Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental investigation of foam performance in the presence of crude oil

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

Abstract

The foam performance in the presence of oil plays an important role in foam application in enhancing oil recovery. The present study systematically investigated the effect of oil type, oil content, surfactant type, surfactant concentration, alkane chain length, salinity, and polymer concentration on foam performance in both the absence and presence of oil. The results showed that oil viscosity and oil density as well as oil component all contributed to foam performance in the presence of oil. Within a certain oil content, both light oil and heavy oil had a positive effect on foam, but heavy oil had a higher tendency to stabilize the foam. The order of foam performance by different surfactants was changed by the oil. It is noteworthy that heavy oil is detrimental to sodium dibutyl naphthalene sulfonate (BM) foam. Light oil can improve foam performance while heavy oil can harm foam in some specific cases. Lower salinity, longer alkane chain length, higher surfactant concentration and the presence of a polymer all benefited foam in the presence of crude oil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Simjoo M, Rezaei T, Andrianov A, Zitha PLJ. Foam stability in the presence of oil: effect of surfactant concentration and oil type. Colloids Surf A. 2013;438:148–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li R, Bleu RBL, Liu S, Hirasaki GJ, Miller CA (2008) Foam Mobility Control for Surfactant EOR. SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, April 20-23, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

  3. Guo H, Faber MJ, Buijse MA, Zitha PLJ (2011) A novel alkaline-surfactant-foam EOR process. SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, July 19-21, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  4. Harkins WD, Feldman A. Films. spreading of liquids and the spreading coefficient. J Am Chem Soc. 1922;44:2665–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aveyard R, Binks BP, Fletcher PDI, Peck TG, Rutherford CE. Aspects of aqueous foam stability in the presence of hydrocarbon oils and solid particles. Adv Coll Interface Sci. 1994;48:93–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schramm LL, Novosad JJ. Micro-visualization of foam interactions with a crude oil. Colloids Surf. 1990;46:21–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schramm LL, Novosad JJ. The destabilization of foams for improved oil recovery by crude oils: effect of the nature of the oil. J Petrol Sci Eng. 1992;7:77–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vikingstad AK, Skauge A, Høiland H, Aarra M. Foam–oil interactions analyzed by static foam tests. Colloids Surf A. 2005;260:189–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee J, Nikolov A, Wasan D. Stability of aqueous foams in the presence of oil: on the importance of dispersed vs solubilized oil. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2012;52:66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee J, Nikolov A, Wasan D. Effects of micellar structuring and solubilized oil on the kinetic stability of aqueous foams. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53:18891–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rohani MR, Ghotbi C, Badakhshan A. Foam stability and foam–oil interactions. Pet Sci Technol. 2014;32:1843–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mannhardt K, Novosad JJ, Schramm LL (1998) Foam/oil interations at reservoir conditions. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, April 19–22, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

  13. Sun L, Pu W, Xin J, Wei P, Wang B, Li Y, Yuan C. High temperature and oil tolerance of surfactant foam/polymer–surfactant foam. Rsc Advances. 2015;5:23410–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Manlowe DJ, Radke CJ. A pore-level investigation of foam/oil interactions in porous media. Spe Reservoir Engineering. 1990;5:495–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Farajzadeh R, Andrianov A, Krastev R, Hirasaki GJ, Rossen WR. Foam–oil interaction in porous media: implications for foam assisted enhanced oil recovery. Adv Coll Interface Sci. 2012;183:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Novosad JJ, Mannhardt K (1989) The interaction between foam and crude oils. Annual Technical Meeting. Annual Technical Meeting, May 28–31, Banff.

  17. Jensen JA, Friedmann F (1987) Physical and chemical effects of an oil phase on the propagation of foam in porous media. SPE California Regional Meeting, April 8–10, Ventura, California.

  18. Osei-Bonsu K, Shokri N, Grassia P. Foam stability in the presence and absence of hydrocarbons: from bubble- to bulk-scale. Colloids Surf A. 2015;43:514–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuhlman MI. Visualizing the effect of light oil on CO2 foams. J Petrol Technol. 1990;42:902–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu T, Ogbe DO, Khataniar S. Improving the foam performance for mobility control and improved sweep efficiency in gas flooding. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2004;43:4413–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nikolov AD, Wasan DT, Huang DW, Edwards DA (1986) The effect of oil on foam stability: mechanisms and implications for oil displacement by foam in porous media. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, October 5-8, New Orleans, Louisiana.

  22. Duan X, Hou J, Cheng T, Li S, Ma Y. Evaluation of oil-tolerant foam for enhanced oil recovery: laboratory study of a system of oil-tolerant foaming agents. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2014;122:428–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jian G, Hou Q, Zhu Y. Stability of polymer and surfactant mixture enhanced foams in the presence of oil under static and dynamic conditions. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2015;36:477–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pang SS, Pu WF, Li YY, Liu ZZ, Wang CY, Liu YF. Influence factors on the stability of foam–oil interaction. Oilfield Chem. 2015;32:355–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jin FY, Wang S, Pu WF, Yuan CD, Wang L, Li KX, Gong C. Emulsified oil foam for improving the flowability of heavy oil in wellbore under high salinity environments. J Ind Eng Chem. 2016;39:153–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Aveyard R, Binks BP, Fletcher PDI, Peck TG, Garrett PR. Entry and spreading of alkane drops at the air/surfactant solution interface in relation to foam and soap film stability. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans. 1993;89:4313–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Andrianov A, Farajzadeh R, Nick MM, Talanana M, Zitha PLJ. Immiscible foam for enhancing oil recovery: bulk and porous media experiments. J Ind Eng Chem. 2012;51(5):2214–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lobo LA, Nikolov AD, Wasan DT. Foam stability in the presence of oil: on the importance of the second virial coefficient. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 1989;10:143–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vikingstad AK, Aarra MG, Skauge A. Effect of surfactant structure on foam–oil interactions: comparing fluorinated surfactant and alpha olefin sulfonate in static foam tests. Colloids Surf A. 2006;279:105–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Myers D. Surfactant science and technology. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Bergeron V, Radke CJ. Disjoining pressure and stratification in asymmetric thin-liquid films. Colloid Polym Sci. 1995;273:165–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Aronson AS, Bergeron V, Fagan ME, Radke CJ. The influence of disjoining pressure on foam stability and flow in porous media. Colloids Surf A. 1993;83:109–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Behera MR, Varade SR, Ghosh P, Paul P, Negi AS. Foaming in micellar solutions: effects of surfactant, salt, and oil concentrations. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53:18497–507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the support received from the State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China

    Wanfen Pu & Shishi Pang

  2. Zitong Gas Production Region of Northwest Sichuan Gas Field, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, Mianyang, People’s Republic of China

    Chongyang Wang

Authors
  1. Wanfen Pu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shishi Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chongyang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shishi Pang.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pu, W., Pang, S. & Wang, C. Experimental investigation of foam performance in the presence of crude oil. J Surfact Deterg 20, 1051–1059 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-017-1991-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-017-1991-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation