis and (2) explore characteristics likely associated and investigate associations with psycho-behavioral and social factors.

Methods

Childhood leukemia survivors’ siblings older than 11 years were recruited through the LEA cohort, a French long-term follow-up program, and completed the family assessment device (FAD). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors likely associated with unhealthy functioning in families as perceived by siblings. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine relationships that predict siblings’ perception of FF.

Results

We included 605 siblings (mean follow-up time from diagnosis 14.1 ± 6.8 years), of whom 175 (28.9%) perceived unhealthy functioning. SEM showed that older siblings were more likely to perceive problematic functioning (β = 0.095, p = 0.014). Sex and leukemia burden had indirect effects on FF through mediators. Family financial situation at diagnosis was not associated with the risk of reporting unhealthy functioning.

Conclusions

Our study contributed to identifying siblings at risk of facing family issues and reinforced the need to provide more consideration and suitable resources to avoid late consequences. Often considered as the “forgotten children”, future research should focus on developing targeted interventions to facilitate family communication and improve siblings’ social support.

Implications for cancer survivors

Overall, results regarding FF perceived by siblings are reassuring and provide new enlightening elements that allow for better support to all families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Kaatsch P. Epidemiology of childhood cancer. Cancer Treat Rev Juin. 2010;36(4):277–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Long KA, Marsland AL. Family adjustment to childhood cancer: a systematic review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev Mars. 2011;14(1):57–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Schoors M, De Paepe AL, Norga K, Cosyns V, Morren H, Vercruysse T, et al. Family members dealing with childhood cancer: a study on the role of family functioning and cancer appraisal. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Alderfer MA, Kazak AE. Family issues when a child is on treatment for cancer. In: R. T. BROWN (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of childhood cancer and sickle cell disease: A biopsychosocial approach. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 53–74.

  5. Strohm K. Siblings: Brothers and sisters of children with special needs. London: David Fulton Publishers; 2014. p. 240.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan LM, Kaal KJ, Bradley L, Alderfer MA. Cancer-related traumatic stress reactions in siblings of children with cancer. Fam Syst Health J Collab Fam Healthc Juin. 2013;31(2):205–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Long KA, Lehmann V, Gerhardt CA, Carpenter AL, Marsland AL, Alderfer MA. Psychosocial functioning and risk factors among siblings of children with cancer: an updated systematic review. Psychooncology. 2018;27(6):1467–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchbinder D, Casillas J, Krull KR, Goodman P, Leisenring W, Recklitis C, et al. Psychological outcomes of siblings of cancer survivors: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Psychooncology déc. 2011;20(12):1259–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchbinder D, Casillas J, Zeltzer L. Meeting the psychosocial needs of sibling survivors: a family systems approach. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Off J Assoc Pediatr Oncol Nurses Juin. 2011;28(3):123–36.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alderfer MA, Logan BA, DiDonato S, Jackson L, Hayes MJ, Sigmon ST. Change across time in cancer-related traumatic stress symptoms of siblings of children with cancer: a preliminary investigation. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020;27(1):48–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sisk BA, Weng S, Mack JW. Persistently low peace of mind in parents of cancer patients: a 5-year follow-up study. Pediatr Blood Cancer Mai. 2019;66(5):e27609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McCubbin M, Balling K, Possin P, Frierdich S, Bryne B. Family resiliency in childhood cancer*. Fam Relat. 2002;51(2):103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Erker C, Yan K, Zhang L, Bingen K, Flynn KE, Panepinto J. Impact of pediatric cancer on family relationships. Cancer Med. 2018;7(5):1680–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Schoors M, Caes L, Verhofstadt LL, Goubert L, Alderfer MA. Systematic review: family resilience after pediatric cancer diagnosis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2015;40(9):856–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hill R. 1. Generic features of families under stress. Soc Casework Févr. 1958;39(2–3):139–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mccubbin HI, Thompson AI, McCubbin MA. Family assessment: resiliency, coping and adaptation : inventories for research and practice. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin; 1996.

