Abstract
This essay develops a comparison between the Stoic and Daoist theories of emotions in order to provide a new interpretation of the emotional life of the wise person according to the Daoist classic Zhuangzi 莊子, and to shed light on larger divergences between the Greco-Roman and Chinese intellectual traditions. The core argument is that both Zhuangzi and the Stoics believed that there is a peculiar kind of emotional responses that emerge by themselves and are therefore wholly natural, since they do not involve evaluative judgment and desire, and distinguished them sharply from emotions, or “passions,” that arise as a result of mistaken evaluative judgments and artificial additions to things as they are, as well as to self-emerging feelings themselves. It is argued that while both Zhuangzi and the Stoics acknowledged the natural and therefore normative status of self-emerging feelings, Zhuangzi assessed them more favorably than the Stoics. The final part of the essay suggests that this divergence can be ultimately traced to different dichotomies that structured the debates in both traditions: rational versus non-rational in the Greco-Roman tradition, and artificial versus natural in the Chinese.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basore, J. W., trans. 1932. Seneca: Moral Essays, vol. 2. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Billeter, Jean-François. 2007. Contre François Jullien. Paris: Editions Allia.
Brennan, Tad. 1998. “The Old Stoic Theory of Emotions.” In The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, edited by Juta Sihvola and Troels Engberg-Pedersen. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bruya, Brian. 2001. “Qing (情) and Emotion in Early Chinese Thought.” Ming Qing Yanjiu 10: 151–176.
Cooper, John. 2005. “The Emotional Life of the Wise.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 43.1: 176–218.
____. 2012. Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cooper, John, and J. F. Procopé, eds. 2010. Seneca: Moral and Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge 956 University Press.
Fantham, Elaine, ed. 2010. Seneca: Selected Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fraser, Chris. 2011. “Emotion and Agency in Zhuāngzǐ.” Asian Philosophy 21.1: 97–121.
Gill, Christopher, ed. 1995. Epictetus: Discourses, trans. by R. Hard. London: Everyman.
____. 2006. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
____, ed. 2011. Marcus Aurelius: Meditations, trans. by R. Hard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Graver, Margaret. 2002. Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
____. 2007. Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Inwood, Brad. 1985. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
____. 2005. Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Inwood, Brad, and Lloyd Gerson. 2008. The Stoics Reader. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Ivanhoe, Philip, and Karen Carr. 2000. The Sense of Antirationalism: The Religious Thought of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard. New York: Seven Bridges Press.
Long, Anthony. 1996. The Stoic Studies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
____. 2002. Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Long, A. A., and D. N. Sedley, eds. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lundberg, Brian. 1998. “A Meditation on Friendship.” In Wandering at Ease in the Zhuangzi, edited by Roger Ames. Albany: SUNY Press.
Lusthaus, Dan. 2003. “Aporetics Ethics in the Zhuangzi.” In Hiding the World in the World: Uneven Discourses on the Zhuangzi, edited by Scott Cook. New York: SUNY Press.
Maspero, Henri. 1971. Le Taoïsme et les religions chinoises. Paris: Gallimard.
Möller, Hans-Georg. 2004. Daoism Explained: From the Dream of the Butterfly to the Fishnet Allegory. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.
Møllgaard, Eske. 2007. An Introduction to Daoist Thought: Action, Language, and Ethics in Zhuangzi. London and New York: Routledge.
Nivison, David. 1991. “Hsun Tzu and Chuang Tzu.” In Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts, edited by Henry Rosemont Jr. La Salle: Open Court.
Olberding, Amy. 2007. “Sorrow and the Sage: Grief in the Zhuangzi.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6.4: 339–359.
Puett, Michael. 2001. The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Qian, Zhongshu. 1998. “The Sage Does Not Experience Emotion.” In Qian, Limited Views: Essays on Ideas and Letters, trans. by Ronald Egan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen. 2005. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sorabji, Richard. 2000. Emotion and Piece of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wong, David. 2006. “The Meaning of Detachment in Daoism, Buddhism, and Stoicism.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5.2: 207–219.
Yearley, Lee. 1983. “The Perfected Person in the Radical Zhuangzi.” In Experimental Essays on Zhuangzi, edited by Victor Mair. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
Zhuangzi. 2006–2015. The Chinese Text Project. http://ctext.org/zhuangzi.