Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the feasibility and value of grassroots innovation

  • Conceptual/ Theoretical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grassroots innovation (GRI) that meets the needs of people at the bottom of the pyramid is driven typically by economically disadvantaged people who find practical and creative solutions using indigenous knowledge to solve their localized problems. In this study, we propose a comprehensive framework to describe factors contributing to the feasibility and value of GRI in society. By employing a triangulation approach, we identify the drivers of GRI, develop and define GRI as a multidimensional construct, explain the outcomes, and suggest the moderating factors conducive to GRI success. We then discuss and develop research propositions on the various proposed relationships in the GRI framework. In addition to setting up a foundation for a future research stream based on GRI, this study provides implications for policymakers, mainstream firms, and co-operative societies/non-profit organizations to realize the financial, environmental, and societal benefits from GRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This paper defines grassroots as an economically disadvantaged segment (mostly fall in BOP segment), coming from rural or nonurban areas.

  2. http://nif.org.in/aboutnif.

  3. http://nif.org.in/innovation/multi_purpose_bicycle/246.

  4. http://nif.org.in/innovation/surjeet-basmati-1%2D%2Dhigh-yielding-and-salt-tolerant-paddy-variety/790.

  5. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26260978.

  6. https://data.unicef.org/topic/education/literacy/#.

  7. http://nif.org.in/vard.

  8. https://ngodarpan.gov.in.

  9. http://www.makeinindia.com/home.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Linn, J. (2004). Market size in innovation: Theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 1049–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, N., & Brem, A. (2012, June). Frugal and reverse innovation-Literature overview and case study insights from a German MNC in India and China. In 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE) (pp. 1–11). IEEE.

  • Agnihotri, A. (2013). Doing good and doing business at the bottom of the pyramid. Business Horizons, 56(5), 591–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amarnani, A., & Amarnani, N. (2008). Microfranchising–market development with a cause (p. 313). New Age Marketing: Emerging Realities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., & Markides, C. (2007). Strategic innovation at the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(1), 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M., & Karlsson, C. (2004). 10. The role of accessibility for the performance of regional innovation systems. Knowledge spillovers and knowledge management, 283.

  • Appadurai, A. (2000). Grassroots globalization and the research imagination. Public Culture, 12(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., Marlier, E., & Nolan, B. (2004). Indicators and targets for social inclusion in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 47–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1998). Personal and collective efficacy in human adaptation and change. Advances in Psychological Science, 1, 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenzon, S., & Schankerman, M. (2015). Motivation and sorting of human capital in open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 795–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri, S., & Kumar, H. (2011). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: Tracing the motivation of ‘Grassroot’ innovators in India. Mind and Society, 10(1), 27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brem, A., & Wolfram, P. (2014). Research and development from the bottom up-introduction of terminologies for new product development in emerging markets. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 9.

  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, B. (2008). The long nose of innovation. Insight, 11, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camps, S., & Marques, P. (2014). Exploring how social capital facilitates innovation: The role of innovation enablers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 325–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chikweche, T., & Fletcher, R. (2012). Revisiting the marketing mix at the bottom of pyramid (BOP): From theoretical considerations to practical realities. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(7), 507–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. The American Journal of Medicine, 119(2), 166–1e7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention (p. 39). New York: HarperPerennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(2), 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Keersmaecker, A. E. K., Parmar, V. S., Kandachar, P. V., & Baelus, C. (2012). Towards scaling up grassroots innovations in India: A preliminary framework. In UNESCO chair international conference-Technologies for Sustainable Development: A way to reduce poverty?, Lausanne, Switzerland, 29–31 May 2012.

  • Duncan, O. D. (1957). The measurement of population distribution. Population Studies, 11(1), 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutz, M. (Ed.). (2007). Unleashing India's innovation: Toward sustainable and inclusive growth. The World Bank.

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, A., & Smith, A. (2015). Green transformations from below? The politics of grassroots innovation. In The politics of green transformations (pp. 120–136). Routledge.

  • Fairbourne, J. S. (2006). Microfranchising: A new tool for creating economic self-reliance. Journal of Microfinance/ESR Review, 8(1), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, J., & Farrington, C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: Towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasko, D. (2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 317–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feola, G., & Butt, A. (2017). The diffusion of grassroots innovations for sustainability in Italy and G reat B ritain: An exploratory spatial data analysis. The Geographical Journal, 183(1), 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feola, G., & Nunes, R. (2014). Success and failure of grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: The case of the transition movement. Global Environmental Change, 24, 232–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1979). The determinants of innovation: Market demand, technology, and the response to social problems. Futures, 11(3), 206–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, B., & Hawkins, R. (2016). Evoke-developing skills in youth to solve the World’s Most complex problems: The social innovators’ framework.