  17. McCubbin HI, Patterson JM. The family stress process: the double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation. Marriage Fam Rev. 1983;6:7–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lavee Y, McCubbin HI, Patterson JM. The double ABCX model of family stress and adaptation: an empirical test by analysis of structural equations with latent variables. J Marriage Fam. 1985;47(4):811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Schoors M, Caes L, Knoble NB, Goubert L, Verhofstadt LL, Alderfer MA, et al. Systematic review: associations between family functioning and child adjustment after pediatric cancer diagnosis: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2017;42(1):6–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Houtzager BA, Grootenhuis MA, Caron HN, Last BF. Sibling self-report, parental proxies, and quality of life: the importance of multiple informants for siblings of a critically ill child. Pediatr Hematol Oncol févr. 2005;22(1):25–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pariseau EM, Chevalier L, Muriel AC, Long KA. Parental awareness of sibling adjustment: Perspectives of parents and siblings of children with cancer. J Fam Psychol JFP J Div Fam Psychol Am Psychol Assoc Div 43. 2020;34(6):698–708.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prchal A, Landolt MA. How siblings of pediatric cancer patients experience the first time after diagnosis: a qualitative study. Cancer Nurs Avr. 2012;35(2):133–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O’ Brien I, Duffy A, Nicholl H. Impact of childhood chronic illnesses on siblings: a literature review. Br J Nurs Mark Allen Publ. 2009;18(22):1358, 1360–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Houtzager BA, Oort FJ, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM, Caron HN, Grootenhuis MA, Last BF. Coping and family functioning predict longitudinal psychological adaptation of siblings of childhood cancer patients. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29(8):591–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barrera M, Fleming CF, Khan FS. The role of emotional social support in the psychological adjustment of siblings of children with cancer. Child Care Health Dev. 2004;30(2):103–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Falissard B. Mesurer la subjectivité en santé: perspective méthodologique et statistique. Masson; 2001.

  27. Berbis J, Michel G, Baruchel A, Bertrand Y, Chastagner P, Demeocq F, et al. Cohort profile: the French childhood cancer survivor study for leukaemia (LEA Cohort). Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(1):49–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Faust C, Auquier P, Hamidou Z, Bertrand Y, Tabone MD, Ansoborlo S, et al. Brothers and sisters of childhood acute leukemia survivors: Their long-term quality of life and its determinants. Cancer Med. 2023;12(5):6200–12.

  29. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMASTER family assessment device*. J Marital Fam Ther. 1983;9(2):171–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Speranza M, Guénolé F, Revah-Levy A, Egler PJ, Negadi F, Falissard B, et al. The French version of the family assessment device. Can J Psychiatry Rev Can Psychiatr. 2012;57(9):570–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Boterhoven de Haan KL, Hafekost J, Lawrence D, Sawyer MG, Zubrick SR. Reliability and validity of a short version of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster family assessment device. Fam Process. 2015;54(1):116–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller IW, Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Keitner GI. The McMASTER family assessment device: reliability and validity*. J Marital Fam Ther. 1985;11(4):345–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Spirito A, Stark LJ, Williams C. Development of a brief coping checklist for use with pediatric populations. J Pediatr Psychol. 1988;13(4):555–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dalgard OS, Sørensen T, Sandanger I, Brevik JI. Psychiatric interventions for prevention of mental disorders. A psychosocial perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996;12(4):604–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Roth S, Cohen LJ. Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. Am Psychol. 1986;41(7):813–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Pub. Co; 1984. p. 445.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1989.

  39. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2007;6(1):53–60.

  40. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th ed. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press; 2016.

