Skip to main content
Log in

Researching of commonalities and differences in cold forging of spur and helical gears

  • Production Process
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern automobiles are equipped with a large number of gear transmissions. In the powertrain, for example, they are used as multi-stage manual transmissions and in the interior for mirror and seat adjustment. Machining manufacturing processes—like gear hobbing and shaping—represent the state of the art in gear manufacturing due to high manufacturing accuracy and flexible machining possibilities. With regard to economic, ecological and technical aspects, cold forging offers a promising production technology. In conventional transverse and forward extrusion processes, the ejection process is a challenge due to high forces and a negative influence on the gearing accuracy. One variant of forward extrusion is the so-called “Samanta” process, whereby an additional ejection step is avoidable by sequential forming of the gears. For the establishment of this process in industry, the increase of the achievable gearing accuracy and the achievable tool life is of major relevance. Thus, a deeper process understanding as well as knowledge about the influences on the process results is beneficial. In this context, the aim of this research work is to produce spur and helical gears by the “Samanta”-process. In addition to the resulting component properties, the characteristics of the process are determined. On this basis, commonalities and differences in cold forging of spur and helical gears are investigated to gain a principle process understanding. These findings are also used to derive possible approaches for improving component and process properties in future research work. The results reveal that cold forging of spur and helical gears by the “Samanta”-process results in characteristic properties and specific challenges within the gear types. Furthermore, a geometric adaptation in the gearing area of the used die promises enormous potential for a positive influence on the process results for both types of gearing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dudley DW (2013) Dudley’s handbook of practical gear design and manufacture. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klocke F, Gorgels C, Kauffmann P, Herzhoff S, Schalster R, Stuckenberg A, Vasiliou V (2008) Trends in der Zahnradfertigung. In: Neugebauer R (Hrsg): Tagungsband zum 5. Chemnitzer Produktionstechnischen Kolloquium CPK: Zerspanung in Grenzbereichen, Berichte aus dem IWU, Band 46, pp 87–113

  3. Bouzakis K-D, Lili E, Michailidis N, Friderikos O (2008) Manufacturing of cylindrical gears by generating cutting processes: a critical synthesis of analysis methods. Ann CIRP 57:676–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Myeong-Sik J, Sang-Kon L (2013) Green manufacturing process for helical pinion gear using cold extrusion process. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14:1007–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Keppler-Ott T (2002) Optimierung des Querfließpressens schrägverzahnter Stirnräder. Dissertation, Universität Stuttgart

  6. Samanta SK (1976) Helical gear: a novel method of manufacturing it. In: Proceedings of NAMRC IV, Columbus, Ohio, USA: Batelle Columbus Laboratories, pp 199–205

  7. Koll W (1990) Kaltfließpressen von Bauteilen mit Verzahnungen. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen

  8. Felten K (2012) Verzahntechnik, 3. Aufl. Expert Verlag, Renningen

    Google Scholar 

  9. Standard DIN 50106 (1978) Testing of metallic materials—compression test at room temperature. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hockett J, Sherby O (1975) Large strain deformation of polycrystalline metals at low homologous temperatures. J Mech Phys Solids 23(2):87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. VDI-Richtlinie (1984) Vorgespannte Preßwerkzeuge für das Kaltmassivumformen. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI), VDI 3176. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  12. ICFG-Document (1982) Calculation methods for cold forging tools. International Cold Forging Group (ICFG), Doc. 5/82. Meisenbach, Bamberg

    Google Scholar 

  13. ICFG-Document (1987) General recommendations for design, manufacture and operational aspects of cold extrusion tools for steel components. International Cold Forging Group (ICFG), Doc. 6/82. Meisenbach, Bamberg

    Google Scholar 

  14. ICFG-Document (2004) Tool life and tool quality in cold forging, part two: quality requirements for tool manufacturing. International Cold Forging Group (ICFG), Doc. 16/04. Meisenbach, Bamberg

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lennartz J (1995) Kaltfließpressen von gerad- und schrägverzahnten Getriebewellen. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen

  16. Klocke F, Nöthe T (2000) Fine machining of cold forging tools. In: Proceedings of 10th international cold forging congress, Fellbach, Germany, pp 175–191

  17. ICFG-Document (1992) General aspects of tool design and tool materials for cold and warm forging. International Cold Forging Group (ICFG), Doc. 4/82. Meisenbach, Bamberg

    Google Scholar 

  18. ICFG-Document (1993) Coating of tools for bulk metalforming by PVD- and CVD-methods. International Cold Forging Group (ICFG), Doc. 9/92, Wire 43, pp 266–270

  19. ICFG-Document (1991) Lubrication aspects in cold forging of carbon steels and low alloy steels. International Cold Forging Group (ICFG), Doc. 8/91. Meisenbach, Bamberg

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fritz AH, Schulze G (2018) Fertigungstechnik, 12. Auflage. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. ISO 1328-1 (2013) Cylindrical gears—ISO system of accuracy—part 1: definitions and allowable values of deviations relevant to corresponding flanks of gear teeth. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  22. Feng W, Lv J, Hua L, Long H, Wang F (2017) Effect of relief-hole diameter on die elastic deformation during cold precision forging of helical gears. Procedia Eng 207:627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee Y, Lee J, Ishikawa T (2002) Analysis of the elastic characteristics at forging die for the cold forged dimensional accuracy. J Mater Process Technol 130–131:532–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Melander A, Thoors H, Stenberg N, Ning M (2015) Spring back evaluation for high and ultra high strength sheet steels with the bending under tension machine. IntJ Mater Form 8:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bausch T (2015) Innovative Zahnradfertigung, 5. Auflage. Expert Verlag, Renningen

    Google Scholar 

  26. König W, Steffens K, Hofmann HW (1985) Gear production by cold forming. Ann CIRP 34(1):481–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Bavarian Research Foundation (BFS) for their financial support of the research project AZ-1252-16. Furthermore, the authors acknowledge the tool manufacturer I.Penkert for machining the dies as well as the company Schaeffler AG for providing the specimens and the scientifically discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Kiener.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiener, C., Merklein, M. Researching of commonalities and differences in cold forging of spur and helical gears. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 13, 391–397 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-019-00887-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-019-00887-2

Keywords

Navigation