Skip to main content
Log in

Saphenous vein characteristics evaluated using three-dimensional contrastless computed tomography before coronary artery bypass grafting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Saphenous vein (SV) grafts are occasionally unsuitable for grafting owing to anatomic variants. However, there is some concern regarding preoperative SV evaluation. We used contrastless 3D-CT to investigate the anatomical SV characteristics before CABG.

Methods

Contrastless 3D-CT was used to preoperatively evaluate the SV anatomy in 102 consecutive patients undergoing elective first-time CABG. The external diameter of the SV was measured at the mid-level of the thigh and calf segments on both sides. Abnormal branches of the SV were classified into three categories; (1) partial duplication, which was defined as double SVs; (2) large accessory SVs, which were larger than the great SV; and (3) complicated branches of the SV, which resulted in the great SV being undetected. The existence of varicose veins was assessed.

Results

The size distribution of the SV (< 3 mm/3–5 mm/5 mm <) was 9/142/53 and 17/154/33 in the thigh and calf segments, respectively. Abnormal branches of the SV were found in 47 patients (46%): (1) partial duplication was noted in 40 patients; (2) large accessory SV was observed in eight patients; and (3) complicated branches were identified in five patients. Varicose veins were detected in 15 patients. SV was harvested in 74 patients, and no additional skin incision was required.

Conclusions

Contrastless 3D-CT is an objective, less time-consuming modality to preoperatively evaluate the SV, and may be less invasive in terms of avoiding unnecessary skin incision. This technique is useful for defining atypical anatomical variations, such as partial duplications, large accessory SVs, and varicose veins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED, Harrington RA, et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:235–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohn JD, Korver KF. Optimizing saphenous vein site selection using intraoperative venous duplex ultrasound scanning. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:2013–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Head HD, Brown MF. Preoperative vein mapping for coronary artery bypass operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:144–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luckraz H, Lowe J, Pugh N, Azzu AA. Pre-operative long saphenous vein mapping predicts vein anatomy and quality leading to improved post-operative leg morbidity. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7:188–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lemmer JH, Meng RL, Corson JD, Miller E. Preoperative saphenous vein mapping for coronary artery bypass. J Card Surg. 1988;3:237–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cagiatti A, Ricci S, Laghi A, Luccichenti G, Pavove P. Three-dimensional contrastless varicography by spiral computed tomography. Eur J Vasc Endovas Surg. 2001;21:374–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee W, Chung JW, Yin YH, Jac HJ, Kim SJ, Ha J, et al. Three-dimensional CT venography of varicose veins of the lower extremity: image quality and comparison with Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1186–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston WF, West JK, LaPar DJ, Cherry KJ, Kern JA, Tracci MC, et al. Greater saphenous vein evaluation from computed tomography angiography as a potential alternative to conventional ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56:1331–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. deFreitas DJ, Love TP, Kasirajan K, Haskins NC, Mixton RT, Brewster LP, et al. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:50–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang A, Buckenham T, Roake J, Lewis D. Computed tomography arteriography to assess greater saphenous vein as a conduit for peripheral bypass. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:870–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wright MP, Smeds MR, Wright L, Ali AT. High-resolution CT angiogram for lower extremity vein mapping. Am Surg. 2017;83:257–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maruyama Y, Imura H, Shirakawa M, Ochi M. Preoperative evaluation of the saphenous vein by 3-D contrastless computed tomography. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;16:550–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradbury AW, Adam DJ, Bell J, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Gillespie I, et al. Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: an intention-to-treat analysis of amputation-free and overall survival in patients randomized to a bypass surgery-first or a balloon angioplasty-first revascularization strategy. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shah DM, Chang BB, Leopald PW, Corson JD, Leather RP, Karmody AM. The anatomy of the greater saphenous venous system. J Vasc Surg. 1986;3:273–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Dijk LC, Wittens CH, Pieterman H, van Urk H. The value of pre-operative ultrasound mapping of the greater saphenous vein prior to ‘closed’ in situ bypass operations. Eur J Radiol. 1996;23:235–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Seeger JM, Schmidt JH, Flynn TC. Preoperative saphenous and cephalic vein mapping as an adjunct reconstructive arterial surgery. Ann Surg. 1987;205:733–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruoff BA, Cranley JJ, Hannan LA, Aseffa N, Karkow WS, Stedje KG, et al. Real-time duplex ultrasound mapping of the greater saphenous vein before in situ infrainguinal revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 1987;6:107–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bagi P, Schroeder T, Sillesen H, Lorentzen JE. Real time B-mode mapping of the greater saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1989;3:103–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kupinski AM, Evans SM, Khan AM, Zorn TJ, Darling RC 3rd, Chang BB, et al. Ultrasonic characterization of the saphenous vein. Cardiocvasc Surg. 1993;1:513–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Broughton JD, Asopa S, Goodwin AT, Gildersleeve S. Could routine saphenous vein ultrasound mapping reduce leg wound complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;16:75–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kockaert M, de Roos KP, van Dijk L, Nijsten T, Neumann M. Duplication of the great saphenous vein: a definition problem and implications for therapy. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38:77–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohn JD, Korver KF. Selection of saphenous vein conduit in varicose vein disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1269–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MacFarlane R, Godwin RJ, Barabas AP. Are varicose veins coronary artery bypass surgery compatible? Lancet. 1985;2:859.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Willmann JK, Baumert B, Schertler T, Widermuth S, Pfammatter T, Verdun FR, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2005;236:1083–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Enago for the English consultation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Maruyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maruyama, Y., Imura, H. & Nitta, T. Saphenous vein characteristics evaluated using three-dimensional contrastless computed tomography before coronary artery bypass grafting. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 69, 444–450 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01457-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01457-5

Keywords

Navigation