Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer authenticity seeking: conceptualization, measurement, and contingent effects

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of authenticity is gaining interest in research and managerial practice. While the focus has been on the supply side, investigating factors that make brands authentic, the demand side, or consumers’ search for authentic market offerings, has been neglected. Informed by the literature, this article develops a psychometrically sound and cross-nationally and temporally stable scale to measure consumer authenticity seeking (CAS) as a set of three dimensions: personal, true, and iconic authenticity seeking. Using a comprehensive theory-based nomological network, this research introduces CAS as an important moderator between brand authenticity and outcomes. It also examines consumers’ intrinsic and extrinsic motives that drive these effects. Finally, this research reveals different consumer profiles managers can use for targeting and segmentation purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Web Appendix B discusses alternative specifications of CAS as either a second-order reflective model or a first-order reflective and second-order formative model.

  2. A robustness test including the dropped item indicates no substantial change in path estimates.

  3. We used a moderated mediation index based on 5000 bootstrapped samples using Hayes’s (2017) PROCESS macro on a reduced model. We included antecedents of CAS as covariates to allow the model’s estimation in this additional analysis.

  4. Self-alienation is a subjective feeling related to psychopathology. We include self-alienation for completeness purposes; it is part of Wood et al.’s (2008) conceptualization of authenticity as a personality trait.

  5. We acknowledge an anonymous reviewer for making this suggestion.

References

  • Akbar, M. M., & Wymer, W. (2017). Refining the conceptualization of brand authenticity. Journal of Brand Management, 24(1), 14–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnould, Eric J., & Linda L. P. (2000) Authenticating acts and authoritative performances: Questing for self and community. In S. Ratneshwar, David G. Mick, & Cynthia Huffman (Eds.) The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires, London Routledge pp 140-163

  • Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117(September), 557–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 78–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao, Y., Zhou, K. Z., & Su, C. (2003). Face consciousness and risk aversion: Do they affect consumer decision-making? Psychology and Marketing, 20(8), 733–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., Ramaswamy, V., Alden, D. L., Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M., & Rachmander, S. (2000). Effects of brand local and nonlocal origin on consumer attitudes in developing countries. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2), 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 473–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, S. E., & Talpade, S. (1994). Adolescent influence in family decision making: A replication with extension. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M., Wiegand, N., & Reinartz, W. J. (2019). Does it pay to be real? Understanding authenticity in TV advertising. Journal of Marketing, 83(1), 24–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beverland, M. (2006). The “real thing”: Branding authenticity in the luxury wine trade. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beverland, M. B. (2005). Crafting brand authenticity: The case of luxury wines. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1003–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. J. (2010). The quest for authenticity in consumption: Consumers’ purposive choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 838–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beverland, M. B., Lindgreen, A., & Vink, M. W. (2008). Projecting authenticity through advertising: Consumer judgments of advertisers’ claims. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., Kozinets, R. V., & Sherry, J. F. (2003). Teaching old brands new tricks: Retro branding and the revival of brand meaning. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, E. M. (1994). Abraham Lincoln as authentic reproduction: A critique of postmodernism. American Anthropologist, 96(2), 397–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, H. M., & Yaprak, A. (2002). Will the real-world citizen please stand up! the many faces of cosmopolitan consumer behavior. Journal of International Marketing, 10(4), 30–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhabra, D., Healy, R., & Sills, E. (2003). Staged authenticity and heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(3), 702–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinelli, M. D., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2020). Keeping it real: How perceived brand authenticity affects product perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(1), 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology/psychologie Canadienne, 49(1), 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deighton, J. A., Mela, C. F., & Moorman, C. (2021). Marketing thinking and doing. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donthu, N., & Garcia, A. (1999). The internet shopper. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(3), 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echambadi, R., & Hess, J. D. (2007). Mean-Centering does not alleviate collinearity problems in moderated multiple regression models. Marketing Science, 26(3), 438–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R. (2001). Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4(2), 144–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, F., O’Dwyer, M., Kraus, S., Vallaster, C., & Güldenberg, S. (2013). The impact of brand authenticity on brand trust and SME growth: A CEO perspective. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 340–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M., Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza, V. (2017). Who buys counterfeit luxury brands? A meta-analytic synthesis of consumers in developing and developed markets. Journal of International Marketing, 25(4), 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R. (1994). Exploring the symbolic meaning of brands. British Journal of Management, 5(s1), S13–S19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euromonitor International (2019). Euromonitor reveals the top 10 global consumer trends in 2019. Accessed November 25, 2020, https://blog.euromonitor.com/euromonitor-reveals-the-top-10-global-consumer-trends-in-2019/.

