Skip to main content
Log in

Twenty-year experience with the Konno operation: Konno incision does not impair LV function

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There has been no report observing the LV function of Konno incision. We examined the outcomes of the Konno operations over 20 years.

Methods

We investigated 63 Konno operations with mechanical valves performed from 1984. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Konno incision including LV function changes and the long-term outcomes of patient survival and reoperation rate (RVOT and LVOT complications).

Results

The postoperative follow-up period was 20.6 ± 6.2 years. Early death occurred in 1 case and late death occurred in 9 cases. The cumulative survival rate was 89.6, 87.5, and 84.5% in the 5th, 10th, and 20th follow-up years. Five patients required reoperation for the aortic valve. The recurrence avoidance rate for LVOT reoperation was 96.6, 94.7, and 92% in the 5th, 10th, and 20th follow-up years of the Konno operation. Konno incision did not show significant decline in postoperative LV ejection fraction. (Pre, 62% vs 20 years later, 58%; P = 0.052.) There were no cases requiring intervention at the event of ventricular arrhythmia, but 13 cases were Complete Right bundle branch block, and 11 cases were Left bundle branch block.

Conclusions

The survival rate associated with Konno operation throughout 20 years was excellent. Konno incision can secure sufficient LV outflow tract and is a safe treatment for complex LVOTO without deteriorating LV ejection fraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LVOT PG:

Light ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient

RVOT PG:

Right ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient

AR:

Aortic valve regurgitation

AS:

Aortic valve stenosis

ASR:

Aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation

CPB:

Cardiopulmonary bypass

IE:

Infective endocarditis

LV:

Left ventricular

LVOT:

Left ventricular outflow tract

LVOTO:

Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction

MVR:

Mitral valve replacement

RV:

Right ventricular

RVOT:

Right ventricular outflow tract

SJM:

St. Jude medical prosthesis

PS:

Pulmonary valve stenosis

PTA:

Percutaneous transluminal angiography

e-PTFE:

Expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene

References

  1. Konno S, Irnai Y, Iida Y, Nakajima M, Tatsuno K. A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic valve ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;70:909–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sakamoto T, Matsumura G, Kurosawa H, et al. Long-term results of Konno procedure for complex left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Eur J Cadiothorac Surg. 2008;30:37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma GK, Wojtalik M, Siwińska A, et al. Aortoventriculoplasty and left ventricle function: long-term follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26:129–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jonas RA. The Ross procedure is not the procedure of choice for the teenager requiring aortic valve replacement. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2005;8:176–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, Fadel B, et al. The Ross procedure in children: preoperative haemodynamic manifestation has significant effect on late autograft re-operation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;38:547–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Takkenberg IIM, Kappetein AP, van Herwerden LA, Witsenburg M, Van Osch-Gevers L, Bogers JJC. Pediatric autograft aortic root replacement: a prospective follow-up study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:1628–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. David TE, Omran A, Ivanov J, et al. Dilation of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:210–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurosawa H. Konno procedure (anterior aortic annular enlargement) for mechanical aortic valve replacement. Op Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;7:181–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Imai Y, Kurosawa H, Kawada M, et al. Konno operation for congenital aortic stenosis. Shujutsu. 1990;44:1051–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lund O, Bland M. Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:20–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichi Matsuzaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsuzaki, Y., Hiramatsu, T., Sakamoto, T. et al. Twenty-year experience with the Konno operation: Konno incision does not impair LV function. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 66, 270–275 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0896-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0896-z

Keywords

Navigation