Skip to main content
Log in

Focusing on delayed clearance for identifying small-sized metastatic lung tumors using synchrotron radiation angiography with a highly sensitive receiver

  • Original Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To detect metastatic lung tumors of less than 1 mm in size by focusing on the clearance of contrast material using synchrotron radiation (SR) angiography characterized by high spatial resolution and high-sensitivity receiver.

Methods

C6 cells, derived from rat glioma cells, were injected to the rat tail vein. Two weeks after injection, the rats underwent SR angiography using a high-gain avalanche rushing amorphous photoconductor (HARP) receiver of extra-high sensitivity with high contrast resolution. The 256-grayscale value was employed in the analysis of images.

Results

19 nodules were identified in images. The tumors were confirmed histopathologically. The average tumor size was 621 ± 193 µm. The clearance curve of the densities was expressed as a logarithm function. Tumors showed delayed clearance of contrast material, taking up to 28 s, compared with arteries, which cleared rapidly at 8 s. In 256 grayscale, the distance was 50. This gap in density clearance made it possible to identify tumors.

Conclusions

SR angiography with a HARP receiver provides high sensitivity and spatial resolution and makes it possible to diagnose metastatic lung tumors of less than 1 mm in size by focusing on differences in the clearance times of contrast material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith RA, Cokkinides V. American cancer society guidelines for the detection of cancer. CA Cancer. 2002;52:8–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deppermann KM. Lung cancer screening-where we are in 2004. Lung Cancer. 2004;45:S39–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald DM, Choyke PL. Imaging of angiogenesis: from microscope to clinic. Nat Med. 2003;9:713–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koh DM, Cook GJ, Husband JE. New horizons in oncologic imaging. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2487–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Battista G, Sassi C, Zompatori M, Palmarini D, Canini R. Ground-glass opacity: interpretation of high resolution CT findings. Radiol Med. 2003;106:425–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hannahan D, Wein berg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Folkman J. Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nat Med. 1995;1:27–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leggett DAC, Kelley BB, Bunce IH, Miles KA. Colorectal cancer: diagnostic potential of CT measurements of hepatic perfusion and implications for contrast enhancement protocols. Radiology. 1997;205:716–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuszyk BS, Corl FM, Franano FN, Bluemke DA, Hofmann LV, Fortman BJ, et al. Tumor transport physiology: implications for imaging and imaging-guided therapy. AJR. 2001;177:747–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gossmann A, Okuhata Y, Shames DM, Helbich TH, Roberts TP, Wendland MF, et al. Prostate cancer tumor grade differentiation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the rat: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media—preliminary experience. Radiology. 1999;213:265–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuszyk BS, Boitnott JK, Choti MA, Bluemke DA, Sheth S, Magee CA, et al. Local tumor recurrence following hepatic cryoablation: radiologic–histologic correlation in an animal model. Radiology. 2000;217:477–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwenke DO, Pearson JT, Umetani K, Kangawa K, Shirai M. Imaging of the pulmonary circulation in the closed-chest rat using synchrotron radiation microangiography. J Appl Physiol. 2007;102:787–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ikura H, Shimizu K, Ikezoe J, Nagareda T, Yagi N. In vitro evaluation of normal and abnormal lungs with ultra-high-resolution CT. J Thorac Imaging. 2004;19:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bayat S, Porra L, Suhonen H, Nemoz C, Suortti P, Sovijärvi AR. Differences in the time course of proximal and distal airway response to inhaled histamine studied by synchrotron radiation CT. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:1964–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kono M, Ohbayashi C, Yamasaki K, Ohno Y, Adachi S, Sugimura K, et al. Refraction imaging and histologic correlation in excised tissue from a normal human lung: preliminary report. Acad Radiol. 2001;8:898–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Konishi T, Matsushita S, Hyodo K, Sato F, Hiramatsu Y, Sakakibara Y. Examination of a new angiographic system that utilizes a highly sensitive receiver and synchrotron radiation for reducing the dose of contrast medium. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W508–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanioka K, Matsubara T, Ohkawa Y, Miyakawa K, Suzuki S, Takahata T, et al. Ultra-high-sensitivity new super-HARP pickup tube and its camera. IEICE Trans Electron. 2003;E86-C(9):1790–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Matsushita S, Hyodo K, Imazuru T, Tokunaga C, Sato F, Enomoto Y, et al. The minimum coronary artery diameter in which coronary spasm can be identified by synchrotron radiation coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68:S84–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mandybur TI, Liwnicz BH, Wechsler W. Disseminated (metastatic) tumors in nude mice produced by intravenous injection of cells of human and nonhuman neurogenic tumor lines. Acta Neuropathol. 1984;63:203–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arfelli F. Synchrotron light and imaging systems for medical radiology. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2000;454:11–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miyakawa K, Ohkawa Y, Matsubara T, Kikuchi K, Suzuki S, Tanioka K, et al. Development of FOP-HARP imaging device. Sensors, cameras, and systems for industrial/scientific applications XI SPIE-IS&T. 2010; 7536:753604-1-8.

  22. Meuli R, Hwu Y, Je JH, Margaritondo G. Synchrotron radiation in radiology: radiology techniques based on synchrotron sources. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1550–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other disease. Nature. 2000;407:249–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fink C, Kiessling F, Bock M, Lichy MP, Misselwitz B, Peschke P, et al. High-resolution three-dimensional MR angiography of rodent tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;18:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Helmlinger G, Yuan F, Dellian M, Jain RK. Interstitial pH and pO2 gradients in solid tumors in vivo: high-resolution measurements reveal a lack of correlation. Nat Med. 1997;3:177–82.

  26. Furuya M, Yonemitsu Y. Cancer neovascularization and proinflammatory microenvironments. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2008;8:253–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hida K, Hida Y, Amin DN, Flint AF, Panigrahy D, Morton CC, et al. Tumor-associated endothelial cells with cytogenetic abnormalities. Cancer Res. 2004;64:8249–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gerlowski LE, Jain RK. Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissues. Microvasc Res. 1986;31:288–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Brasch RC, Dillon WP. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:891–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cuenod CA, Fournier L, Balvay D, Guinebretiere JM. Tumor angiogenesis: pathophysiology and implications for contrast-enhanced MRI and CT assessment. Abdom Imaging. 2006;31:188–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Kenkichi Tanioka of Tokyo Denki University, Mr. Misao Kubota, Mr. Kazunori Miyakawa of NHK Science and Technical Research Laboratory and Mr. Akira Kobayashi of Hamamatsu Photonics Corporation for their technical assistance. The authors are grateful to Mr. Avi Landau for his language consultation. This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant C-20591471 and Grant C-23592053).

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shonosuke Matsushita.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 6680 kb) Online Resource1. The original animation of SR angiography (the case of Fig. 2). Several nodules were shown with delayed clearance of density from a few seconds after rapid infusion, and some of them remained visible for a few minutes. Their time course of density were analyzed (Fig. 1) using captured still images (Fig. 2)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ito, H., Matsushita, S., Hyodo, K. et al. Focusing on delayed clearance for identifying small-sized metastatic lung tumors using synchrotron radiation angiography with a highly sensitive receiver. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 62, 553–559 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-014-0430-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-014-0430-x

Keywords

Navigation