Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Species richness and community structure of earthworms (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae) in natural and agricultural ecosystems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the earthworm community in habitats that are differentiated by the gradient of agricultural land use intensity, as well as differentiated natural ecosystems. The material was collected from the central part of Serbia. In addition to population density, as one of the basic structural characteristics, we used relative numerous relationships of individual populations to analyze the structure of the earthworm community. A total of 16 earthworm species were identified. The highest species richness was registered in primary ecosystems, with the highest number of registered species amounting to 12. The highest number of species belonged to the genera Allolobophora and Aporrectodea. However, Aporrectodea rosea (Savigny, 1826) was identified as an edificatory. These are the species that have the highest tolerance threshold on adverse climatic and ecological conditions, and have exceptional survival ability. The lumbricid fauna of mesophilic meadows, with several cosmopolitan species, was fairly uniform. In conventional fields, as well as in organic ones, earthworm populations were poor, and non-associative. Our analysis of the earthworm community in different ecosystems provides an insight into the current state of the examined ecosystems and represents a good basis for applied research in soil ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • European Environment Agency (2011) Biogeographic regions dataset. Permalink. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-andmaps/data/ds_resolveuid/b2515476c53448d39b499915cd34dde7. Accessed 3 March 2019

  • Bartz MLC, Brown GG, da Rosa MG, Filho OK, James SW, Decaëns T, Baratta D (2014) Earthworm richness in land-use systems in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Appl Soil Ecol 83:59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry EC, Karlen DL (1993) Comparisons of alternative farming systems. II. Earthworm population density and species diversity. Am J Alternative Agr 8:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhadauria T, Kumar P, Kumar R, Maikhuri RK, Rao KS, Saxena KG (2012) Earthworm populations in a traditional village landscape in central Himalaya, India. Appl Soil Ecol 53:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore R (2004) A provisional list of valid names of Lumbricoidea (Oligochaeta) after Easton, 1983. Universidad Complutense, Madrid, pp 75–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks D, Bater J, Jones H, Shah PA (1995) Invertebrate and weed seed food-sources for birds in organic and conventional farming systems. BTO Report No. 154, BTO, Thetford

  • Chan KY (2001) An overview of some tillage impacts on earthworm population abundance and diversity: implications for functioning in soils. Soil till Res 57:179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00173-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri P, Singh SM (2014) Biology and ecology of tropical earthworms. DPH Pvt Ltd, New Delhi

  • Chaudhuri PS, Nath S (2011) Community structure of earthworms under rubber plantations and mixed forests in Tripura India. J Environ Biol 32:537–541

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csuzdi C, Zicsi A (2003) Earthworms of Hungary (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae). In: Csuzdi C, Mahunka S (ed) Pedozoologica Hungarica. Vol. 1, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, pp 1–271

  • Culy MD, Berry EC (1995) Toxicity of soil-applied granular insecticides to earthworm populations in cornfields. Down Earth 50:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira T, Bertrand M, Roger-Estrade J (2012) Short-term effects of ploughing on the abundance and dynamics of two endogeic earthworm species in organic cropping systems in northern France. Soil Tillage Res 119:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ (1996) The influence of environmental factors on earthworms. In: Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ (eds) Biology and ecology of earthworms. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 134–162

  • Edwards CA (1983) Earthworm ecology in cultivated soils. In: Satchel JE (ed) Earthworm ecology - from Darwin to vermiculture. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 123–137

  • Ernst G, Emmerling C (2009) Impact of five different tillage systems on soil organiccarbon content and the density, biomass, and community composition of earthworms after a ten year period. Eur J Soil Biol 45:247–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardi C, Montanarella L, Arrouays D, Bispo A, Lemanceau P, Jolivet C, Mulder C, Ranjard L, Römbke J, Rutgers M, Menta C (2009) Soil biodiversity monitoring in Europe: ongoing activities and challenges. Eur J Soil Sci 60:807–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01177.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt RA (1997) A comparative analysis of the effects of organicn and conventional farming systems on soil structure. Biol Agric Hortic 14:139–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.1997.9754803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González G, García E, Cruz V, Borges S, Zalamea M, Rivera M (2007) Earthworm communities along an elevation gradient in Northeastern Puerto Rico. Eur J Soil Biol 43(Suppl 1):S24–S32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.08.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackenberger KD, Hackenberger KB (2014) Earthworm community structure in grassland habitats differentiated by climate type during two consecutive seasons. Eur J Soil Biol 61:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2014.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hole DG, Perkins AJ, Wilson JD, Alexander IH, Grice PV, Evans AD (2005) Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biol Conserv 122:113–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 2361 (2005) Soil quality — Sampling of soil invertebrates — Part 1: Hand-sorting and formalin extraction of earthworms

  • Jamatia SKS, Chaudhuri PS (2017) Earthworm community structure under tea plantations (Camellia sinensis) of Tripura (India). Trop Ecol 58(1):105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalu S, Koirala M, Khadaka UR (2015) Earthworm population in relation to different land use and soil characteristics. J Ecol Nat Environ 7(5):124–131. https://doi.org/10.5897/JENE2015.0511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemens E, Stierhof T, Dauber J, Kreimes K, Wolters V (2003) On the quality of soil biodiversity indicators: abiotic and biotic parameters as predictors of soil faunal richness at different spatial scales. Agr Ecosyst Environ 98:273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00087-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KE (1985) Earthworms: Their ecology and relationships with soils and land use. Academic Press, New York