  • Fernandes, D., & Mandel, N. (2014). Political conservatism and variety-seeking. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golossenko, A., Pillai, K. G., & Aroean, L. (2020). Seeing brands as humans: Development and validation of a brand anthropomorphism scale. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(4), 737–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, K., & Martinec, R. (2004). Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 296–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. B. (1998). Does cultural capital structure American consumption? Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. B. (2002). Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 70–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, D., Schneider, M. J., Popovich, D. L., & Bakamitsos, G. A. (2016). Mean centering helps alleviate “micro” but not “macro” multicollinearity. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1308–1317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interbrand (2019). Best global brands 2019. Accessed November 25, 2020, available at https://www.interbrand.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Interbrand_Best_Global_Brands_2019.pdf.

  • Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joo, S., Miller, E. G., & Fink, J. S. (2019). Consumer evaluations of CSR authenticity: Development and validation of a multidimensional CSR authenticity scale. Journal of Business Research, 98, 236–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: theory and research. In P. Zanna (Ed.), In M (pp. 283–357). Burlington Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani, A. (2009). The self and the brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschate-Fischer, N., Hoyer, W. D., Stokburger-Sauer, N. E., & Engling, J. (2018) Do life events always lead to change in purchase? The mediating role of change in consumer innovativeness, the variety seeking tendency, and price consciousness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(3): 516–536.

  • Law, K. S., Wong, C.-S., & Mobley, W. M. (1998). Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 741–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, D. W., O’Connor, K., Kovács, B., & Newman, G. E. (2019). Authenticity. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, T. W., Peters, C., & Shelton, J. (2006). The consumer quest for authenticity: The multiplicity of meanings within the MG subculture of consumption. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 481–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leith, M. S., Sim, D., Zwet, A., & Boyle, E. (2019). What does Brexit tell us about our understanding of European identity? The Political Quarterly, 90(3), 559–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L. J., Choi, H. S. C., & Joppe, M. (2018). Understanding repurchase intention of Airbnb consumers: Perceived authenticity, electronic word-of-mouth, and price Sensitivity. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(1), 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997a). Individual differences in the pursuit of self-uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(21), 1861–1883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997b). The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psychology and Marketing, 14(6), 601–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B. (2003). The dangers of poor construct conceptualization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3), 323–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, T., Bartsch, F., & Han, C. M. (2020). Brand credibility and marketplace globalization: The role of perceived brand globalness and localness. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00312-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzler, K., Grabner-Kräuter, S., & Bidmon, S. (2008). Risk aversion and brand loyalty: The mediating role of brand trust and brand affect. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 17(3), 154–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster (n.d.). Definition of “iconic”. Accessed April 3, 2021, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/iconic.