  • Fressoli, M., Arond, E., Abrol, D., Smith, A., Ely, A., & Dias, R. (2014). When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: Implications for models of inclusive innovation. Innovation And Development, 4(2), 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futrell, D. (1995). When quality is a matter of taste, use reliability indexes. Quality Progress, 28(5), 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Ramamurti, R. (2011). Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4), 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K. (1995). People’s knowledge for survival: Grassroots innovations for sustainable natural resource management. In IFAD’s International Conference on Hunger & Poverty in Brussels during November (pp. 16–23).

  • Gupta, A. K. (1998). The honey bee network: Linking knowledge-rich grassroots innovations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K. (2000). Grassroots innovations for survival. LEISA-LEUSDEN, 16, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K. (2006). From sink to source: The Honey Bee Network documents indigenous knowledge and innovations in India. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(3), 49-66.

  • Gupta, A. K. (2007). Grassroots to global: Online incubation of grassroots innovations based enterprises.

  • Gupta, A. K., & Wang, H. (2009). Getting China and India right: Strategies for leveraging the world's fastest growing economies for global advantage. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Gupta, A. K. (2010a). Grassroots green innovations for inclusive, sustainable development. In The Innovation for Development Report 2009–2010 (pp. 137-146). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

  • Gupta, A. K. (2010b). Empathetic innovations: Connections across boundaries. Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K. (2012). Innovations for the poor by the poor. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 5(1–2), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K. (2016). Grassroots innovation: Minds on the margin are not marginal minds. Random House India.

  • Gupta, A. K., Sinha, R., Koradia, D., Patel, R., Parmar, M., Rohit, P., & Chandan, A. (2003). Mobilizing grassroots’ technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: Articulating social and ethical capital. Futures, 35(9), 975–987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, A. L., Kramer, W. J., Katz, R. S., Tran, J. T., & Walker, C. (2007). The next 4 billion. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2(1–2), 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model. Human Development, (1), 661–669.

  • Hindle, T. (2008). Guide to management ideas and gurus (Vol. 42). John Wiley & Sons.

  • Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M. (2016). Grassroots innovation: A systematic review of two decades of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 973–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immelt, J. R., Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2009). How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard business review, 87(10), 56-65.

  • Joshi, R. G., Chelliah, J., & Ramanathan, V. (2015). Exploring grassroots innovation phenomenon through the lived experience of an Indian grassroots innovator. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 4(1), 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1983). Frontiers for strategic human resource planning and management. Human Resource Management, 22(1–2), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsikeas, C. S., Morgan, N. A., Leonidou, L. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (2016). Assessing performance outcomes in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Choi, J. B., & Greene, M. (2017). Synergistic effects of social media and traditional marketing on brand sales: capturing the time-varying effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(2), 268-288.

  • Kumar, H., & Bhaduri, S. (2014). Jugaad to grassroot innovations: Understanding the landscape of the informal sector innovations in India. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 6(1), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Chand, V. S., Zhang, L., Hoppers, C. A. O., Zhang, W., Esders, M., & Gupta, A. K. (2013). Grassroots innovations for inclusive development: Need for a paradigmatic shift. Vikalpa, 38(3), 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2002). Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(7), 681–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M., Rockström, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I., Stirling, A. C., Smith, A., & Folke, C. (2012). Transforming innovation for sustainability. Ecology and Society, 17(2).

  • Leeflang, P. S. H., Verhoef, P. C., Dahlstrom, P., & Freundt, T. (2014). Challenges and solutions for marketing in a digital era. European Management Journal, 32, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiponen, A. (2005). Skills and innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(5–6), 303–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Xue, D., & Gu, P. (2008). Design for product adaptability. Concurrent Engineering, 16(3), 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochner, K., Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (1999). Social capital: A guide to its measurement. Health & Place, 5(4), 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., Peterson, R. A., Jain, A. K., & Malhotra, N. (1979). A new product growth model with a dynamic market potential. Long Range Planning, 12(4), 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. J., Upham, P., & Budd, L. (2015). Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation: Insights from the sharing economy. Ecological Economics, 118, 240–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascitelli, R. (2000). From experience: Harnessing tacit knowledge to achieve breakthrough innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management: an International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association, 17(3), 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masse, S. J., & Dorst, K. (2007). Exploring the development process of grassroot social entre- preneurship. International social entrepreneurship research conference 3, Center for Corporate Values and Responsibility (CVR), 1–24.

  • Meek, W. R., Pacheco, D. F., & York, J. G. (2010). The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: Evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 493–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafukho, F. M., Hairston, N., & Brooks, K. (2004). Human capital theory: Implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 7(4), 545–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (2000). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Knowledge and social capital (pp. 119–157).

  • Nair, A. K., Tiwari, R., & Buse, S. (2017). Emerging Patterns of Grassroots Innovations: Results of a Conceptual Study Based on Selected Cases from India. In Lead Market India (pp. 65-95). Springer, Cham

  • Nakata, C., & Weidner, K. (2012). Enhancing new product adoption at the base of the pyramid: A contextualized model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, G. C. (1998). Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxoby, R. (2009). Understanding social inclusion, social cohesion, and social capital. International Journal of Social Economics, 36(12), 1133–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paganetto, L., & Phelps, E. (Eds.). (2003). Finance, research, education and growth. Springer.