  • Liebig MA, Doran JW (1999) Impact of organic production practices on soil quality indicators. J Environ Qual 28:1601–1609. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800050026x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lofs-Holmin A (1983) Earthworm population dynamics in different agricultural rotations. In: Satchell JE (ed) Earthworm ecology - from Darwin to vermiculture. Chapman & Hall Press, London, pp 151–160

  • Mršić N (1991) Monograph on earthworms (Lumbricidae) of the Balkans I-II. Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti. Ljubljana

  • Nuutinen V, Haukka J (1990) Conventional and organic cropping systems at Suitia. VII: Earthworms. J Agric Sci 62:357–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathi K, Jayanthi L, Ameer Basha S (2013) Population dynamics of earthworms in cauvery delta areas in relation to soil properties. Indian Stream Res J 3(10):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathi K, Balamurugan M, Prashija KV, Ameer Basha S (2015) Earthworms population and community structure from agroecosystems of Cauvery delta areas of Tamilnadu state, India. Blaze J Biodivers Conserv 1(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelosi C, Bertrand M, Roger-Estrade J (2009) Earthworm community in conventional, organic and direct seeding with living mulch cropping systems. Agron Sustain Dev 29:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2008069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pelosi C, Toutous L, Chiron F, Dubs F, Hedde M, Muratet A, Ponge JF, Salmon S, Makowski D (2013) Reduction of pesticide use can increase earthworm populations inwheat crops in a European temperate region. Agr Ecosyst Environ 181:223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfiffner L, Mäder P (1997) Effects of biodynamic, organic and conventional production systems on earthworm populations. Biol Agric Hortic 15:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.1997.9755177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol 13:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pop VV (1997) Earthworm-vegetation-soil relationships in the Romanian Carpathians. Soil Biol Biochem 29:223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Römbke J, Jänsch S, Didden W (2005) The use of earthworms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts. Ecotox Environ Safe 62:249–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rüdisser J, Tasser E, Peham T, Meyer E, Tappeiner U (2015) The dark side of biodiversity: Spatial application of the biological soil quality indicator (BSQ). Ecol Indic 53:240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šapkarev J (1978) Kišne gliste Jugoslavije. Sadašnja taksonomska proučenost i njihova dalja istraživanja. Biosistematika 4:293–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims RW, Gerard BM (1999) Earthworms. FSC Publications, London

  • Smith RG, McSwiney CP, Stuart Grandy A, Suwanwaree P, Snider RM, Robertson GP (2008) Diversity and abundance of earthworms across an agricultural land-use intensity gradient. Soil Tillage Res 100:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojanović M, Sekulić J, Trakić T (2018) Checklist of earthworms (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae) from Serbia: a review. Zootaxa 4496(1):124–155. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4496.1.9

  • Stojanović M (1996) Faunističko-ekološka studija Lumbricida (Oligochaeta) Srbije. Dissertation, University of Kragujevac

  • Stojanović-Petrović M, Trakić T, Sekulić J. (2020) Kišne gliste (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae) Srbije. Univerzitet u Novom Sadu

  • Tarrant KA, Field SA, Langton SD, Hart ADM (1997) Effects on earthworm populations of reducing pesticide use in arable crop rotations. Soil Biol Biochem 29:657–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tischler W (1949) Grundzüge der terrestrischen Tierökologie. Friedrich Vieweg, Braunschweig

  • Tu C, Wang Y, Duan W, Hertl P, Tradway L, Brandenburg R, Lee D, Snell M, Hu S (2011) Effects of fungicides and insecticides on feeding behavior and community dynamics of earthworms: Implications for casting control in turfgrass systems. Appl Soil Ecol 47:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban NA, Swihart RK, Malloy MC, Dunning JB (2012) Improving selection of indicator species when detection is imperfect. Ecol Indic 15:188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gestel CAM (1992) Validation of earthworm toxicity tests by comparisonwith field studies: a review of benomyl, carbendazim, carbofuran, and carbaryl. Ecotox Environ Safe 23:221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(92)90060-g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver W, Shannon CE (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press

  • Whalen JK (2004) Spatial and temporal distribution of earthworm patches in corn field, hayfield and forest systems of southwestern Quebec, Canada. Appl Soil Ecol 27:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasmin S, D’Souza D (2010) Effects of pesticides on the growth and reproduction of earthworm: a review. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2010:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/678360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc I (1981) Dažďovky (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae) Slovenska. Biologické práce 27(1), Veda, Slov Akad Vied, Bratislava, pp 134

  • Zicsi A (1982) Rewision zweier Bretscherischen Regenwurm-Arten (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae). Rev Suisse Zool 89:553–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development (Agreement No. 451-03-68/2022-14/200378 and 451-03-9/2021-14/200122).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Institute for Information Technologies Kragujevac, Jovana Cvijića Bb, 34000, Kragujevac, Serbia

    Jovana M. Sekulić

  2. Faculty of Biopharming, Megatrend University, Maršala Tita 39, 24300, Bačka Topola, Serbia

    Slobodan N. Milenković

  3. Faculty of Science, Institute of Biology and Ecology, University of Kragujevac, Radoja Domanovića 12, 34000, Kragujevac, Serbia

    Mirjana M. Stojanović, Filip J. Popović & Tanja B. Trakić

Authors
  1. Jovana M. Sekulić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Slobodan N. Milenković
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mirjana M. Stojanović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Filip J. Popović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tanja B. Trakić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja B. Trakić.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors state no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekulić, J.M., Milenković, S.N., Stojanović, M.M. et al. Species richness and community structure of earthworms (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae) in natural and agricultural ecosystems. Biologia 77, 2115–2124 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-022-01077-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-022-01077-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation