Skip to main content
Log in

Fictitious soil pile model for dynamic analysis of pipe piles under high-strain conditions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fictitious soil pile (FSP) model is developed to simulate the behavior of pipe piles with soil plugs undergoing high-strain dynamic impact loading. The developed model simulates the base soil with a fictitious hollow pile fully filled with a soil plug extending at a cone angle from the pile toe to the bedrock. The friction on the outside and inside of the pile walls is distinguished using different shaft models, and the propagation of stress waves in the base soil and soil plug is considered. The motions of the pile—soil system are solved by discretizing them into spring-mass model based on the finite difference method. Comparisons of the predictions of the proposed model and conventional numerical models, as well as measurements for pipe piles in field tests subjected to impact loading, validate the accuracy of the proposed model. A parametric analysis is conducted to illustrate the influence of the model parameters on the pile dynamic response. Finally, the effective length of the FSP is proposed to approximate the affected soil zone below the pipe pile toe, and some guidance is provided for the selection of the model parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meng K, Cui C, Liang Z, Li H, Pei H. A new approach for longitudinal vibration of a large-diameter floating pipe pile in visco-elastic soil considering the three-dimensional wave effects. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 128: 103840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang Y, Di T, Hesham El Naggar M, Wu W, Liu H, Jiang G. Modified Rayleigh-Love rod model for 3D dynamic analysis of large-diameter thin-walled pipe pile embedded in multilayered soils. Computers and Geotechnics, 2022, 149: 104853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fattah M Y, Al-Soudani W H. Bearing capacity of open-ended pipe piles with restricted soil plug. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2016, 11(5): 501–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Y, Jiang G, Wu W, El Naggar M H, Liu H, Wen M, Wang K. Analytical solution for distributed torsional low strain integrity test for pipe pile. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2022, 46(1): 47–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu J, Guo Z, Ling X, Yu X, Zhu N. Studies on bearing characteristic of open-ended and close-ended pipe piles under high-speed railway loadings. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2021, 21(14): 2140001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paikowsky S G, Whitman R V. The effects of plugging on pile performance and design. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1990, 27(4): 429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsumoto T, Takei M. Effects of soil plug on behaviour of driven pipe piles. Soil and Foundation, 1991, 31(2): 14–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brucy F, Meunier K, Nauroy J F. Behaviour of pile plug in sandy soils during and after driving. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Offshore Technology Conference. Houston: Tex., OTC, 2021, 6514: 145–154

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ko J, Jeong S. Plugging effect of open-ended piles in sandy soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2015, 52(5): 535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fattah M Y, Salim N M, Al-Gharrawi A M. Effect of plug removal on load transfer in plugged open ended pile behavior. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 2016, 7: 124–136

    Google Scholar 

  11. Randolph M F, Leong E C, Houlsby G T. One-dimensional analysis of soil plugs in pipe piles. Geotechnique, 1991, 41(4): 587–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gavin K G, Lehane B M. The shaft capacity of pipe piles in sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(1): 36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paik K H, Lee S R. Behaviour of soil plugs in open-ended model piles driven into sands. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 1993, 11(4): 353–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fattah M Y, Salim N M, Al-Gharrawi A M. Effect of soil plug removal on the load-carrying capacity of symmetric and non-symmetric pile groups. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2020, 15(9): 911–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu W. Vertical vibration theory of pile-soil system based on fictitious soil pile method and its application. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith E A L. Pile driving analysis by the wave equation. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1960, 86(4): 35–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu W, El Naggar M H, Abdlrahem M, Mei G, Wang K. New interaction model for vertical dynamic response of pipe piles considering soil plug effect. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2017, 54(7): 987–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kraft L M Jr, Focht J A Jr, Amerasinghe S F. Friction capacity of piles driven into clay. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1981, 107(11): 1521–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yan S W, Dong W, Liu R, Yin H, Fan Z. Study of influence of soil plug on driving piles of offshore oil drilling platform. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(4): 703–709 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu R, Zhou R, Yan S. Plug effect on drivability of large-diameter steel piles. Ocean Engineering, 2005, 23(2): 71–76 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heerema E P, De Jong A. An advanced wave equation computer program which simulates dynamic pile plugging through a coupled mass-spring system. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Numerical Methods in Offshore Piling. London: ICE, 1980, 37–42

    Google Scholar 

  22. Randolph M F, Simons H A. An improved soil model for one-dimensional pile driving analysis. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Numerical Methods in Offshore Piling. Nantes, 1986, 3–17

  23. Liyanapathirana D S, Deeks A J, Randolph M F. Numerical modelling of the driving response of thin-walled open-ended piles. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2001, 25(9): 933–953

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu W, Liu H, El Naggar M H, Mei G, Jiang G. Torsional dynamic response of a pile embedded in layered soil based on the fictitious soil pile model. Computers and Geotechnics, 2016, 80: 190–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu W, Liu H, Yang X, Jiang G, El Naggar M H, Mei G, Liang R. New method to calculate apparent phase velocity of open-ended pipe pile. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2020, 57(1): 127138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Holeyman A E. Dynamic non-linear skin friction of piles. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Penetrability and Driveability of Piles. San Francisco: International Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1985, 173–176

