Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aortic valve neocuspidization in patients under 65 years old

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to elucidate the surgical outcomes of aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) in patients under 65 years old.

Methods

From December 2010 to February 2019, we performed AVNeo in a total of 168 patients. Of them, we evaluated 36 patients aged under 65 years. Twenty-three patients had aortic regurgitation (AR) and 13 had aortic stenosis (AS). There were 20 patients who had isolated AVNeo, and the concomitant procedures were coronary artery bypass grafting in 5, mitral valve procedures in 4, ascending aorta replacement in 4, MAZE in 3, closure of atrial septum defect in 1, and tricuspid valve annuloplasty in 1. In the AS series, preoperative echocardiography revealed an average peak pressure gradient of 81 ± 33 mmHg. In the AR series, preoperative echocardiography revealed 15 patients with severe AR and 8 patients with moderate-severe AR.

Results

There were no conversions to valve replacement. There were two in-hospital deaths owing to low output syndrome and sepsis in the emergent cases. In the AS series, postoperative echocardiography showed an average peak pressure gradient of 23 ± 15 mmHg 1 week post-procedure and 19 ± 9 mmHg 26 months post-procedure. In the AR series, postoperative echocardiography revealed no AR in 11, trivial in 9, and moderate in 1. Three patients underwent reoperation. The freedom from reoperation rates were 100% and 93% at 36 and 60 months of follow-up, respectively.

Conclusions

AVNeo in patients aged under 65 years appears to be suitable considering its early and midterm outcomes. Verification and follow-up of its long-term outcomes and reliability are indispensable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozaki S, Kawase I, Yamashita H, et al. Aortic valve reconstruction using self-developed aortic valve plasty system in aortic valve disease. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:550–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozaki S, Kawase I, Yamashita H, Uchida S, Takatoh M, Kiyohara N. Midterm outocomes after aortic valve neocuspidization with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155:2379–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iida Y, Fujii S, Akiyama S, Sawa S. Early and mid-term results of isolated aortic valve neocuspidization in patients with aortic stenosis. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66:648–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Iida Y, Akiyama S, Shimura K, Fujii S, Hashimoto C, Mizuuchi S, et al. Comparison of aortic annulus dimensions after aortic valve neocuspidization with those of normal aortic valve using transthoracic echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;54:1081–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ozaki S, Kawase I, Yamashita H, et al. A total of 404 cases of aortic valve reconstruction with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:301–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozaki S, Kawase I, Yamashita H, Nozawa Y, Takatoh M, Hagiwara S, et al. Aortic valve reconstruction using autologous pericardium for patients aged less than 60 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:934–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Fleisher LA, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135:e1159–e1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanaka H, Takahashi H, Inoue T, Matsuda T, Oda T, Abe N, et al. Which technique of cusp repair is durable in reimplantation procedure? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:112–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tada N, Tanaka N, Abe K, Hata M. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation after aortic valve neocuspidization using autologous pericardium: a case report. Eur Heart J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytz105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dvir D, Webb JG, Bleiziffer S, Pasic M, Waksman R, Kodali S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA. 2014;312:162–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Dr. Edward F. Barroga (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8920-2607), Medical Editor and Professor of Academic Writing at St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan for reviewing and editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasunori Iida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Yasunori Iida and all the co-authors have no conflicts of interest associated with this study.

Ethical standards

The present study was approved by the institutional review board for human research of Ogikubo Hospital.

Informed consent

All the patients provided written informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iida, Y., Sawa, S., Fujii, S. et al. Aortic valve neocuspidization in patients under 65 years old. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 68, 780–784 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01302-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-020-01302-9

Keywords

Navigation