  • Morhart, F., Malär, L., Guèvremont, A., Girardin, F., & Grohmann, B. (2015). Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 200–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulard, J. G., Garrity, C. P., & Rice, D. H. (2015a). What makes a human brand authentic? Identifying the antecedents of celebrity authenticity. Psychology & Marketing, 32(2), 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulard, J. G., Raggio, R. D., & Folse, J. A. G. (2016). Brand authenticity: Testing the antecedents and outcomes of brand management’s passion for its products. Psychology and Marketing, 33(6), 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulard, J. G., Raggio, R. D., & Folse, J. A. G. (2021). Disentangling the meanings of brand authenticity: The entity-referent correspondence framework of authenticity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 96–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulard, J. G., Rice, D. H., Garrity, C. P., & Mangus, S. M. (2014). Artist authenticity: How artists’ passion and commitment shape consumers’ perceptions and behavioral intentions across genders. Psychology & Marketing, 31(8), 576–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulard, J., Babin, B. J., & Griffin, M. (2015b). How aspects of a wine’s place affect consumers’ authenticity perceptions and purchase intentions. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 27(1), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén B. O. (2011). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Napoli, J., Dickinson, S. J., Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1090–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, G. E., & Dhar, R. (2014). Authenticity is contagious: Brand essence and the original source of production. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, J. C., Ordanini, A., & Giambastiani, G. (2021). The concept of authenticity: What it means to consumers. Journal of Marketing, Forthcoming,. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242921997081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, S. O., Tudoran, A. A., Honkanen, P., & Verplanken, B. (2016). Differences and similarities between impulse buying and variety seeking: A personality-based perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 33(1), 36–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W., Macinnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polites, G. L., Roberts, N., & Thatcher, J. (2012). Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: A review and guidelines for their use. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(1), 22–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualls, W. J., & Puto, C. P. (1989). Organizational climate and decision framing an integrated approach to analyzing industrial buying decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2), 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, A., Forehand, M. R., Puntoni, S., & Warlop, L. (2012). Identity-based consumer behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 310–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riefler, P., Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2012). Cosmopolitan consumers as a target group for segmentation. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3), 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. L., & Wood, S. L. (2005). Paradox and the consumption of authenticity through reality television. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 284–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G., Smith, R. E., & Diener, E. (1975). Personality research: Components of variance attributable to the person and the situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, B. H., & Pan, Y. (1994). Managing corporate and brand identities in the Asia-Pacific region. California Management Review, 36(4), 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirianni, N. J., Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., & Mandel, N. (2013). Branded service encounters: Strategically aligning employee behavior with the brand positioning. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 108–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiggle, S., Nguyen, H. T., & Caravella, M. (2012). More than fit: Brand extension authenticity. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 967–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, C. J., & Reisinger, Y. (2006). Understanding existential authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(2), 299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B. (1994). Authenticity and the textual persona: Postmodern paradoxes in advertising narrative. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11(4), 387–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokburger-Sauer, N., Ratneshwar, S., & Sen, S. (2012). Drivers of consumer-brand identification. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 406–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, M., Bettman, J. R., & Sujan, H. (1986). Effects of consumer expectations on information processing in selling encounters. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(4), 346–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. J., Rindfleisch, A., & Arsel, Z. (2006). Emotional branding and the strategic value of the doppelgänger brand image. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verlegh, P. W. J. (2007). Home country bias in product evaluation: The complementary roles of economic and socio-psychological motives. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(3), 361–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vredeveld, A. J., & Coulter, R. A. (2019). Cultural experiential goal pursuit, cultural brand engagement, and culturally authentic experiences: Sojourners in America. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(2), 274–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57(2), 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 349–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, K., Kim, H. M., & Sen, S. (2009). Why do consumers brands? Buy counterfeit luxury. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the authenticity scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(3), 385–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooten, D. B., & Reed, A., II. (2004). Playing it safe: Susceptibility to normative influence and protective self-presentation. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 551–556.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Adamantios Diamantopoulos, Barry Babin, Mario Pandelaere, the Editor, the Area Editor, the anonymous reviewers, as well as members of the AMA Global Marketing SIG for their valuable feedback on previous versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabian Bartsch.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lisa Scheer served as Area Editor for this article.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 139 kb)

Appendices

Appendix A

Table 8 Research on the conceptualization of authenticity in marketing

Appendix B

Table 9 Measurements

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bartsch, F., Zeugner-Roth, K.P. & Katsikeas, C.S. Consumer authenticity seeking: conceptualization, measurement, and contingent effects. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 50, 296–323 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00813-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00813-y

Keywords

Navigation