Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deviating vital signs in continuous monitoring prior to discharge and risk of readmission: an observational study

  • IM - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Premature discharge may result in readmission while longer hospitalization may increase risk of complications such as immobilization and reduce hospital capacity. Continuous monitoring detects more deviating vital signs than intermittent measurements and may help identify patients at risk of deterioration after discharge. We aimed to investigate the association between deviating vital signs detected by continuous monitoring prior to discharge and risk of readmission within 30 days. Patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery or admitted with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were included in this study. Eligible patients had vital signs monitored continuously within the last 24 h prior to discharge. The association between sustained deviated vital signs and readmission risk was analyzed by using Mann–Whitney’s U test and Chi-square test. A total of 51 out of 265 patients (19%) were readmitted within 30 days. Deviated respiratory vital signs occurred frequently in both groups: desaturation < 88% for at least ten minutes was seen in 66% of patients who were readmitted and in 62% of those who were not (p = 0.62) while desaturation < 85% for at least five minutes was seen in 58% of readmitted and 52% of non-readmitted patients (p = 0.5). At least one sustained deviated vital sign was detected in 90% and 85% of readmitted patients and non-readmitted patients, respectively (p = 0.2). Deviating vital signs prior to hospital discharge were frequent but not associated with increased risk of readmission within 30 days. Further exploration of deviating vital signs using continuous monitoring is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klinge M, Aasbrenn M, Aasbrenn M, Öztürk B, Christiansen CF, Suetta C, Suetta C et al (2020) Readmission of older acutely admitted medical patients after short-term admissions in Denmark: a nationwide cohort study. BMC Geriatr 20:203. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01599-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW (2003) The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pittappilly M, Sarao MS, Bambach WL, Helmuth A, Nookala V (2019) Vital signs on hospital discharge and re admission rates. Int J Med 112:275–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcz002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Siuba MT, Sadana D, Gadre S, Bruckman D, Duggal A (2022) Acute respiratory distress syndrome readmissions: a nationwide cross-sectional analysis of epidemiology and costs of care. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0263000

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rasmussen MG, Ravn P, Molsted S, Tarnow L, Rosthøj S (2017) Readmission to hospital of medical patients—a cohort study. Eur J Intern Med 46:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2017.07.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah T, Churpek MM, Perraillon MCoca, Tamara Konetzka R (2015) Understanding why patients With COPD Get Readmitted: a large national study to delineate the medicare population for the readmissions penalty expansion. Chest 147:1219–1226. https://doi.org/10.1378/CHEST.14-2181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clausen J, Falck H, Julie H, Walbech S, Gögenur I, Hansen HF (2022) Incidence and clinical predictors of 30-day emergency readmission after colorectal cancer surgery-a nationwide cohort study. Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW, Hall BL, Cohen ME, Williams MV, Tsai TC, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY, Author C (2015) Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA 313:483–495. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.18614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson R, Bhattarai M, Hudali T (2019) Vital sign abnormalities on discharge do not predict 30-day readmission. Clin Med Res 17:63–71. https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2019.1461

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen OK, Makam AN, Clark C, Zhang S, Xie B, Velasco F, Amarasingham R, Halm EA (2017) Vital signs are still vital: instability on discharge and the risk of post-discharge adverse outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 32:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3826-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Halm EA, Fine MJ, Kapoor WN, Singer DE, Marrie TJ, Siu AL (2002) Instability on hospital discharge and the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with pneumonia. Arch Intern Med 162:1278–1284. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.11.1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elvekjaer M, Aasvang EK, Rasmus OM, Sørensen HBD, Porsbjerg CM, Jensen J-U, Haahr-Raunkjaer C, Meyhoff CS (2020) Physiological abnormalities in patients admitted with acute exacerbation of COPD: an observational study with continuous monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput 34:1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00415-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Duus CL, Aasvang EK, Olsen RM, Sørensen HBD, Jørgensen LN, Achiam MP, Meyhoff CS (2018) Continuous vital sign monitoring after major abdominal surgery—quantification of micro events. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 62:1200–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/AAS.13173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun Z, Sessler DI, Dalton JE, Devereaux Pj, Shahinyan A, Naylor AJ, Hutcherson MT et al (2015) Postoperative hypoxemia is common and persistent: a prospective blinded observational study. Anesth Analg 121:709–715. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Taenzer AH, Pyke J, Herrick MD, Dodds TM, McGrath SP (2014) A comparison of oxygen saturation data in inpatients with low oxygen saturation using automated continuous monitoring and intermittent manual data charting. Anesth Analg 118:326–331. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saab R, Wu BP, Rivas E, Chiu A, Lozovoskiy S, Ma C, Yang D, Turan A, Sessler DI (2021) Failure to detect ward hypoxaemia and hypotension: contributions of insufficient assessment frequency and patient arousal during nursing assessments. Br J Anaesth 127:760–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Haahr-Raunkjaer C, Mølgaard J, Elvekjaer M, Rasmussen SM, Achiam MP, Jorgensen LN, Mette et al (2022) Continuous monitoring of vital sign abnormalities; association to clinical complications in 500 postoperative patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 552:552–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taenzer AH, Pyke JB, McGrath SP, Blike GT (2010) Impact of pulse oximetry surveillance on rescue events and intensive care unit TransfersA Before-and-after concurrence study. Anesthesiology 112:282–287. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0B013E3181CA7A9B

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med 360:1418–1428. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa0803563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hartl S, Lopez-Campos JL, Pozo-Rodriguez F, Castro-Acosta A, Studnicka M, Kaiser B, Michael Roberts C (2016) Risk of death and readmission of hospital-admitted COPD exacerbations: European COPD Audit. Eur Respir J 47:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01981-2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Breteler MJM, KleinJan EJ, Dohmen DAJ, Leenen LPH, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda JP, van Loon K, Blokhuis TJ, Kalkman CJ (2020) Vital signs monitoring with wearable sensors in high-risk surgical patients a clinical validation study. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med 361:311–312. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMC090911

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Innovation Fund Denmark [8056-00055B], Capital Region of Denmark’s Research Foundation, Bispebjerg Hospital, Rigshospitalet, and Technical University of Denmark. No sponsor had any role in the study design, collection of data, analysis, access to the data, interpretation of data, writing, or the decision to submit the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicharatch Songthawornpong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Christian S. Meyhoff and Eske K. Aasvang have founded a start-up company, WARD247 ApS, to pursue the WARD-projects regulatory and commercial activities. WARD247 ApS has finalized terms for license agreement for any WARD-project software and patents, of which one has been filed. WARD247 ApS has not had any influence on the study design, conduct, analysis or reporting. Christian S. Meyhoff and Eske K. Aasvang reports lecture fees from Radiometer. Nicharatch Songthawornpong, Mikkel Elvekjaer, Jesper Mølgaard, Søren M Rasmussen and Vibeke R. Eriksen declare no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This analysis was based upon data from two previous observational studies (NCT03491137 and NCT03660501), both approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained prior to inclusion.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Songthawornpong, N., Elvekjaer, M., Mølgaard, J. et al. Deviating vital signs in continuous monitoring prior to discharge and risk of readmission: an observational study. Intern Emerg Med 18, 1453–1461 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-023-03318-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-023-03318-4

Keywords

Navigation