Skip to main content
Log in

Which Button Do I Push? More Thoughts on Resetting Moral Philosophy in the Western Tradition

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates Michael Slote’s call for rebalancing Western moral philosophy by using Chinese philosophy, especially Confucianism, as a form of moral sentimentalism. I agree with the need for a correction of the over reliance on reason in Western moral philosophy, but I reject the rational/sentimental dichotomy and focus on the importance of the will. I make use of the important contribution made by Daoism and the conduct concept of wu-wei 無為. I explain the use of wu-wei in Daoist texts as a nominative to denote a type of conduct, as a verb in moral imperatives, and as an aspiration for human moral behavior. I consider how appropriating this concept into Western moral thought offers significant solutions to three seemingly intractable problems: weakness of will, universalization of moral duties, and the conception of life as plagued by moral dilemmas. I conclude that wu-wei is not the result of some experience of alternative consciousness. It is an alternative consciousness that is shown in behavior, but not able to be said in language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, Sarah. 1997. The Way of Water and Sprouts of Virtue. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. 1970. “Three Ways of Spilling Ink.” In Philosophical Papers, edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, Nathaniel F. 2011. “Wuwei and Flow: Comparative Reflections on Spirituality, Transcendence, and Skill in the Zhuangzi.” Philosophy East and West 61.4: 679–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Karen, and Philip J. Ivanhoe. 2000. The Sense of Antirationalism: The Religious Thought of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard. New York: Seven Bridges Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornford, Francis M., trans. 1952. The Republic of Plato. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • D’Aquili, E., and A. B. Newberg. 1998. “The Neuropsychological Basis of Religions, or Why God Won’t Go Away.” Zygon 33: 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, Herbert. 1972. “A Way without a Crossroads.” In Confucius: The Secular as the Sacred. New York: Harper.

  • Guthrie, Kenneth Sylvan, trans. 1920. Porphyry, Life of Pythagoras. http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/porphyry_life_of_pythagoras_02_text.htm (last accessed on October 6, 2020).

  • Harner, Michael. 1990. The Way of the Shaman. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, R. D., trans. 1925. Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.

  • Hutton, Eric, trans. 2014. Xunzi: The Complete Text. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Hyun, Hochsmann, and Guorong Yang, trans. 2007. Zhuangzi. New York: Pearson Books.

  • Kingsley, Peter. 2004. In the Dark Places of Wisdom. Inverness, CA: The Golden Sufi Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, G. S., J. E. Raven, and M. Schofield. 1984. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, C., J. McManus, and E. D’Aquili. 1992. Brain, Symbol, and Experience: Toward a Neurophenomenolgy of Human Consciousness. New York: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Williams, David. 2002. The Mind in the Cave: Consciousness and the Origins of Art. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, Ronnie. 2018. “Referring and Reporting: The Use of Selfing Language in the Zhuangzi.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 17.4: 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C. 1981. Cognition and Consciousness. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, Hans Georg. 2009. The Moral Fool: A Case for Amorality. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, M. 1966. “La Ricerca Archeologica di Velia.” La Parola del Passato 21: 191–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, James L. 2002. Shamanism and the Ancient Mind: A Cognitive Approach to Archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese Caratelli, Giovanni. 1988. “La Thea di Parmenide.” La Parola del Passato 42: 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Danesh. 2014. “Zhuangzi, Wuwei, and the Necessity of Living Naturally: A Reply to Xunzi’s Objection.” Asian Philosophy 24.2: 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2015. Trying not to Try: Ancient China, Modern Science, and the Power of Spontaneity. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, Michael. 2010. Moral Sentimentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2015. “The Philosophical Reset Button: A Manifesto.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14.1: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ustinova, Yulia. 2009. Caves and the Ancient Greek Mind: Descending Underground in the Search for Ultimate Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan. 2000. “Mengzi and Xunzi: Two Views of Human Agency.” In Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.

  • ______, trans. 2008. Mengzi: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

  • Watson, Burton. 1968. The Complete Works of Chuang-Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelman, M. 2000. Shamanism: The Neural Ecology of Consciousness and Healing. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yearley, Lee H. 1996. “Zhuangzi’s Understanding of Skillfulness and the Ultimate Spiritual State.” In Essays on Skepticism, Relativism and Ethics in the Zhuangzi, edited by Paul Kjellberg and Philip J. Ivanhoe. New York: State University of New York Press.

Download references

Acknowledgment

This essay was originally prepared for the International Conference on Slote Encountering Chinese Philosophy, March 15–17, 2018, sponsored by the Chinese University of Hong Kong and the Kaifeng Foundation of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronnie Littlejohn.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Littlejohn, R. Which Button Do I Push? More Thoughts on Resetting Moral Philosophy in the Western Tradition. Dao 20, 49–67 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09761-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09761-w

Keywords

Navigation