    Google Scholar 

  27. Simons H A, Randolph M F. New Approach to One Dimensional Pile Driving Analysis. Cambridge University, Engineering Department, (Technical Report) CUED/D-Soils. 1984

  28. Plan T L. Numerical and experimental studies on dynamic load testing of open-ended pipe piles and its applications. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Kanazawa: Kanazawa University, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chow Y K. Analysis of vertically loaded pile groups. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1986, 10(1): 59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. El Naggar M H, Novak M. Analytical model for an innovative tube test. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1992, 29(4): 569–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. El Naggar M H, Novak M. Non-linear model for dynamic axial pile response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(2): 308–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Michaelides O D, Bouckovalas G, Gazetas G. Non-linear soil properties and impedances for axially vibrating pile elements. Soil and Foundation, 1998, 38(3): 129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Berghe J V, Holeyman A E. Application of a hypoplastic constitutive law into a vibratory pile driving model. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Vibratory Pile Driving and Deep Soil Compaction. Louvain-la-Neuve: A.A. Balkema Publishers, 2002, 61–68

    Google Scholar 

  34. Salgado R, Loukidis D, Abou-Jaoude G, Zhang Y. The role of soil stiffness non-linearity in 1D pile driving simulations. Geotechnique, 2015, 65(3): 169–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lysmer J, Richart F E. Dynamic response of footing to vertical loading. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1966, 92(1): 65–91

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen T T, Berggren B, Hansbo S. A new soil model for pile driving and driveability analysis. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Application of Stress-Wave Theory to Piles. Ottawa, 1988, 353–367

  37. Warrington D C. A new type of wave equation analysis program. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Application of Stress-Wave Theory to Piles. Ontario: Ottawa, 1988, 142–151

    Google Scholar 

  38. Deeks A J, Randolph M F. Analytical modelling of hammer impact for pile driving. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1993, 17(5): 279–302

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu J T, Wang K, El Naggar M H. Dynamic response of a defect pile in layered soil subjected to longitudinal vibration in parallel seismic integrity testing. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 121: 168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cui C, Meng K, Xu C, Liang Z, Li H, Pei H. Analytical solution for longitudinal vibration of a floating pile in saturated porous media based on a fictitious saturated soil pile model. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 131: 103942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang Y, Wu W, Jiang G, Wen M, Wang K, El Naggar M H, Ni P, Mei G. A new approach for estimating the vertical elastic settlement of a single pile based on the fictitious soil pile model. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 134: 104100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang L, Wu W, Zhang Y, Li L, Liu H, El Naggar M H. Nonlinear analysis of single pile settlement based on stress bubble fictitious soil pile model. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2022, 46(7): 1187–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Meyerhof G G. Bearing capacity and settlement of pile foundations. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1976, 102(3): 197–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Skempton A W. The Bearing capacity of clays. In: Proceedings of the Building Research Congress. London: ICE, 1951, 180–189

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tomlinson M J. Foundation Design and Construction. 5th ed. England: Longman Scientific and Technical, 1986, 842

    Google Scholar 

  46. Novak M, Nogami T, Aboul-Ella F. Dynamic soil reactions for plane strain case. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1978, 104(4): 953–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Burland J B. Shaft friction of piles in clay—A simple fundamental approach. Ground Engineering, 1973, 6(3): 30–42

    Google Scholar 

  48. Holeyman A E. Technology of pile dynamic testing. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Application of Stress-Wave Theory to Piles. Rotterdam. Hague: Taylor & Francis Group, 1992, 195–215

    Google Scholar 

  49. Alwalan M F, El Naggar M H. Analytical models of impact forcetime response generated from high strain dynamic load test on driven and helical piles. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 128: 103834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mullins G, Lewis C L, Justason M D. Advancements in Statnamic data regression techniques. In: Deep foundations 2002: An international perspective on theory, design, construction, and performance. Orlando: ASCE-American Society of Civil Engineers, 2002, 915–930

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Nishimura S, Matsumoto T. Wave propagation analysis during Statnamic loading of a steel pipe pile. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Statnamic Seminar. Tokyo: Canadian Embassy of Japan, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  52. Matsumoto T, Hoang H N. Comparison of static and dynamic pile load tests at Thi Vai International Port in Viet Nam. ISSMGE International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories, 2013, 3(1): 36–66

    Google Scholar 

  53. Paik K, Salgado R, Lee J, Kim B. Behavior of open- and closed-ended piles driven into sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(4): 296–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sawant V A, Shukla S K, Sivakugan N, Das B M. Insight into pile set-up and load carrying capacity of driven piles. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 7(1): 71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LXZ22E080001), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51779217, 52178358, and 52108349), and China Scholarship Council (No. 202006320262). We gratefully acknowledge this support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuihua Wang.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tu, Y., El Naggar, M.H., Wang, K. et al. Fictitious soil pile model for dynamic analysis of pipe piles under high-strain conditions. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 17, 915–934 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0907-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0907-8

Keywords

Navigation