  41. Sawyer MG, Sarris A, Baghurst PA, Cross DG, Kalucy RS. Family assessment device: reports from mothers, fathers, and adolescents in community and clinic families. J Marital Fam Ther. 1988;14:287–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Alderfer MA, Navsaria N, Kazak AE. Family functioning and posttraumatic stress disorder in adolescent survivors of childhood cancer. J Fam Psychol JFP J Div Fam Psychol Am Psychol Assoc Div 43. 2009;23(5):717–25.

    Google Scholar 

  43. McCubbin MA, McCubbin HI. Families coping with illness: The resiliency model of family stress, adjustment, and adaptation, In: C.B. Danielson, B. Hamel-Bissell & P. Winstead-Fry (Ed.). Families, health, and illness: perspectives on coping and intervention. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1993.

  44. Vermaes IPR, van Susante AMJ, van Bakel HJA. Psychological functioning of siblings in families of children with chronic health conditions: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2012;37(2):166–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Houtzager BA, Grootenhuis MA, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM, Caron HN, Last BF. Psychosocial functioning in siblings of paediatric cancer patients one to six months after diagnosis. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990. 2003;39(10):1423–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Vercasson C, Auquier P, Michel G, Bertrand Y, Ansoborlo S, Tabone MD, et al. Quality of life in parents of childhood leukemia survivors. A French childhood cancer survivor study for leukemia study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020;7(10)e28419.

  47. Wawrzynski SE, Schaefer MR, Schvaneveldt N, Alderfer MA. Social support and siblings of children with cancer: a scoping review. Psychooncology. 2021;30(8):1232–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. McDonald FEJ, Patterson P, White KJ, Butow P, Bell ML. Predictors of unmet needs and psychological distress in adolescent and young adult siblings of people diagnosed with cancer. Psychooncology. 2015;24(3):333–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Trouillet R, Gana K, Lourel M, Fort I. Predictive value of age for coping: the role of self-efficacy, social support satisfaction and perceived stress. Aging Ment Health. 2009;13(3):357–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Van Schoors M, De Paepe AL, Lemiere J, Morez A, Norga K, Lambrecht K, et al. Family adjustment when facing pediatric cancer: the role of parental psychological flexibility, dyadic coping, and network support. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2740.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Iacobucci D, Saldanha N, Deng X. A meditation on mediation: evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions. J Consum Psychol - J Consum Psychol. 2007;17:139–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Haukeland YB, Czajkowski NO, Fjermestad KW, Silverman WK, Mossige S, Vatne TM. Evaluation of “SIBS”, an intervention for siblings and parents of children with chronic disorders. J Child Fam Stud. 2020;29(8):2201–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Skinner EA, Edge K, Altman J, Sherwood H. Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(2):216–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all of the survivors, their families, and their siblings who agreed to participate in this study. The authors gratefully acknowledge the entire LEA Study Group (supplementary file 2).

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the French National Clinical Research Program (PHRC-N), the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) and the Assistance Publique of Hôpitaux de Marseille.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Cindy Faust: formal analysis, funding acquisition, methodology, visualization, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. Pascal Auquier: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, validation, and writing—review and editing. Yves Bertrand, Marie-Dominique Tabone, Sophie Ansoborlo, André Baruchel, Virginie Gandemer, Jean-Hugues Dalle, Aurélie Phulpin, Justyna Kanold, Maryline Poirée, Alexandre Theron, Geneviève Plat, Isabelle Pellier: funding acquisition, investigation, resources, and writing—review and editing. Gérard Michel: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, resources, and writing—review and editing. Julie Berbis: funding acquisition, methodology, supervision, validation, and writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy Faust.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee SUD MÉDITERRANÉE (reference RO–2016/20).

Consent to participate and consent for publication

This is an observational study. All participants received an information note and had the right to withdraw consent at any time.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faust, C., Auquier, P., Bertrand, Y. et al. Impact of childhood leukemia on siblings: their long-term perception of family functioning and its relationship with their psychosocial characteristics using structural equation modeling. J Cancer Surviv (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01385-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01385-2

Keywords

Navigation