Abstract
Objective
The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery (JACS) has released guidelines on preoperative physiologic assessment for lung cancer surgery. However, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), which is recommended for patients with poor pulmonary function, is available only in limited institutions. We investigated the possibility of 6-min walk test (6MWT) as a substitute of maximum oxygen consumption test (VO2max) on preoperative physiologic assessment for lung cancer surgery.
Methods
The relationship between VO2max and 6MWT was retrospectively analyzed in 51 subjects other than lung cancer patients. Following the preliminary analysis, we modified the risk assessment in the JACS guidelines by substituting 6MWT for VO2max, and patients who underwent lung cancer surgery were retrospectively assessed using the modified assessment.
Results
Analysis of the correlation between VO2max and 6MWT revealed VO2max to be significantly correlated to minimum SpO2 (SpO2min) and maximum decrease in SpO2 (ΔSpO2) during 6MWT. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that SpO2min and ΔSpO2 were predictable for a VO2max of 15 mL/kg/min, which is the borderline between the average- and increased-risk groups in the JACS guidelines. A total of 1,066 patients were assigned to the average- or increased-risk group according to the modified JACS guidelines using the criteria of SpO2min < 91 % and ΔSpO2 > 4 %. The increased-risk group was significantly inferior to the average-risk group in Home Oxygen Therapy induction rate, cardiopulmonary-related 30- and 90-day mortality (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
In clinical practice, decreased saturation during 6MWT may be simple and substitutive for CPET in risk assessment for lung cancer surgery using the JACS guidelines.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- 6MWT:
-
6-min walk test
- JACS:
-
The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery
- CPET:
-
Cardiopulmonary exercise test
- DLCO :
-
Carbon monoxide diffusion capacity of the lung
- FEV1 :
-
Forced expiratory volume in 1 s
- PPO:
-
Percent predicted postoperative
- SpO2 :
-
Oxygen saturation
- VO2max:
-
Maximum oxygen consumption
References
Sakata Y, Fujii Y, Kuwano H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2008. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58(7):356–83.
Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin JP, Keenan R, Bolliger CT. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132 (suppl):161S–77S.
British Thoracic Society. Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland Working Party. Guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery. Thorax. 2001;56(2):89–108.
Eugene J, Brown SE, Light RW, Milne NE, Stemmer EA. Maximum oxygen consumption: a physiologic guide to pulmonary resection. Surg Forum. 1982;33:260–2.
Brutsche MH, Spiliopoulos A, Bolliger CT, Licker M, Frey JG, Tschopp JM. Exercise capacity and extent of resection as predictors of surgical risk in lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2000;15(5):828–32.
Olsen GN, Weiman DS, Bolton JW, et al. Submaximal invasive exercise testing and quantitative lung scanning in the evaluation for tolerance of lung resection. Chest. 1989;95(2):267–73.
Bechard D, Wetstein L. Assessment of exercise oxygen consumption as preoperative criterion for lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;44(4):344–9.
Bolliger CT, Jordan P, Soler M, et al. Exercise capacity as a predictor of postoperative complications in lung resection candidates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151(5):1472–80.
Richter Larsen K, Svendsen UG, Milman N, et al. Exercise testing in the preoperative evaluation of patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. Eur Respir J. 1997;10(7):1559–65.
Win T, Jackson A, Sharples L, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests and lung cancer surgical outcome. Chest. 2005;127(4):1159–65.
Smith TP, Kinasewitz GT, Tucker WY, Spillers WP, George RB. Exercise capacity as a predictor of post-thoracotomy morbidity. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;129(5):730–4.
Wang J, Olak J, Ultmann RE, Ferguson MK. Assessment of pulmonary complications after lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(5):1444–7.
Walsh GL, Morice RC, Putnam JB Jr, et al. Resection of lung cancer is justified in high-risk patients selected by exercise oxygen consumption. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58(3):704–10.
Morice RC, Peters EJ, Ryan MB, Putnam JB, Ali MK, Roth JA. Exercise testing in the evaluation of patients at high risk for complications from lung resection. Chest. 1992;101(2):356–61.
Brunelli A, Al Refai M, Monteverde M, Borri A, Salati M, Fianchini A. Stair climbing test predicts cardiopulmonary complications after lung resection. Chest. 2002;121(4):1106–10.
Olsen GN, Bolton JW, Weiman DS, Hornung CA. Stair climbing as an exercise test to predict postoperative complications of lung resection. Chest. 1991;99(3):587–90.
Solway S, Brooks D, Lacasse Y, Thomas S. A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain. Chest. 2001;119(1):256–70.
Markos J, Mullan BP, Hillman DR, et al. Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;139(4):902–10.
Pierce RJ, Copland JM, Sharpe K, Barter CE. Preoperative risk evaluation for lung cancer resection: predicted postoperative product as a predictor of surgical mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150(4):947–55.
Ninan M, Summers KE, Landreneau RJ, et al. Standardised exercise oximetry predicts postpneumonectomy outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64(2):328–33.
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakagawa, T., Chiba, N., Saito, M. et al. Clinical relevance of decreased oxygen saturation during 6-min walk test in preoperative physiologic assessment for lung cancer surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 62, 620–626 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-014-0413-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-014-0413-y