  • Pansera, M., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Crafting sustainable development solutions: Frugal innovations of grassroots entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 8(1), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastakia, A. R. (1996). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: the case of agricultural pest management (doctoral dissertation).

  • Pastakia, A. (1998). Grassroots ecopreneurs: Change agents for a sustainable society. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(2), 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, J. E. (1990). A dual strategy for deliberate social change in cities.

  • Phelps, E. S. (2013). Mass flourishing: How grassroots innovation created jobs, challenge, and change. Princeton University Press.

  • Popescu, C., & Diaconu, L. (2008). Human capital and innovation.

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2012). Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy & Business (26).

  • Ramani, S. V., SadreGhazi, S., & Duysters, G. (2012). On the diffusion of toilets as bottom of the pyramid innovation: Lessons from sanitation entrepreneurs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(4), 676–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S. S. (2006). Indigenous knowledge organization: An Indian scenario. International Journal of Information Management, 26(3), 224–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. S. (2001). The microfinance revolution: Sustainable finance for the poor. The World Bank.

  • Saboo, A., Kumar, V., & Anand, A. (2017). Assessing the impact of customer concentration on IPOand Balancesheet based outcomes. Journal of Marketing, 81(6), 42–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., Martínez, I. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups: An experimental study. Small Group Research, 34(1), 43–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2007). Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., Saboo, A., & Kumar, V. (2018). Investigating the influence of characteristics of new product introduction process on firm value: The case of pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 66–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Oxford: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitoe, P., & Marzano, M. (2009). Future of indigenous knowledge research in development. Futures, 41(1), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simula, H., Hossain, M., & Halme, M. (2015). Frugal and reverse innovations–Quo Vadis?. CURRENT SCIENCE, 109(5), 1.

  • Singh, R. K., Dwivedi, B. S., Singh, A., & Tripathy, S. (2014). Farmers’ knowledge and creativity in eco-friendly pest management: Lessons in sustainable agriculture. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 13(3), 574–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review, 86(1), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Arond, E., Fressoli, M., Thomas, H., & Abrol, D. (2012). Supporting grassroots innovation: Facts and figures. SciDev. Accessed January, 13, 2014.

  • Smith, A., Seyfang, G., Hielscher, S., & Hargreaves, T. (2013). Constructing grassroots innovations for sustainability.

  • Smith, A., Fressoli, M., & Thomas, H. (2014). Grassroots innovation movements: Challenges and contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 114–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, S., & Sutz, J. (2008). Developing countries and innovation: Searching for a new analytical approach. Technology in Society, 30(2), 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasavori, M., Ghauri, P. N., & Zaefarian, R. (2016). Entering the base of the pyramid market in India: A corporate social entrepreneurship perspective. International Marketing Review, 33(4), 555–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsikriktsis, N. (2004). A technology readiness-based taxonomy of customers: A replication and extension. Journal of Service Research, 7(1), 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Top 5 Bottom of the Pyramid Markets: Diverse Spending Patterns and Future Potential. (2019). Retrieved from https://blog.euromonitor.com/top-5-bottom-pyramid-markets-diverse-spending-patterns-future-potential/.

  • Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oost, E., Verhaegh, S., & Oudshoorn, N. (2009). From innovation community to community innovation: User-initiated innovation in wireless Leiden. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 34(2), 182–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, M., & Sridharan, S. (2012). Product development for the BoP: Insights on concept and prototype development from university-based student projects in India. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyrauch, T., & Herstatt, C. (2017). What is frugal innovation? Three defining criteria. Journal of frugal innovation, 2(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeschky, M., Widenmayer, B., & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal innovation in emerging markets. Research-Technology Management, 54(4), 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, W. (2010). A social capital perspective of innovation from individuals to nations: Where is empirical literature directing us? International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2), 151–183.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the special issue Guest Editors and the anonymous reviewers for their guidance and support in the review process. The author would also like to thank Anita Pansari and JeeWon Brianna Choi for providing feedback in an earlier version of the manuscript. Author thanks Nupur Krishna for her valuable feedback at various stages of the preparation of this manuscript. The author is also grateful to Rajan Vardarajan and Jagdish Sheth for their insightful guidance at various stages during the development of the paper. In addition, author thanks the participants at the Thought Leaders Conference on Managing Business and Innovation in Emerging Markets, held at the Indian School of Business (ISB), Hyderabad, India from April 26-28, 2018, for their valuable feedback on this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management Development Institute Gurgaon, Mehrauli Road, Sukhrali, Gurgaon, 122007, India

    Shaphali Gupta

Authors
  1. Shaphali Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaphali Gupta.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rajendra Srivastava and V. Kumar served as Special Issue Guest Editors for this article.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Description of some of the innovations considered in the study (select innovations)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, S. Understanding the feasibility and value of grassroots innovation. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 48, 941–965 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00639-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00639-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation